Topic: Jack Smith

41 chapters across the catalog

Greenland Gambit
Episode 1835 53:13 - 1:03:35

1835: Greenland Gambit

Joe DiGenova on Jack Smith and Pam Bondi Grudge

Legal analyst Joe DiGenova criticized Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump, alleging unconstitutional conduct and the improper use of paid FBI informants. DiGenova expressed a personal grievance against Pam Bondi, suggesting she prevented him from supervising a grand jury in Florida. He argued that the 2022 Mar-a-lago raid was an abuse of authority rooted in actions dating back to 2016.

Kohanna
Episode 1822 1:57:31 - 2:00:54

1822: Kohanna

Arctic Frost Investigation, Jack Smith Phone Data Seizure

Senator Chuck Grassley provided an update on the "Arctic Frost" investigation, alleging that Special Counsel Jack Smith secretly obtained phone record data from eight senators and one congressman. Verizon reportedly complied with the data requests, while AT&T challenged the legal basis for the subpoenas. Grassley claims the investigation targeted 92 Republican organizations or individuals.

Kohanna
Episode 1822 2:00:54 - 2:02:45

1822: Kohanna

Jack Smith Subpoena, House Judiciary Committee Hearing

Special Counsel Jack Smith has been subpoenaed to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on December 17th. Chairman Jim Jordan is demanding all documents and communications related to Smith's investigations into President Trump. The hearing follows the dismissal of federal cases against Trump and the appointment of Pam Bondi as the new Attorney General.

FLOP30
Episode 1819 2:34:50 - 2:38:17

1819: FLOP30

Jim Jordan, Jack Smith Financial Subpoenas

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan is investigating claims that Special Counsel Jack Smith secretly subpoenaed the financial and phone records of GOP lawmakers. Jordan discovered that his own personal phone data from Verizon was released to the DOJ as part of the "Arctic Frost" investigation. The probe seeks to determine if Attorney General Merrick Garland or FBI Director Christopher Wray authorized the surveillance of political opponents.

Champagne Socialist
Episode 1812 1:06:45 - 1:08:25

1812: Champagne Socialist

Verizon Phone Taps, Ted Cruz, Jack Smith

Verizon informed Senator Ted Cruz that his office's hardline was affected by a surveillance effort led by Special Counsel Jack Smith. While AT&T reportedly challenged the legal basis for the data requests, Verizon complied. The incident has sparked outrage among members of Congress regarding privacy and executive overreach.

Bad Fad
Episode 1808 1:28:52 - 1:32:02

1808: Bad Fad

Donald Trump, Lawsuits and Mar-a-Lago Raid

Donald Trump labeled Special Counsel Jack Smith and Andrew Weissmann as criminals, suggesting they should be investigated for their roles in the "illegal raid" on Mar-a-Lago. Trump joked about the legal absurdity of suing himself now that he is president again. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi was filmed shouting "shut up" at a reporter who questioned her about liability for the January 6th Capitol riot and her refusal of the National Guard.

Soros Stooge
Episode 1800 38:21 - 44:42

1800: Soros Stooge

Senator Chuck Grassley Reveals FBI Arctic Frost Investigation Details

Senator Chuck Grassley releases whistleblower records detailing "Arctic Frost," an FBI investigation that allegedly targeted the Republican National Committee and 92 other Republican-linked entities. Grassley claims the probe, initiated by agent Timothy Thibault, served as the foundation for Special Counsel Jack Smith's electoral case against Donald Trump. The hosts highlight the lack of mainstream media coverage regarding these revelations, comparing the scope of the alleged surveillance to the Watergate scandal.

O.G. Daffy
Episode 1787 1:02:54 - 1:06:04

1787: O.G. Daffy

Russiagate Durham Documents, Jack Smith Investigation

New claims suggest that documents from the John Durham investigation were discovered in a "burn bag" within a secure room, implicating Obama-era officials in a conspiracy against Donald Trump. Special Counsel Jack Smith is also reportedly under investigation regarding his prior international legal record. The hosts express skepticism that high-ranking officials like John Brennan or Hillary Clinton will face meaningful consequences.

Old Bag
Episode 1735 1:53:00 - 1:55:40

1735: Old Bag

Rachel Maddow, FBI Agent Names and Jack Smith Cases

Rachel Maddow reports that FBI supervisors are advising agents who worked on Jack Smith's cases to prepare for their names to be released to the public before they are fired. Maddow suggests this is a targeted move to expose them to Trump supporters. The hosts dismiss Maddow's framing, noting her declining viewership and "emotional" talking points.

Bro Media
Episode 1710 2:22:49 - 2:25:51

1710: Bro Media

Legal Analysis, Status of Trump Lawsuits

Constitutional lawyer Rob provides a comprehensive update on the various legal cases facing Donald Trump. He predicts that federal cases led by Jack Smith are effectively "dead" following the election. State-level cases in New York and Georgia are expected to be tied up in lengthy appeals regarding immunity and procedural issues.

