Episode 850 · Friday, 12 August 2016

200.8 Re-Redux

A deep dive into the technical architecture and historical origins of the media deconstruction movement reveals why independent funding is the only shield against corporate bias.

By The No Agenda Show | 3h 33m listen | 53 chapters
200.8 Re-Redux cover
The No Agenda Show · No. 850

About this episode

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak deconstruct the 2016 political convention cycle, contrasting the high-volume media output of the Republican event against the Democratic gathering. Broadcasting from a New Jersey motel in FEMA Region 3 and Northern Silicon Valley, the duo analyzes the partisan comedic bias of Samantha Bee and the evolution of media sourcing from television DVRs to YouTube. This special retrospective also traces the show's origins back to a 1993 CNET pilot and the eventual formation of the No Agenda brand.

The production workflow relies on the Freedom Controller, an open-source system built by producer Dave Jones to manage real-time IRC chat integration and audio sculpting. Technical details include the use of Heil PR40 and Rode Procaster microphones, M-Audio hardware, and fast-acting noise gates to create a specific theater of the mind. The hosts explain the Value for Value funding model as a superior alternative to the NPR underwriter system, citing financial independence from corporate advertisers as a primary defense against government censorship and the Alex Jones canary.

Adam Curry reflects on his departure from MTV and mainstream radio following his coverage of the Michael Jackson death investigation. John C. Dvorak details his constant audio collection using H2 recorders and his preference for the CAD 3000 microphone. The episode features the influential Family Guy Weenie and the Butt parody and the origins of the Deducing jingle, concluding with a promise of a boots-on-the-ground report from Nice, France.


Loading show notes…
Loading clips…
CHAPTER 01 / 53 Discussion

No Agenda Episode 850, Jersey Motel and Silicon Valley

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak open episode 850 of the No Agenda podcast on August 11, 2016. Curry broadcasts from a motel in New Jersey within FEMA Region 3, while Dvorak remains in Northern Silicon Valley. They explain that this specific program is "almost live" because both hosts are currently on brief vacations.

adam curry· john c. dvorak· no agenda· episode 850· fema region 3· silicon valley

00:00 Feel like you're ready? I'm ready, I'm ready. I was born ready. Alright, let's do it. Adam Curry, John C. DeVora. It's Thursday, August 11, 2016. This is your award-winning Gitmo Nation Media Assassination, episode 850. This is no agenda. Sitting in a Jersey Fleabag Motel and broadcasting almost live from the Garden State here in FEMA Region 3. In the morning everybody, I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley where I remain, I'm John C. Dvorak. Hey, hey, it's not, I'm hitting it but it's not going. Ah, there it is. I think we keep it. Don't do a thing, it was great. Yeah, probably okay. It's just we're still talking. Yeah, throwback to the good old days when connectivity was crap and today's not that much better really. Well, you're sounding reasonably good. Well, it's a little better. In fact, let's explain what we're up to here because you said, you prefaced the show with your lead in

00:58 by saying almost live. That's right. We are not live at this moment for this particular program. I am on a brief vacation. John, you are on a brief vacation. One show, that's about all we do. Yeah, every once in a while. And I think this is the... A number of years ago we did two in a row. Yeah, I mean, we could also just do a show right now and it would be very simple. It would be, Everyone Hates Donald Trump. And that was the show. Goodbye, everybody. Yeah, Everyone Hates Donald Trump. So this is one of these shows that we like to put together from time to time. We've been doing it since episode 200. It became 200.5. And the most recent one we did, for some reason became 200...no, no, it was a progression, so 200.7. That was almost a year ago, a little over a year ago. Right. And that was after 200.6, which is about three years earlier or something like that. Yeah.

01:49 We did three of these. Yes. And on the last one I will, and you'll hear it because you're gonna hear this show, this last one. Yeah, we kind of stack them on top of each other and don't... Yeah, it's like an onion. Yeah, it is like an onion, exactly. And what you're gonna hear is us promising on show 200.7. To never do this again. To do another 200.5 from scratch because what you have is a show older and older progression and show 200.5 is an old, that's a long time ago, that's 600 shows ago. Yeah and the quality was so different. The quality was mediocre and I have to say this, I didn't notice this the first time or the second time we reprised show 200.5 which is going to be reprised for a third time. You had a, you had a, I don't know what mic you were using but it was crap and compared to the Rode that you have now. Yeah. Also I was listening on... You were popping like a son of a bitch. There's lots of stuff wrong with that.

02:48 Pop pop pop pop. But you know, it was always my quest from now going on in my 11th year to create a very small all digital portable system that you could pretty much run off of your laptop anywhere. And I think after 200.5 somewhere in the 300s I said screw it and I just got a huge bunch of outboard gear which was completely not portable but it sounded better. And then we, you know, I was doing trips again and we decided to to try it on all digital and at one point I because you have to listen to the sound you have to monitor the the final signal otherwise you have to you know what a lot of people do is go back and they add compression and all these things after the fact and it never works out that well but in order to do that back in the day I think I explained it in the two

03:37 100.7 is I actually had like a, you know, like a half second delay on my headphones when I was doing the show, which was, which are driving me nuts. Yeah. It's well, you don't use headphones at all. So yeah, you know, exactly. And I'm not going to be deaf like all these other guys. So the quality is decent today, although I don't know, for some reason the dongle is, uh, is crunching a little bit here and there. But as I was listening last night, I also heard us say hello to us from the future. That was kind of fun. I was listening to this show. Yeah, hello in the past. I want to be the first to say hello to us in the next future. Yes, okay. Do your Adele.

CHAPTER 02 / 53 Discussion

Media Industry Terminology, Lede and ISO Definitions

The hosts define industry-specific terms to help new listeners understand their jargon, such as "evergreen" content. They explain that "lede" is spelled L-E-D-E in journalism to prevent the word from accidentally being printed in the final copy. Additionally, they define "ISO" as an isolated recording or standalone clip used during the show's production.

lede· iso· isolated recording· newspaper terminology· media production

04:17 Hello my friend in the future. I heard that song came on the other day and before the song really kicks in she sounds just like you. It's uncanny. Hello. Now the reason we like to do these shows and the reason why I think the stacking is okay in this case is There's so many things that newcomers really don't have a grasp on, things we talk about, things we say, the genesis even of In the Morning which you'll hear coming up. I wrote down a couple of things. It's taken some people who I know a long time to understand what an evergreen is. And we just say it offhand, like, oh, it's an evergreen. But it's not that apparent to everybody. No, we make that mistake a lot. I think people, if you get, if you're in some industry, you start using the kind of the inside chatter, the kind of inside phrases, the inside stuff.

05:18 Like in the newspapers, if you write a newspaper or magazine, there's a thing called a lead, the beginning of whatever you're writing is the lead. But you don't realize 90% of the time, you won't realize that that's actually spelled L-E-D-E. Yeah, a lot of people don't know that. And that's done because, why would you do that? Why don't you just call it what it is, a lead, L-E-A-D. No, you do, everything they have, like graph is G-R-A-F, everything that you have those kinds of words are all misspelled on purpose so they don't end up in the copy. Oh, is that the reason why? I didn't know that. Yeah, because you want to make sure that's why everything is completely misspelled that this one is inciting or you got to do this, you got to do that is all. Everything's always misspelled, so it draws attention to oh God, this stuff will slip into the copy if you put well, this is a pretty good lead. Somebody could see that and say, oh, that must be the first sentence. Oh, I didn't realize that. Yeah. And so it's just a draw attention to itself. Another word. I'm sorry.

06:19 Sorry, no, you're going to say something. I would say another term that we use is ISO. Then if you just fall into the program, you're like, what the hell is an ISO? And I remember the first time I heard the word ISO, I was 19. I just started my television career in the Netherlands and it was in Dutch, it's ISO. I'm like, what the hell is an ISO? It's I-S-O, which is short for isolated. And, you know, when you're working in the business thing, I didn't want to ask. I mean, I remember asking what the director did. I really remember that. So what does the director do except yell at everybody in the control room? Is he? But I, so, you know, the director does that.

06:59 Iso is typically, well, the way I learned it is a camera that is switched in the main switching system but also has a recorder running all the time so you have an isolated recording from that particular unit. Actually, when you look at it, it means a lot of different things but it does mean isolated or isolation. And we use it just, I use it just for little clips of clips. Yes, standalone. It's more like a standalone thing when we say an ISO. Let me see, maybe I have an example of one that I can pull up. We probably have other little phrases we shouldn't be using. So here's an example of an ISO. Take him out now. Elizabeth Warren. Take him out now. So that's an ISO. But it comes from a longer clip and we isolate a particular bit. So I made a mistake. That happens. It proves I'm human. Yeah, exactly.

CHAPTER 03 / 53 Discussion

Podcast Production Workflow, Chat Room Integration and Signal-to-Noise

Adam Curry describes the technical complexity of producing the show as a "one-man band," managing clips, audio levels, and a real-time IRC chat room. He compares his ability to filter information from the scrolling chat to "neural network recognition," a concept he learned from a CIA associate. Curry emphasizes that the chat room is integrated into his workflow, though he occasionally has to step away when the "signal-to-noise" ratio becomes distracting or negative.

chat room· irc client· neural network recognition· production workflow· signal-to-noise

07:53 Yeah, that's my favorite at the moment. That is a good one. Proves I'm human. Proves I'm human. Doesn't prove anything. From one year ago, there are a couple things that are different. First of all, your comedic timing, and I don't know if that's a matter of just the gear that we're using, that we hear each other better, and the timing is better, and I guess we have low latency, pretty low latency on the Skype. Your comedic timing has gotten impeccable. with your little one-liners. And I heard new ones that I hadn't heard the third time I heard these shows. I'm like, oh my god. You throw things in that are usually pretty off-color. Ha! No! Yes! Off-color. Yeah, yeah, for sure. There's something that I wanted to bring up and that is the chat room. And on the last, no, two shows ago on 848,

08:51 But I quit the chat room. And I just want to explain exactly how the chat room works for me, who is pretty much producing the technical end of the show. And you don't look at the chat room and that's good, actually. I think that's a good thing. So when we have... No, because that way I can react with the chat room as a third party, an outsider. Right. But they say the chatter do this and that and I'm makes me curious go on So when I'm producing the show, I have my hands full I got You know, I'm looking for clips. I'm listening to you, which is of course why I often don't hear your fantastic comedic zingers

09:32 They are zingers. I got my foot on the mute switch in case... Oh, that's right. You're still... You're like the one man band. I am. You just need something between your legs, something between your thighs and you can squeeze every so often. So on my screen, I have a number of things. I have alerts if certain emails come through because people do respond in real time. I have a back channel chat room window open, which is a little bit off to the side. And that's in you know if we have technical issues That's where void zero and mountain vortex are sitting in there and then and so when I have that when I say the chat room It's it's pretty much just an IRC client running in a terminal window So it's just scrolling by and there's some highlights, you know, some text is highlighted like a person's handle, etc And of course when someone also says something directed at me in the chat room then that highlights so it's integrated into everything I do and

10:27 This stems from, I think, I was thinking about why am I able to do this? You know, like, I just pick things out. So, scrolling by all the time and sometimes there's something really good in there and I'm able to pick it out and I realize it stems back to, that must have been 10. And I was talking to Uncle Don, who of course, you know, famous CIA guy, along as an ambassador and all kinds of stuff. And we've talked about him many times on the show. And he told, I remember him telling me a story about a group of guys that he worked with. And he, I don't know if I even knew that he was talking about CIA at the time. I was so young. But I recall very distinctly saying we had these guys who were very good at neural network recognition. I think that's what the term he used.

11:14 And what that meant was he had there were guys who could look at a map an aerial map and. because of their neural ability, they could see patterns and say, oh, that looks like a covered up airbase or that looks like, you know, they had that capability. And maybe that's stuck in my brain because I have this capability to pull things out. Sadly, I also pull the things out that are shit, that really piss me off when I really don't need it. So my point is the chat room truly is integrated into everything we do, at least from my side. And if the signal to noise is off, then it messes with my head. I can't do it. So it's important for people to understand that when you're in the chat room and everyone's chatting around and making jokes, and sometimes these jokes are funny. We bring up punchlines from the chat room all the time.

12:11 But often, you know, when, you know, what was it the other day? Like, oh, someone better try that conversion therapy on Curry's daughter. It's like I didn't need it at that moment. So, you know, when, you know, what was it the other day? Like, oh, someone better try that conversion therapy on Curry's daughter. It's like I didn't need it at that moment. So I got to get out. I thought the trigger point was when somebody says whatever it is, they're always defending Trump. That was the a you're right that was them well that was both on the last show and speaking of which And this is the main versus the main you didn't bring that up this yeah, I'm going sorry The main difference between long, but we have a latency problem today. Yeah, the shame yeah, I'm gonna fix it for for the next show the difference between the last time we did one of these shows and this one is really Donald Trump for the show

CHAPTER 04 / 53 Discussion

Media Deconstruction, Donald Trump and Government Agency Allegations

The hosts discuss their role in deconstructing mainstream media coverage of Donald Trump, noting the irony that they are often accused of being Trump defenders. They read a satirical letter from contributor Professor Dave King, who jokingly claims the show is a government-sanctioned propaganda operation. The letter suggests the show's clips and jingles are pre-prepared by a three-letter agency to keep the public confused.

donald trump· media deconstruction· propaganda· professor dave king· disinformation

13:10 And the irony of what is happening is here is a presidential candidate who is now really a candidate, general candidate. and who continuously from day one has said the media is dishonest, mainstream media sucks, they lie, they're no good. We do our job at deconstructing what the media is doing and a lot of it, I mean I would look at the TV and say you can play the game. Switch the channel and if within 30 seconds they don't say Trump then never watch the channel again because it doesn't happen. It's always, it's all Trump, everyone's talking about Trump. So there's a lot of work for us to do. We don't investigate, we're not necessarily journalists. We deconstruct media. It's how we open the show every single time. And the irony is that here's the guy saying the media is dishonest. We show how dishonest the media is and we get penalized. We literally get financially penalized because people think we're big Trump defenders. And I received a note from Professor Dave King, who's one of our longtime contributors. I thought I'd read it to you. I think it's kind of funny.

14:12 You ready? Yeah, I'm there. Hey there, Crackpot and Buzzkill. I don't know why it took me so long, but now I've figured it out. It is so blatantly obvious what you two are doing! The No Agenda podcast is a three-letter US government agency production. Yes, it's obvious. Twice a week, you and John are furnished with nicely produced pre-edited clips in order to spread misinformation to the public and keep them confused. This is why you can say anything you want and not get in trouble because it is already government-sanctioned propaganda or disinformation. I've been in the music production business for 46 years, I know how difficult it is to record random clips from various sources and perfectly edit them. Adam, this would be impossible for you to achieve twice a week by yourself. John would definitely be hopeless at doing it. You guys don't sit around meticulously cutting those clips together 24-7 in order to play them on the show. No, the clips are all pre-prepared and pre-edited, accompanied by text for both of you to read. Period.

15:10 These clips are prepared and furnished to you by the US government. This also helps propagate the idea that America is some kind of free country that allows anybody to say anything he or she wants. Definitely bullshit, and you know it after having lived in Holland for a few years. Now you're all of a sudden a flag-waving American patriot. It's really noticeable when you're breaking down a clip. You're reading a breakdown that has been pre-written and prepared for you. After 849 shows, you do a fairly good job of making it seem spontaneous. But as Lincoln once said, you can fool all the people, all of the time, or you can't. You guys don't sit around 24-7 monitoring all the world's media. The US government does it! Your silly jingles, karma, nighting, and birthday wishes are included to make the show appear more homemade. Adam, this is most likely the only work that you really do. That's why you always defend playing your stupid repetitive jingles.

16:01 As this is your only real contribution to the show. Is this the best you have to offer? It's really pathetic. Logically, nobody in their right mind would donate money to the show. The donation letters are obviously pre-written as well. Nobody can prove or disprove them. But the real donations and salary you guys receive certainly comes from the US government. Of course, you will refute all of this in typical Adam Curry fourth-grader fashion, but I don't care what you say, as it is so obvious that you guys are doing. You are just two shills working for the US government. This is also why you have never had live interviews on the show with real people, like President Obama on Marc Maron, for example. You couldn't let somebody else come in and possibly gum up the works. Besides, they might see that you guys are what they're really up to. Best podcast in the universe, my ass.

16:48 They could have made that gag a little shorter. Yeah, I could have edited it. This is true. Come on. But that's pretty much the way I wish that would be ideal. Yeah, right. That's what I was thinking. Government check. Yeah, government check and the whole show handed to you on a silver platter. We don't have to do any clips or anything. It'd be fantastic. We have about I looked at the past year and we're at about 50 clips a show average. That's a lot. I'm trying to cut back. I really, ideally, and I did it on the last show, I had my ideal number of clips. 11. Because I noticed that 12. Ah, I thought it was 11. When I first started doing clips, I did two. That's right. You had one or two clips, I remember. I did a couple of clips, and I did clips probably for about a month before you started doing clips. Yeah.

CHAPTER 05 / 53 Discussion

Political Convention Coverage, Samantha Bee and Comedic Bias

The hosts reflect on the high volume of media clips generated during the 2016 political conventions, noting that the Republican event provided more "gold mine" material than the Democratic one. They criticize comedian Samantha Bee of the show Full Frontal for her perceived partisan bias, arguing that her "hate" for Republicans hinders her comedic timing. They also briefly mention Bill Maher's persona and his views on religion.

republican national convention· democratic national convention· samantha bee· full frontal· bill maher

17:45 And that was an evolution we haven't talked about, but the clips were not part of the show idea. And as we transferred over to... And if you listen to what we're gonna play after we're done with a little spiel, even in I think a show, in the original show 200.5, we... talked about how we're kind of moving toward media deconstruction. I don't think we really hit our stride until that oil pipeline show. Probably in the 300s or 400s, I think around show 400 perhaps, we started becoming serious media deconstructors and that required more and more clips to the point where once in a while, and it's happened a couple of shows ago after these conventions, these conventions were brutal.

18:32 That's when we had like 50 clips. It's not part, there's too many clips because we cannot. If you listen to those shows after the conventions, you hear a lot of, where's this clip? I don't know. Let me see if I can find it. Well, I don't see it on here. I don't see, well, hold on. Oh, here it is. Here it is. I misspelled the word. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. It's not that bad. It's not that bad. Oh, yes. It's not horrible. No. No, it's not every time. I'm just saying it happens too much. And after that, convention, I mean especially the second one. I got the biggest kick out of the second convention. We had just the craziest stuff. I think we got more out of the second one than the first one because the first one was kind of, I thought it was kind of boring. Yeah, mediocre, not a good television event really. But the second one was dynamite for finding clips. Meanwhile that woman who does full frontal, Samantha Bee. Yeah. She's a Republican hater to an extreme.

19:32 And she's very funny and she structures gags very well. She's got this show called Full Frontal. I can't barely get through it because it's really laden with hate. And so she did the Republican convention and you know, it's all this Trump, Trump, Trump. And then she comes in as the Democratic convention is going on, she's on the, in the studio, it's not a studio, it's a studio at the convention itself for PBS NewsHour. They actually have the booth right in the convention hall. And she comes in and she says, oh, it was a gold mine. This was as this thing was wrapping up too. So the Trump convention was a gold mine, it was hilarious, everything was funny. She says, you know, I can't get anything from this convention. There's nothing, it's not very funny. How is that possible? And I'm listening, holy crap, how,

20:23 all in are you? Yeah. As a comic, you're supposed to find humor in everything. Comics should not be... Comics or comedians? Is she a comedian or comic? What is she? Actually, it's synonymous in the business. Oh, okay. But amongst themselves, they call themselves comics, generally speaking. And Mimi used to produce comedy. We know a lot of comedians. Yeah, that's why I asked you. I said comedians there because it actually sounded better. I don't know why. But yeah, I flip back and forth between the two terms. But she's a comic comedian, whatever. I think she's hilarious, but she's really got a lot of hate and it hurts her show. And you see this with even Bill Maher. He has this kind of, he has hate that is kind of, I think it's a kind of a gimmick.

CHAPTER 06 / 53 Discussion

Evolution of Media Sourcing, YouTube and Producer Contributions

The process of gathering clips has evolved from recording directly off a television DVR to sourcing high-quality segments from YouTube and other online platforms. This shift allows the hosts to provide direct links in the show notes for their audience. They credit their "producers" (listeners) for finding and sharing relevant clips via Twitter, which helps them stay current on global news events.

youtube· dvr· twitter· media sourcing· show notes

21:17 in some ways because he gets all worked up about certain specific things and Muslims, he hates Muslims. Yeah, well he hates religion in general. He's right, he hates religion in general. He's a hater. I don't know where I was going with that. I'm not sure where you were going with that. But... I was going that we're getting too many clips from the second... Well, there's nothing... We had just the opposite. But there's something else that happened is throughout, you know, in the past couple of years and I think you're right around that pipeline episode and that is... That's four years ago, almost five years ago? Yeah. My goodness. I thought that was a seminal presentation.

21:53 What also has increased is just the pure availability of televised segments online, which makes it easier for me. You sit at the TV and you're always recording off the TV. I did a lot of that during the conventions. But it's much easier when possible to say, ah, okay, that's great. I got to get that clip, write it down, go back, find the program, and then it's on YouTube or you can always find something somewhere and then clip it from that, which is so much easier than you have a link for the show notes. I like providing that as well instead of, like for your clips, we never really have a link because you're getting right off TV and they're not available online.

22:33 So that has changed and just the pure availability and our producers, our producers have really hit their stride. They've hit their stride with making little packages and clips and really the no agenda thinking that has dramatically, I think, improved the product. There's a lot of, yeah, the no agenda thinking is out there far enough that a lot of the clips are brought in to Twitter and to the feeds. And then so you can go, just to follow your own Twitter feed, you can get two or three clips from, did you hear this? A lot of it, of course, we've heard already or done on the previous show, because we are pretty up to date with stuff that we present. But it's very handy. I could, when I'm, sometimes if I'm traveling,

23:23 I have to rely on YouTube and some other things to get clips because I don't really have any way of hooking up to the TV in the hotel. And there's no DVR, so it wouldn't do me any good if I did. Right, right. So, um... And I'll point out that when we're traveling like I am today, I'm in New Jersey to hang out with some friends who I haven't seen for 26 years. It's... although I have to work on the connection, but in general, you know, we can do it from anywhere. And we do. We don't... we try not to skip anything. Try to stay on top of everything and bring you an outstanding product. Now, I have a bunch of notes.

CHAPTER 07 / 53 Discussion

The Onion Format, Episode 200.5 and Show History

The hosts introduce a special "onion" format episode that stacks previous introductory shows (200.5 and 200.7) to provide a historical overview for new listeners. They acknowledge that while the show has elements of performance art, its primary goal is to explain the various memes and the "In the Morning" catchphrase. They reflect on how their understanding of the show's own history is often as vague as the listeners'.

episode 200.5· episode 200.7· show history· performance art· evergreen

24:04 that I think we can probably do after we play this 200.7, which incorporates 200.5. 200.6 was lost. Right, it's gone. 206 was lost in the shuffle. 200.6 was, what we did with 200.7, which I think was probably a mistake, instead of incorporating 200. I think there's a reason for it. There's something in 200.6 that was not, it wasn't interesting or it was dated or it wasn't a good analysis. So we've got 200.7 coming in, and 200.7 plays 200.5, which is the original. And you have to remember that this was the introductory show. So if you wanted to get somebody into no agenda, they, well, I don't get it, there's all this noise, and they keep saying in the morning. Morning. Morning, yep.

