Gulf of Tonkin Incident, Historical Revisionism and Conspiracy Labels
A review of historical documents from 1964 regarding the Gulf of Tonkin incident reveals discrepancies between official government reports and actual events. While the Pentagon maintained that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched conclusive attacks on U.S. destroyers, later evidence suggests the second incident was fabricated. This historical context serves as a framework for understanding how the label of conspiracy theorist is used to marginalize those questioning official narratives.
gulf of tonkin· lyndon johnson· vietnam war· pentagon· new york times· conspiracy theory
00:00 We do not do discounts. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Thursday, May 30th, 2013. Time for your Gitmo Nation Media Assassination Episode 517. This is no agenda. Did you just blow your nose? Coming to you from the Travis Heights Hideout in Austin, Texas in the morning everybody. I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley, no I didn't blow my nose, I'm John C. Dvorak. It's like, here's John on a Shays Lounge. Mind you, I've never ever seen your studio. I was not allowed to go the one time I was at your house. Not allowed to what? To look at it. So we only have an imaginary vision of your archive with your Shays Lounge. And now I, you know, I, what? Yeah. I'm sitting there blowing my nose. So now I did all my printouts cause I like to have, Oh God. I think you were doing a line.
01:16 I'd be able to have a lot more energy. So I have... nuts. What? So I print out my clips. Yes, we know. Well, apparently the printer had been defaulted to printing landscape. So I can't possibly read this like in two-point type. It's horrible. So who messed with your printer? Was that Busker Jr.? No, I was printing some stuff the other day and I think I did it. So you're one of the few people I know who has a need to print something in landscape.
01:57 Oh yeah, what was it? Oh yeah, no, what it was, was I, you know what's been bothering me is this conspiracy, it's a conspiracy, conspiracy theorists, conspiracy, you know that whole thing? Yeah, I live with it every day, yeah. So I, I think, well you know, what, It's not as if we're not talking about conspiracies, we're just talking about people that are lying to us. Yeah. Trying to get around the lie and figure out what's really going on. And so I went out of my way, since I do have a New York Times subscription, to dig up the old original writings on the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Oh, very good. Which is another one of those things that during this period
02:35 You people would say, oh, you're just a conspiracy person. Yeah. Now, when was this? When was the Gulf of Tonkin? What year was that? It was 1964. Right. I have all the printouts here. Landscape. Right. Because it's the New York Times. So, 64. But of course, since then, obviously, you know, we've become so transparent and it's just, you know, the government doesn't lie to you anymore. Why would it get worse? No, that's impossible. So, anyway, so here's an example of now. You would have been, oh, yeah. conspiracy theorist because you think that there was no attack now the funny thing was there was this there was a there was two incidents that took place one day after another the second day and this by the way is what created the Vietnam War for everybody it was very important was a false flag
03:22 Yeah, well no, it wasn't even a false flag. No, it wasn't a false flag. It was bullcrap. There was no anything. It was just made up out of whole cloth. Yeah, okay. Here's what happened. There were two days. The first day was a Apparently we had a ship way off shore and there was a couple of PT boats from the North Vietnamese coming out there to take a look, see what was going on. We took a couple shots at them. Much later determined that the first story was, oh, they shot at us and so we had to fire back. The real story that came out later was no, we shot at them to get them away. So nothing happened. Somebody must have come up with a bright idea.
04:00 that the next day we were under attack yes by the North Vietnamese out here in the middle of the Gulf of Tonkin yes that day nothing happened at all in fact Lyndon Johnson was recorded as saying he was golfing wasn't he what is he just hanging out by the poolside he said I think they must have been shooting at whales or something But anyway, so the idea was it was just a lie. There was nothing and this lie persisted because here's an article from 1967. This is three years later. Can I just say one thing? So I'm not quite sure what you were doing with the printouts, but if you're walking around and saying to people, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. Here, look at this printout from 1964. This isn't... No, I want it for the show. I'd like to recommend you not do that because that doesn't really work.
04:49 It's for the show. Nobody thinks I'm a conspiracy nut anyway. J.W. Fulbright in a statement confirmed it. This is like three years later during another one of those hearings. You know that they're having okay, did this ever really happen confirmed today that this and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee And the staff meeting was inquiring into the 64 Gulf of Tonkin incidents to clear up uncertainties about reported encounters between the United States destroyers and North Vietnamese torpedo boats Right just three years later. We're doing a little look at look into it the Defense Department issued a statement emphasizing that the evidence
05:29 that two American destroyers were attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats was conclusive. Any suggestion that the August 1964 attacks on the US destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf did not occur is contrary to the known facts the Pentagon statement said. Yeah. So, yeah, so now if you're back there and by the way there was a lot of, there were sailors on the ships and they told their mates and their girlfriends and other, you know, nothing happened, I don't know what this is all about. Oh, nothing happened and you go out and say nothing happened, this is bull crap. You would be dubbed a conspiracy nut or something like that. This is just a way to marginalize the realities that are behind most of these stories.
