Topic: Dhs Surveillance

8 chapters across the catalog

Hundos
Episode 1035 56:21 - 1:00:13

1035: Hundos

Stingray Technology, Surveillance in Washington D.C.

DHS reports indicate that "Stingray" devices, which mimic cell phone towers to intercept data, are being used extensively throughout Washington D.C. Testing found these rogue devices near the Russian, Chinese, and Israeli embassies, as well as the Trump International Hotel. While some are used by domestic law enforcement, many are believed to be operated by foreign intelligence services for corporate and political espionage.

Loyalty Test
Episode 899 48:11 - 50:42

899: Loyalty Test

Secure Fence Act of 2006, Border Wall and Physical Barriers

President Trump's executive order regarding the border wall is described as an extension of the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed by George W. Bush. The act authorized 700 miles of physical barriers, but much of the funding was diverted to technology like drones and cameras. The hosts argue that physical barriers are more effective than high-tech surveillance, which can be easily bypassed.

Thick & Creamy
Episode 537 2:24:26 - 2:27:31

537: Thick & Creamy

Chris Inglis and the "Anywhere on the Earth" Clause

NSA Deputy Director Chris Inglis is rumored to be a top candidate to replace Janet Napolitano at the Department of Homeland Security. The hosts analyze a specific statement by Inglis where he claimed the NSA does not target Americans "anywhere on the earth," suggesting this phrasing leaves room for surveillance conducted via space-based satellite systems.

Episode 493 28:32 - 29:57

493: Snowquestration

Micro Drones and Corporate Surveillance Threats

The threat of drone technology is shifting from large military Reapers to swarms of micro-drones and quadcopters used for surveillance. Documents from the Department of Homeland Security indicate an interest in drones equipped to detect weapons and track communications. The discussion posits that corporate-run drones and biological threats are more practical dangers to privacy than high-profile government drone strikes.

Episode 491 1:28:37 - 1:32:13

491: Pope and Change

Operation Tripwire, Office for Bomb Prevention

The Technical Resource for Incident Prevention, known as "Tripwire," is identified as a central database for the Office for Bomb Prevention (OBP). Established under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 19, Tripwire facilitates an online collaborative network for sharing intelligence on IED tactics. The hosts claim this system legitimizes the mass collection of citizen data under the guise of preventing explosions.

Episode 416 1:03:48 - 1:06:11

416: Datapalooza

Air Force Instruction 14-104, Domestic Intelligence Oversight

Air Force Instruction 14-104, issued in April 2012, outlines the oversight of intelligence activities and the incidental collection of data on U.S. persons. The document permits the transfer of such information to other government agencies within a 90-day window. There is growing concern that the Department of Homeland Security, under Janet Napolitano, will eventually take control of domestic drone surveillance.

Episode 412 12:42 - 16:39

412: Red Square Patch

DHS Keyword Tracking and PII Collection Policies

The DHS monitoring program tracks specific keywords related to domestic security, terrorism, and border violence, including terms like "assassination," "swat," and "homegrown." While the agency collects Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in certain categories, it reportedly excludes high-profile celebrities and media members from specific types of reporting. Third-tier sources, including blogs and podcasts, require verification from mainstream outlets before their content is escalated.

Drunk in America
Episode 215 1:44:36 - 1:48:56

215: Drunk in America

DHS Cell All Initiative, Chemical Sensor Surveillance

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is promoting the "Cell All" initiative, which aims to embed chemical sensors in consumer cell phones to detect deadly substances. While DHS claims the system will be "opt-in" and anonymous, skeptics argue it represents a new layer of always-on surveillance. The technical feasibility of such a device in a standard smartphone is also questioned.