24:56 200.5 was done to explain, get you up to speed. 200.6 and then subsequently 200.7 was to correct The old material that was in 200.5 that's all been kicked out of the show. There's a lot of stuff that's changed. We don't do everything that was talked about in 200.5 anymore. We decided for one reason or another that, you know, and we explained a couple of things in 200.7 what we've dropped. But this show, the one we're doing now, which is 200.8, is going to make another group of corrections and it will do that at the end of the Onion that we're about to play. So we're gonna start 200.7 which will segue into 200.5 which segues out of 200.5 twice actually because it does it in the middle once and then it goes back into the show. And then it comes out. We're not gonna do another middle. The middle's fine. Please, no more middle.

25:55 So the show comes out and we'll make a noise and then boom, we're gonna talk about what maybe should be noted that's changed yet again within the last year. All right. So I would say let's get ready to go into the 200.7 show. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Thursday, July 5th, 2015, time once again for your Gitmo Nation Media Assassination Episode 736. This is no agenda. Analyzing ourselves once again and broadcasting live from the Crackpot Condo in FEMA Region 6, downtown Austin, Tahoe. So in the morning everybody, I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley, I'm John C. Dvorak.

26:42 Immediately I notice you're different when we don't have an audience So this is episode 200.7 a K a minute this back up a minute. Well, why would I be different when there's an audience? I don't know I'm a ham. I'm just I'm just yes I'm just presuming, I'm just presuming that. That's funny. No, you were like, and I'm John Cena, everybody. Episode 200.7, aka 736. And we do these periodically.

27:21 We're doing done it once before twice before we did a show called 200.5 Which was kind of an introduction to people to the show I? Did don't get a lot of the memes and the noises and the things that we do and some of the history of the show Then we reduxed the show we did it again on two years later, which was around 435 I think yes, right six in the four hundred and And we didn't do it since and we're almost into the 800s now. So we felt that we should do one more look at the history of no agenda as we Apparently, I listened to the show again last night, apparently we don't even know the history of the show. We don't know the answers to any... We had people ask us questions we couldn't really answer many of them. We had a lot of theories. And we never discussed much about the show being performance art, which it has that element. And I don't think we talked about that at all, which is odd since it's always been that way.

CHAPTER 08 / 53 Discussion

Linguistic Habits, Audio Quality Improvements and Skype Latency

Reviewing older episodes, the hosts cringe at their past linguistic habits, such as the frequent use of "fact of the matter" and "at the end of the day." They also discuss the significant improvement in audio quality since 2010, moving from high-latency Skype calls with frequent dropouts to a sophisticated real-time digital plugin system. Curry notes his transition from portable digital setups to high-end outboard gear to achieve a professional sound.

skype· audio quality· noise gating· universal audio· linguistic crutches

28:21 And we wanted to do this one more time with maybe some more explanatory stuff, play that one old show again. But I want to mention that this will be the last time we do this. We are going to at some point in the next year or two do another deconstruction of our own show but we're gonna do it from scratch. Right, right. We'll have to. We'll start over we probably have to bring the weenie and the butt and put it back in. Which was one of my favorite parts of listening to 200.5 again. It was like oh yes, ah yes. That was actually the highlight of the show. The whole show. I noticed a number of things though. Well let me ask you what did you notice listening to, well we listened to 200.6 which included 200.5.

29:05 More things that well what I heard was a lot of fact of the matter exactly yeah, no essentially All the crap that we've moaned and groaned about we had not really we had not caught on to it no In 2012 and this was done. Yeah, we had not caught on to it And so you hear it and you just cringe cringe-worthy. I know Then but seriously, yeah, no all over the place essentially actually What I write down here Whatever the case whatever the case end of the day. Oh, man, that's fact of the matter So does this mean we've gotten better or are we just anal? Oh

29:50 I think we're more cognizant. I think it's self-awareness. I think that's what's important. But I think it's also think that the listeners are in the producers that follow us since we've been bitching and moaning about this. And we just got a letter in from somebody saying, well, yeah, no, it's fine. You should be able to say that. And he had all these rationales. We don't want to say it. That's the key. Yeah. But we've we've made everybody else aware. of these little picadillo's. And I know that this is the same thing that we're going through when you watch a TV show or you listen to somebody on the radio and they keep saying, the fact doesn't matter, and the fact doesn't matter. I know it's horrible. At the end of the day. Well, you know, change your words, change your world. What? That's a book I once read, change your words, change your world. Well, I think that's probably true. Yeah. It makes you speak in another language. And of course, the other thing I know, well, I'll tell you, I'll say what I noticed, another thing is audio quality. Big difference. Right, two forms of it. The 2010 audio quality was terrible. Yeah.

30:48 And you were bitching about it, in fact. You were saying, hey, my mic sounds like crap. And it wasn't something I could necessarily do anything about at the time. Well, apparently did something about it because in the 2012 presentation, I've sounded great. And now if you separate, except for the middle bit, the middle bit, no, the cutouts, the cutouts, I would be kind of commonly and say something like, well, one of the reasons that I've done that is because And so that's the way it works. It'd be this long, you know, I'd be... Oh, right, right, right, right, right, right. Lots of dropouts. Yeah, yeah. Well, that is Skype that has just improved and, you know, we have much higher bandwidth now. But the main thing that's changed, and I've been on my... And if you even say in 200.5, you'd be saying, you know, how would you... We're anal about audio. We really like... Audio quality has to be good. And we were just struggling with what we had.

31:40 I think at one point during that time I was, because I wanted everything to be as digital as possible or as contained as possible because of you know going on trips and traveling abroad and not wanting to schlep along an entire studio and a lot of it was external gear. I remember at one point I was actually doing the show probably for a year and a half with a very slight delay on my headphone so I could monitor in real time what was happening because we record pretty much direct to tape as you call it, you know, direct to... I need to know what the end product is so we don't have to go back and do things after the fact.

32:18 Not that that's necessarily all that noticeable in our performance. But anyway, wow. Big difference with what we have now, and that is purely because of this universal audio, real-time, zero latency plug-in system that we're using. Right, which makes a difference in the sound. That's another reason we have to do this show again from scratch next time, because the information that we gave out about the technical aspects of the show is all, except for my still talking free air.

CHAPTER 09 / 53 Discussion

Headphone Usage, M-Audio Hardware and Microphone Preferences

Dvorak explains his unconventional preference for not using headphones during broadcasts, which previously caused audio feedback issues. The hosts discuss their current hardware, including M-Audio breakout boxes and specific microphones like the Heil PR40 and the Rode Procaster. They detail the technical requirements of their setups, such as the need for 48-volt phantom power for certain units.

m-audio· heil pr40· rode procaster· phantom power· headphones

32:55 You were fascinated with both shows. It doesn't come up on the show much. I don't use headphones. The reason why I was, well, first of all, I'm still fascinated by it because it's just not a typical radio thing, I don't think. Although, again, I'll use the anecdote, a guy in Vancouver used to do that on the air. Vancouver, enough said. Well, it was a big market. Vancouver's not a slouch town. We had a long period where, because I didn't have proper noise gating and other effects, where I would hear myself come back from your speakers into your microphone. Yeah, and then you'd play the clip, turn down your speakers. Oh wow, do I even have that clip anymore? We never talked about that in the show. I don't know if I have that, let me see. Turn down your speakers, which was annoying.

33:41 Yeah. Jarring and it was I banned it. Here it is. Turn down your speakers! I thought that was you. No, that's Michael Butler. Yeah, but you're so Butler. That's good. That's good. But that was a function of mine not using headphones and yeah. Well, it is. It has the audio equipment has drastically changed the show because we can pretty much do the same show no matter where I am. And you also are able to do it almost from anywhere because you pretty much just have to have your microphone. Are you still using your M-Audio breakout box? Is that what you're using? Well, I'm using the newer one that has two channels.

34:23 Because the other one blew up. When I'm in Washington North, I do use the old M-Audio box, because I had two of them, one of them blew up. And I use it up there. But this one is really a nice box, this new one. I can't remember, it just says M-Audio on it. Let's see if it's got a model number. It's the M-Track something or other. The other one's M-Track too, but this is a two channel black, it's really pretty. I don't know that it works perfectly, but it does work, I think. Oh no, it's fantastic. It sounds good. But you're also, you're the mic man. You have found the microphone that is perfect for your voice for our setup is outstanding. Yeah, I've got a good mic here and I've got a, I use the PR40 up north. It's just that I don't want to deal with,

35:16 With the 48 volts and all the rest of it, because that whole M-Audio I don't believe has a phantom power. Anything else we need to talk about before we get into it? I took a lot of notes. We can talk about it at the mid-break. You had a bunch of stories that we talked about. Let me give the design of what we're up to. We've cut out the original 2000.6 opening because it makes no sense and it was mostly about Adam getting married. Right, and that's the reason we did that. It had nothing to do with the show. Right, right, right. So we're just pulling that and then the mid-break which answers questions Unfortunately, the questions and the answers are dated. There's a couple of things in there that are okay, and I may drop them in when I edit this thing, but we're pulling that out and we're gonna do a new one. And that's what we're gonna do halfway through the show. And then at the end, we're gonna have the original ending, which is the 200.5 ending, and then as we go to music week,

CHAPTER 10 / 53 Discussion

Post-Mortem Rituals, Listening Skills and Retired Clips

The hosts describe their "post-mortem" ritual of gossiping and critiquing the show immediately after recording. Curry admits that his listening skills have improved over time, though he still occasionally misses Dvorak's points while managing technical tasks. They also mention retiring certain sound effects, like a submarine dive sound, and the occasional error of playing the same clip in consecutive shows.

post-mortem· listening skills· white house correspondents dinner· sound effects· archives

36:13 They interrupt those two guys those dudes John and Adam of 2012 from the past and they interrupt the ending and they're gonna yak about something and then we the John and Adam from 2015 are going to interrupt them and finish the whole thing and you're gonna have a nice piece of entertainment and realize that this will be the this is being retired so just but just in case just in case for whatever reason in a year or two we decide to still use something from this 200.7 show I know we agree we won't I just want to say hi to Adam and John from the future I just want to make sure that they're all happy yeah you don't know one more thing that that and that partially has to do with the

36:59 the setup and we've improved a lot of the technical pieces. A lot of that is just Moore's Law. Computers have become better and just the whole setup is much easier to handle for me. I noticed that I am able to listen to you I have better listening skills now than I had in both of those eras, let's call them that. And I still have to this day, after the show was posted, and we're done, we always do a post-mortem, we gossip about stuff, nothing really show related, just

37:36 All my old wives gossip, you know, whatever. Well, we also discuss if this show had some issues We talked about that always which is what we're supposed to do, but we end up gossiping and we end up gossiping I always listen to the show and and and to this day still I there's there moments I'm like, I didn't hear what he was saying I didn't I didn't understand it and that's mainly because I'm doing things I'm getting clips ready or I'm listening trying to anticipate what clip you're talking about because if in case it wasn't clear I And maybe this needs to be reiterated. We don't talk outside of the show rarely. I have no idea what stories John's working on. He has no idea what I'm working on. Of course, we kind of now throughout the years know what we may or may not pick up on and I can actually say, I don't have to worry about that. I think John will cover that.

38:23 But and sometimes I do and sometimes I don't I think I missed one thing recently when you groused at me It was the the White House Correspondents dinner, right? I missed it. I just missed it. It was my night. You're right I should have had a couple of one-line good clips from one-liners and something funny and I missed the whole thing I didn't even get to why I like to watch the red carpet thing. That's right. I'm one of these days We're going to do live commentary. We're never gonna do this Probably not But I think that I've gotten better at listening. to what you have to say. And when I listen to his, to me it's cringe-worthy. Oh man, you didn't understand at all what he was talking about. And that's probably one of the biggest problems in life, but certainly in media, where most people, if they're interviewing somebody, we're not interviewing each other, but we're having a conversation. Well, we make clips from people that botch, you know, somebody says something crazy and then the guy just ignores them. Yeah. So I'm completely guilty of that.

39:24 But it's mainly because I'm doing a whole bunch of other things the same. I also keep my eye on the chat room, which is well known you don't do. And there's more benefit than not to, for me, looking at the chat room. I'd get benefit out of it, but... Uh-huh. I said, I think in one of these shows, I think in 200.5 that it's so distracting to me because I just end up reading what they have to say instead of doing the show. Right, right, right. And so yeah, it is distracting and I read something and then, you know, and then I just didn't, sometimes you just don't hear stuff. So I've gotten better. I'm happy with that personal improvement goal. Yeah, I think I've personally improved on some things too. I should have, but probably not as much as I'd like.

40:11 I haven't been replaying clips that were played on previous shows as much. I don't think I've done it maybe once every two or three months, maybe. I don't understand what you're saying. You play a clip like on show 250 and then 252, I play the clip as though it's new. Remember that? Yeah, once in a while. The horn. Yeah, no, the buzzer. Which for some reason is one channel only. No, no, that wasn't the buzzer. You used to use that submarine dive sound. I don't know if I have that anymore. I don't think it was the buzzer for that. I think we've also, we've banned that one. We've lost a lot of clips. No, we haven't really lost a lot of them. Well, they're not technically lost. They're like stuff in my archives. I have no idea what that sound effect was.

CHAPTER 11 / 53 Discussion

Backstage Tour, Early Career and MTV Departure

In a segment from the original episode 200.5, the hosts provide a "backstage tour" of their history in mainstream media. Adam Curry discusses his time at MTV and his eventual departure from mainstream radio after being fired for discussing the Michael Jackson death investigation. They recall the early days of the podcast in 2007, when Curry was living in London and the show had a significantly different, less structured flavor.

mtv· meveo· michael jackson· london· podcasting origins

41:04 It was not important. It was something, it was a whoop whoop or something. It was one of those military sounding things. I don't know what it was. Alright, fine. Alright, well let's just start with the show 200.5 which is the introduction show for people who don't know the history of the show. We try to discuss the history and then there's a break and when we get to the break point we'll come back in. Okay, here we go. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's May 16th, 2010, time for your Gitmo Nation Media Assassination episode 200.5. This is No Agenda. Welcome to a special backstage tour of the No Agenda show coming to you from the Hilltop Watchtower Crackpot Command Center in Gitmo Nation West.

41:46 in the People's Republic of Southern California. In the morning, I'm Adam Curry. And it's not really a media assassination today, it's a no agenda assassination. I'm John C. Dvorak. We still get to say in the morning. Yeah, definitely in the morning never goes away You know the thing is we we should tell people since this is really a show where we're just essentially gonna talk about the show And we're gonna ask answer a lot of questions and probably ask some but you know one of the things You should immediately note that we actually had a debate as to whether we're going to play the opening jingle. It's kind of sad that we didn't put the debate on the backstage show. This is kind of where we, yeah, I think on this show, which is driven by support from our producers slash donors, supporters,

42:40 where we kind of bear it all. Not that we have any secrets, I don't think, but people just want to know a lot of stuff that we don't put into the show because, little known facts, we make it look easy. And also a lot of this personal stuff that they're asking, because I sent out a message on Twitter to get some questions and we also got a couple emails and you worked up some questions yourself. To be honest about it, a lot of it is just plain boring. Yes, indeed. You know, John and I have been in, in fact you said this on episode 200, we've been in media, in all forms of media from print, you've probably been around typesetting,

43:19 Actually, I used to be a typesetter part-time when I was in college. See, it doesn't surprise me. All the way through to today's reality-based television programming and everything in between on mainstream media. And I would say, well I certainly gave up a number of years ago and I am patently unhirable by mainstream media. In fact the last... Especially after you did that CFTC thing. Well yeah, that's right. When I said Michael Jackson was probably killed and they cut me off and of course now it turns out he probably was. uh... but in the last radio station i was on which was around the time we started the show actually in fact no you were doing this that show while we're doing the show here but i think we started this show yeah but i don't we've done a couple like a week or two and then we started doing this show right i was doing that first was not right now i think you were fired during the i was fired during a we were doing no agenda when i was fired by only just started that show yeah i know i think we did for about a month

44:23 I was trying to think back, because that was, I think, 26 of either October or November 2007. The first episode was like 35 minutes. The good old days. I was living in London, which did give the show a very different flavor, I have to say. I was also baked out of my mind. Right. Although, you know, to be honest about it, I don't think that was apparent. And I actually argue with you. I don't think your personality has changed that much from stop since you stopped smoking. Right. But I well, there's a couple of episodes there where I remember one time I actually went off on some tangent and I said, dude, I'm so baked. Yeah.

CHAPTER 12 / 53 Discussion

CNET Pilots, Halsey Minor and Early Tech Media

The hosts recount their first meeting in 1993 during the filming of pilots for CNET. Curry recalls registering CNET.com and being paid $200,000 for the pilot, while Dvorak remembers the involvement of Hollywood producer Kevin Wendell. They discuss the early competition for hosting roles, noting that Leo Laporte was originally considered for the "McLaughlin Group" style roundtable.

cnet· halsey minor· leo laporte· kevin wendell· vhs

45:05 But yeah, I do remember that but the personality well I'm happy to hear that I'm just more awake and I can do more and I'm more focused Yeah, and you finally got a rig that makes me sound decent. Yeah, but that's well, you know We had a pretty good setup it sounded okay, but this is the best one I have to say this is definitely the best one so now we met At, I guess, where did we meet, John? Was I incorrect? Well, Tangents.com on Twitter asked the question. DeVril, Dvorak and Curry have a unique relationship. How did you guys meet? And did you hit it off right away? I'll tell you something. I found in my crap that arrived from the UK, I found a videotape

45:53 of the CNET pilots where we actually first met for the very first time. Although I believe that was in 1993. Three or four maybe. I think it was three. Yeah and I'm gonna get one of those VHS to DVR thingies to transcode all of this stuff, but this was when CNET did not have a website in fact I registered CNET.com and said to Halsey minor. Hey, dude You know I'll do your email if you want you know you might want to have a web thing that I think that would be more appropriate for what you're doing here, but alright, they paid me like 20 grand to do that pilot

46:29 uh... which was nice and you were doing kind of mclaughlin group type roundtable as the pilot for that show yeah they died that that's kinda interesting because we've seen that they actually uh... went through a whole bunch of people before they decided they wanted me to do it and i didn't really want to do it actually be asked by never wanted to work for cnet uh... but i did like the idea of uh... love watching kevin wendell at work was they brought him i was a little more he was a guy from fox Yeah, he's a guy from somewhere. He's a Hollywood guy. He had set up the Fox Network. He was one of the driving programming forces behind Fox. Early days. Early days. Yeah, yeah.

47:07 whatever the case was he was a slick operator and it was fun to watch him work and uh... but they first wanted leo leport to be that mclaughlin guy and leo wanted to do it uh... badly he was always wanted that that sort of gig and because but it's cuz very serious and it's you know this and that and but they had me do it uh... but that that never got off the ground it just wasn't gonna work and then so then they gave me some other job uh... being a uh... uh... kind of a clownish co-host With the Gina st. John. Oh, yeah well they offered me to move out to San Francisco and be there full-time and They offered like really low salary, but two million shares of stock and I declined Yeah That was an error. Well who knows what I was like well. Yeah, I know it's a crapshoot. I did the same thing I screwed up

47:57 I said, how many shares outstanding? Well, it was vague, right? I was like, you know what? I got a pretty good thing here at MTV. I'm good. So anyway, so we met in 93 casually. Very casually. Very casually. But you know, we followed each other's careers a little bit, but then I was kind of triggered by that when you had your moment of richness. And I was floating around Europe and I ran into a newspaper with one of these papers, I think it was a Dutch story somewhere. And it had a picture of you and you're some superstar in Holland and it was just unbelievable. So how did this guy make so much money? And so then you showed up in town again and so then we just kind of forced myself on you. But wasn't it a... Yes, and that was nice. But wasn't it a... Wasn't I on Cranky Geeks when we connected?

CHAPTER 13 / 53 Discussion

Meveo Meetings, Show Naming and Conversation Dynamics

The hosts detail their re-connection at Meveo through Ron Blum, which led to the creation of the Tech 5 news show and eventually No Agenda. They credit the name "No Agenda" to a casual realization that they had no specific goals for the program other than honest conversation. Curry expresses his belief that a natural, unscripted conversation between two well-traveled individuals is inherently interesting to an audience.

meveo· ron blum· tech 5· cranky geeks· no agenda name

48:44 No, I think we met up first and then I put you on Cranky Geeks. Well where the hell was it, John? Because... Well we... I... We did some... an email exchange and I said let's go have lunch or something. We had our first... our lunch... our initial re-meeting lunch at the Fringal and we talked about, you know, getting some... getting a daily news show, the Tech 5 thing, ideas like that and then I... then we went and had a big meeting with Ron in the office. Yeah, Ron Blum. You are in Cranky Geeks after that. I'm trying to look now in my email if I have something from you from that must have been 2007, right? Probably. How do you do that in Gmail? Do you do date 2007? I don't know. Anyway, that's the basically the story and then we we

49:34 I don't know, but then we just kind of naturally got along. We really don't know. That's the answer. We really don't know how that happened. We actually get along just in some funny way. It's not really explainable. It's like you meet somebody and you've known them for a long time so you know that they're obviously not assassins. Of course, that may not be true. But whatever the case is you you've always had you know you had an acquaintance, and then you decide that you know now you're working together It's almost like you know where people meet on a Hollywood set and they're hanging out a lot And then they'd go off their separate ways, but instead of going off our separate way since we were both the game at MeVeo We decided to start doing a show and that now it's debatable is that you know how it got named when we started I think I came up with a name

50:19 I don't know if that's true. I think you're the one that approved the name. Are you going to tell me it was your brain fart? I think it was. I was saying, well, we got no agenda. And then you said, let's call it no agenda. Yeah, that sounds about right, actually. That sounds good. Something like that. And then as it evolved, we got into other things which are kind of the same kind of like, we don't know who came up with the idea, I mean the donation thing. Well before we get to that, because the show started off with a very different format. It was in fact I think our first show was on a Friday. and like a Friday afternoon, Friday morning for you and we would just talk about stuff and I would grab the Financial Times but we would also just talk about stuff, you know, the difference between America and Europe. Right. And it was just like a casual conversation. Yeah, just like a conversation. Yeah. And this was, in my opinion,

51:13 I've always felt that two guys, an interesting conversation between two people is interesting to everybody. And I've always believed I could sell conversations I had with my wife and I always felt that a good conversation will show where there's not a lot of... rehearsal or preparation, but just guys who are just talking about stuff that they know a lot about. And coincidentally, because the two of us are so extremely well-traveled, I mean, pretty much been everywhere, and observant because, you know, we're generally floating around looking at stuff, it turns out that we have enough life experience to

51:52 to have an interesting conversation and we're both from slightly different backgrounds so we could complement each other in ways that I thought was interesting for people to listen in on. Yeah, and from my perspective I was looking to do a show with total honesty. Not in the regard of, oh, let's all hold hands and tell each other a secret, but more like, you know, why don't we just say what it is and not be fake and just talk about stuff and we can contradict and we can have an argument and we don't have to... In fact, we had no... No thoughts even I think about making money doing no agenda. Yeah, we had absolutely no agenda And and I was just happy that someone would listen to my bullshit Like hey, here's the guy who actually knows more than me because he's been around longer for sure and and and and we'll listen to some of the because I think I was I

CHAPTER 14 / 53 Discussion

Career Guidance Tests, Natural Cynicism and Audience Feedback

Dvorak shares an anecdote about a career guidance test that identified his ideal profession as a "critic," which aligns with his natural cynicism. The hosts discuss how their different fan bases initially reacted to the partnership, with some listeners suggesting they should perform solo. They conclude that their complementary perspectives are what eventually built a loyal, unified audience.

mmpi test· career guidance· cynicism· audience growth· solo shows

52:43 I was maybe a late bloomer. I was like saying, oh, wait a minute. The world kind of works a little bit differently because I was so embedded in the hits. You know, that's all I did. I played hits on radio, on television. Like, you know, I knew what all the celebrities were doing and all of a sudden like, hey, this is something else going on here. I think I corrupted you more than you corrupted me when it comes to this show. Correct. I would agree. mainly because of my natural cynicism. I took a test, it was a computer software program some years ago, I've always found it fascinating, that was a career guidance, it was almost like a very elaborate computer test, you'd answer a million questions, it was like an MMPI or Minnesota Multi-Faculty

53:26 phase personality inventory that people takes in some companies it'll be it's actually an illegal test you shouldn't be forced to take it but it can tell whether you're a psycho and all those other things and this was the to determine what your what your career path should be and I took the test a couple of times and it was the weirdest thing to get back at the top of a career path this is telling you this is what you should go be doing critic really Yeah, that's awesome. That's really good. I like that. So anyway, so yeah, we've got that thing. When we started, there's a couple of... I got like hand worker on all my tests. You should be shoveling shit, boy. You shouldn't be in any kind of business. You might be surprised. That test was pretty amazing. I had other people take it. It was just like nailing people left and right. I wish I could... If I could find it in my archives... I'll take it. If you can find it, I'll take it. ...and reproduce it in a modern format, it would be nice.

