Topic: Wael Ghonim

5 chapters across the catalog

Cleanest Dirty Shirt
Episode 377 2:10:47 - 2:14:43

377: Cleanest Dirty Shirt

Wael Ghonim Book Deal and Julian Assange on RT

Wael Ghonim, the Google executive associated with the Egyptian revolution, has secured a major book deal, which the hosts view as a "payoff." Similarly, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is launching a talk show on Russia Today (RT). The hosts criticize the quality of RT's programming and the perceived co-opting of these figures by mainstream or state-run media.

Blood and Treasure
Episode 317 29:49 - 32:55

317: Blood and Treasure

International Republican Institute, Mohamed ElBaradei and Wael Ghonim

The hosts link the Egyptian uprisings to training and financing provided by the International Republican Institute, chaired by John McCain. They also note that Google executive Wael Ghonim created the campaign website for Mohamed ElBaradei, whom they predict will be the next leader of Egypt.

Pap Schmear
Episode 278 1:56:59 - 2:01:54

278: Pap Schmear

Egypt Food Riots and the Google Revolution Myth

The uprising in Egypt is described primarily as a riot over rising food and flour prices rather than a purely political movement. The media narrative focusing on Google executive Wael Ghonim as the "face of the revolution" is dismissed as a myth created to highlight the power of the internet. The hosts compare the public's susceptibility to these narratives to the blind support for projects like high-speed rail in the United States.

Gingerbread Nation
Episode 277 42:10 - 46:30

277: Gingerbread Nation

Media Narratives of the Facebook and Twitter Revolutions

The hosts critique the mainstream media narrative that social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are the primary drivers of the Egyptian revolution. They analyze news clips featuring Google executive Wael Ghonim and protesters at the Egyptian Parliament. They argue that the media is oversimplifying the conflict and that targeting an empty parliament building was a tactical move for safety rather than a strategic victory.