Topic: Ashkenazi Dna

A viral video claims that a pet lizard's saliva sent to 23andMe returned results indicating the lizard was 51% Ashkenazi Jewish. The hosts express deep skepticism toward commercial DNA tests, citing personal experiences with inconsistent results for pets.

The hosts revisit early 2020 reports suggesting that COVID-19 appeared to disproportionately affect Han Chinese populations. They recall speculative discussions regarding whether the virus could target specific DNA profiles, such as Ashkenazi lineages, and the role of genetic data companies like 23andMe. The segment concludes that initial reporting on ethnic susceptibility was largely inconsistent with later outcomes.

A theory is discussed suggesting the coronavirus may have originated in the Middle East, specifically Jordan or Saudi Arabia, as a weapon targeting specific DNA markers. The conversation touches on the ACE2 marker being prevalent in both Asian and Ashkenazi populations. It is posited that China may have been analyzing a foreign bioweapon that leaked due to poor laboratory safety protocols.

A speculative theory is discussed regarding whether the coronavirus could be genetically targeted toward specific ethnicities, such as Chinese or Ashkenazi populations. The conversation touches on the potential for using DNA services like 23andMe to enforce selective quarantines based on genetic markers. This is framed as a dark hypothetical scenario involving the segregation of individuals based on their ancestry results.

Inside Edition conducted a test of commercial DNA kits from 23andMe and AncestryDNA using identical triplets and quadruplets. Despite having identical DNA, the siblings received significantly different ancestry percentages, with some showing French or Scandinavian heritage that their siblings did not. The hosts argue that these commercial tests have low confidence levels and are often "bullcrap" used to create a false sense of certainty about heritage.