54:20 So anyway, we started the show just casually and it had a... it really started picking up a following quickly and people were feeding back into the mechanism encouraging the continuation of the show. And then somewhere along the line, this was your idea I'm sure of it because it could have been mine, you decided to do two shows a week. Yeah, I don't remember why. There was some reason because I think we're starting the show is starting to get long get long. Yeah, we said well Why don't we want to do two show actually that's when we made a real commitment though and for now that was much later in the game We made a real commitment to do two shows after we we said hey, you know, this is real. We're building an audience and

55:07 But I think we were going for a good year there just on one show. We probably went a year building an audience and we had kind of a weird audience because they were really your fans separate from my fans and my fans would say you should do the show by yourself, you should get rid of Curry. and I give that motherfucker two to the head man and I can't believe that he would be getting the same kind of commentary and it's always made me laugh because it's like oh yeah that's what you want just some guy talking solid by the way I have never no conversation no pace and flow I've never received never received an email of someone saying get rid of Dvorak ever I've seen I've I have seen the get rid of Dvorak meme on Twitter

CHAPTER 15 / 53 Discussion

Radio Philosophy, Theater of the Mind and MIT Sound Studies

Both hosts express a deep-seated love for radio as a "theater of the mind" that requires no visual preparation. They discuss the importance of high-quality audio, citing an MIT Media Lab study which found that viewers perceive a television picture as being higher quality if the accompanying sound is superior. Dvorak recalls his time as a "hero" to sound engineers at TechTV for advocating for better microphones and audio processing.

theater of the mind· fcc license· mit media lab· dolby· sound engineering

55:48 on twitter and i've seen it here and i've never seen how you like it and i've never seen it ice then within your fans are less than this uh... uh... crazy style hostile okay so uh... at a certain point though i think that what what really drew us together is were both radio guys at heart i think we're in and i know i am I've grew up in radio television was more like a sidetrack for me. I never felt I Too tall I'm too lanky. I'm too geeky I have Tourette's there's a whole bunch of stuff that would make me not ideal for television My head isn't big enough to be really successful know about that. Yeah, you got no you gotta have a huge not not metaphorically speaking but physically a huge head that makes you successful on TV we've already established that and

56:37 well but it was our it was our i think i really are are uh... mutual love of radio in the i'd love radio and the reason there's a lot of reasons i think it should be explored one is that fact that you don't have to it's a different it's different i mean uh... radio is uh... and this is basically we're doing is radio needs a modern former radio podcasting uh... you don't have to get dressed you don't have to uh... triumph uh... more than that is theater of the mind is what i like about it right and you can also be right with you in my part which uh... is extremely valuable uh... and i mean my first broadcasting uh... but training was in reiwa to foothill college for a while and when i was on the radio station

57:23 I just loved it. I produced a radio play and I did a lot of radio. I got a third class license which you had to have at one time. Yeah, FCC license. I still have mine. Nobody needs them anymore. And I've always liked, and I'm very, kind of a sound nut. I like good quality sound which is why I was always carping on the quality of this broadcast. Even when I was doing, when I was doing um, Silicon spin at the tech TV. Uh, sound is always forgotten on television. Don't get me. Yes. And so, but as, but I made a big stink about it because it sounded so bad and, and two of the sound engineers that were working there were, I was their hero. I know the hero of the sound engineers because the sound engineers couldn't get anybody to listen to the fact that they were using cheap mics and, and, and they weren't doing notching or anything. Right. And so the sound, it sounded like a cheap ass production.

58:18 Now the thing that's interesting is that MIT during the Negroponte era when they had the media lab, they had studied this to death and they had done double blind studies over and over again and it kept coming up. If you take a group of people and have them watch a TV show with shitty sound, and then have them compare and then show another TV show with really great sound like Dolby 5 channel. They watch longer. No, it's not just that. When they do an analysis, they claim the picture's better. That's fantastic. Yeah, makes sense. And I'm a sound nut, although I've had a lot of trouble just because of the technology we've been using, but now, okay, so now it's where it should be.

59:03 I am way into creating a custom sound that gives you something that affects the listener in other ways. By the way, do you have the record button pushed? Oh, yes, I do. So, you know, we have compression. I put noise gates on because I don't want to hear when I'm when either I'm talking or where there's by the way I love silence when neither of us say anything the noise gates kick in it's completely silent if I didn't have those on then I'd hear your room, you know, I'd hear stuff rustling of papers and that's a to me an important part of our sound and I love it because in the beginning

CHAPTER 16 / 53 Discussion

Audio Sculpting, Noise Gates and the Star of the Show

Adam Curry explains his technical process for "sculpting" the show's sound using noise gates and compression to eliminate ambient room noise and create a sense of intimacy. They discuss how the silence created by noise gates can actually grab a listener's attention. The hosts joke about who the "star" of the show is, comparing their dynamic to the Smothers Brothers.

noise gates· compression· ambient noise· skype delay· smothers brothers

58:18 Now the thing that's interesting is that MIT during the Negroponte era when they had the media lab, they had studied this to death and they had done double blind studies over and over again and it kept coming up. If you take a group of people and have them watch a TV show with shitty sound, and then have them compare and then show another TV show with really great sound like Dolby 5 channel. They watch longer. No, it's not just that. When they do an analysis, they claim the picture's better. That's fantastic. Yeah, makes sense. And I'm a sound nut, although I've had a lot of trouble just because of the technology we've been using, but now, okay, so now it's where it should be.

59:03 I am way into creating a custom sound that gives you something that affects the listener in other ways. By the way, do you have the record button pushed? Oh, yes, I do. So, you know, we have compression. I put noise gates on because I don't want to hear when I'm when either I'm talking or where there's by the way I love silence when neither of us say anything the noise gates kick in it's completely silent if I didn't have those on then I'd hear your room, you know, I'd hear stuff rustling of papers and that's a to me an important part of our sound and I love it because in the beginning

59:41 Certainly when we had a huge Skype delay, people would be like, oh, you know, I keep grabbing my iPod or my MP3 player because I think that the thing is stopped or it's crapped out, but then you guys talk again and it gets people's attention. Silence is beautiful. Yeah, yeah, it does work and we have a moment of silence every so often. But anyway, so the two of us are kind of have a, we have amenable personalities. So we're complementary. We're not, you know, people say, well, you work because you're the opposite. No, we're hardly the opposite. No, not at all. We're just complementary. We have different kind of needs and issues, perspectives, but they're not

1:00:23 opposite. They're just different. And so it worked out. So we have a show that works. Very rare to do these kind of partnerships. Somebody else asked the question, let me go to this one, who is the star of the show? And of course that would be me. Yeah, exactly. Right on. I thought I'd get that in before you gave the same line. I was wondering if we could actually say it at the same time. Like, nah, it'll never work on Skype. We'll never hit that at the same moment. No, but that would have been funny on stage. So, um, yeah. In a Smothers Brothers kind of humor way. There's no star of the show, uh, because

CHAPTER 17 / 53 Discussion

Family Guy Influence, Weenie and the Butt, Morning Zoo Parody

The hosts credit a specific episode of the animated series Family Guy, featuring the "Weenie and the Butt" radio parody, as a major influence on the show's aesthetic. They play a clip of the parody, which mocks the content-free "Morning Zoo" radio format of the 1980s and 90s. This satire led to the adoption of the "In the Morning" catchphrase and the use of various sound effects to pace the show.

family guy· weenie and the butt· morning zoo· seth macfarlane· radio parody

1:01:06 and there's no like sidekick i mean it's not like there's a dominant character i mean the right adam produces the show so he picks up uh... the dominant side of the production because he's the one who hits the buttons it says in the morning he's the one who opens the show cuz he's got all that gear but it's uh... it's just happens to be what you have to do if you're producing because if i was producing a you know i i started the clips on my pet story and i think myself but so it's not somebody has to produce you can have two producers now uh... suck but But what happened and a lot of people Talk about this at least I've seen it around like well You know used to be in fact we used to say the show that has We open we would open the show the show that has no jingles. No sound effects. No agenda and Then I think you because people need to know that John is a kind of guy and this is I really appreciate this by the way who will see something on television or find a crazy documentary or something that you're generally interested in and it's often I think it's stuff that you don't even

1:02:09 Believe in or care about yourself, but he'll burn you a DVD and make a nice label on it And you know and I'm always amazed by the labels. It's always nice art, and it's lit You know it's labeled beautifully that way if the feds bust in they look at it. They say oh this bus This isn't a bootleg this guy's got to be the real deal, but that's not like movies. It's you know it's it's documentaries. It's different shows that he's seen and you handed me a copy of the family guy and with the episode Weenie and the Butt. And that really got the g- because again, we're both radio freaks and we figured this would just be funny to do and it kind of stuck. And I think that it'll be fun- that's also where In the Morning came from, by the way. And it's such a takeoff on the Morning Zoo format and which we both, I would say, love and hate at the same time. Loathe, of course, now it's just so old-fashioned.

1:03:05 But when you listen to this, you can understand why radio guys get off on Weenie and the Butt. It's about two minutes, this. Oh, that's the Hulu... the Hulu pre-roll. Watch your favorites anytime for free. Hulu. Hey everybody, it's Weenie and the Butt here live at the Quahog Airshow. We're all ready for the Weenie Sound-A-Like contest. I don't know, Butt. I don't think they can say my catchphrase because they no funny. Oh, there it is! And if you think you can say that just like Weenie here, you could win $97.1 for the cool weekend ahead. Weenie and the Butt! Weenie and the Butt! Cool weekends in the morning, 97.1 FM. Cool weekends in the morning with Weenie and the Butt. WQHT 97.1! 97.1!

1:03:52 Wee-wee-wee-wee at the butt! In the morning, cool weekends! At the head. Wee! Wee! And the butt! And welcome back! Uh, excuse me, I-I gotta find a lost kid. Can I use your mic? That's what she said! Whoa! You got butt-slam! And that! Ho-ho-ho-ho-ho! Listen, I could really use a hand here. That's what he said! Butt-slam! That's Manic Monkey on 97.1! Cool, weekends in the morning! Oh, weekend long. In the morning, in the morning. On the radio. Give me that.

1:04:29 Stewie Griffin, will you please report to the radio booth? Stewie Griffin. Hey, that's quite a voice you've got there. You ever think about doing radio? Well, uh, I listen to a lot of radio. Peter and Lois leave the radio on when they go out, so I feel like somebody's home. Well, here's my card. Call me if you're interested. Hey, okay, we've got our first contestant. Let's hear Weenie's catchphrase. Dan O'Farney. I think we have a wiener! And that's Dicky the Punchline Donkey on 97.1. Dicky the Punchline Donkey on Cool 97.1. Cool Weekend. On the radio. In the morning. FM. Cool. WQHG. Cool Weekend. In the morning. On 97.1. 97.1.

1:05:19 It's one of the greatest moments in Family Guy history. It really is and you know they produced all of that stuff and they must have had a ball because it really was like that in the 90s, in the 80s and the 90s. Radio was absolutely in the morning. No content. 0 content. All filler. And I used to hate it. We'd have to do liner cards. Here read this, hit the jingle. All right, 100.1 dollars in cash for you on Z100! Z100 serving the universe. So we kind of decided, we didn't decide, it just happened. Most of the show by the way for people who ask all these questions, it's really an evolution. Yeah. There's no meeting. We don't have meetings, we don't read documents. No, we, in fact, if there's a rule,

CHAPTER 18 / 53 Discussion

Show Evolution, Pacing and the Goldman Sachs Lifestyle

The show's format evolved from a casual conversation to a structured mockery of mainstream media, aided by jingles produced by Jeff Smith. The hosts argue that their show provides a service for busy professionals, such as those at Goldman Sachs, who do not have the time to dig through news stories to find hidden connections or media deceptions. They emphasize that they are entertaining themselves while providing valuable analysis.

jeff smith· jingles· media mockery· goldman sachs· current events

1:06:08 We generally agree not to talk about what we're going to talk about because we know that what will happen is we'll start talking about it and then we bring it up on the show and then it always suck. It's like it's been rehearsed. There's no tension there. Right. And you know, so so anyway, so this evolved. But what happened with that, then, of course, you ran into Jeff Smith. And so we ended up getting a bunch of these jingles and things which some people complain about but the fact of the matter is it paces the show well. It is a mockery of the other model but it adds kind of a nice, I don't know what it is, the atmosphere is improved by it. The in the morning thing is used as a rim shot.

1:06:48 generally or should be and it is often. So I say something funny which is very common on the show and then he hits the rim shot. Or if you go off on a tangent. So we have a bunch of these things which we use and now we had a couple questions. By the way, that's an old radio trick for a segue. It's really It helps transition the listener's brain from one segment to the next. It jars you for a moment there. And if you listen to our last show, show 200, Adam was going off the deep end.

1:07:24 on some topic. He kept talking. It was way at least two, three minutes overdue to stop it. And I told him to play the Adam Curry's Pet Peeve of the Day jingle, which I knew would transition. It would, you know, stop him in his tracks. That's right. It also stops me. You're right. Yeah, it works perfectly that way. So the show, here's from one of our listeners, the show you do today is very different from the show when you first started, e.g. personal anecdotes are gone. No, they're not. Audio clips and jingles are now prevalent. Originally less than an hour a week is now four hours a week and listeners are now asked to contribute cash. Is the show where you want it to be or are you planning more changes? The show just evolves so we don't plan anything although we do things individually that may or may not stick. In fact if anything, we're always trying, it's more like

1:08:20 When I find something, and by the way we'll get into this, but a lot of people send me stuff. That's how I get a lot of good information. Either that's good or I'll find something else that is good that relates to it. I'm thinking, ah man, I'm going to blow John away with this. Ah, he's going to love this when I play this. I can just hear what he's going to say. That's what I'm thinking. Yeah, there's that and there's the other time, they, curiously though we both tend to be on the same stories which is kind of interesting but we had a show, I can't remember, it was about six or seven shows ago where you had actually collected the clips that were all complementary to my discussion and it was like, because I didn't get some of these clips that I wanted, you had them and I actually thought that was the most unbelievable show we've ever done because it looked rigged.

1:09:07 Yeah, it really flowed very nicely and that happens from time to time But yeah, I'm on board with the evolution with there's nothing is absolutely nothing is planned I have my own things John has his things sometime we might send each other a link from time to time and and even then usually the link doesn't get discussed because I always saw well, whatever, you know is over but But we have a couple of common interests of things that are funny, that we think are funny. Usually they have to do with mainstream media. I think that's the most fun is when we rag on mainstream media and pull it apart and simultaneously open people's eyes as to what's really going on on television. You know, that may have been triggered by the Weenie and the Bud episode of The Family Guy because once we started mocking that model, we started looking at the media bitching about it generally.

1:10:02 on a higher plane I believe than the people at Fox have ever thought of. And we started, we realized that it was actually, we were entertaining ourselves and we knew it was very valuable information and we had the time. It's not like anyone can't do this but most people work for a living. If you're to have a job at Goldman Sachs and you're there till, you know, seven at night and you have to get in early, whatever, and then you have to drink all day, which seems to be what the job's about. And watch strippers. You don't have time to go and start digging around these stories to find the one, you know, the missing element or the kind of the crazy connection. You just haven't got time to do it. And then, you know, the fact that the mainstream media doesn't do it and they don't,

1:10:48 is just makes you wonder. So I will say that there were two seminal moments when we had our equivalent of a meeting and the one is when we spoke on the phone and said you know what this thing is real this is really catching on let's do two shows a week that I do remember and that was like well you know something's happening here this is really special we should just do it and then I even recall you saying, okay, I've got to switch this around. I've got Cranky Geeks on Wednesday. I mean, this is when we started to really integrate this show into our daily schedule, into our lives, because actual work does go into it. I don't know about you, but every single day, here's my system.

CHAPTER 19 / 53 Discussion

C-SPAN Addiction, Show Prep and the Freedom Controller

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak discuss their heavy reliance on C-SPAN for show material, praising its unedited coverage and searchable video archives. Curry describes his "Freedom Controller" system for organizing show notes and links using Gmail labels and specialized software. They often send each other real-time alerts to watch specific C-SPAN segments, comparing themselves to the Muppets' Statler and Waldorf.

c-span· book tv· freedom controller· gmail labels· show prep

1:10:02 on a higher plane I believe than the people at Fox have ever thought of. And we started, we realized that it was actually, we were entertaining ourselves and we knew it was very valuable information and we had the time. It's not like anyone can't do this but most people work for a living. If you're to have a job at Goldman Sachs and you're there till, you know, seven at night and you have to get in early, whatever, and then you have to drink all day, which seems to be what the job's about. And watch strippers. You don't have time to go and start digging around these stories to find the one, you know, the missing element or the kind of the crazy connection. You just haven't got time to do it. And then, you know, the fact that the mainstream media doesn't do it and they don't,

1:10:48 is just makes you wonder. So I will say that there were two seminal moments when we had our equivalent of a meeting and the one is when we spoke on the phone and said you know what this thing is real this is really catching on let's do two shows a week that I do remember and that was like well you know something's happening here this is really special we should just do it and then I even recall you saying, okay, I've got to switch this around. I've got Cranky Geeks on Wednesday. I mean, this is when we started to really integrate this show into our daily schedule, into our lives, because actual work does go into it. I don't know about you, but every single day, here's my system.

1:11:34 I have labels set up in my email, like Gmail labels, and whenever I come across something that I think is interesting or that someone sends me or that I find, I'll email it and tag it with that label. So I have a label now for show 201. And then the night before the show, that is if I haven't found anything that showed up that I really needed to dig into, which of course can take hours of extra work I Destroying my relationship. I'm watching C-SPAN C-SPAN 1 2 & 3 I'll skim by HLN CNN CNBC MSNBC just to see what they're doing see if I find anything funny I find myself watching less of Fox these days. It's just too annoying for me but C-SPAN I find to be

1:12:39 Just I love it so much it to me that is it is actual entertainment and of course C-SPAN has done a great job with their video library because all you have to do is remember a line that someone said which is typically what I'm looking for. You go to the archive, you type it in search transcripts, it'll search the transcripts and come up with that actual piece of video and cue the video to the spot where the line is. I mean it's amazing what they've done there. It's a very valuable resource and you know the thing is on the weekend they have this, what I really like, I mean I like the regular C-SPAN but on the weekend they have this book TV. Yeah. They bring these various writers in and many of them have written crazy books one way or the other, right wing, left wing, everything. And they sit them down with a guy who really is a good conversationalist or sometimes somebody that's in their same field of study.

1:13:29 And they talk to him for an hour or more, usually an hour, and it's a whole hour and it's basically like books on tape. I mean you get the whole, pretty much the perspective you're looking for. You find everything out from this person. It's just amazing. It's much better than any talk show, Charlie Rose or any of these commercial things. Yeah, and what's nice about that is I kind of know what you're watching. So I know that I don't have to and I must say from time to time it happens every other week probably, either you'll send me, sometimes I send you an SMS, a text message saying, dude, C-SPAN 3 now. Right? And then we'll both sit down and watch something at the same time. This has happened to me that I've been in the car and I get like, C-SPAN 2 now. I'm like, oh crap, but I luckily have the C-SPAN iPhone app and I'll listen to the audio. It's like, it's sickening. We're like the guys from the Muppets.

1:14:21 It's a little crazy. Yeah, it is. But it's not as though, you know, and the funny thing is I don't think when we first began the show that we were going to get so heavily embedded into current events to this extreme. And like somebody says, you know, your show was about you guys going out to dinner and you know, and it was a lot of moments and we still discuss wine and food occasion when it comes up. But instead of sitting around talking about our meal, that people can live vicariously through our steaks and cabernet, that pretty much kind of just went by the wayside. The audience also drove that and and the only way to measure that is by feedback that you get and the growth of the audience and it was pretty clear what people were interested in and they were interested on our take of current events were interested in our unveiling if you will and this is purely because of our experience our unveiling of the bullshit and the I would say the deception of mainstream media

CHAPTER 20 / 53 Discussion

Value for Value Model, NPR Underwriters and Financial Independence

The hosts explain the "Value for Value" funding model, which relies on direct listener donations rather than traditional advertising. They criticize the NPR and PBS model of using "underwriters," which they argue is just a euphemism for corporate advertising that compromises objective reporting. They recount how listeners began sending them money they would have otherwise given to public broadcasting, leading to the show's financial independence.

value for value· npr· pbs· underwriters· donations

1:15:23 And I think it's helped a lot of people see things in a different light and that's what the audience wants. And you know, John, you and I are both in the audience business at the end of the day. Yeah, in fact it is. You can tell by the way people send you notes. I mean, yeah, every once in a while somebody that was there from the original show and they kind of like the fact that we have a wine tip once in a while, which I can still do, or there's some observation we made about the trends in food. That's fine, which is now different than me complaining on the earlier show, the show 200 about the raw milk issues. That's a kind of a foodie thing. But the point is that the people that really got jacked up and the ones that are

1:16:04 pretty much financing the show because they send in big contributions and say wow we like it did the way you deconstruct these stories the way you term apart the way you show us me is a worry when you show me that this that i'm being led astray people it's very valuable for people to have some sense of uh... understanding of what they're being bombarded with so let's look at the when did we start asking for donations that began uh... sometime uh... in 2009, I believe we semi-seriously may have done something in late 2008. And the only reason I can say this, because I can look at the PayPal account since we did it as a PayPal thing, and we did it at the beginning, I think, with trepidation. Not complete trepidation, but I think you may have had a little more than I did, because I've always felt there's a model

1:17:01 of direct support. And I was thinking about this, I have to keep thinking of different arguments because you know the ones that do it the best are public broadcasting and... You're right, that's what it was. We were talking about that and then we were talking about PBS and I said why do those dickheads who are clearly shills, not all and all the time, but Why do they get away with this and why do people support that? It appears that we have a large number of people who like us the same way they either currently do or used to like public broadcasting. Right, and public broadcasting also has the issue with the fact that they have commercials and we really played up a couple of clips that we developed

1:17:48 We found about you know them admitting that there's no under let's play that one because we can't play that enough this was the president of PBS NPR was NPR. Yes NPR being asked about underwriters. Yeah, about their underwriters and how the state of affairs and here was our answer. Okay, moving on to money. How are NPR's corporate underwriting revenues holding up in the recession? And what about foundation grants? Two different stories. Underwriting is down. It's down for everybody. I mean, this is the area that is most down for us, is in sponsorship, underwriting, advertising, call it whatever you want.

