6 chapters across the catalog
The 2016 safety pin movement emerged in the UK following the Brexit vote as a way for individuals to signal they were not "racist" or "hating" immigrants. Critics like Katie Hopkins argued the movement was a form of virtue signaling by the Remain campaign to disparage those who voted to leave the European Union.
The Safety Pin Movement and Gender Identity in Schools
A YouTube clip by Shelly Carradine explains the "Safety Pin Movement" as a way to show support for women, people of color, and the LGBT community. The hosts discuss the potential psychological impact of social justice messaging on young white males in the education system.
A listener requested "Maximum Karma" for a friend paralyzed in an accident, while another sent a gag gift involving a box of safety pins. The safety pins are a reference to the "safe space" movement following the 2016 election. The hosts reiterated their value-for-value model, which relies on listener donations rather than traditional advertising.
John C. Dvorak discusses a Facebook announcement regarding a new addition to his household, which turns out to be a poodle rather than a child. The conversation shifts to millennial culture and the use of safety pins as a political symbol. The safety pin, originally patented in the 1870s, is ironically linked to its 20th-century use for pinning diapers.
The hosts discuss the theory that George Soros is orchestrating a "Purple Revolution" in the United States, similar to color revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine. They examine the use of safety pins as a solidarity signal and suggest the protests are part of a coordinated effort to destabilize the incoming administration.
LBC host Katie Hopkins criticized a post-Brexit trend where people wear safety pins to signal they are a "safe person" for minorities. Hopkins mocked the movement as a creation of the "Remain" campaign intended to paint "Leave" voters as hateful.
