Topic: Pcr Cycles

A male traveling nurse testified before a medical subcommittee regarding a shift in COVID-19 hospital protocols around January 2021. He alleged that patients were intentionally kept immobile and that the CDC's adjustment of PCR cycle thresholds coincided with a sudden drop in reported cases. The nurse expressed deep moral distress, comparing his role in administering "comfort care" (morphine and Ativan) to being an executioner.

A donor from Wisconsin shared a story about a neighbor who tested positive for COVID-19 while unvaccinated, but received a negative result the next day after claiming to be vaccinated. The hosts attribute this to different PCR cycle thresholds used for vaccinated (28 cycles) versus unvaccinated (38+ cycles) individuals. Dame Sexy also contributed $923.75 from Colorado.

Historical data from the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic shows a secondary bump in infections during the second year, a pattern that appears to be repeating with current COVID-19 variants. In sports news, golfer John Rahm tested positive for COVID-19 for the second time in two months. The recurring positive tests raise questions about the diagnostic reliability of PCR testing for individuals who have already recovered from the virus.

The diagnostic validity of the PCR test is questioned, citing the intentions of its inventor, Cary Mullis, who stated it was not a diagnostic tool. Concerns are raised regarding the CDC's use of different cycle thresholds for vaccinated (35 cycles) versus unvaccinated (40-45 cycles) individuals. Critics argue these standards are designed to statistically favor vaccine efficacy by reducing positive results in the vaccinated population.

The World Health Organization issued a notice regarding PCR testing standards, leading to reports of laboratories lowering cycle thresholds to 27 cycles. Critics suggest this change, occurring shortly after the U.S. presidential transition, is designed to reduce reported case numbers. Epidemiologist Dr. Kat addressed the notice on TikTok, arguing that false positives are rare and emphasizing the need for clinical diagnosis alongside genetic material detection.

The World Health Organization issued a memo regarding the proper use of PCR tests, suggesting that high cycle counts can lead to false positives. This information was widely circulated by outlets like Zero Hedge but received less attention in mainstream reports. The hosts note a repetitive nature in the "media simulation," where old stories like the 1976 swine flu often resurface in current coverage.

The World Health Organization released a directive regarding the risk of false SARS-CoV-2 results when using RT-PCR reagents. The notice emphasizes that high cycle counts can make it difficult to distinguish between background noise and the actual presence of the virus.

The Florida Department of Health has mandated that all labs report the cycle thresholds for PCR tests to provide more context on viral load. This policy change follows a high-profile police raid on the home of Rebecca Jones, a former state data scientist accused of unauthorized access to emergency alert systems. Jones alleged that the raid was political retaliation for her criticism of Florida's COVID-19 data reporting.

A global team of experts identified ten fatal flaws in the Corman-Drosten report, which established the protocol for PCR-based COVID-19 testing. The review claims the tests cannot distinguish between live virus and non-infectious viral fragments. Dr. Anthony Fauci is cited as previously stating that PCR results with a cycle threshold above 35 are often unreliable, contradicting widespread testing practices.

Retired Thai-German microbiologist Professor Sukharit Bhakdi explains the technical limitations of PCR testing for clinical diagnosis. Bhakdi argues that detecting viral genome fragments in the nose or throat does not necessarily equate to an active infection or the COVID-19 disease. He compares the sensitivity of high-cycle PCR tests to a breathalyzer that might detect trace amounts of alcohol without the subject being intoxicated.

Dr. James Linden discussed the financial incentives driving the production of PCR primers and testing kits. He noted that labs are often running 45 cycles, which increases the likelihood of false positives from environmental fragments. The discussion suggests that the rush for government grants has influenced the widespread adoption of these high-sensitivity testing protocols.

An appeals court in Portugal ruled that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test, citing a 97% false-positive rate when cycle thresholds exceed 35. The hosts praise Portugal as a "common sense" country and digress into the high quality and low price of Portuguese wine and olive oil.

Vermont Health Commissioner Dr. Mark Levine addressed questions regarding the cycle threshold (Ct) used in PCR testing during a public radio appearance. Levine acknowledged that most assays are calibrated to a Ct in the 30-range, noting that higher cycles may detect non-infectious viral particles. He stated that the current public health goal is to identify as many infections as possible, even if the science regarding transmissibility at high Ct levels is still evolving.

A producer with experience in PCR testing corrects the host's terminology, explaining that the process involves "thermal cycling" rather than "spinning up." Sir Addison, CEO of Shitposts, promotes Eables CBD and thanks the hosts for their analysis of the PCR "scam."

A detailed report from WRAL in North Carolina investigates how high cycle thresholds in PCR testing lead to inflated case numbers. Experts from Oxford and Duke University explain that tests cycled 35 to 40 times can detect dead RNA from old infections rather than active, infectious virus. The report suggests that a threshold of 25 cycles is a more accurate measure of whether a person is actually contagious.

A July 2020 clip from the "This Week in Virology" podcast features Dr. Anthony Fauci discussing PCR cycle thresholds. Fauci states that a cycle threshold of 35 or more makes the chances of the virus being replication-competent "minuscule" and refers to such results as "dead nucleotides." Despite this admission, standard lab results often fail to disclose the cycle count to patients, which is criticized as a lack of transparency.

The segment explores the technical limitations of PCR testing, specifically the use of 45 cycles which many experts consider too high for accuracy. Reference is made to a vaccine court case, Snyder v. HHS, which notes that results above 35 cycles are cause for concern due to potential DNA contamination. The "CSI effect" is discussed as a phenomenon where the public overestimates the infallibility of DNA evidence, ignoring risks of secondary transfer and lab errors.

The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services confirmed using a PCR test cycle threshold of 37 to signify a positive COVID-19 case. Critics argue that any threshold over 35 results in excessive false positives and picks up viral debris rather than active infections. Lab technicians are accused of being complicit in inflating case numbers by using these high cycle counts to meet political or institutional demands for "positives."

Independent MP Randy Hillier questioned the Ontario government regarding the high cycle threshold (CT) used in PCR testing, which can lead to over 50% false positives. Hillier cited experts claiming that tests over 25 cycles are dubious, while Ontario labs reportedly operate at 38 to 45 cycles. Government officials defended the testing as an "effective tool" for making policy decisions and managing outbreaks in cities like Toronto and Ottawa.

Donald Trump announced that the U.S. has conducted over 100 million COVID-19 tests. Technical experts in Victoria, Australia, confirmed that PCR tests are being run at 35 to 40 amplification cycles, which critics argue is too high and leads to "false positives" by picking up viral fragments that do not indicate active infectivity.