1:18:36 Right, call it whatever you want and then I think we started to open people's eyes. This is kind of the way it went. We started to open people's eyes about how it really worked and people were like, wow, you know, Monsanto sponsors this, Archer Daniel Midland sponsors that. And we're like, well, okay, so how about the objective reporting about those companies? Well, there doesn't seem to be a hell of a lot of it. And I think a lot of people, this is maybe how it really started John and I'm just vague on it but is people start to send us like $100 and say well this is what I would have normally spent on PBS, the national treasure. I want to spend it on you. And I think that's where we said oh wait a minute. There's something here. It's an evolutionary show and like with anything in evolution, just a model, it's very difficult to put your finger on a spot. I mean, we can do the weenie and the butt spot and that had some influence and we can point right to it. But the rest of it is always vague because it just kind of evolved. We were actually very, you know, being an open source show, which is another idea that we decided to go with,

CHAPTER 21 / 53 Discussion

Open Source Content, Novelist Business Model and Commercial Breaks

Adam Curry advocates for an "open source" approach to the podcast, allowing anyone to redistribute the content. They compare their donation model to that of a novelist or a church, where the audience provides direct support for the work they value. Both hosts express a long-standing hatred for commercial breaks, which they feel interrupt the creative flow and ruin the quality of media products.

open source· novelist model· commercial breaks· creative freedom· direct support

1:19:37 In other words, we don't care if you steal the show. I actually do remember I was in New York with Mickey and it was winter. It must have been winter 2009. And I remember I called you and I said, you know, hey, this this model that we've been kind of, well, not really working on, but that has evolved. It seems to be working. We should really go for this. We should really try. And I think at that point I said, boy, I would love to do this full time. I would love to do nothing else but this. I enjoy it so much. Well, the model as I remember, I was always for it from the get-go because I've always admired the model itself. I always admired the fact that you can get, if you give people what they want,

1:20:23 You know, essentially, if you're doing it, it's like the Max Headroom thing where they had the direct numbers, you know, the guy was, the show was going downhill, the numbers would go down and you could see it in real time. You can see if we're doing the right thing, if we're doing a good job. uh... it directly it's not as if that is value for value you can't go off the deep and we can turn the show into like an analysis of the sixties music and that's all we talk about for two hours and expect to get any money from anyone so we're only did doing it at the same time we don't obviously don't want to uh... be pushed around by the audience we have to lead them uh... as a as opposed to just doing whatever they want

1:21:03 So you have to have some leadership. This is like a company that you don't focus group everything. Focus grouping takes you, it shows you what they used to like. But if you want to move the show in new directions or try different things, you actually have to experiment with it. But you will get that feedback. You're gonna get a pushback saying, no, this sucks. don't do that again and you know and then the donations go way down. So it's an interesting tightrope walk but it's direct support from the listeners and people have come up with all kinds of different complaints about it. Well, you know, you know, why do I have to spend $100 because I can go see a movie for 50 bucks and they put a lot of money into making those movies and you guys don't put any money into making this show and this is kind of weird kind of complaints about production costs I've been getting every once in a while. And I never had a real good retort for it except, well, it's different. It's like you're paying for books on tape. It's like we're really competing with books on tape. We're not competing with Avatar.

1:22:05 and uh... so i was a little bit about the rules of competing with radio but not in your radio you get twenty two minutes an hour of action well less radio is terrible seventeen minutes of programming in thirteen minutes of commercials you know make your choice Right, and how much is your time worth? So I've used that argument, but then I also found another one which I really haven't exploited on the show, but you know, because people do this production, well it costs a lot of money to make a movie. What about a novel? Novels are one of the first businesses that are directly user supported. Good point. You buy a book. Good point. And you read the book and you've already paid your money, although of course unlike our show, the book you pay in advance for the book.

1:22:48 and you pay in advance for the Avatar movie, you pay in advance for a lot of these things. We don't do that. We're more of the church model where you, you know, if you don't like the sermon, you don't have to put anything in the coffers, but it's the same thing. Books are user-supported. There's no ads in a book. And once you get over the personal hurdle coming from mainstream, where by the way we hate commercials, I've always hated commercials. I hate that's where the GVR is such a godsend. No, but I mean just even as a creative as a creator of content I'm like, oh, you know, I got it. I got to hit the commercial break. I gotta wait for the commercial. Oh, yeah. No, they're terrible. You got us interrupt your flow. Watch one of these shows anyone listening to this on Fox or any place else and they get somebody in a really heated debate, but they're on a hard break. Yeah. Oh, yeah. I've seen this with Tom Brokaw and the president.

1:23:41 And you know and they got some some guys screaming in his ear counting down the commercial and the president's actually just saying something really interesting and It's annoying. It's very very annoying as a creator to go through that but then Yeah, it was kind of weird At least for me it was you know you feel embarrassed to ask people for money and there is a psychological hurdle But once you're over that, you got over it pretty quickly. Yeah, it's easy sailing. I had some pushback from the family.

1:24:16 Psych and I won't say who but they know who they are. Yeah, the comment. How can you bring yourself to begging for money for this? How can you do that? It's been needed. Can't you get some advertisers? I don't want any advertisers if I can get money directly from the listeners. I mean why would I want that? Yeah, it screws up the product. It just ruins the product. I mean there's nobody and the thing is most of the people have not... We've taken it... One of the reasons we do this show and we do this, the money, asking for money and support donations, is because, whatever you want to call it, is because it gets us closer to the audience, it's actually a good close connection, you know what you're getting for your money, it just makes you feel more honest. And there's another thing we did which I know was my initiative and I think it helped us in a number of ways, is we decided to stream it live when we do the show.

CHAPTER 22 / 53 Discussion

Live Streaming, Chat Room Feedback and Professional Podcasting

The decision to stream the show live provided an instant feedback loop through the chat room, which Curry uses for punchlines and real-time links. They distinguish their "Value for Value" system from a simple "tip jar," asserting that they are running a professional-level operation. Dvorak notes that while some listeners suggest getting advertisers, they prefer the honesty and closeness to the audience that direct support provides.

live stream· chat room· instant feedback· religious programming· tip jar

1:23:41 And you know and they got some some guys screaming in his ear counting down the commercial and the president's actually just saying something really interesting and It's annoying. It's very very annoying as a creator to go through that but then Yeah, it was kind of weird At least for me it was you know you feel embarrassed to ask people for money and there is a psychological hurdle But once you're over that, you got over it pretty quickly. Yeah, it's easy sailing. I had some pushback from the family.

1:24:16 Psych and I won't say who but they know who they are. Yeah, the comment. How can you bring yourself to begging for money for this? How can you do that? It's been needed. Can't you get some advertisers? I don't want any advertisers if I can get money directly from the listeners. I mean why would I want that? Yeah, it screws up the product. It just ruins the product. I mean there's nobody and the thing is most of the people have not... We've taken it... One of the reasons we do this show and we do this, the money, asking for money and support donations, is because, whatever you want to call it, is because it gets us closer to the audience, it's actually a good close connection, you know what you're getting for your money, it just makes you feel more honest. And there's another thing we did which I know was my initiative and I think it helped us in a number of ways, is we decided to stream it live when we do the show.

1:25:10 And that did a number of things. One, it gave, at least me, I appreciate the instant feedback loop of the chatroom. Now, I can't watch it all the time, but sometimes a punchline will come through and they're always on a 25-second delay, so it's interesting how that works. But a punchline will come through or someone might drop a link in there. But I personally, even if I didn't have the chat room, just knowing that people are listening live at that moment gives me an energy that I've always loved doing things live. I'm not a big fan of recording. If I have to record something, it's got to be live to tape like I do daily source code, like you do Cranky Geeks, although that's streamed live as well now.

1:25:51 I just want it live, live, live because then you can leave all the warts in there and all the crazy shit and that actually makes it more interesting when it's not highly produced. And it also forces us to kind of, you know, I think before we were doing it live, it's like, hey, what time should we do the show? Well, I got this, I got that. Now it's like, there's my schedule is Thursday morning, I get up at 6.30, i get up and and from then on out it's no agenda sunday morning six thirty i get up from then on out it's no agenda i know i had the same thing said occasionally had to move the show to the wednesday night hasn't we haven't had that in a long time we're gonna have a next month as ever travel things in erupting shows which brings me to but when i finish one more thing about the donations one of the things that we when we went into the donation thing we start asking for for money uh... directs support from the listeners

1:26:46 This has never really been, I've been figuring this out because it's a form of marketing that interests me but one of the things that people say, well you can't make it, I'm sure you're starving to death and you can't do it, why don't you get an advertiser they always say. No one except us And I believe me, I haven't seen anything close and there may be some religious programming that I'm not aware of. But nobody doing podcasting, professional level, good quality podcasting as we're doing, has taken it serious. Yeah. We are seriously, you know, we have programs, we came up with the night thing, we've got a different kinds of this. We also don't call it a tip jar. We don't work for tips. We're seriously doing this and it's like take it or leave it. This is the model we're working with.

CHAPTER 23 / 53 Discussion

Public Service, Competitive Edge and Getting Laid

The hosts believe the show serves as a public service by providing listeners with a "competitive edge" in their daily lives and careers. Dvorak compares this to his old PC Magazine columns, which were designed to make readers smarter than their colleagues. Curry jokes that the ultimate goal is to help the audience "get laid" by making them sound more intelligent and informed in social situations.

public service· entertainment· pc magazine· competitive edge· social enrichment

1:27:33 It's going to be a lot better. The product you're going to get is a lot better. If you get anything out of it, you get something out of it, you know, contribute. I mean, just the way, this is new. Do you feel the show serves as more than just a source of entertainment? If yes, what do you hope to accomplish? Well, first of all, let me say from my perspective, I absolutely see this as a form of entertainment. I hope everyone is entertained by our show. They have to be. If you're not entertained, we have blown it. There has to be a moment where... and entertainment comes in different ways. It can be funny, it can be dramatic, it can be sad, it can be frightening, whatever emotion button we're hitting, it has to be entertainment, otherwise why listen?

1:28:18 I remember somebody sent us a link, well there's a couple people that do a show like yours and they sent us a link to somebody's show that was very much like ours, they deconstructed the news a bit, they tended not to have our perspectives but they did a fairly decent job and it was so dull. they had no it was just like this academic drew you can't get you know it it's just that the modern audience is the modern audience and in no matter how intellectual you might think you are you will be better served by someone who feed you information in a way that that keeps your attention and to keep your attention you have to have an element of entertainment our personalities generally speaking I think are are are are the entertainment

1:29:04 Well, also, and I've only had this one... Well, in my humor, of course. Yes, obviously. I've only had this one other time in my career. Sometimes you just find these magical combinations and it's not by design. You can't train for it. You can't go to school for it. It just happens and you have these combos that just work. and this is one of those that just work in fact my biggest fear now and I know what yours is John, but my biggest fear is you're gonna roll over and die one day and the show will be over and I know you're... I'll give you ten years at least and you're afraid I'm gonna go crazy and leave Mickey and go off the deep end I mean I know what your fear is. That's my thinking yeah I think that can happen any minute. Our Pledge asks on Twitter Mr. DeVarque your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Hey! There's the meme.

1:29:51 Why are you so popular? I think we answered that question just now. Also the No Agenda chat folks wanted the moderator should be invited. They've donated a lot of their time. Well, they're invited to listen to the show when we're done with it. Next time maybe we can do something more for them. This show is the first one in a long time that we're not streaming live, but also this is a different type of show. We're just kind of... So let's answer the second part of that question though. What do you hope to accomplish? What do you hope to accomplish, John, with this show? I think at some... and this is gonna be... this sounds really... this is not gonna sound good. Because it makes you sound... there's a kind of a... you'll see. Let them eat cake. No, no. I think that we... I think... honestly believe that we're doing a serious public service.

1:30:44 to bring people, generally people that are listening to the show. I've always believed this, even when I'm a writer, people always say, well, what do you, when I'm writing like in PC Magazine, when I was writing all those years and Inside Track, I always had a vision of what was I trying to accomplish and what I was trying to accomplish because I knew it would get me more readers. This is a selfish reason, by the way. I knew it would get me more readers. My concept was if I could, if somebody read my column and they're working in a cubicle, and my column was designed to give them an edge over the guy in the other cubicle who wasn't reading my column.

1:31:21 And I've always believed that this is your value proposition, a phrase I hate. But it's one of the things I've always, it's always in the back of my mind. I'm trying to give people some edge over the people who aren't paying attention to me. Oh no, this is basically we want you, the audience, to be able to get laid because you sound smarter listening to us. Exactly. I mean at the end of the day isn't that it? Or a job or a promotion or anything. It can enrich your life because you had that one little bit of information that someone went, oh well that guy said something interesting. Oh she has an interesting take on stuff. And for me it's that, maybe it's just that.

CHAPTER 24 / 53 Discussion

Personal Fulfillment, Hookers and Blow, The Crackpot Shield

Adam Curry expresses deep personal fulfillment in producing the show, stating he feels he was "born to do this." They address listener questions about their "hookers and blow" jokes, with Curry clarifying his views on the sex industry based on his upbringing in Amsterdam. They also discuss the "crackpot" moniker, which they embrace as a "shield" that allows them to speak the truth while being dismissed by authorities as harmless conspiracy theorists.

personal fulfillment· hookers and blow· amsterdam· crackpot· conspiracy theorist

1:32:01 Now this is... For you. No, I'll tell you what it is. This is... I think I was born to do this. I think everyone is born to do something and it took me a long time with a lot of detours and I've been counting down the hits and I've, you know, I've pretended to run companies with varying degrees of success but basically riding off of fame and fortune which in itself is interesting to have a perspective from that angle uh... but this is i love this i'd try so love it and people say man you work really hard to do a lot and we have house guests and the like my god and so is on that thing is editing anys recording stuff is i'd love it and it's not it doesn't even feel like work i'd love this i'd love what we do i'd love what i do but and that's also completely selfish but to get you laid day now they're good actually good uh... works generally are selfish at some level because you are

1:32:57 You know, if you think you're helping somebody, sometimes it's selfish because you get a good feeling from it. That's a selfish thing. Although it wouldn't be defined as such by anybody in their right mind. So let's talk about the open source model for just a second. Well wait, before we do that, since you kind of brought it up, I want to bring in Simon Smith's question from Twitter which says, when you offer relationship advice on NoAgenda, my wife doesn't react well to the hookers and blow angle. Really? She should try it. What does that mean? I don't know. Some people just... You know, we do get... I hear a certain thing... Two things I hear. One is people don't like the hookers and blow because they put some people off.

1:33:39 Okay, that's just who we are I guess and we find it amusing. You know, I don't think John, I've never done blow and I certainly have never done the combination of hookers and blow at the same time. So you admit to doing hookers? Yeah, absolutely. Like you've never done hookers. I don't discuss these things in public. By the way, the hooker situation is a cycle. and the 30s, the 70s, lots of hookers, and so we're going into a new cycle of hookers. You probably were starting around 2012. Let me put it this way. I am not against hookers. I think that there's a lot of bad stuff that happens in the sex industry. But if you know, there's a lot of women who support their children and themselves and if that's what they want to do and it can be done in a safe manner, power to you. I grew up in Amsterdam. I saw it working quite well, thank you. The problem is when it gets driven underground. That's a whole separate show.

1:34:42 So now what was your, right, now what was your point? So the second one, people say, well I try to help people listen to the show but then they hear the opening and the whole in the morning thing and they think it's some BS top 40, you know, weenie in the butt show and then they don't listen. And I actually... I don't know what we can do about that. Nothing, but I actually like it because you have to, once you get over that hump, then you can get kind of sucked in. No, that's also a mask. That's probably important. Can you imagine like some meeting going on at the NSA or the CIA and they're like, yeah, we've got to get rid of these guys. I hear bad things about that Kareem Dabour act. Let's listen to the show. And they hear this whole in the morning bit and like,

1:35:24 that can't be anything. It definitely puts people off. Or maybe Echelon, you know, Echelon is sniffing our show and they're like, oh this can't be interesting. Just what you said, the guy goes into a meeting and says, these guys are subversive, these two guys. And the guy says, really? Well let me hear the show. And then they start playing it with that opening. Get the hell out of my office you crackpot. Get out of here. By the way, that is, now that you mention it, I purposely love, and I don't know who came up with the moniker, but I love being called the crackpot because it is the ultimate shield. The ultimate. Because some of the stuff we say, and I think we get pretty close to the truth on a lot of issues, I would rather people say, ah, he's just a conspiracy theorist, he's just a crackpot, because that will save me from getting killed.

CHAPTER 25 / 53 Discussion

Producer Community, No Agenda Art and Trademark Philosophy

The show relies on a community of volunteer artists, such as Randy Asher and Paul T, who create custom artwork for every episode. The hosts discuss their "post-mortem" process for selecting show titles for SEO and choosing the best art from submissions. They reiterate their anti-trademark philosophy, encouraging fans to create and sell their own No Agenda merchandise without fear of legal action.

randy asher· paul t· no agenda art· seo· trademark

1:36:18 we've talked about that yeah I think it's a good theory and it's a dislikeable theory but the guy you know we shot to track down the guy who could coin crackpot and buzzkill it was an email I got and we mentioned that the next show we mention it and you thought it was great to be called the crackpot yeah I love it and so then we our artwork started to have a crackpot and buzzkill put on it so we just reiterated the whole thing we should so now move into that open source nature of the show so two amazing things which are a part of the model, a part of the openness and the freedom and the support through donations is we don't own anything. I guess technically if you really looked at it we do. But the show is whatever it is. And we have people cutting this up, splicing it, putting it into all kinds of, you know, making

1:37:12 Translating tones making trance music out of it, but we also have people who create things So a lot of our jingles by the way, we could use a lot more and we'd love them But we are very critical. We don't just use everything people send in a lot of people send in stuff that we just feel is not good enough We have artwork and we have two main artists sir Randy Asher and sir Paul T and they you know these guys have jobs they do stuff whatever who knows what they do and and they they spend their time they create artwork for us for almost every single show now there's no agenda art.com where people can drop art and we've used the art from different artists if anything we so after every show people should know we have a discussion so the first thing we say is what do we think of the show

1:38:01 And there's been a couple times we said, well that sucked. And we're pretty brutal with each other, although John never agrees with my criticism of him. If I say, well you sucked on that, he's like, no that was really good. And if you criticize me, you're usually right and I just take it like a man. Ha! So we talk about that and then we talk about... Yeah, essentially it's a post-mortem that most publications do. Yeah, then we'll say what do we call the show? So we think about what will get the best SEO results, what will people be searching, we want all those accidental hits. And then we have to choose from the artwork and that is sometimes the hardest part because it's so good we don't want to have one guy put off over the other guy because they both sent in something great. That's a hard choice sometimes. Yeah, it's amazing. We have, and there's other artists waiting in the wings that contribute on an occasional basis. We have some tremendous support

1:38:59 from these guys and then you know Asher set up his own t-shirt shop in a through I don't know what it what mechanism and you know we have no agenda stuff dot com stuff yeah and that we have you know all these guys and we've encouraged it and we don't we don't have our name trademark somebody came up with an email the other day that sent said I think I got a good promotional idea why don't you trademark in the morning and then every time you hear anybody saying it on any show whatsoever send them a cease and desist order and then they'll promote you and you'll get free publicity. Although it's actually a funny idea but it's not our model at all. It sounds like work and that's one thing we hate. We don't want to do any work. We actually don't want to do anything. We just want to do this show. We don't want to have any extra work. We don't want to do any extra promotion stuff that involves leaving a computer.

CHAPTER 26 / 53 Discussion

Freedom Controller, Structured Data and Automated Show Notes

Adam Curry details the "Freedom Controller," an open-source system built by producer Dave Jones to manage show preparation and notes. The system allows Curry to clip articles, save offline abstracts, and drag-and-drop sound files into a structured outline. This automation turns the preparation process directly into the final show notes, saving hours of production time and enabling searchable archives.

freedom controller· dave jones· open source· structured data· automation

1:39:54 How are we going to interrupt right there and talk about some of the things that we talked about on that show? And then also, we're going to maybe do a little bit of a reiteration of what our comment was two years later, where we corrected ourselves because after two years, from 2010 to 2012, a lot changed. A lot changed. And we're going to discuss a little bit of that and then we'll get back to the show. But let's talk about a couple of things. I wrote down some notes on this. Can I say something first? Sure. I want to thank you for putting up with my shit. We cut the whole middle part stay No, you know what? I mean, you get the viewer insulting in some yes, and then I apologize for that but the one point you said Yeah, we're talking about you know, what is our greatest fear? I'm like, oh, I'm afraid that you know You're gonna drop dead one day and won't have a show and then you and and you were afraid of I would leave Mickey and go crazy and

1:40:49 So you had part of it right? Yeah, you let her make you think she went crazy. Wow, who knew? Who knew? No, but I listen and I'm like, wow man, you know, you certainly, certainly in two, in the earlier part of the sequence of shows that is no agenda, you put up a lot of my crap and I appreciate it. You stuck with me, you hung in there. Well, I knew we had something going and then you had this episode 100 where I wanted to quit Yeah, you actually wanted to quit a couple times. How stupid was that? No, I've got a couple of times Hunter by the way was the deuce club show we did very well we had a lot of support and We're changing our club structure so we can so people can all be the deuce club members will be part of the club Yeah, which we're

1:41:38 figure out somehow a way to put that together shortly. Let's talk about a few of the things that we discussed in the interim that have changed, and one of them was show prep. You had a different way of doing show prep in 2010. You changed it a little bit in 2012, which was then you talked about it. Now your show prep is completely different, to an extreme I'd say. What is it now? Oh, okay. Yes, that's a good question. Dave Jones, who is one of our producers who lives in Alabama. He's a dude named Ben for I think a tax preparation firm, a small or smallish firm. And he and I were kind of working on, Dave Weiner was a big outliner guy, besides working together on podcasting, but he's always been about organizing information and outline. I'm naturally drawn to the idea of

1:42:34 But organizing information and outliner with expanding, you know, trees and you can see what's underneath it. And Dave Jones just on his own time, and this has been going on for I think we're now in our fifth year, have been building the system which we call the Freedom Controller, which is open source, you can download it, run it on your own server, you can do anything, you can replicate everything we're doing. It's, you know, it has documentation too, and updates. Where we have this template for each show that has a lot of the the initial things that are in there But also there's an entire system whenever I see an article That I think is interesting or if you send me a link that there's an article that's interesting I have a bookmark lit on my phone and any any browser I have and it will not only will place that article into an outline into an outline format and also save an offline copy

1:43:26 a stripped down kind of like a... what is that? An abstract. Well, it's just without formatting. It's without the... Okay, unformatted. Yeah. But it has everything in there, including the images. It'll save all of that. And what's cool about it is, you know, I set up all of that. And what's cool about it is, you know, I set up all these topics and then I can drag and drop all the sound files in that we use after the fact. And pretty much the show prep is already the show notes. So when we're done, often we're still doing our post show postmortem and our gossip. And then I'll pretty much I hit publish.

1:44:02 And it turns the show notes, all these topics, and then I can drag and drop all the sound files in that we use after the fact. And pretty much the show prep is already the show notes. So when we're done, often we're still doing our post show, post-mortem and our gossip. And then I'll pretty much I hit publish. And it turns the show notes, all the stuff that we used into the show prep into the show notes. It's a dynamite system. It is one of, for me at least on the production side, it is, it really Really completes the whole product that we're making and because it's all structured data. We've had these great developers who have been able to Create apps, but also the search search dot and a show notes calm all of that flows very easily very Automatically into anything because of the format that it's in that's the main the main difference it also saves me hours and hours of time I can even

CHAPTER 27 / 53 Discussion

Show Day Routine, Improv Performance and Misspelled Clips

The hosts describe their intense show-day routines, with Curry often working until 2:00 AM on analysis and legislation. They emphasize that the show is a "performance art" piece based on improv, with no rehearsals or pre-interviews to maintain natural tension. Curry admits to frequently misspelling clip filenames in his haste, which Dvorak has learned to navigate during their real-time interactions.

show day· improv· performance art· radio cues· file naming

1:45:02 If you send me an email, and I did want to talk about that for a minute, if you send me an email, I put it into a folder on my iMap email system, and then when I'm doing my show prep, usually the evening before the show, I can hit import, and it'll import all of the emails that I've saved, which just have text or something interesting that someone said, and I can go in and edit out any email address or anything I want to. So everything flows into this one system. And it's really dynamite. I think that every podcast should be using it, quite honestly. Well, on the night before, what do you do? You say show prep. This is kind of show prep. Right. So the night before, well, the night before and the morning before, and I don't have to get up as early as you do, but I get up at seven and the show starts at 11 for me, so I have all this time. The night before, that's really when I go crazy just getting as many clips, recording clips, doing as much as I can.

