Topic: John Coleman

Weather Channel founder John Coleman challenges CNN's position on climate change, asserting that there is no scientific consensus and that man-made global warming is not happening. Coleman argues that the 97% consensus figure is manipulated because the government only provides research grants to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis. He claims the issue has become a political tool for the Democratic Party rather than a scientific reality.

Weather Channel founder John Coleman appeared on CNN to challenge the scientific consensus on global warming. Coleman argued that the "97% of scientists" figure is manipulated because the government only funds research that supports the global warming hypothesis.

A listener reports that his third-grade son came home crying after a Scholastic reading test that presented global warming as an absolute catastrophe. The test reportedly used multiple-choice questions where the only "wrong" answer was a skeptical view of climate change. The parent used a John Coleman video to counter the "government propaganda" taught in the classroom.

Weather Channel founder John Coleman appeared on CNN's "Reliable Sources" to argue that man-made global warming is a "hoax" and a political tool of the Democratic Party. Coleman claimed that government funding manipulates scientific consensus. In response, Weather Company CEO David Kenny distanced the brand from Coleman, stating his views are not scientifically based. The hosts analyze the media deconstruction and the ownership of The Weather Channel by NBCUniversal and private equity firms.

John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, presents a case against the theory of significant man-made global warming. He cites his 60 years of experience as a meteorologist and criticizes the American Meteorological Society for politicizing science. Coleman highlights the discrepancy between atmospheric warming models and actual measured temperatures, which he claims have shown no warming since 1998.

The hosts conclude that time and cold winters will eventually defeat the global warming "scare." They argue that understanding the financial and political mechanisms behind the movement provides a state of "enlightenment" that reduces fear. The segment ends with a reminder of the $22 billion spent annually in the U.S. on climate initiatives that have not "fixed" the perceived problem.