Topic: Viva Frei

5 chapters across the catalog

The Chit
Episode 1534 1:16:57 - 1:19:03

1534: The Chit

Project Veritas Boardroom Coup, Viva Frei and Robert Barnes

The hosts discuss the recent leadership changes at Project Veritas and the departure of James O'Keefe. They critique a podcast by Viva Frei and Robert Barnes, noting that while the duo mentioned "No Agenda," they seemed unfamiliar with the show's specific reporting on the Veritas boardroom situation. The hosts dismiss the "boardroom coup" narrative as a distraction.

Toxic Stew
Episode 1452 28:03 - 31:35

1452: Toxic Stew

US Sovereignty, WHO Treaty Legality

Legal analysts Robert Barnes and Viva Frei discuss the Biden administration's efforts to empower the World Health Organization. Barnes clarifies that any rule changes are not legally binding on the United States without a two-thirds Senate vote to ratify a formal treaty. The discussion emphasizes that the US joined the WHO via joint resolution, not a treaty, allowing for unilateral withdrawal.

Brain Fog
Episode 1425 1:04:00 - 1:06:40

1425: Brain Fog

Viva Frei, Canadian Mandate Exit Strategy

Legal commentator Viva Frei predicts that Canadian provinces will slowly drop COVID-19 mandates by citing "changing science" to avoid appearing as though they are yielding to the truckers. Meanwhile, reports suggest police are beginning to clear the Ambassador Bridge.

Baby Stealers
Episode 1423 4:19 - 7:20

1423: Baby Stealers

Viva Frei, FBI Corruption and Agent Provocateurs

Canadian livestreamer Viva Frei reflects on the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and expresses regret for being too objective given his current view of FBI corruption. The discussion links this distrust to fears of agent provocateurs infiltrating the Canadian trucker protests to create a "January 6 type" situation.

King Mitch
Episode 1299 1:19:33 - 1:22:28

1299: King Mitch

Viva Frei, Legal Standing in Election Lawsuits

Legal commentator Viva Frei explains that many election-related lawsuits have been dismissed based on "standing" rather than a lack of evidence. He clarifies that a dismissal for standing means the court did not even reach the stage of reviewing the merits or the detailed affidavits provided by witnesses and intelligence agents.