Nerd & Knucklehead
Episode 1706 1:06:28 - 1:10:37

1706: Nerd & Knucklehead

NPR, Trump Political Retribution List

NPR reports on over 100 instances where Donald Trump has threatened to prosecute political opponents, including Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Barack Obama. The report expresses concern that a second Trump term would dismantle the norm of an independent Justice Department. The hosts compare these threats to the current administration's use of Special Prosecutor Jack Smith against Trump.

Kamplaining
Episode 1705 53:10 - 55:53

1705: Kamplaining

Jack Smith Evidence Release, Trump Diet Coke Anecdote

Judge Tanya Chutkan released nearly 2,000 pages of evidence from Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump. The hosts highlight a specific anecdote from a White House aide regarding Trump watching the January 6th riots while requesting a Diet Coke, questioning the legal significance of such details.

Sloppin' Hopper
Episode 1702 1:04:30 - 1:06:56

1702: Sloppin' Hopper

Jack Smith, Donald Trump, January 6th Evidence

A new court filing from Special Counsel Jack Smith alleges that Donald Trump reacted with indifference when informed that Vice President Mike Pence was in danger during the January 6th Capitol riot. The filing claims Trump said "so what?" after being told of the chaos. Prosecutors are using these details to establish Trump's state of mind and criminal intent regarding his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Turban Tossing
Episode 1700 50:46 - 54:13

1700: Turban Tossing

Jack Smith, 2020 Election Interference Filing

Special Counsel Jack Smith released a 165-page filing outlining the prosecution's case against Donald Trump regarding the 2020 election. The document attempts to bypass the Supreme Court's immunity ruling by arguing Trump's actions were those of a private candidate rather than a president. The hosts dismiss the filing as a "lame" October surprise with no new evidence.

Corn Sweat
Episode 1690 58:53 - 1:02:46

1690: Corn Sweat

Jack Smith Superseding Indictment, Jamie Raskin

Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a superseding indictment against Donald Trump, attempting to navigate the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity. Representative Jamie Raskin and Zoe Lofgren are criticized for their rhetoric regarding Trump's potential return to office. The hosts argue the new indictment is a "slimmed down" version of previous charges intended to influence upcoming debates.

Corn Sweat
Episode 1690 1:05:10 - 1:11:17

1690: Corn Sweat

Legal Analysis of Trump Indictment, Fundraising Texts

Legal fellow Zach Smith and a constitutional lawyer analyze the technical hurdles Jack Smith faces in proving Trump's actions were "unofficial." One host attempts to call back the numbers sending automated Trump and Rand Paul fundraising texts, discovering they are disconnected or invalid. They conclude the indictment is primarily a political tool for the 2024 election cycle.

Mummy and the Dummy
Episode 1673 1:31:37 - 1:36:13

1673: Mummy and the Dummy

Fischer v. United States, DOJ Obstruction Charges

Legal analyst Jonathan Turley discussed the Supreme Court's ruling in Fischer v. United States, which found the DOJ improperly applied an Enron-era obstruction statute to January 6th rioters. This decision significantly impacts the federal case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against Donald Trump. Hundreds of defendants may now face re-sentencing or have their convictions overturned due to the court's interpretation of the law.

Sand Battery
Episode 1672 50:22 - 53:01

1672: Sand Battery

Mar-a-Lago Documents Case, Jack Smith Filing

Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a detailed response to claims that FBI agents tampered with boxes at Mar-a-Lago. The filing describes how Donald Trump allegedly kept highly guarded secrets among personal keepsakes like Christmas ornaments and clothing. Judge Eileen Cannon continues to hold hearings on various motions, delaying the case indefinitely.

It's The Boyfriend
Episode 1671 1:50:21 - 1:55:47

1671: It's The Boyfriend

Trump Legal Challenges, Presidential Debate Preview, Jake Tapper

Donald Trump faces a complex schedule of nine ongoing legal cases, including federal criminal charges brought by Jack Smith and state charges in Georgia led by Fani Willis. The upcoming CNN presidential debate is expected to focus heavily on Trump's status as a "convicted felon." CNN hosts Jake Tapper and Dana Bash will moderate the event, which will be simulcast on ABC and is predicted to draw record-breaking viewership.

Rousting Granny
Episode 1662 2:17:21 - 2:22:40

1662: Rousting Granny

Mar-a-Lago Classified Documents Case, Judge Aileen Cannon

Lawyers for Donald Trump and co-defendant Walt Nauta appeared before Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida to argue for the dismissal of charges in the classified documents case. The defense alleges the prosecution is "selective and vindictive," claiming that prosecutors threatened Nauta's attorney with a blocked judgeship if his client did not cooperate. Judge Cannon has indefinitely postponed the trial start date, making it unlikely to begin before the November election.