Topic: Anita Hill

9 chapters across the catalog

Commie Comey
Episode 1071 57:07 - 1:00:35

1071: Commie Comey

CNN Panel of Republican Women on Kavanaugh

A CNN panel featuring Republican women reveals strong support for Brett Kavanaugh. The participants express skepticism regarding allegations from 36 years ago and argue that a man's character should not be judged by high school behavior. They question why Ford did not come forward during Kavanaugh's previous federal background checks and express sympathy for the nominee's family.

M-Word
Episode 1076 2:45 - 4:55

1076: M-Word

Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and CNN Reporting Inaccuracies

The hosts examine media coverage of Justice Clarence Thomas attending the ceremonial swearing-in of Brett Kavanaugh. They criticize CNN reporter Caitlin Thomas for implying Clarence Thomas was previously accused of sexual assault, clarifying that his confirmation hearings involved allegations of inappropriate workplace comments rather than assault. The discussion touches on the historical context of the Anita Hill testimony.

CIA Paid Me
Episode 1075 39:04 - 41:24

1075: CIA Paid Me

Elizabeth Warren Fundraising Email and Political Victimhood

Senator Elizabeth Warren sent a fundraising email following the Kavanaugh vote, framing the loss as a "sham" and calling for a "grassroots army" to take back the House and Senate. The email mentions various marginalized groups, including "podcasters," as being shut out of power by entitled men. The hosts criticize the "chip in" payoff as a weak conclusion to a passionate message.

3 Belts No Road
Episode 983 16:58 - 21:45

983: 3 Belts No Road

Bill Maher and Chelsea Handler Debate Clinton Legacy

Chelsea Handler and Bill Maher discuss the necessity of re-examining rape allegations made by Juanita Broaddrick against Bill Clinton. The conversation links the 1990s defense of Clinton by feminists to the Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas hearings, suggesting that political expediency derailed the conversation on sexual harassment for decades. The panel concludes that the stakes are higher with Donald Trump, yet Clinton's past remains a crucial part of the cultural shift.

DroneWolf.com
Episode 348 1:04:02 - 1:06:23

348: DroneWolf.com

Anita Hill's 20th Anniversary and Hunter College

Hunter College hosted a conference celebrating the 20th anniversary of Anita Hill's testimony against Clarence Thomas. The hosts critique the event as a gathering of "elite" feminists and mock the famous "fish without a bicycle" slogan. They argue that the younger generation, including the college president's own daughter, finds these historical feminist tropes irrelevant and confusing.

DroneWolf.com
Episode 348 1:10:03 - 1:13:32

348: DroneWolf.com

Anita Hill's Religious Background and Oral Roberts University

A New York Times article reveals that Anita Hill was a professor at Oral Roberts University at the same time Michele Bachmann was a student. The hosts argue that Hill has been mischaracterized as a leftist, when she was actually a deeply religious Pentecostal conservative during the Reagan era. They suggest her offense at Clarence Thomas's behavior was rooted in religious morality rather than secular feminism.

Code for Biodiversity!
Episode 246 53:31 - 57:41

246: Code for Biodiversity!

Nina Totenberg Controversy, Clarence Thomas Allegations

The hosts compare the firing of Juan Williams to past controversial statements by NPR's Nina Totenberg, who once wished AIDS upon Senator Jesse Helms. They also discuss a recent Washington Post interview with Lillian McEwen, a former assistant to Clarence Thomas, who corroborated claims regarding Thomas's inappropriate workplace behavior during the Anita Hill era.

Dandelion Wine
Episode 99 1:14:36 - 1:17:56

99: Dandelion Wine

Supreme Court Nominee, Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill

The hosts briefly discuss the upcoming Supreme Court nomination, referencing the historical controversy of the Clarence Thomas hearings. They revisit the Anita Hill sexual harassment allegations and Joe Biden's past comments on the appointment process. The conversation shifts into a satirical exchange about the timing and legitimacy of harassment claims in high-profile political settings.