Topic: Military Proxy

Economist Michael Hudson outlines a historical strategy developed in the 1970s by Senator Scoop Jackson and the Department of Defense to use foreign legions as proxies for U.S. interests. This policy involves utilizing groups that harbor deep-seated hatred for regional enemies to fight "banker wars" and "oil wars." The segment argues that Israel, Ukraine, and various jihadist groups have all served as components of this American imperial strategy.

Following the domestic resistance to the Vietnam War, U.S. planners shifted toward a strategy of proxy warfare to avoid the political fallout of a military draft. This involved mobilizing groups like the Wahhabi jihadists in Afghanistan and later supporting forces in Ukraine and Israel. The goal is to field armies "willing to fight to the last man" of their own country to achieve U.S. geopolitical objectives without American casualties.

Economist Michael Hudson's analysis suggests that because the U.S. cannot politically sustain a military draft, it relies on Israel as a proxy to secure regional oil resources. The theory posits that Israel fights ideologically while serving broader Neocon and neoliberal interests.

The military-industrial complex is identified as the primary winner in the Middle East conflict, with the U.S. launching retaliatory strikes in Syria against Iranian proxies. There have been approximately 20 attacks on American troops in the region recently. Critics argue that the U.S. is being "hoodwinked" into a war economy that benefits defense contractors while ignoring domestic issues.

The "Eager Lion 2013" military exercise in Jordan involves 15,000 soldiers from 18 countries, which observers believe is a preparation for a real-world intervention in Syria. Senator John McCain's recent visit to Syria is seen as a precursor to increased U.S. involvement in a proxy war against Russia. Speculation suggests that a "staged" chemical attack could be used as a catalyst for further military action in the region.