1:45:59 Which will also be intermingled with if I have an analysis of something so if there's a document if there's legislation if there's something else I'll really spend a lot of time the evening before I typically don't go to bed before 1 or 2 a.m. So it's a short night I beg up in the morning and then I had so the clips are kind of all ready to go and then I start organizing all of the topics into the familiar if you'd look at the show notes into all the familiar subheadings of you know of different of different topics that we discuss and And then just before the show, you know, I organized the clips into little folders. You send your clips. I don't listen to them. I just drop them right in. I don't even really look at them at all. If you say you decided not to listen to my clip, I've never listened to it for the purposes of extemporaneous discussion. Surprised. I mean, yeah, that's the way our whole theory.

1:46:50 I think we talk about it on the Twitter. We do. Our whole theory is, and this is based on a lot of different things we both experienced, is the pre-interview and the rehearsal. If you do that, you kill it. The life is drained from a show like this if we rehearsed. So it's done as a performance art, it's done like improv. And a lot of people are surprised by it because we're so good working together, which is the reason I think you like working with me, is that I am fairly good, I'm not as good as I could be at cuing you.

1:47:25 So I'd be saying something and it's a cue for a clip, you'll be looking for the clip. And then I say, and then you can't believe what he said. Boom, the clip starts playing. And that's all this engineering talent that you have and your ability to do that is why it surprises people. We talked about this off the air. about how we do have a lot of radio people that listen to the show. Oh, they think we have a whole staff and we have messaging lights and that you're starting clips or people have no idea. I want my morning show to sound like that. I said, well, good luck with that, buddy. That's not going to happen. So it's all single handed, which is and slick. We do drop the ball occasionally and something. I just have to stop the clip because I didn't set it up completely. And Adam's jumping the gun. And sometimes you heard a cue when there wasn't one there.

1:48:13 Or you'll be talking about a clip and I'm like, what is it? But then instead of digital, it'll be digital. You play the wrong clip on occasion. You just misspell clips sometimes. Well, no, not sometimes. Often. I have a tendency to when I'm doing the clips, I just type something in that I think I'm hitting the right keys and off it goes and then I never edit it so it goes into something. Because I have your clips alphabetically. The story about Jordan could be Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P-Y-J-P- Jadon, STY, TSORY, something. I've learned to work around it. I know, that's why, in fact, if you hadn't learned to work around it, I'd probably put more effort into making the spelling correct. There's something else that has changed in the interim since our last, since 200.6. Podcasting has seen a resurgence.

CHAPTER 28 / 53 Discussion

Resurgence of Podcasting, Linear Media Constraints and The Intercept

The hosts discuss the mainstream media's "resurgence" in podcasting, noting that traditional broadcasters often struggle with the format's lack of linear constraints. They contrast their own flexible show lengths with the rigid 59-minute slots of NPR or the "eyes-glazing" long-form posts of The Intercept. They argue that while they have no hard breaks, they still "edit in real time" by moving between topics naturally.

linear media· npr· the intercept· word count· editing

1:49:12 Yeah, the mainstream media picked it. I think about this, and I'm sure you do too, but it's almost as if the mainstream media and the broadcast media, the radio people for sure, have said, somebody finally came into a meeting and said, you think that these guys could actually replace us because they don't have really the overhead we have? Right. Well, we can do podcasting too. That's right. The union said, oh no, oh no. So they start doing podcasting and all of a sudden they're interested and so they write articles about it. Yeah. Of course, we're generally, even though we're, I'd say pioneers having going on our eighth year, we never get mentioned in these articles. Just they mention each other. Oh, PBS has got a podcast about gemstones. Yeah. Well, but the big difference, and this is something that we just naturally understood and have done from day one, radio or television, any type of linear media

1:50:10 They always do 59 minutes and 58 seconds. It's going to be exactly an hour. Everything is back times. In fact, if you look at scripts, even for podcasts that NPR does, it's the script that has The the seconds next to it so each line is a separate right you know what I mean Chris And and we don't have to worry about the next show we don't have to worry about hitting a sponsor break No heartbreak no heartbreaks. No news if we can go as long as when we can start over the hour now We can start whenever we want and no traffic on the eight or the yes or the threes or the sixes and we take it we Have from the get-go

1:50:52 So, seeing that I think is completely liberating. Like, oh, I could, you know, I can just talk until either... That race is over. Yeah, well, until we both know that it's time or, you know, or it's boring when we call each other. You call me out more often than I call you out, but, you know, it's good. And I like the raw nature of it. I feel that people are...we've always felt this, that people are so tired of the pro-formulaic way that programming is put together. We mock it. We do. Every once in a while we catch a Democracy Now! where the guy says, well, the worst thing about this is that they're gonna have a meeting tomorrow and then, Bob, we gotta get...sorry, we're done for today. We'll talk to you later. Sorry. Yeah, got to go. Just when it's getting interesting. Exactly.

1:51:37 This happened in writing media too, as a columnist. When you're writing for print, generally speaking, you write to a number. So they want 650 words, you try to get 635 to 650, 660 maybe, and they cut out stuff, put something in. Or they just pad. But you trade, because there's a spot there, the thing is going to appear in it, and it's only so much. area, and so you have to write the numbers. And there's different styles, you can do 500-word essay, 650-word essay, 750s, 1200, they're all pretty standard. After years and years of doing it, in your brain, it's astonishing to do. You can go right to 650 and stop it, and you do a word count, boom, 650. Well, with the internet, that ended.

1:52:31 Again, it's liberating, because now you maybe want to ramble a little bit. So it goes to 752. It has these different numbers. It could be anything you wanted to, because there's no real page layout that you have to worry about. I was amused by one of my editors, I think he was at PC Computing for a number of years, John Zilber, who became a PR guy later. But he used to be one of these guys, and I think this is the drawback. he would start writing and because there was no end, he would just go crazy. He'd write 7,000 words on something. Well, but this is also a problem. And so if you look at the Intercept, which is the $250 million WordPress blog from Pierre DriveMyCarMedia,

1:53:10 They don't have editors and it goes on so long that you just your eyes glaze over like I can't read anymore I'm so tired of it and we don't allow that to happen Because we we stop each other either naturally just subtly we go into another topic We are editing either at the same time in real time that said when we did show 200.5 which people have heard or heard a half of so far and We do discuss, oh the show an hour and a half, you know, oh, we can't, I think we ended it with saying something like, oh I knew it, we couldn't go under an hour and a half or two hours or something that's like a joke now.

CHAPTER 29 / 53 Discussion

Episodic Memory, Benghazi Thesis and Conceptual Art

As the show has matured, the hosts have moved toward "deeper digs" into complex subjects like the Benghazi kidnapping thesis. They acknowledge that the show's artwork has evolved from simple photos of the hosts to sophisticated conceptual art by contributors like Martin JJ and Nick Durant. They also reflect on how their show length has naturally increased as the availability of online material has grown.

episodic memory· benghazi· hilda knowlton· martin jj· nick durant

1:53:50 Yeah, why is that? Well, I think we do deeper digs. I think that's part of it. The digs are deeper on the material. I think there's a shallowness to some of those earlier shows when we'd come up with stuff and it wasn't as interesting. And that's also just the amount of material available on the internet. That has helped us tremendously. People publishing stuff everywhere. It's great. We have, each of us have our little list of things we want to talk about on each show And many times complimentary, sometimes not. And it drags on and it goes... Too long. We're shooting for $245. That's what we try. But I can imagine five years from now, making tons of money. We're going to go to sleep for a moment. We'll be right back. Producers in five hours. No, it's not going to happen. I think we've decided

1:54:41 Although I say we may have decided before we were going over three hours on a lot of shows yeah, that was I felt that when people were gonna listen that long and It was dragging on and sometimes the material could have been cut down and just certain things We didn't need to talk about so here is the the challenge in a way, but also it's a benefit We are episodic And this is why even though we, I think, discourage it mainly, people want to hear all of what we've said in a previous episode so that because we do reference things and I'm getting better at saying, hold on a second, let's just explain what this is also for ourselves. Right. I do that too. Yeah.

1:55:25 I've gotten this way, I've gotten better at it. Just to stop and say, okay, this is where this comes from. You're talking about something from a year ago. I mean, we've had to re-discuss the Benghazi thesis, which was a failed kidnapping attempt. Right. Other things that we've come up with over the years. In fact, there was something in show 200.5 where we mentioned that Hilda Knowlton was behind the whole farming thing, and I forgot all about that connection. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, let's go over some more stuff on the list here. You made a big deal about me handing you DVDs that were highly produced and very pretty. And we don't do that anymore. With labels, no, we don't do that. That's done. Well, we also don't see each other anymore. Right, we don't see each other anymore, even though I'm gonna head down there. Oh, don't threaten me. We just talk about three shows a week, and we actually, I think it was last year, we did a third show for the purposes of another vacation.

1:56:23 And so we did a show, if you remember, and we were so tired from doing that third show that there's no way...now when we were doing an hour and a half, we thought it might be a good way to divide it up. It would give us three, four and a half hours a week of material over three shows. But it turns out that when we're talking about something, we can't keep it down to an hour and a half. It's just not possible. So the three show things fell by the wayside. It was never... It's just not a good idea because you just don't have enough... Even the Friday, Saturday before we do the Sunday show, it's tight but that was chosen specifically because Friday is when the throwaway news is put out there that you're really not supposed to know but it's put out there because they need to publish something and that's why I personally I catch a lot of stuff on the Friday afternoon news cycle if you will.

1:57:09 And then I thought it was funny we had a discussion of the artists who at the time were Randy Asher and Paul T, the dominant artists. This is during the era when we actually would allow our pictures of the two of us to be on the artwork, which we now is banned. And because it was just, it just wasn't good. The art has really become conceptual. It's much more advanced than that. So good. Well, beside that, or in addition to that, the productions that people are making, and again, I'm going to say this is also Moore's Law, just better computers and editing, etc.

CHAPTER 30 / 53 Discussion

Studio Atmosphere, Moving Blankets and Microphone Mods

Adam Curry describes his preference for a "dark, dingy cave" studio atmosphere, using heavy moving blankets to deaden room echo. Dvorak discusses his use of a CAD 3000 microphone from China, which was recommended by a professional microphone "modder." They compare their different recording environments, with Curry seeking a "night disc jockey" vibe and Dvorak allowing for more natural room ambience.

studio setup· moving blankets· cad 3000· microphone mods· michael joly

1:57:47 We now have entire songs mashup stuff put in the right key. I mean really top-notch stuff that when I was working in Top 40 hit radio B we would contract with people who would do that for a living and then typically they'd make something or a spoof song and they'd send it to 20 stations and get you know bit because they're all in the payroll we have people doing such our producers doing such high quality work it's really astounding some of the stuff that we receive and use on the show and Right, I think that's a function of our open source nature and the volunteer nature of the show, which is unique. We did discuss a little bit about how the funding works. There was one part of the conversation I thought was interesting and wasn't really explored, but I like a brightly lit room, and Adam, do you still like a dark, dingy, kind of cave-like atmosphere when you do the podcast? Yes, yes I do. Why is this?

1:58:44 I don't know. I think I explained it previously. I can't read in the dark. You're reading stuff all the time. Yeah, but I'm reading the screens. You read off paper, I read off screens. For me, it's a romantic... It's part of our... Okay, for me, it's part of the theater of the mind. I like to be closed off. The dark room. Yes. Well, back when I was smoking, and I smoked continuously during the show, I only needed a green visor and then I would have been set. I'm sitting here with a single light bulb somewhere. So now actually it's in the second bedroom is the studio and I have one of those big heavy moving blankets, you know the kind.

1:59:32 Yeah, accumulate after many moves then it's on to it's on a wall No, because I'm facing the window the shades are drawn on the window and then this big black moving blanket is in front of mainly for noise Of course for the you know, so I don't have an echoey sound to make it a little deader in the room yeah, but it also really, you know brings down the Ambient light I like it. It's just what I've always I've always romanticized I've always wanted to be the night disc jockey even though that's where the shit the closure you Nouncing to your mouth close over your mouth and a close-up of the microphone your lips come close to it Yeah, and it's a baby. Hey, man. It's raining outside. This is driving in a car with the windshield wipers going back and forth I do you on the radio. This is the night owl. I'm telling you what's going on. We play another set of Led Zeppelin from beginning to end

2:00:19 Yeah, that's my romantic nature. Well, you know, whatever works. I, on the other hand, have thought about deadening up the room because I know that when you have a dead room, you have a nice sound. But I don't. I let the ambience do its thing and I don't know that it hurts that much. I play the mic pretty close so I'm not like too concerned about it, even though it's not as directional. as the Heil PR 40. And what are you using now? I'm using a CAD 3000 from China. China. I know. Yeah, nice. I know. Nice. I'm using my, I'm using the Rota. I've changed. I'm using the Rota Procaster. I'm a close miker. I like to spit in the mic. Yeah. Well, I use this mic because I was doing research on mods and I do have a mod mic, which I use for quite a while. The, the Jolie mic.

2:01:07 which has modded everything, the whole thing is just a completely remake of a Chinese mic, which is what these modders love to do. And so I ran into this one guy who's a major, major modder, and he likes to fix mics and do crazy things, but he claims that a lot of things people do, especially removing the capsule, is just a waste of time, you just want to deal with the electronics. And so I asked him specifically, well you do a lot of mods, what is the best mic Made in China period you didn't have any idea. He says he named this Mike, huh? He says this is the best Mike he's ever seen coming out of China It's an American company, but it's Chinese Mike is it the one in California? Cad cat no cat is in the Midwest I believe okay

CHAPTER 31 / 53 Discussion

Noise Gate Philosophy, Digital Silence and The Abyss Look

The hosts discuss the technical philosophy of using fast-acting noise gates to create "digital silence" when neither host is speaking. Curry explains how he helped fellow podcaster Andrew Horowitz set up a similar system for the DH Unplugged show. Dvorak compares the "dead" audio sound to the "Abyss" visual style used by Charlie Rose, which utilizes black velvet to create a void-like background.

noise gates· digital silence· charlie rose· the abyss· dh unplugged

2:01:54 something audio devices and I think they're in Indiana. I don't remember, but the mic is Chinese mic and it looks like a Chinese mic and we listened to all these mics and you have to have final approval on the mic and you said that mic sounds terrific. And so I've kept this mic and I've been using it with a spit screen. And I'm very happy with the sound of it. And it's a good mic, it's got three, it's got like, it's got a figure eight pattern, it's got capsules in front and back, it's got a nice overall, I think the build is nice. And it was 200 bucks. Nice. Well, here's a little thing I'll just point, just show everyone how it works. I'm big on noise gates, I believe if you can't afford

2:02:38 the NPR-like studio, which is really dead. And I read an article recently about the sound. There's a whole philosophy behind it. So you need to have a very fast acting noise gate so that when you're talking you can hear the... And when I'm talking, when you're talking, you can hear there's ambient noise, especially if you have your window open or if you have a fan on or anything like that. So I'll just turn yours off right now and return mine off. And people who are listening to the show, I even have a low rumble coming from somewhere. It's so different. We sculpt the sound to what we want it to be. Yeah, curiously Horowitz has a noise kit that he uses when we do the Horowitz show DH Unplugged. Is that recent?

2:03:25 It's pretty recent. He actually took over. He called me and he said, I want to set this up. And I walked for like two hours. I walked him through what he needed. And it was kind of like, you know, helping the stewardess land the 747 in a way on the phone. Turn the noise gates back on. Hold on. Yes. And and I said, you want a noise gate, man, you really want this because it just enhances the closeness and the, you know, the personal nature of the sound. And I like it when it's completely dead and I love the fact that we have silence from time. We talked about that on... Yeah, you did. Yeah, you harped on it really. I like it. I like it. Yeah, I like it. People did... It jars people awake. I actually like the dead room sound. I mean, I don't mind the NPR sound. But it's as good as a noise gate. The NPR sound is dead.

2:04:12 It's totally dead and I know how to do that sound and we had the Cranky Geek show and it was being produced in San Francisco. We had the black because I wanted the abyss look. It's a look I like on TV because it's cheap and it works and it's I don't know why it's not used more. than a busy set. Charlie Rose is the best user of the abyss. So you're in a big black room, it's actually a form of black velvet that the camera can't pick up where it is. It's like magicians use it constantly so you can't figure out where the mirrors are. Where the rabbit's coming from. And where the rabbit's coming from. it also deadens the room if it's in far enough. So you can get a very... Nice sound. You can use the cheapest microphone and you sound pretty good. What was interesting is when I, before I disclosed what had happened with my personal life, I was in this apartment and I didn't have any stuff. I had nothing. I didn't even have the moving blankets. And a number of people said, hey, what's going on? I hear something. Something is different about the sound. Wow. Yeah, it's, you know, a stick.

CHAPTER 32 / 53 Discussion

Infrastructure Support, Soundbyte Software and The Wiki Page

The show's technical infrastructure is maintained by volunteer "CISOPs" like Void Zero (Ben), who manage bandwidth and streaming. Adam Curry reveals he uses "Soundbyte" software by Black Cat Software on an original iPad to trigger his soundboard and jingles. They also briefly discuss the No Agenda Wiki, which serves as a repository for the show's various memes, jingles, and host biographies.

void zero· soundbyte· black cat software· no agenda wiki· infrastructure

2:05:17 Stick noticed it. Huh. Yeah. Well, anyway, back to the question, especially the list cost of producing. Somebody brought that up and there was no real answer. I mean, we do have to pay for bandwidth now and it's not cheap. And again, we have void zero. Sir, 19-inch rack. Yeah, and he does the heavy lifting for... He's the CISOP that's super talented. Dude named Ben. Yeah, he runs the infrastructure. Of course, we do have to pay for it, but he's come up with... This is a legacy from the No Agenda Stream folks, Mr. Oil. When they set all of that up, they were thinking of starting a business and that didn't really pan out, but we were very happy to assume what they...

2:05:58 had created and Mark does that for us out of love for the show. We love him for it. And his partner Iris, who when he was in the hospital, she was running, he had given her instructions, she was making sure everything was working, making sure the stream was up and changing stuff and this is cool. Now on my list here I have an anomaly that I spotted. I don't know why, I don't know that I noticed this in 2006, but the 2006 200.6 show. You said something about how we promote or something and then you said, I said something about why I tell people to go to the No Agenda wiki page.

2:06:40 And then you went kind of like, why? Why are you sending people to that? With that voice even, I remember. It could have been. And it was like I was befuddled by this because it's always been a good page. It has a rundown of some of the basics of the show. And one time when they edited it down to next to nothing, I bitched and somebody put all the good stuff back up there, which is the meaning of the jingles and the memes and the rest. But I was kind of befuddled by your response to that. And then you, I think it was because that was the era when you were irked about somebody messing with your personal homepage or something. It had nothing to do with anything I was talking about. Remember that? Yeah, I also remember that luckily they put our height on the wiki page. Yeah, you were talking about that. I don't know if that's still up there. I know it was humorous height. It was like

2:07:29 I don't know. Four feet and 500 inches or something. Five foot 17. Yeah, yeah. I don't know. I like, I just want people to listen to our show and as witnessed by our great websites, we really don't care much. Other than get the show and if you want to go to the show notes, they're detailed and you can get to them Then they're indexed and I just like it when still you type in no agenda into a search engine You the first couple of pages are our seven. It's at seven now. That's great Ben seven for a while, right? And there's somebody everyone's was something sneaks in is always galling when you see that some It's been a while since I've searched for our... Manny Pacquiao says he has no agenda and to fight, you know, something. Oh, okay. All right, all right. I gotcha. I gotcha. Yeah, that kind of thing. Do we really have anything? I do have a couple of questions myself. Do you still use that Soundbyte software? I do. Yes, I do. So it runs on my original iPad 1, Wi-Fi only.

2:08:27 and you run a little program on the computer. One of these days I will publish the whole setup. It's just, I want to do it with... But you've been saying that for years. It's because I need someone to come... This is my vinegar book. I'll put it over here on the list. Okay, yeah, we'll see who releases it first. The vinegar book or the sound setup. But it's really it's nice to have a number of go-to things and then say one two three four five one two three There's 50 clips that we use regularly which includes for instance the you know This may be for some people interesting. So we do the birthday song

CHAPTER 33 / 53 Discussion

Soundboard Tour, Jingle Origins and The Deducing Song

Adam Curry provides a tour of his digital soundboard, playing various "beds" and "rim shots" used to pace the show, including the birthday song and the "New World Order" clips. They discuss the origins of popular jingles like "Karma" and "Deducing," noting that many were created by anonymous listeners. Dvorak highlights his favorite clips, such as "Two to the Head" and the various "Science" stings.

soundboard· jingles· karma· douchebag· two to the head

2:09:03 So that's pretty much one bed and it goes on and on and on. And then when it's time for me to end that, I start the second one and then I just stop the first one. So you can make it as long as you want. I'm not really that talented that I can fit everything into these pre-produced beds all the time. This is the main thing. And then I do time this to say, you know, this is episode 7, 3, 6. This is no agenda. And then that ends. And then there's a second one that I start here, which is this. And that just goes on and then you come in and whenever you're done and you say I'm John C. Dvorak, then I hit. So that's all just a standard radio. The second part was an extension of the first. That's interesting. I didn't know that. It's funny. Things you don't need to know. I don't need to know and I don't want to know.

2:09:52 What other questions did you have? Well, now that we're here in this segment, before we go back to the show, I think you should play us one of the things that we've done only recently, but Adam, I encourage him to do these medley of clips at the end of the show. So it makes the show kind of, you know, it's like the dessert the way I see it. and people you know they give you a list of the whole show them as a get a kick out of some of the clips why don't you play as like about which is present a shot at that long ones but i have all the short clips you can you can quickly get to say you got your little push button device there again but that's those could be short clips of the longer clips of the short ones ok just i want you to just run down top what's right on the thing right there go ok

2:10:36 That's the news flash sound effect. We have the this of course when we always tell people to go out and hit people in the mouth which is also two clips. Got that one. And then the second part of that clip is this one. It's the New World Order stuff. And then I might add this in. That's all separate. The Hey Citizen. We have the... I have a ding. You have a bell. I have a digital bell. See, my bell is this. And then we have our phone call whenever we do a little phone call bit. We have that. We have... We have this one. We have your favorite.

