Topic: Hockey Stick

Author Mark Steyn has been involved in a long-running legal battle with climatologist Michael Mann over comments regarding the "hockey stick" climate graph. The case, which has spanned over a decade in the DC court system, centers on allegations of libel and the scientific validity of Mann's research.

The hosts discuss the long-running legal battle between author Mark Steyn and climate scientist Michael Mann. Steyn has spent over a decade in DC courts after calling Mann's "hockey stick" climate graph a fraud. They also joke about suing other podcasters for using the "Value for Value" model.

Author Mark Steyn is currently involved in a long-running defamation lawsuit brought by climate scientist Michael Mann. The suit stems from comments Steyn made 12 years ago regarding Mann's "hockey stick" data and the internal investigation at Penn State. The trial is seen as a significant case regarding the ability to criticize scientific data and the limits of free speech in the climate debate.

Critics examine the "hockey stick" graph created by Michael Mann, alleging that he cherry-picked tree ring data to create a dramatic temperature spike at the end of the record. The graph became an iconic tool for the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to argue that human industry caused unprecedented warming starting in the 1880s. Skeptics claim the data was manufactured to justify political goals rather than reflect accurate historical temperature variations.

A geologist argues that climate has always changed, citing the Medieval Warm Period (1000 AD) as a time of prosperity that was later "erased" by Michael Mann's hockey stick graph. The speaker claims he was denied an NPR interview because he refused to attribute warming to human activity. He asserts that the current "irrational hysteria" in the media ignores 100 previous studies confirming that historical warming was global and natural.

Manitoba health officials reported four cases of the B.1.1.7 COVID-19 variant, though all individuals have already recovered. Despite the low numbers, Canadian Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam released a controversial modeling chart showing a "rocket projectile" spike in cases if public health measures are lifted. Critics described the yellow trend line on the chart as hyperbolic and physically impossible given testing capacities.

A long-standing libel lawsuit filed by climatologist Michael Mann against Dr. Tim Ball was dismissed with prejudice by a Canadian judge. Mann, the creator of the famous "hockey stick" temperature graph, was ordered to pay Ball's legal costs after failing to produce underlying data for the court. The hosts discuss the implications of this ruling for the global warming debate and the transparency of climate science.

Climate scientist Michael Mann lost a legal case in British Columbia after refusing to produce the underlying R2 regression analysis data for his famous hockey stick graph. The court dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice and ordered Mann to pay defendant legal costs.

A 2006 congressional testimony from a geophysicist challenges the "hockey stick" temperature graph, arguing that the Medieval Warm Period was a real, global phenomenon that modern climate scientists have tried to erase. The witness describes being pressured by NPR to attribute warming to human activity and warns of an "irrational hysteria" in the media regarding natural climate cycles.

Climate scientist Michael Mann spoke at Green Mountain College, defending his "hockey stick" climate curve and criticizing political assaults on environmental science. Mann drew controversy by adapting Martin Niemöller's famous Holocaust-era "First they came" quote to describe the targeting of immigrants, scientists, and environmentalists in the current political climate.

The hosts critique the shifting "consensus" numbers on climate change, noting that media figures like Chris Cuomo now cite 99% agreement. They reiterate their skepticism based on the failure of computer models, the "Climategate" emails, and the political nature of cap-and-trade systems.

A donation from a listener in Ontario leads to a discussion about the "hockey stick" climate data illusion and the website ClimateAudit.org. The segment includes personal well-wishes for a family member in Germany battling cancer.

The Bank of Scotland is set to pay out £1.5 billion in bonuses despite being 80% taxpayer-owned, leading to a proposed special tax on bonuses in the UK. On a positive note, the hosts report that the No Agenda audience is growing by 20% month-over-month. They express a desire to reach a "hockey stick" growth curve to support the show's expansion.