Topic: Miriam Adelson

Representative Thomas Massie's recent primary defeat in Kentucky is analyzed through the lens of his voting record and opposition to the SAVE Act. While some attribute his loss to spending by pro-Israel groups and Miriam Adelson, others argue he lost support in his red district by obstructing the Trump agenda. The hosts also touch on Ken Paxton's involvement in local Texas legal matters affecting the Fredericksburg area.

Buckley Carlson, brother of Tucker Carlson, expresses a sense of betrayal regarding Donald Trump's foreign policy, specifically the military engagement with Iran. He argues that Trump's actions contradict his campaign promises and suggests the influence of major donors like Miriam Adelson dictates U.S. policy toward Israel. The segment explores the idea that Trump is "loyal only to neocons and donors" despite his populist rhetoric.

During a public appearance, Donald Trump called out billionaire donor Miriam Adelson, crediting her and her late husband Sheldon with influencing his decision to recognize the Golan Heights. Trump sparked controversy by claiming Miriam refused to say whether she loved the United States or Israel more, suggesting her primary loyalty lies with Israel. The exchange is highlighted as a rare moment of transparency regarding the influence of mega-donors on U.S. foreign policy.

Candace Owens appears on Piers Morgan's program to argue that Israel dictates United States foreign policy. She claims that Donald Trump's military actions against Iran were taken at the behest of Benjamin Netanyahu and donor Miriam Adelson rather than for American interests. Owens describes a "MAGA schism" between the "9/11 generation" who oppose Middle East intervention and neoconservative elements she claims have infiltrated the movement.

Cenk Uygur and other political commentators have suggested that the appointments of Rubio and Waltz were influenced by major donor Miriam Adelson. Adelson, who invested heavily in the Trump campaign, reportedly sought the inclusion of "Israel hawks" in the cabinet. This perspective frames the appointments as a strategic move to satisfy key financial backers while maintaining a hardline stance in the Middle East.