2:11:27 And then we have the two to the head of course, we have this one. Then I have three science clips, so the longer one is... So we have the science ISOed. Or we have the science is in and then of course we have our standard Got the Spanish Got Chinese got French German we got of course a new entry a man this month, of course Not to forget

2:12:13 We have... You've been deduced. And of course we have the karma jingle there as well. You've got karma. And then there's a few small ones like, uh, what do we have? We have this one. You can take that to the bank. We got that. Uh, not often used but when used it's always, it's always appropriate. John C. DeVore acts pet peeve of the day. And that's probably about half of them. Who did the de-douching one? I have no idea. We should give her him as a... Obviously, female voice. She may have produced it or somebody else may have produced it. We need to give whoever it is credit someday because I forgot who that was and when it came in. I really don't. Many of these things we should... And we've talked about this, I think, in the 2000.5 but not emphasized it. Most of the show's direction has been

CHAPTER 34 / 53 Discussion

Knighthoods, The Night Network and Global Recognition

The hosts discuss the "No Agenda Knighthoods," a merit-based system for high-level donors that parodies the British honors system. Dvorak argues that their knighthoods are just as valid as those granted by the Queen of England and suggests creating a "Night Network" iPhone app for exclusive communication among knights. They note the diversity of their knights, which includes doctors, dentists, and lawyers.

knighthoods· queen of england· night network· iphone app· meritocracy

2:13:06 From the producer listener they have pushed the show in a certain direction the douchebag thing we never called anybody a no shag No, no, they called each other douchebag and then somebody came up with the damn jingle Yeah, and and then the deducing jingle came after that we had nothing that was not an invention by us most of the stuff We invented the producership idea the club now coming up in the night was a these are but this is kind of meta. This way the show flows is largely promulgated, I would say, or pushed along by the...

2:13:42 people who listen to the show and produce it and and come up with stuff they come up with all kinds of things and Good things and there's a lot of stuff that isn't all that well I want to say when we do our final segment I have a couple things about how you can best Interact with us and how you can help us when you want to as a producer if you want to add something obviously not just the financial part But there are some things that would be very helpful for me. Certainly. I'm trying to find this one producer Who has made, who has done a lot of these jingles and I was, this is the problem. Well I will mention here, since it needs to be mentioned, I don't think it was really mentioned that much in 2002, I know I keep saying 2000, 200.5 or 6.

2:14:24 We'd still need donations even though we're doing this show, so if you would go to devorak.org slash NA, I think it would be appreciated. And we will have people who have given producer and executive producer amounts to the shows to mention when we're done on our little vacation moment. There is of course one jingle I didn't play which is also on the soundboard. Also don't know who made that. And let's go back to show 200.5. I, although I think we discussed it, I think you're the one that probably pushed the idea. Probably the name of a knighthood is probably what I, my contribution. Well, the knighthood thing, I'll tell you, one of the, one day, and I've said this, I've done this with everybody who knows me will have heard this probably at one time or another, and I know I ran it past Adam. Every time some American, and I think it's supposed to be illegal to receive a knighthood from the Queen, but they do.

2:15:35 Anyway, every time somebody says, why is, what's the queen, what's so special about England that they're granting knighthoods? Why don't we grant knighthoods? Right. Why can't we just grant, why can't anybody, why can't Ford Motor Company grant knighthoods? What difference does it make? Yeah, that's good. So ours are just as good as the queen's. I think so. And I think we have a better group. That's for sure. The knights that have been on our list are, they're fantastic people. Every one of them. I have a plan by the way. of making a night iPhone app that will only be for nights and it'll be limited for a number of reasons but it'll only be for nights and and it'll be like our our communication model like a network a night network no that's a good idea yeah I think it'd be kind of fun and and we did like a bat signal I still want a bat signal we're gonna need it one of these days well we've got a lot of professional people in the knighthoods we don't have a doctor we have a dentist do we have a lawyer

CHAPTER 35 / 53 Discussion

Marketing Strategy, Church Models and Motivation

John C. Dvorak, drawing on his background in direct marketing and public radio, explains how he uses "church" and "PBS" models to drive show promotions. They discuss how they monitor listener numbers and donor reports to gauge the show's health. Curry admits that while low donations don't make him less excited, they do motivate him to "deconstruct" the product and improve the next episode.

marketing· church model· direct marketing· motivation· donor reports

2:16:35 Oh, you know, that's a good question. We need a lawyer. That's what you need, right? You need a doctor. We need a lawyer. We need a butcher. Yes, hell yeah. A farmer. We need someone to do the farm. What drives the new promotions? That's a good question. It depends on how you interpret it, of course. And I will say all the emails, promotion ideas, John does all of that. I do the production of the show. John does all of that stuff. Yeah, I'm the marketing guy. Mainly because I've always admired certain forms of marketing that are very rarely executed by the general public and by that I mean, or by general companies or little operations like ours. And by that I mean PBS and religion, churches.

2:17:26 Because the model is so interesting that you get people that like you so much because you're doing something for them and that's what PBS and churches are perceived as doing. One's giving you, helping you spiritually and the other one's educating you out of mainstream media supposedly. They're a model for getting money. By the way, I have a background in public radio. I had a couple of shows, two different shows that were on public radio for almost 10 years. about computers and I saw the mechanism how it works and how much money they get and all the rest of it and I always said you know why you know why does it just have to be those two groups and then of course the publishing you know the those direct payment for a novel is a different kind of a thing. Why are these the only two groups that are using this model

2:18:18 a and and does anyone know is that they're actually pretty successful with this mileage it will thank you there's some churches out there that have you know it not counting the mega churches but but some decent size churches maybe two thousand to three thousand parishioners and they got the guy who with a cadillac in a big house and they got plenty of money and it's only like two thousand people that are supporting this the entire parish and it's like uh... Does anybody notice that this looks like, of course the tax-free thing doesn't hurt the guy, but it's like obviously it's a model that works and people don't mind the model. I mean we're not getting knighthood donations because people think this is a dumb idea. So anyway, so I do the promotions. I come up with them every once in a while.

2:19:04 one comes forward and says, well here's an idea, this is what people would like. It's kind of like selling the dream kind of thing, I'm not sure. I used to be in direct marketing. I say that when people ask me about this, I say, look, we have a church and our religion is the truth, or as close as we can get to it. There's that element. I think, you know, we seem to offend a few people if we go off the deep end with the church angle, but the fact of the matter is we do the thing on Sunday morning and I'm sure a lot of people don't go to church and listen to us instead. or football. It would be interesting to see what, since we're in full tilt here trying to maximize our incomes, it'll be interesting to see what the drop-off is on listenership on the live stream during the football season. Oh, interesting. And by the way, we do look at that kind of stuff. We look at all the numbers, we keep track of stuff. Eric likes to dream up weird reports and we look at them and we know where we're headed and we're doing fine.

2:20:04 doing well enough that we can quit and do this full-time and and you know that's which is okay being in a struggling situation is not a bad thing and the show I think is sound if I can say it. Is it harder to be excited for the next show if donations are down on the previous show? It is for Adam. That's not true. It's not like I'm less excited. You said so once no and then you misinterpreted what I said what I what I meant was first of all it bums me out because I take that as a as a direct result of the program of the product that we produced It bums me out. Yeah, it bums me out doesn't make me less excited. No it motivates me it gets me motivated to do a better show

CHAPTER 36 / 53 Discussion

Teammate Dynamics, Scoring Goals and Sincere Praise

The hosts analyze their on-air relationship, describing it as a "teammate" dynamic rather than a "father-son" one. They admit to a healthy level of competition, where each host tries to "score a goal" by bringing a superior story or analysis. Dvorak notes that he only gives Curry "kudos" when he knows he cannot top the information Curry has presented.

teammate dynamics· competition· praise· father-son relationship· dominance

2:20:50 And we deconstructed and John by the way, you got to know this he's like like the horrible uncle you never wanted He'll send you notes like well that thing you did that made donations drop through the floor as horrible And I know and it took me like two months to figure out that this is just writing that just to piss me off No, I was writing it for a good reason because I believed it to be true It's the way you write it. It's like, oh, sorry, sorry, grandpa. Yeah, sorry. Don't be such a dick. I suppose I should put a bunch of smiley faces and that would make you happy. Yeah, good. This is what I love about you. What is the single most enjoyable element of the show for each of you? Hmm. That's a great question. And I don't like saying the term a great question, but it's a thoughtful question. Maybe if you think, what do we like to, I think when the show ends,

2:21:48 I think... Ours. First of all, there is no element in the show. I think that's... we have no fixed elements. The only thing that's fixed is donations. uh... and we do that about an hour and forty five minutes to an hour yes and we've talked about that because we we know is the donations fall off if we push the thing off to near the end because a lot of people to be honest about do not listen to the entire show yeah i agree i get a lot of emails from people like can we just we just did that two weeks ago but how can you send me this email and yeah i agree a lot of people don't get to the whole show which by the way it's ok

2:22:24 It's okay. And for people who listen, who are like, oh, that was, you know, this is what I love. This fast forward. You can fast forward through something you think is boring. I guarantee you'll be backing up. I think so too. For me, wow, this is going to sound kind of weird. Most enjoyable, personally enjoyable. I like it when I have either an article or a clip and I get praise from you. Yeah, I'll do that because I actually keep a running score, but it's just for me. I know you're paying attention to it. And I'll score a goal for you when you hit one that completely catches me flat-footed, I got nothing on it, maybe my take is even wrong because your take is better.

2:23:13 and it's interesting. So I give you a kudo right on the spot, and it's sincere by the way, and I usually only do it when I know I can't top you. You can actually come up with something that's better than where you got the kudo, something really stunning, but I know I've got a topper. Yeah, and so I won't give you the kudos in so that's kind of interesting. Do we have a weird father-son relationship? No, no, it's not. No, it's as a teammate relationship where you're trying to compete for that position of you know dominance, okay? Yeah, I think it's a team It's a team orientation where the two guys are working to win But you know but but you want to be the guy that does okay if you score the goal

2:23:54 Yeah, you scored the goal, okay, you scored the goal, next time I'll score the goal, you prick. Yeah, that's a good analysis. The father and son thing doesn't work that way because father and son would be more patronizing. I'm not patronizing, I'm straightforward about it. That's true, that's true. I'll give you that. I know how much you'd like that to be the case, but no. Not gonna happen. I don't think so. I got a little thing here, a little aside. I had Eric run the numbers on which country listens to us and where we get most of our support from. That is a question.

CHAPTER 37 / 53 Discussion

Global Listenership, Australian Support and The Danish Anomaly

A breakdown of global listenership reveals that while the United States is the primary source of support, Australia ranks surprisingly high as the second-largest donor base. The hosts speculate that this is due to the high level of media suppression in Australia. They also note anomalies, such as high listenership in Denmark with low financial support, and a lack of engagement from Poland despite frequent show coverage.

australia· netherlands· canada· denmark· poland

2:24:30 and here's the answer. I'm going to do it because I have the numbers and you don't so this is my rare opportunity to make you do what we do on the show quite a bit which is make the other person guess knowing full well that they'll never guess it correctly and it's just kind of a stalling tactic but guess who's number one? Now is this in total amount of donations? This will be both donors and amount but it's going to go by the total amount but it turns out the numbers match pretty well with the It's one to one pretty much with the donors and totals. I will say that the Netherlands is very high on the list. Who's number one? Oh please! Well, number one's got to be America. Of course, by a factor of nine. Yeah. Alright, so now it gets interesting. Number two, and before you answer, I'm going to tell you right now, you're not going to get it.

2:25:29 Australia? Oh, jeez, you got it! Yes! He shoots, he scores! Oh, man. No, I knew Australia had to be really high. I shouldn't have given you the tease. No, no, I knew it. I knew this because, I mean, we've had... I track it kind of in my head. I'm like, man, I get stories. The Aussies are... They're really into us. But don't mess with them, man. These guys will mess you up. and they don't like what's going on and I can almost guess by which country is the most suppressed. So of course America wins and then Australia and I think the Netherlands has got to be third or fourth on the list. No actually, the Netherlands actually comes in sixth.

2:26:15 It goes like this, United States, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and Netherlands. The UK as well of course. I actually thought the Netherlands would come in a little higher. Yeah, so did I. But no. And Belgium? The reason is because the Netherlands, the guys who do contribute to the show are from Belgium. They're aggressive. Right. You know, Pell's mockers, all he's in Belgium. He's in Belgium. Yeah. Yeah. Well, Belgium comes in. Then it comes Germany, Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Mexico.

2:26:54 And then we have an anomaly with Japan, which has very few people listening, but they give a lot of money. And same with Hong Kong, that's where all the money is. Then we got Spain, Italy, France, Denmark is actually higher, but they don't give any money. They're like, they're cheap. Cheap. The damn Danes. Yeah, the Danish are obviously cheap. And then Poland, which is like, that doesn't count. The non-English speaking countries, it doesn't bother me. So this is very interesting for the amount of, that's really interesting, for the amount of time we spend on or have spent on stories about Poland.

2:27:32 They're way down on the list. Oh, they're way down. The amount of time we spend on the UK and Australia, that's about right. Yeah. And Canada, we probably should do more on Canada. Yeah, the Canadians are starting to complain about it. and the right and you know it's easy enough to do i mean it's kinda hard to beat this hour has twenty two minutes or anything to show is that uh... nails and constantly we got some support in singapore i mean almost every country's estonia dominican republic malaysia qatar israel one person but for our wishes i dad actually when it really surprises me the most that we'd have one listener in israel you may be blocked there for all i know could be and uh...

CHAPTER 38 / 53 Discussion

Subscriber Numbers, PayPal Issues and Financial Stability

The hosts admit that determining exact "subscriber" numbers is impossible due to the nature of podcasting, proxies, and BitTorrent distribution. They estimate their audience is between 50,000 and 400,000, though only about 1,500 people are active $5 monthly subscribers. They discuss technical issues with PayPal that often cause subscriptions to lapse, affecting the show's financial stability.

subscribers· paypal· bit torrent· proxies· financial stability

2:28:12 Portugal, we haven't got much. You'd think I'd have more from Brazil since I'm a writer there and fairly well known, but again it's in translation. They may be writing all kinds of crap, you don't know what they're translating it to. No, I know what they're translating. I've had a lot of people, I know a lot of Brazilians and one guy said to me once, and I know the translator, he's a great guy, I've sat down with him and PowerPoint like in 10 minutes the guy's fantastic. Let me uh, what was the oh Here's one that I can't answer. What are the current subscriber numbers? so first of all subscriber numbers of the word subscriber is a misnomer because We really don't know

2:28:58 How many people listen to this show by downloading? We absolutely just don't know. John, how often, and by the way, I don't think anyone knows in podcasting what their actual real numbers are. There is so much smoke about numbers. You have to guess. And uh... What would you guess? Well, based on normal direct marketing returns and the kind of money we get, It's hard to say, I mean it could be anywhere from 50,000 to 400,000. Yeah, that's about the same range I'm in. It's impossible to tell from the downloads and the proxies and of course, I'm sure there's a small percentage that is maybe not downloading at all, listening only to the stream, there's people getting a bit torrent.

2:29:53 Because we only have, you know, in terms of pure subscribers that are paying the $5, we only have about 1,500 of those people. we have not pushed everybody very hard to do the five dollar thing. Some people have done the thirty. Some people say I'm not going to do it until you make it ten and I haven't put that up. So I mean that's you know and then they every time they change their credit card or some number they get bounced by PayPal so they don't have the subscription anymore. I get letters saying well I sorry but I didn't realize I haven't had a subscription for six months because PayPal bounced it and I got a resubscribe sorry you know they apologize and some people get bounced for no good reason it's you know we were not that stable that we need more subscribers for sure will push they will be pushing that probably on the show more okay I have two more things one more is one is actually would like to know how you prep for the show

CHAPTER 39 / 53 Discussion

Clip Collection, H2 Recorders and Spousal Feedback

Dvorak describes his constant state of clip collection, using an H2 recorder to capture audio even while watching movies with his family. Curry admits to testing his "raps" on his wife, Mickey, though she often "shoots him down." They emphasize that while the show notes are extensive, the actual on-air discussion is driven by finding one or two "zingers" that will resonate with the audience.

h2 recorder· clip collection· show prep· mickey curry· zingers

2:30:48 I think I already explained what I do. I don't do, I don't generally, what I do is I typically take the articles and things that I found and I print them out and pile them up. as they come, because I get most of my stuff online. And then I'm always making clips, because I have an H2 recorder by my side at all times, and I'm constantly jumping up, even with the full family could be watching a movie or something, I'm jumping up and stopping the movie, backing it up and then getting a clip. So I collect a lot of, I spend most of my time collecting clips and articles.

2:31:24 and I don't organize them very well. Because of the nature of the show, I'm always assuming that it's going to go anywhere, because you never know who's going to bring up a topic that gets interesting in the conversation itself. So I'm probably underprepared. in terms of pure preparation, not in terms of the work that goes into getting the clips and all that, I'm reading a lot, but in terms of like thinking about what I'm gonna do. Occasionally we'll take a bunch of notes, or if you watch or listen to the show maybe a year ago, I would have these notes, I used to ridicule myself for having, taking terrible notes I can't read.

2:31:59 And that was a little more preparation, but I found that it really hasn't, that didn't do anything to improve the show. And it also kind of puts, if I prepare too much, I'll try to dominate the show. And which kind of ruins the pace and flow. For me, I do collect everything because if you look at the show notes versus what we talk about in the show, the show notes are often four times as much information and I think that is a valuable part of the show for people. to be able to go and research stuff and look at things and there is a reasonable segment of the audience that really uses that and appreciates it and looks at it. Some of the iPhone apps give you good access to it and searchability. But I'm typically always hoping, just hoping, that I can find

2:32:52 From a radio production perspective here it is. I'm hoping that there's one or two zingers that I have either it's a clip or it's a story or something and I'll work on that and I cannot go to bed on a Wednesday night or a Saturday night without knowing I have something and I sometimes will try out my My rap on Mickey. I'll say how does this sound? and usually I get shot down. Yeah, I refuse to do that. I think that's overdoing it. Yeah, I get shot down. Good. So here's a question that somebody has for you. What happened to the global blank fund? Adam was supposed to have a big report on it. The what?

CHAPTER 40 / 53 Discussion

Dead Ends, Nokia Apps and BlackBerry Podcasting

The hosts address "dead ends" in their research, such as a rumored global fund from the Reagan era that Curry could not verify. They provide technical advice for listeners using older devices like the Nokia E71 and BlackBerry, explaining how to use RSS feeds to access the show. They also joke about the "glut of talent" on the show despite it being the same two hosts for years.

dead ends· nokia e71· blackberry· rss feed· investigative work

2:33:33 Remember that fund you were talking about that that money that was hidden that during the Reagan administration or something. Oh, you know Yeah, the It was a French name. Yeah, this is from Brian. Okay. Wait, we'd not does there's your answer Brian? Yeah No, well, I hit so many dead ends and I just don't have the time to spend my life on Yeah, and it's not going to bring anything to the party. I guess the answer is no one has done enough reporting, at least that I could find, that makes it believable or credible enough and the only way to really get into it is I'd have to do the investigative work myself and that's obviously not going to happen. Okay, Hugs A Lot asks, what's the actual cost of producing the show? Most podcasts have zero budgets and still produce shows. DSC is done free. No, no it's not. That's not true.

2:34:26 DSE is a part of what the founding and sustaining producers of the NOAA Gender Stream donated their money for, and will have to do another drive. And you know, what is the actual cost? I mean, what does it cost you to go to work? You know, there's actual cost. This is actual time. It's, it's, there's preparation. Time is money. Value for value. That's the way it works. Time is definitely money. So is there, is there actual, you know, would you like me to charge by the hour? The amount of time it took me to set up the studio? That's just one little thing. No, you don't want to. Not sure what, actually the question to me is vague. I don't know what it means. DZPix asks, what iPhone, iPad app does Adam use for the Jingles Sound Bank?

2:35:11 I use a program called Soundbyte, B-Y-T-E, one word, Soundbyte on the Mac. It is created, made by Black Cat Software. And I've just kind of been, they essentially replicated a cart machine. They look like carts, you can color them like you would color, and a cart is a cartridge, that's the old school way of putting Jing Jingle Machine. And it's pretty customizable and what's nice about it is they released an iPhone app which I can run on the iPad although it kind of sucks because it runs in iPhone mode and you kind of enlarge it and it doesn't work very well. In fact, today I didn't use it at all but normally

2:35:59 I do and it brings up the screen of your cart deck the way it looks on the computer screen and the only reason if I had it I would prefer to have an extra monitor instead of having the the iPad run that Because I use two monitors because I have a lot of stuff that I have to monitor And really what I need is I need to be able to connect a third screen to my laptop I don't think that's an easy thing to do though. Okay? Here's an interesting question. I should be able to answer it, but I'm going to have you do it if you can. I bought a Nokia E71 because you said you like it. How do I get the stream to work on it? Can we do that? There is actually in the Nokia OV store...

2:36:45 which is their version of the App Store, there is a, it just released, if you go there and it's like create your own Nokia app, I think they're actually calling them apps, you can enter the RSS feed for no agenda and it will create an app for your phone. And then you can put that on your phone. It does not do the streaming bit, but you can get streaming, Programs all over the place for for the Nokia, but I think it's more interesting just to be able to to make your own app for the for the For the episodes, so that's how you do that and BlackBerry by the way also is coming out They called me like yeah, we're gonna do podcasting on the BlackBerry where do you log in and put in your shows for your company? And I put in no agenda daily source code tech 5 top 5 cranky geeks, and then I got bored

2:37:43 So apparently there's some podcasting thing on Blackberry. Any more from the chatroom? This is Alex from Twitter. Let me see if there's one more here. Hold on one second, I'm just going to see who's texting me. Guy says, the show's gone from a show with no jingles and no talent to a glut of both. I thought that was kind of unique. It's gone to a what? We have a glut of talent apparently on the show. It's just the same two guys. Somebody else asks, the show has changed a lot since its inception. It's the same guy actually, Opera Now. Do you prefer the new format? And you know obviously we do.

CHAPTER 41 / 53 Discussion

Future Outlook, Independent Control and The Alex Jones Canary

Looking to the future, the hosts assert that their independent model protects them from the "attack mechanism" of advertisers. They compare their situation to Alex Jones, whom they view as a "canary in the coal mine" for government censorship of independent media. They express confidence that as long as they maintain their "crackpot" status and direct listener support, they will remain below the radar of major regulatory interference.

alex jones· independent media· censorship· arbitron· conspiracy theory

2:38:25 Or wouldn't be doing it and the audience does more the audience does to I mean, you know, this show is you know It's it's a you know, you know, I've been broadcasting long enough. You always have people who say oh it was much better than oh, it was better though Oh, no, I have the same thing as a writer you get this I have people that still say when you are writing that column for info world. It was much better Yeah, and I looked at those I could go back and look at that old crap and it wasn't Generally speaking things improve. Yeah, I guess it's just the nature of the beast. I say it's the nostalgia or you know people at some point people either like you more in time because they hear you more, they read you more or they like you less in time and then they associate that with maybe you were doing something different before. Generally speaking you weren't. Alright so wrapping this up, what's the future?

2:39:17 Well, we got another 200 shows to do at least no we have what we have at least until episode 333 Well before you do another Promotion like the deuce club. Well, we got to thank all the deuce club members profusely and we'll do that over time and in on the web page and I think you know, we're not showing any indication of slower growth and where people still like the show I think that the great thing and we talked about this off of the air a lot there's a there's so much material for us yeah I think the show there's only there's only growth because it just comes automatically it's the media is getting worse yeah they're laying everybody off the the the Obama administration is getting worse they're lying to the public just straight out I

2:40:08 You know, there's these crazy things that Hill and Knowlton are doing. I mean, now that I find that they're behind all the global warming stuff, you know, we're doomed that that's going to go through because you can't stop Hill and Knowlton. I don't know. Are you worried that the show will ever get like taken off the air? Not seriously, but it could be it could take be taken off the air. I don't think this by the way is a huge benefit of Of our model because if you have advertisers, that's the attack mechanism That's where you're weakest when the minute someone doesn't like what you say look at look at I miss you know and that's just one example the minute you go somewhere that they don't like you then then the audience

2:40:49 For us it's easy. The audience like what we do, we get no money. It's like, okay, we can turn that around in one episode. We can go, oh, okay, we went off the track there. We can get it back on. But when your advertisers pull out, then the network goes nuts and then you're out of a job. You're dead. You're gone. You're history. You're out. And you lost, in other words, you don't have control from the get-go. Yep. And that's another reason I think the direct support is the way to go. It's open source, we don't care. One of the things that's great about it, I always say, well, if somebody bootlegs a show, puts it on their own website, takes credit for it, say they produce it, I don't care. The fact is our messages are embedded in the show.

