Topic: False Advertising

5 chapters across the catalog

Lunar Economy
Episode 1872 1:57:47 - 2:01:04

1872: Lunar Economy

Kars 4 Kids, California Advertising Ban

A California judge bans "Kars 4 Kids" advertisements in the state, ruling that the charity misled donors about where their money went. The lawsuit revealed that funds primarily supported a New Jersey-based Jewish organization rather than "needy children" in California. The hosts discuss the effectiveness of the "earworm" jingle despite the controversy.

TRANSNOODLE
Episode 1392 14:48 - 15:33

1392: TRANSNOODLE

Spanx Sale and False Advertising Anecdotes

A brief mention of Sara Blakely selling a stake in Spanx leads to a humorous tangent about the perceived "false advertising" of shapewear. Personal dating anecdotes are shared regarding the surprise of encountering Spanx in social situations.

Biden Reset
Episode 1221 22:47 - 26:57

1221: Biden Reset

Political Advertising, Obama Cease and Desist Order

Barack Obama's legal team reportedly issued a cease and desist order against a Republican PAC ad that used audio from his memoir. The ad featured Obama's voice describing "plantation politics" to criticize Joe Biden's relationship with the Black community. Critics suggest the legal move may have been a marketing tactic to draw more attention to the ad's content.

Infosanement
Episode 1183 49:40 - 51:46

1183: Infosanement

Donald Trump, CNN Lawsuit, Lanham Act False Advertising

Lawyers for Donald Trump sent a letter to CNN threatening legal action under the Lanham Act, alleging false advertising. The claim suggests that if a network portrays itself as unbiased news while being partisan, it violates commercial standards. The discussion notes that such a legal theory could also be applied to other networks like Fox News and is unlikely to succeed in court.

Hemorrhagic Flu Outbreak!
Episode 144 5:29 - 6:19

144: Hemorrhagic Flu Outbreak!

Axe Deodorant False Advertising Lawsuit in India

A man in India filed a lawsuit against the manufacturers of Axe deodorant after using the product for seven years without successfully attracting women. The legal claim targets the brand's marketing imagery, which symbolically suggests that using the spray directly results in romantic success.