2:41:26 and it goes with us. We don't need to prove numbers. We don't say, oh, our numbers from Arbitron came in and we got a 3-3 and this is a here, look Mr. Advertiser, give us some more money. We have a better CPM, we have a certain demo, they have to prove our demo and we have to prove the CPM and this and that and the other thing. I mean, it's ridiculous. Remember those days when you'd wait for the Arbitrons to come out and the whole station was like tiptoeing around and well, we know the trends are down so we're how bad will it be here uh... yeah we don't have a deal with any of that we don't want to assist ridiculous and it will be completely independent we don't have anybody telling us what to do we don't have uh... advertisers telling us what to do which is the deep real danger here and i did without exception the only way we would be taken off the airs of the government or somebody sued us

2:42:17 or the government decided to pull the plug, who knows? But that's not going to happen. We're below the radar, we're crackpots, we believe in conspiracy theory people, and maybe we'll get taxed for being conspiracy theory guys. Yeah, that's the worst thing that could happen. Well, I can live with that. It seems to me that Alex Jones will get taken out before we do, and that would be a nice warning shot. He's the canary in the cage, as far as I'm concerned, even though I don't think he does half the work we do. I think he has good guests, but that's a different format. No, we can't. That's another thing. That's the one question we should at least before we finish. We cannot do two hours. Yeah, we've done it again.

CHAPTER 42 / 53 Discussion

Listener Interaction, Encryption and Foreign Media Sources

The hosts provide guidelines for listener interaction, requesting short, descriptive subject lines and the use of encryption for sensitive government leaks. They discourage sending the same idea to both hosts and emphasize the importance of timestamps for long video links. Dvorak notes his increased use of foreign media sources to find stories that are ignored by the American mainstream press, such as events in Cambodia.

encryption· pgp· foreign media· cnn· listener interaction

2:42:59 Before we finish, people say, well, can I be a guest on your show? How come you don't do this? How come you don't do that? We may do some separate interview shows separately that will be on the stream that will be part of some other initiative. This show is what it is. It's two guys talking to each other about the current events just like you do in the coffee shop with your buddies. is no guess. When you're in the coffee shop you don't say, man, coming in to have a guest, don't ask. You know, so and so who just finished a book. So what was your book about? This is not the Larry King show. Right. Well anyway, so yeah, we were going to do an hour. We're moving up now on, what are we at? I have the exact recording here. We are at 145. Good job. Thank you again to everyone who supports No Agenda, who supported this show, the Deuce Club. Thanks to everyone who's out there making websites and crazy ideas and promoting us.

2:43:56 It is also your show, so I can just say thank you. John, thank you. Thank you. It's the highlight of my week. And it happens twice a week. And we'll try to do these special third shows every so often. Yeah, what are we going to talk about? Well, I think we talked out. The funny thing is I'll bet we could do another two hours. You know, I was just about to say, not a problem. And our spouse... Why do you think it's so weird that I don't use headphones? It's atypical for radio guys. Totally atypical, but I've managed, because I use the pop screen as my point of departure

2:44:41 and so if i keep my lips within a quarter inch of the pop screen i'm within the range of this microphone we're back by the way uh... with uh... the last uh... bit of this special episode and this is that you can tell that we speak exactly the same way off air as we do it but i think that's a weird That's you know it reminds me of like I tell people this when you give them try to give people teleprompter training that and it and the funny thing is when I remember years and years ago is doing some some audio radio thing of some sort and I was reading advertising copy and there was just a moment where the read became my actual voice oh and that's when you get the gig obviously and you go oh my god that sounds so cool yes I'm actually natural

2:45:28 Now by the way, there's one thing I did want to mention in the first half is the stammering I do all the time. I think it's annoying. Thank God people don't bitch about it. I don't notice it at all. Yeah, well I do when I hear myself. Well, you know, everyone has... there's a lot of stuff I don't like about how I talk. You know you sound a lot better than I do. Anyway, so I think this is pretty much wraps this show up. Well I just wanted to say there are the format well not the format if anything the show has kind of developed the format. For me you know there there there is a change which was driven more by

2:46:12 the world around us, and when I say the world, I mean the media world, is that now that there's less and less news actually being presented in the mainstream media, I think that both of us have taken it upon ourselves to work much harder at actually finding new words. I mean, we're doing more uncovering, and I jokingly call myself a government legislation analyst, Did you get the email from the guy who says that was redundant? No, I don't or I haven't seen it yet. Oh, yeah Well a guy says what could you call yourself that all legislation is government legislation or it can't be called legislation So you're being redundant. You should be calling yourself an independent legislation analyst. No, that's something that doesn't sound good at cocktail parties when you say I know I'm just telling you need to realize it's redundant

2:47:08 Yeah, I think that way you've done a lot more reading of deep reading and gotten into reading legislation I had not gone that way I have I'm more I'm still floundering in some of this I disagree because you're doing something interesting you especially the last couple of shows you've been tuning into a lot of foreign media sources as still English spoken in general Yeah, I have gone to the foreign sources and then because that's the only thing I've been able to do where I'll bring these stories up and you haven't heard them which proves my point that these stories are not getting out there. Some of these stories are interesting like the Cambodian child. It hits CNN now actually. Finally. Yeah. That's another thing we've done since the Red Book began and actually even before that.

2:47:54 People are finally realizing that we're way ahead of the curve on some of these stories. Way ahead of the curve. Well, yeah, just look at drones. I mean, I think, I don't think it was in 205 that I can remember, but I know we were talking about drones as far back as 2010. And it kind of creeps up on you and sometimes just got to remind myself like man we've been talking about this for so long. And we were joking about drones overhead now it's mainstream conversation. Just mainstream conversation. So let's wrap this one up, give people a heads up on the next show and then we hope they'll keep helping us here.

2:48:29 Yes. With the donations, even though we're not live, well we are live to tape, but it's kind of a... And we're gonna be back... Ah, let's interrupt these guys once again, this is what we were talking about earlier in the show. Now this is the end. We've interrupted ourselves twice here. And is there anything else? There's a couple of things that I suppose we should wrap with. I'd like to talk about how best to interact with the show, with stories and ideas. And this is really from my end. I don't know if you have a different opinion. Yeah, this hasn't been discussed yet. Yeah. Let's discuss it occasionally on the regular show. Right. So when you have a lot of email, as an example,

CHAPTER 43 / 53 Discussion

Email Management, FIFO Problems and Show Night Deadlines

Dvorak and Curry discuss the "FIFO" (First In, First Out) problem of managing hundreds of daily emails, where the most recent messages often get the most attention. Dvorak uses "Squirrel Mail" and prints out important emails, while Curry relies on his digital system. They set strict deadlines for donations and clips, with Dvorak "closing the books" at midnight Pacific Time on the night before a show.

email management· fifo· squirrel mail· show night· deadlines

2:47:54 People are finally realizing that we're way ahead of the curve on some of these stories. Way ahead of the curve. Well, yeah, just look at drones. I mean, I think, I don't think it was in 205 that I can remember, but I know we were talking about drones as far back as 2010. And it kind of creeps up on you and sometimes just got to remind myself like man we've been talking about this for so long. And we were joking about drones overhead now it's mainstream conversation. Just mainstream conversation. So let's wrap this one up, give people a heads up on the next show and then we hope they'll keep helping us here.

2:48:29 Yes. With the donations, even though we're not live, well we are live to tape, but it's kind of a... And we're gonna be back... Ah, let's interrupt these guys once again, this is what we were talking about earlier in the show. Now this is the end. We've interrupted ourselves twice here. And is there anything else? There's a couple of things that I suppose we should wrap with. I'd like to talk about how best to interact with the show, with stories and ideas. And this is really from my end. I don't know if you have a different opinion. Yeah, this hasn't been discussed yet. Yeah. Let's discuss it occasionally on the regular show. Right. So when you have a lot of email, as an example,

2:49:11 I've tried to do this before, you know, please be descriptive in your subject line, etc. and please be as short as possible. Sometimes it's just not possible. People have a story. If you have a story to tell, if there's something important, if you have new information, new shit has come to light, all of that, of course, is fine. But again, subject lines are very important. When you think about going through two or three hundred emails, you know, ten seconds makes a difference in my life. It really does. For me, please, if you have a link or something that's just funny or something you feel is relevant, Tweet it to me. I read every single tweet I probably will not retweet if you send some something that I'm gonna use on the show I will always favorite it so you know that I've read it and the reason why is it's I go down a list and it's link link link link I don't have to open an email don't have to go to a next email don't have to read a whole thing just You're limited to 140 characters is beautiful if you send it that way and the same, you know for John the same thing and also

2:50:11 Don't send the same great idea to both of us. That sucks. Send it to John or to me. Don't send... sending it to both is generally not a good idea because, you know, sometimes I think, oh, well, John will have that or you may think I'm doing it and sometimes we wind up not even covering it. These are very, very important things. And encryption, if you really truly are sending something... If you're a government guy... You need to encrypt because I can promise you anonymity because my system is set up so I'll know that I won't blow your cover, but there's going to be copies and it's just stuff. If you really want to be protected, then learn how to do encryption. It's not all that hard.

2:50:52 Yeah, and send the encrypted stuff down because I yeah, I more a lot I don't and then a lot of time worrying about it many people will send me clips So they'll have oh here's four clips. I made please don't do that. I appreciate it But typically I'm just winding up, you know, clipping your clips. If you want to send me a sound file of something that's highly appreciated because that saves me a lot of time in recording something or encoding it or taking it off the web, whatever. Let me see. So that's, yeah, those are really the only thing. I actually don't have so much of a problem with the clips. So you can send them to me. But if you have a long clip or a reference clip where it says, oh, look at this YouTube video, do put the time,

2:51:33 Oh yes, please, yeah, please tell me where it's relevant. And some kind of descriptor, like, you'll love this, it's 54 minutes 20. No, I won't. I don't love that. Yeah, that sort of thing is not good. No, it's not helpful. That's all listen to this or this kind of yeah, we believe this yeah, and I don't mind getting the email but you have to realize I get more email than Adam I'm betting I don't think so I get over 450 pieces a day. Oh, um, no, I'm probably I get about 40 an hour is what I get. Well, that would be 800. Well, but it does slow down during a certain hour. So we're probably close. Not far from it. I go through my email and pretty much if I look at my email page right now, like from cellist days from yesterday, there'll be a page of I think there's like 35 on the page the way squirrel mail delivers it. Squirrel mail. I use squirrel mail.

CHAPTER 44 / 53 Discussion

Morning Production, File Naming and Memory Retention

To ensure memory retention, Dvorak produces his final clips on the morning of the show, as filenames are often too short to contain full descriptions. He organizes these into folders to keep track of the "nut" of each segment. Curry follows a similar process, organizing both his and Dvorak's clips into folders just before the broadcast begins to ensure a smooth, real-time flow.

morning production· memory retention· file naming· democracy now· clip organization

2:52:34 the commonly converse with, yeah, I'll check theirs out. But if I looked at or read you these now, you say, well, why am I opening this? Or the worst thing that happens to the email, which is the FIFO problem that we've discussed on the show, I'll, oh, this is good. We didn't discuss this in 200.5 or 600. We've discussed it on the regular show, which is the last thing that comes in is the first thing that goes out.

2:53:11 And here's how it works, I get an email, oh, this is great, I'm gonna have to do this for the show. Now if I don't print the email out, which is though I use a printer, Adam doesn't. If I don't, because he uses the Freedom Controller. If I don't print it out right there. And I say to myself, which I know I shouldn't do, but I'll do it anyway, I'll get back to this. Yeah, it doesn't happen. Yeah, flagging and all that stuff never works. No, it doesn't work. I never get back to it because I can't find it. I said, who sent that? Who sent that? What was the title? And I'll try to dream up, I do searches on subject lines. I can't, no, that wasn't it. And it's gone. Right. Oh, another thing. It is not helpful to say, if you have a great

2:53:51 Like, oh, this document or this legislation. People send that to me on show day morning. And what happens is, of course, I don't have time to dive into it. Oh, this would be great for today's show. No, it won't because I'm already way, way down the path. There's always room for things, but certainly something I have to read and parse and I like marking up PDFs. No, send it to me after the show or a day before. Not show morning. It's sad because there's a lot of good stuff and then I have the same problem. By the time I'm back around, it's like, I don't remember it or I didn't put it in the right place or just stuff. If you get a stuff between Pacific time anyway, between noon and four,

2:54:36 I'd say five on Wednesdays and Saturdays. That's helpful, yeah. It has a better shot. It does. But then I have this problem because we talked about how we finish the show and on show night, so I call it show night, which is the night before the show. That's the night with no sex, is that what you call it? Well, Sex would be better, but it'd be kind of distracting. Show night would be you have, you're getting your clips, you're organizing the thing. I get to, I have to go to bed right after, I close the books at midnight. at midnight Pacific time. So if you get a donation and after that it doesn't get, it goes to the next show, it doesn't go on. We're pretty strict with that. So I close that, I send all this stuff, I also have to type in all the checks that came in over $50, so that's like a little just extra work, which is fine, because some of the checks are nice, they got notes and it's interesting. So I have to send it all out to Eric, and then that's about, I'm done with all that around 12, 20, and I have to go to bed because I gotta get up at seven.

2:55:37 to move the clips from, and I produce my clips in the morning before the show because the clips themselves, even though I've tried, I'll put very descriptive stuff, and this is the, I'll put the Democracy Now, and I'll put the name of who's saying something and what they're talking about. I try to put it all in there, but 90% of the time, I can't get it all in there. and because it would be too long of a file name. So I do the clips in the morning before the show, I produce them so I can remember them. So when I look at the clips, there'll be 20 clips, there'll be 20 clips, and I just produced them like an hour earlier. I can look at the clip and say, I know that, I just heard it. Yeah, I have the same thing. That's the last thing I do before we start the show is I organize the clips into little folders. My clips, your clips are always in one folder.

2:56:28 And that's the only way I can remember them. Otherwise, if it's done too far in advance, now, I won't remember either. What the hell was that? Yeah, sometimes I'll carry a clip over for a week. Yeah, I never got to put this in the next show and I won't know what it was. I look at it says, it says barriers. That what is that? It's just something that I really knew what that meant, you know, three days ago, but now I don't know what it means. Hey, I want to thank Eric, the shill. Okay, I don't thank him to thanks Eric. Yeah, he he does all the rings and stuff and he's customer support I guess would be what we'd call he's good at that. He's really good, and I want to thank Mimi who you know make sure that That we're all on the straight and narrow yeah, she does that and that's it. That's that's the whole no agenda

CHAPTER 45 / 53 Discussion

Staff Appreciation, Demographic Diversity and Newsletter Importance

The hosts thank their small support staff, including "Eric the Shill" for customer support and Mimi for organizational oversight. They marvel at the diversity of their audience, which spans from intelligence officers to steelworkers, making it impossible to sell to traditional advertisers. Curry emphasizes the importance of the show's newsletter and warns listeners to check their "Promotions" tab in Gmail to ensure they receive it.

eric the shill· mimi· demographics· newsletter· gmail promotions

2:55:37 to move the clips from, and I produce my clips in the morning before the show because the clips themselves, even though I've tried, I'll put very descriptive stuff, and this is the, I'll put the Democracy Now, and I'll put the name of who's saying something and what they're talking about. I try to put it all in there, but 90% of the time, I can't get it all in there. and because it would be too long of a file name. So I do the clips in the morning before the show, I produce them so I can remember them. So when I look at the clips, there'll be 20 clips, there'll be 20 clips, and I just produced them like an hour earlier. I can look at the clip and say, I know that, I just heard it. Yeah, I have the same thing. That's the last thing I do before we start the show is I organize the clips into little folders. My clips, your clips are always in one folder.

2:56:28 And that's the only way I can remember them. Otherwise, if it's done too far in advance, now, I won't remember either. What the hell was that? Yeah, sometimes I'll carry a clip over for a week. Yeah, I never got to put this in the next show and I won't know what it was. I look at it says, it says barriers. That what is that? It's just something that I really knew what that meant, you know, three days ago, but now I don't know what it means. Hey, I want to thank Eric, the shill. Okay, I don't thank him to thanks Eric. Yeah, he he does all the rings and stuff and he's customer support I guess would be what we'd call he's good at that. He's really good, and I want to thank Mimi who you know make sure that That we're all on the straight and narrow yeah, she does that and that's it. That's that's the whole no agenda

2:57:16 I don't think, well the producers of course, the people who support us obviously. Our Grand Dukes, we got two of them. It's a big deal. Pelsmacher and Foley. Foley. No, I'm not going to do that. But everyone, all the people who, students, there's people on fixed income social security. Wide range of producers and listeners, I have to say. It astonishes me, that's the most interesting thing, is the number of The range that we have of listeners, the demo is out of control. There's no way you can isolate the demo. We couldn't even sell this to an advertiser. No, because the demo's all over the map. We don't know what they're gonna sell, Mars bars or geriatric underwear. We're not sure what we're supposed to sell on your show. Not a problem. Exactly. We have no idea. And it's really not important. I mean, I think it's great to have a wide variety, because that way our input, we get a lot of input.

2:58:13 The input is from a wide variety of people. We have people in the government, we have people in the intelligence, we have people in the military, we have steel workers, we have dentists, doctors. One of the things we talked about on the 200.5 show, which I wanted to mention, is that we were lamenting some of the people that we had you know who was the it was that when the oldest show is knighthoods ran that a rundown and we're talking about we need lawyers and we need uh... butchers we like to have a butcher listening we have what at this point years later five years later that show we have all of them we have a knight who's a butcher we have a knight who's a dentist we have plenty of doctors who are nice we have plenty of lawyers we have professors we have professors we have uh... may again military men we have entrepreneurs

2:59:01 So everybody's on board and we try to do the best we can to keep everybody entertained as best we can. I think we do a good job. I think so. If not, we wouldn't be, the show would be over. Yes. And that could happen if, you know, support, if we lose our way or we lose our, it would be our fault. Yeah, I agree. Something would change and Or everyone rushed all this new show these guys are doing dumb agenda dumb agenda. I've never heard a dumb agenda I've heard a no agenda, but not dumb agenda all a dumb agenda so much better much better than no. Yeah, really It happened yes, I'm cognizant of it every single every single show I'm always happy if we get to do another one I

2:59:41 Right, and that is determined on a weekly basis, and it's actually a twice weekly basis, and it depends on your help, your donations, and your support to Dvorak.org and it would be my last plug for that. And the newsletter, I will say, is of extreme importance to the show, which you do all that, and that is your science. You really work very hard on getting people to open the newsletter. Yeah, well that's a challenge. And I encourage everyone I've started moving the the signup link to the top of the show notes right on the home page Sign up for the newsletter there's and then make sure that if you're on gmail making it's probably in the promotions tab or yeah It always shows up in the promotions tab who will show up and spam once in a while because these guys don't care about you No at all and that is the bottom line. This is it's your show You produce it this how it works. I can't say it any other way

CHAPTER 46 / 53 Discussion

Community Meetups, Amtrak Train Museum and Sign-off

The hosts discuss the "No Agenda community" and the long-lasting friendships formed at local meetups around the world. Dvorak reiterates his plan for a meetup at the Sacramento Train Museum via Amtrak, promoting the idea that "trains are good, planes are bad." They sign off with their traditional "Adios Mofos" and a promise to return for the next regular Sunday show.

meetups· amtrak· sacramento train museum· moscow· adios mofos

3:00:38 People are producing. We have the final production, we put it all together, we try to lead you into places where we think it'll be interesting. That's what we do. But it really is... I hate the word, but it's a community. You don't hate the word, you're full of it. Nah, it's like one of those words. It's a good word. Okay. It's a community and everyone's a part of it. and I'm like, everyone's a part of it. And over the next year or so, we're gonna try to create the more meetups so people can have their little get-togethers. Because it turns out, and we've both witnessed this, is that if you're out with the no agenda community in anywhere from Michigan to Tennessee to wherever, and there's a few of them gather. To Moscow, you name it. A few of them gather, a few of them gather together, and they all like each other. It's like a social thing.

3:01:28 because anyone who listens to NOAJ will have a certain take on the world and that take on the world affects your personality in just the way that other people who listen to NOAJ end up liking each other. So we could create a lot of long-lasting friendships if we put a little more effort into that part of it. And I think we're going to attempt to do more. Certainly, I plan to be on the road. in the coming fall? I still want to do my trip to the Sacramento Train Museum on the Amtrak. Meet up. Nice. That would be great. Everybody gets on the train, they chug it up to Sacramento, and we all go to the train museum, look around, meet up, have a lunch in Sacramento, and then jump on the train and go back or stay there, whatever anyone wants to do. I think it'd be fantastic. All aboard, trains good, planes bad.

3:02:21 We pick up everyone from San Jose up through the peninsula, through San Francisco and on. Nice. Well, I think we did it. I think so. Play us out, Maestro. Yes, this is another one of those things on the board. For the oh yes of course you know for those of you who have the opportunity to listen to the show live has its own merit and is interesting certainly if you're in the chat room and Not not everybody knows that probably a half an hour before we start live. There's a pre stream and And I play songs and sometimes even things we'll be playing in the show itself. We've got some longer jingles or things that have been sent in. It's kind of a... For me personally, I like it. You get all hyped up. Yeah, hyped up. Pumped up! Yeah, pumped up. That's right. Pumped up and ready for the show. Okay, so on the next program, that'll be your two interviews with Scully and Heil. Did you say Hail Apple to John Scully?

3:03:22 I didn't dream up Hail Apple until after I did that interview. Oh, it's too bad. I went to the Apple store locally here though and I got recognized by two or three of these Apple guys and I brought up the Hail Apple thing. Did they like it? They didn't get it. Well, I'll say Hail Apple, John! I've raised my arm. Hail Apple to you. Coming to you from the crackpot condo here in FEMA region 6 in downtown Austin, Texas in the morning everybody I'm Adam Curry and from northern Silicon Valley where I remain I'm John C Dvorak We'll be back with our interview show next week on 737 adios mofos All right. Yay You heard okay, so what we did and we're back now. This is 200 point eight you're hearing It's just not like we're not in and out and in and out. Yeah, this is the this is us before the next Sunday show

CHAPTER 47 / 53 Discussion

Post-Show Reflection, Donkey Punch and Long-Distance Dynamics

In a final reflection, the hosts discuss the "Donkey Punch" joke from the Family Guy clip and the benefits of their long-distance working relationship. They argue that being in the same studio would likely lead to the "Martin and Lewis" effect of personal friction. Curry credits radio mentor Scott Shannon for teaching him the value of silence in broadcasting.

donkey punch· seth macfarlane· long-distance· martin and lewis· scott shannon

3:04:14 And what do you have for notes? I have some notes that... All right, I'd love to hear them. Let's hear your notes. I noticed that there was the word... there's something about Punch the Donkey that was in the Weenie and the Butts show. Huh, yeah. And when I heard it the second time, or the third time, or the fourth time, I realized it was a sexual innuendo, the donkey punch. Yeah, and that came up one time on the show, actually, maybe back in the 200s. I recall you mentioning the donkey punch or something then. I just remember getting a lot of email explaining what it is. It's not good. No, no, no, no, it's not good. But that would be just Seth Mayfarlow's kind of humor. I also know, okay, let's go over this since from the beginning to the end. We said a lot of yeah, no's. Yeah, no.

3:05:06 There's something about radio stations. I put a note here, but I put it early when I listened to this thing, so I forgot what that means. Comments on time, some overall style, but Fox, French, fresh. Oh yeah, you were talking about, or somebody was talking about working at, with the Kendall Kevin Wendell and you saw he's a producer my fox some about he was actually a pretty now he said and I want to reach restate that because I heard that too he started not Fox News but what we called the coat hanger network he was Intimately involved in putting together all the, because Fox wasn't a network per se. It started, they bought, what, they bought all the UHF stations and all these crazy stations they were buying up. And that's why it was called the Code Hanger Network. Wendell was a part of that. Well, his main thing was he was the producer of Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Ah, right. Wait, wasn't that Quincy Jones? Wendell was the producer. He was like a producer who actually worked. Like the showrunner.

3:06:14 He may have been the showrunner. I don't know that he was, but he was one of the guys that was actually working, not like Quincy Jones, who was like the executive producer, like, you know, that just, you know, has a finance interest. Importance. What was harder for me was that we both realized that we had done the pilot for CNET and we both had declined the millions of the stock. And you like, yeah, that was a mistake. John said that was you took stock. I took stock, I didn't get that kind of stock, but I took stock and I sold it rather quickly. I was like you, I didn't have any confidence in this thing. That was a mistake. Yes, it was a mistake. But we might not have been doing this show. I can give you, no, in half of these deals that we dropped that we didn't do or you didn't do it right or lost money doing something else, we wouldn't be doing this show. Yeah, you're right. Import sound silence.

3:07:13 thesis yeah this thesis about sound going dead this is good sound oh no that's the thesis of the noise gate which we only started using you know in the past couple of hundred shows and I like so when we don't when we're we both are quiet and it's all in digital then there is zero signal there's not a single bit of anything being recorded it's just zero nothing null And I like it because I know that when we and we're very good at it, but it's natural. We don't set out to do it when we don't talk for like that half a second too long. It gets everyone's attention like, oh, did something like, oh, you get air. So I like that. I learned that from Scott Shannon. He said silence is one of the best things. Let the let the room breathe for a minute. You have to look up Scott Shannon if you don't know who he is.

3:08:08 He's my radio mentor. A meanable personality, I think was good. That is more important than people like to think and we don't see each other and I think it's good. I think we'd get it if we were actually, this show would have not gone toward show 900 if we had been in the same studio. It certainly wouldn't have been the same show, I agree. No, it wouldn't be the same, Sean. It wouldn't be. And I don't even know we could get that far because I believe that this would happen to Martin and Lewis. You can do get pretty far with a long distance relationship.

CHAPTER 48 / 53 Discussion

Non-Visual Queuing, Harmonica Practice and Listening Skills

The hosts explain how they have developed non-visual queuing techniques to compensate for not being in the same room. Dvorak mentions his ongoing practice with the harmonica, hoping to eventually use it for on-air "hits." They conclude that the "theater of the mind" created by their audio-only format is a unique skill that requires intense listening from both the hosts and the audience.

queuing· harmonica· listening skills· theater of the mind· bluetooth

3:08:46 If it's paying the bills and doing all these things. But if it's a short distance relationship, so you're seeing the guy all the time, it would get on your nerves because people have, especially older guys, you have certain habits and it just would get on your nerves. It'd drive you nuts. And we made a point, or actually you made the bigger point about it. We don't even want to see each other. We can't do the show in the same room because when you work with somebody for a long time, and this isn't fully understood by anyone who doesn't do stuff like this, is that you cue off each other. And you see, oh, okay, I think he, okay. And you're cuing off the guy's, you know, he's making a face or he's maybe pauses it or, I mean, the greatest thing you can do if you want to cue off each other's radio, you can be talking and then the guy picks it up and he starts talking a little bit and he, instead of cuing you with a kind of the right, you know, kind of a lead in to you playing a clip, for example, you just make a hand signal. Right, right. We don't have that luxury.

3:09:49 And we don't have that luxury. So we have to work on these other ways of queuing. It only works about it works a lot, but it works 70. I think maybe 30 percent of the time they fail. Yeah, but nobody cares. To this day, I get people saying, wow, how many people do you have running the show? Because you're so tight and it's right on top of each other. And the clip is generally tight. It's not always tight to us. It's not that no. I'm a little bit more critical, but yeah. Star of the show gag was funny. Producer, what is this? I wrote this down. Producer not elaborate, not elaborated or something. I'm not sure what that means. I don't know what that is.

3:10:32 Weenie in the butt, I got a star thing here. Drawback to benefits, I don't even know what that is. See, this is terrible. This is like me going, remember the early shows used to read my notes? Yeah, it lasted about 10 episodes. Yeah, because I couldn't read anything. I can't read my notes. People complain. Oh yeah, fact of the matter, way, way more than that. A lot of that, a lot of fact of the matter. We talked about that in 207. It's something, origins of media deconstruction, I don't know what the... Going back to what you were talking about, the hand signals. So we force ourselves really to listen to each other.

3:11:13 You know in order to get the subtle cues or you know well, you know this is really this is really you know No, it goes because I don't need a cue. I mean I can jump in I'll just step on you I mean, I don't need to hit a button on it With a clip I've got coming up You're the one that has to really pick up on the cues more than I do I don't I don't think I'm under that much pressure It's well Maybe not, but when either one of us has a thing we want to set up and discuss, I think in the past couple of years we've gotten much better at understanding, okay, he's got a thing. Because we don't discuss any of this. You don't tell me, hey, I got a package or I got a couple clips in a row or there's something I want to do. And sometimes we misunderstand, but to me really, and this is brought up in those previous point shows,

3:12:07 It is all theater of the mind. It is all, it is all encompassing. And I think it's what would podcast when you were in someone's head typically on the, on the earbuds, although I don't know if that's, if that's the typical way people listen anymore, things a lot of Bluetooth in the car and stuff like that. But if you're listening on headphones or earbuds, it's important. It all matters. And listening is a, Skill that is diminishing in our world today. I would think so yeah, well because people are always on their phone Exactly and you still have a song on your harmonica a high-end shows I'm playing the harmonica for more than 400 shows I'm still trying to what I'm trying to do with the harmonica is I'm trying to understand completely the harmonic and the different I have a bunch of different was in different keys

CHAPTER 49 / 53 Discussion

Hookers and Blow Misunderstandings, Guest Policy and PR Pestering

The hosts clarify a misunderstanding regarding the phrase "hookers and blow," noting that some older listeners misinterpreted "blow" as a sexual act rather than cocaine. They reiterate their strict "no guest" policy, which protects them from being pestered by PR firms and avoids the "dud" guest problem. Dvorak recounts an instance where tech figure Michael Arrington failed to show up for a scheduled appearance, reinforcing his dislike for guest-dependent formats.

hookers and blow· pr firms· guest policy· michael arrington· charlie rose

3:13:06 And I want to be able to do little harmonica hits. Ah, yes. And so I get to feel for it. I've already got the definitive book on how to play songs on a harmonica. One of these days I'm going to surprise you with a couple of things. Okay. Can't wait for that. We had the one... We didn't discuss this properly. Yeah, I need the show so far the hookers and blow anecdote and the people always say hookers and blow it says rude I Didn't mention this but one of the people that objected to is one of our first and earliest dames there since she's an older woman and still is I guess and She didn't know that blow meant cocaine. Oh, she thought it was blowjob. Oh

3:14:00 Yeah, that's what she thought was rude. Oh well Like hookers like cocaine and hookers isn't rude, but okay. Well not compared to blowjobs. Yeah And that's and that's I wonder how many people think that that's a good question It's a me and for me. It's a music industry term. It's like a joke that we've been going around for a hundred years Yeah, lots of hookers and blow though. I mean, it's just it's been around Yeah, it's a music industry term because that's, you know, in limos. Limos. Who has a limo anymore? Well, they used to. Fools. Yeah, it used to be a big deal. The limo. Now it's the Escalade. Oh, they used to. Fools. Yeah, it used to be a big deal. The limo. Now it's the Escalade. Now, here's a couple of things. You interrupt me when you're talking about the open source model, but you did come back to it.

3:14:52 I wanted to discuss something that actually came up in that joke letter that you got and read about us being, you know, spooks or something. I've explained it before on various shows, but I'm going to explain it again why we developed the model we have for this show. I forgot to point out this really kind of we presented an eavesdropping shows two guys talking to each other you get a listen in the audience listens in and then they they get anything out of it they hopefully donate and contribute to the show. There's a number of things I've noticed going through I don't know a decade or more of doing television cable stuff and and other

3:15:35 lower the end than cable, internet stuff, is that when you have to have people on the show, this is why we refuse to have people on the show. We do not interview anybody. Or if we did interview somebody, I would do, for example, a standalone interview that would be used as a filler show. We've done this a couple of times. And we would run it just as a straight interview. Or I could take a clip from it, but nobody's coming on the show to tell us anything. And the reason is that over the years I've determined that the only good show is a show without guests, which is pointed out in that letter. And the reason for this, there's a number of reasons and they're all good reasons.

3:16:16 You don't have to deal with the dud. Which happens a lot. It happens way more than you'd think. Most people are not good guests. They cannot talk, they freeze up or they don't have anything to say. Or they're only there to promote something. Or they're only there to promote stuff. And the second thing about not having guests is really great is that you make it a policy and then you don't get pestered by every PR woman in the world. Oh, my CEO would be a great guest on your show. Or, by the way, you do get them to, that still happens, and then you can say to them, so you've never listened to the show, I take it. Because if they're asking if they can put their CEO on the show, they've never heard the show ever. You know, honestly, for me, I find, you're more interesting.

CHAPTER 50 / 53 Discussion

Media Deconstruction vs. Interviews, Podcast Awards and Lo-Fi Streams

The hosts argue that pulling a one-minute "nut" from someone else's interview is more effective than conducting a 30-minute interview themselves. They mention winning a Podcast Award and discuss the "lo-fi" streams created by fans to help listeners with data caps. Curry explains why he stopped publishing his raw jingles, citing a lack of attribution from other podcasters who used them without permission.

podcast awards· lo-fi· bandwidth· phone boy· jingle attribution

3:17:07 than most guests I could think of. I mean that, I don't want to talk to some guest. I mean, I've done thousands of interviews. The guests have an agenda and the show is no agenda. Yes. They always have an agenda. Another thing that's a problem besides the guests being a dud, the guests not showing up. Another problem. Doesn't show up. Or he forgets or he cancels at the very last minute. Michael Arrington failed to show up at a Cranky Geek show. He was booked, everything, time and everything. He stayed in bed and he wouldn't apologize. Wow. There's a guy for you. Yeah. So that all these, and this is a nightmare. And the timing of it, it's like, well, we can't do Thursday. Can you do Saturday? Can you do Tuesday? You know, it's all this. But to me,

3:18:02 I'm not really interested in them. I like hearing other people ask some questions and I can use their answers. It's the same questions probably. Yeah. Clip, a one-minute clip, which is kind of the nut, which is another journalism term, but it's kind of the nut of somebody's interview, the one thing that's really interesting We can pull that out and just run it as a very useful one minute. Exactly. As opposed to having the guy on the show for 30 minutes. And if you listen to these guys, we watch all this stuff, C-SPAN and Charlie Rose and all these other guys. It's mostly blather. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It's nothing. And then there's maybe something good and we can pull that. It's a much better approach. It is a better approach. It's kind of the... It's kind of the...

3:18:55 Maybe not. It's a little bit like the Daily Show, but I think we were doing this a lot earlier. And because it's audio clips, we can do so much more. We're not limited. We're not limited in general by a whole bunch of things that television does. But just to, you know, just to look, we deconstruct media. It says it right there on the packaging. That is what we do. So we look at media. We don't have to necessarily deconstruct people, although that's also fun and deconstruct words and things people say, you know, like that a lot. Actually, that's a good point. We don't deconstruct people. We deconstruct media and interviews are people. So we also should mention that we won the podcasting award. So that running gag that we're never going to win an award is over. And we didn't mention that because it wasn't done by show 200 points up. And let me go polish up my award. Oh, I'm sorry. There is no award. It's just it's just the title. There's no actual trophy. Well, there is if somebody does what they said they were going to do.

3:19:56 Uh, mainstream, by the way, let's stick on, let's stick on the open source model for a moment because I can't reiterate that enough. And I hear by C questions coming in. The whole idea is, and we started off very early by please copy the show, put it anywhere you want. You know, we'd like for you to put the whole show in one place, not cut it up, but re blog it, re blog it, retweet it. But also, you know, and I think this was early days when. Bandwidth to Australia was particularly problematic. We'd have people create low, very low bandwidth versions so it wouldn't kill people's data caps in other parts of the world. I forgot about that. Yeah, we had anyway, the lo-fi stream, all kinds of stuff like that. And anything you want to use, it's okay. The same goes for the branding, for the logo. You want to create a merchandise, sell it. We hope, it would be nice if you gave us a piece of it, that'd be great.

3:20:53 It's not a prerequisite. The only thing that I stopped doing is publishing the jingles that we have. Because I got really sick of hearing our jingles on every other podcast with no attribution and, haha, isn't that funny? And I'm like, no, that's not cool. So I didn't want to make that too easy. But there's lots of people who cut stuff out of the show and collect them like phone boy, he does that. So we feel that everything except for our likeness, our own Adam and John likeness, everything is pretty much fair game and we'd like you, we encourage

CHAPTER 51 / 53 Discussion

Cognitive Dissonance, Chris Hedges and The Evil Corp Media

The hosts discuss the "cognitive dissonance" and physical illness caused by mainstream media consumption, contrasting it with the relaxed demeanor of analyst Chris Hedges. They argue that the media acts as an "Evil Corp" that confuses the public. They contrast their "Value for Value" model with the "NPR tote bag" model, asserting that their listeners are true producers rather than just donors.

cognitive dissonance· chris hedges· bernie sanders· evil corp· npr tote bags

3:21:30 people to do that because it is a part of our distribution. And there's a YouTube version made every show and there's all kinds of things that are out there and sometimes they go away, they fail. There's tons of, I mean seriously tons of extra sites and websites and initiatives that people start and sometimes they peter out but often they keep going like No Agenda Book Club is still there, still going strong. And in return... I'm sorry? I was saying the movie club is defunct it seems. And in return, since we realized that there's no way we could ever, I think it probably started like no one's going to advertise on this show. And I think we had our doubts about advertising on podcasts in general, but I said, no one will advertise on this. That'll never work for us. And we decided to introduce the value for value model, which, hey, did you get some value from listening to us?

3:22:29 continuously here it helps people deal with the bullcrap of being particularly these days inundated with making them ill physically ill mentally a lot of people get sick listening to the news They get confused, they get this cognitive dissonance and they have this horrible look on their faces that develops. I was watching Democracy Now and they had Chris Hedges, that kind of communist, very interesting guy to listen to most of the time, against this guy, Paul Rubin, he's not Rubin, but he's a very short Department of Labor guy that used to be in the Clinton administration who's now teaching at Cal.

3:23:07 And his name's eluding me, but he was on and he was so, he was a Bernie super, but he's all in for Clinton and Hedges doesn't, he says it's all bull crap. Hedges, actually I'm trying to get a quote for a future show, but Hedges says, well it doesn't make any difference if Hillary wins or if Trump wins. The system is the system. They can't do anything about it. and there's not going to be any change in this and that and he listed all these things I don't see why anyone would get worked up he looked a lot more relaxed than this poor character from Cal who just looks like he's wearing it on his face. I mean, it's just, and I think a lot of people end up wearing on their face this, what the media does, it ages you, it causes you to be confused, you can't think straight. So terrible business. In fact, I came up while listening to the shows, I came up with another new little phrase that we can use once in a while, which is the mainstream media is not your friend. I like it.

3:24:12 They're not, yeah, they are evil. Yeah, it's totally evil. It's like evil corp. Then I cannot reiterate enough again that we truly consider people who are listening in, because that's what it is, you're listening in, they are producers. You are producing the show. And I think that is the big secret. I can't really explain how it happened or why it happened or how that came to be. But I feel that the majority of our listeners do feel like they're producers. And that's not necessarily financial support. That's all kinds of support that's going out and promoting us. There's a million different ways people can help, and they find new and interesting and innovative ways to do that. So you are deemed a producer. And NPR should have figured that out decades ago.

3:25:08 But instead they're still doing the, hey send us 10 bucks we'll give you a tote bag. Which is, it's just not, it doesn't give you the same vibe. You're not really a part of the programming. Yeah, it's like, send that loser a tote bag. And a coffee mug. Now the... We did mention our original artist was Paul T and Randy Asher was Paul Couture who came in later and did the website. Which is nowagendaartgenerator.com. And he designed the original ring and a couple of other things he did before he kind of quit everything but the website. And now we have probably I think a core cache of about six artists, perhaps more.

3:25:54 You know, led by a series of wins by Martin JJ and Nick Durant. And then we have some more professional guys. We got guys like Mark G who have come in. Yeah, out of work artists and other guys that do just tremendous work. There was a list somewhere of the number of accepted artwork for the covers. And it's interesting, everybody kind of gets in every so often if they try hard enough. But there's still a few guys who kind of dominate the scene because of the gist of some of these artworks is like exactly what we're looking for. It's hard to explain. And I want to remind anyone who's a budding artist that Martin JJ was probably one of the most

CHAPTER 52 / 53 Discussion

Art Generator, Martin JJ Streak and The Douchebag Jingle

The hosts praise the "No Agenda Art Generator" and the competitive spirit among their volunteer artists, noting Martin JJ's long streak of accepted covers. They revisit the origin of the "Douchebag" jingle, explaining that it was a listener-driven invention that they initially hesitated to use. They compare their use of audience-insulting humor to that of sports radio host Jim Rome.

art generator· martin jj· douchebag· jim rome· karma

3:25:08 But instead they're still doing the, hey send us 10 bucks we'll give you a tote bag. Which is, it's just not, it doesn't give you the same vibe. You're not really a part of the programming. Yeah, it's like, send that loser a tote bag. And a coffee mug. Now the... We did mention our original artist was Paul T and Randy Asher was Paul Couture who came in later and did the website. Which is nowagendaartgenerator.com. And he designed the original ring and a couple of other things he did before he kind of quit everything but the website. And now we have probably I think a core cache of about six artists, perhaps more.

3:25:54 You know, led by a series of wins by Martin JJ and Nick Durant. And then we have some more professional guys. We got guys like Mark G who have come in. Yeah, out of work artists and other guys that do just tremendous work. There was a list somewhere of the number of accepted artwork for the covers. And it's interesting, everybody kind of gets in every so often if they try hard enough. But there's still a few guys who kind of dominate the scene because of the gist of some of these artworks is like exactly what we're looking for. It's hard to explain. And I want to remind anyone who's a budding artist that Martin JJ was probably one of the most

3:26:46 He submitted probably more than anyone historically, and I think he went for years without anything getting picked. And then all of a sudden he caught something changed. And this happens in everything. This happens in the neural network of the brain. This happens if you're a bowler. This happens if you're a pitcher. This happens in sports a lot. All of a sudden something changes and now you're good because you've practiced a lot. And he's essentially practiced a lot. Then he's just on a streak. It was, it was, he had to actually retire for a short time because we couldn't find any art better than his. Too much, too much Martin J. And so he says, I'm kicking everyone's ass, I'm going to take it to time off. And then everybody, but everyone brought their game up. It's a very interesting phenomenon, that art, because that art is a big deal to us. We're very unique in that.

3:27:34 extensions or namespace was set up specifically to allow that. Interestingly, the Apple podcast app doesn't do that very well or at all probably. Some do, but the larger beauty of this We would not be able to do the show without all of this. Without all of the content. Even if we had to hire one producer, we wouldn't be able to make enough money to make it work. We have no producers. We have thousands of producers, but we have no producers. We have nobody in-house people twiddling dials. I don't think it would be nearly as good a show either because you're better

3:28:21 at talking and twiddling dials at the same time than most dedicated dial twiddlers. Well, not just the dialing, but the links we get, the stories, of course, a lot of the... We got guys in Rio right now, dude's name Ben, I'll be talking about that. upcoming show and you know, they have real inside information. They're real boots on the ground, real boots on the ground who are in these situations, who are in these places. To get that, now you need a whole staff. So this is somehow we've come across some model that is futuristic. It's actually, it evolved and it evolved largely due to the, and we've said this on the other two shows,

3:29:05 It evolved largely by the producers themselves, in other words our audience, pushed the show along. And the example that I used and it was used in the other show is the douchebag thing. We never had, or even Karma, but the douchebag thing was the real classic that we had nothing to do with this. And I remember in the early days when the douchebag thing started to appear and then we had the douchebag jingle. People saying oh these guys they suck and they're calling their audience douchebags What kind of professionals are they calling their audience names? And I want to remind anyone who thinks that's off and kind of crazy to do listen to the Jim Rome's show someday and See what he calls his audience. It's quite amusing. I

CHAPTER 53 / 53 Discussion

Final Summary, European Report and Sunday Show Preview

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak conclude the special episode, summarizing their historical "smorgasbord" of audio. Curry prepares for a trip to Europe, promising a "boots on the ground" report from near Nice, France, for the upcoming Sunday show. They encourage new listeners to use this episode as a primer for the show's unique format and sign off from FEMA Region 3 and Silicon Valley.

europe· nice· france· boots on the ground· adios mofos

3:29:53 But that wasn't even our idea. No, nor was it our jingle. Same for Karma. All of this has been produced and handed to us and it's highly, highly appreciated. So there you have it. I think that's it. Do you have any notes that you want to wrap up? No, I did my notes in the beginning. Let me just check. I got the ISOs thing. No, no, I mean, you know the obvious things. It's just the obvious changes that we've seen in the past year the increase of clips Which it actually makes it much easier for for deconstructing I think that you know the half promise of getting out on the road more is starting to kind of work You know to have the stream of consciousness and it's nice to go out and meet people why you sound very what does that mean? Huh?

3:30:45 Well, we make big talkers when it comes to going out on the road. Oh, that would be you! I actually go on the road! What are you talking about? Hey, I was on the road once. Yeah. Well, let's make a solemn pledge that we go out on the road more often. I was just in New York and we had a big meetup. Yeah. That was my birthday in April. Let's do more of that. Yeah, well I'd like to. And if here's what we have in San Francisco, I should go to one of these meetups they have once in a while. And now the guy who was putting them together bailed out and shut it down. Well, that is the downside of having producers you don't have on a payroll. I'll take our system any day.

3:31:25 Yeah, I'm sure we can get, I still have to do the meet up at the train museum. That's gonna be great. I gotta get on the stick for that. Alright, well... I know it's been three years I've been talking about it, but... Well, we have patience. We have patience, it's okay. Alright, I guess that should wrap it up then for show 200.8. I think it does. NAY 200.7, NAY 200.5. And we'll never do it again. We'll never do it again. And you can don't forget the morgue org slash na. Yes, or get us through this episode Yeah for Sunday show and I'll be returning from Europe on Saturday and we'll be all good to go to bring you another show on Sunday and We'll be deconstructing whatever has come our way in the meantime And I'll probably have a little report from Europe since I will be in France near Nice boots on the ground

3:32:20 Yeah, see what's going on. That's part of what I do. All right, everybody. So now you're up to speed on how we put it together, why we put it together in a historical smorgasbord of audio that you've listened to. Thank you very much for all your support. And make sure and also use this as a show to refer people to if you try to get them into the show at all. Excellent. Or if they come back, you usually can get them in and listen to an episode and they say, that's too confusing. They sang in the morning all day. It's not the morning. And so just say, hey, go listen to this show. And it explains all the stuff we do kind of mostly. So there. And with that coming to you from the Garden State in FEMA Region three in the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry and from northern Silicon Valley, which is it's kind of the brown state.

3:33:08 In more ways than one, I'm John C. Dvorak. We'll talk to you right here on Sunday on No Agenda. Adios, mofos!