21:16 Because of all of that co2 emissions from the factories in the sacred ground. Ah, dumb Well you know I think we've seen this go in waves John and I'm sure it goes along with money being released Now we have this big push You've got that Columbia outfit chiming in the president with his hey denying It is the effects on national security And so as well a brand new show I believe its on Discovery Neil deGrasse Tyson And this of course is the tech horny's real doll, if you will. The tech horny just loves this guy and he's the director
21:54 What is the planetarium in New York? Hayden. Hayden, right. One of them And he is an astrophysicist? This guy runs a planetarium let's put it out Yeah he shines the light on the ceiling Is it... I mean I either demeaned that guy No no but he's an astrophysicist He's also a showboater Well this is the problem and he was on Charlie Rose so I watched this Most of it is just him laughing nervously. And I think Rose was even a little bit annoyed because he, DeGrasse Tyson comes up with these funny comebacks on, you know... Charlie Rose will set up just as an example. So we're all going to die from climate change and he'll come back and say well we're dead already! You know? Just bad jokes goes nowhere
22:39 But he is loved by the established... I'll just call them the tech horny because they also fall into a lot of this all in on man-made climate change. First, the question from Rose which I found to be fascinating taking it from Global warming, man-made global warming, man-made climate change, climate change deniers to science deniers. So now we're there! Charlie Rose no less! Do we have too many scientific deniers in our country? Or do we give too much prominence... Do we give too much prominence of the scientific deniers in our country?!
23:17 Let me just, the science is in. Now listen to this... Do we have too many scientific deniers in our country? Or do we give too much prominence to those who want to look the other way at science? There's some of those and dare I implicate Some elements of journalism in this because there's a journalistic ethos not to tell you what your ethos is. Oh, please I'm gonna tell you what you eat So now he's arrogant as well But as I understand it and it's been told to me the journalist obligation when writing a story is to give equal Column space to all sides Let me ask somebody who might actually be a professional in writing as a journalist John C Dvorak is this correct?
24:02 Not not completely you're supposed to do a balanced report is what he's talking about, but you don't give Necessarily right an equal. You have a point of view you have a point of view and it would you have a point of view? He just always gonna have one and some people who have slanted point of views And some people don't some people write objectively But typically there's a story to be told and there will be somebody that will say no It's not that way and you put them into the story, but you don't give them equal Okay, hold that thought and I will come back to you with more questions in a moment We're half to both into one of each side And if someone says the earth is round and someone says the earth is flat at some point You're gonna make a judgment this where there's it's flat people. It just flat-out wrong. I will not be giving them the attention we're wasting time and I'm not doing a service for
24:49 to in my role of informing the public. And so I think journalists are really smart people and they're highly educated and they're curious, they have a curiosity that kids have that they still have as adults it's the other kind of branch of curiosity manifested in society scientists and journalists and that's a great thing to have but at some point invest your brain energy to recognize when something is fringe and report it that way And so, when you do that people then are properly informed about what is and is not true. What is an emergent truth? What is a truth that's in doubt? What is something— Wait a minute. Emergent truth? A truth that has been refuted? Be responsible on that frontier! I think it will help my job certainly
25:42 So is that how you do it then? I don't know what he's talking about. What he is saying for, he's calling on his fellow questioners... He wants the journalists to just be good to him. Party line! Yes yes but he's actually asking people just ignore anything and they'll go back and use this, I've heard this before They go back and use the argument again. If you're talking about World War II, you don't give equal time to Hitler's perspective on the genocide! Who said that? Oh yeah I've heard it Isn't that kind of exactly what you need to figure out what that guy was thinking or how he made? No, this is a climate change guy. They mock everybody. You've heard it before on... I can't remember which we had a clip where somebody said the problem with the journalism is they should be all in! They shouldn't even be addressing any of these doubters. They shouldn't even be writing about them and they shouldn't even give many
26:38 attention. I mean, we should take the 30 000 real scientists as opposed to the people who are all in on this because very few of them have any science in their background...very few! And they just say let's just go for that you know just push with it because they were all gonna die which is why that Columbia boy don't have much time left yeah we need insurance every year there we were gonna was it past midpoint, oh we can if we don't do something by the end of this year 1999. We're all gonna die in 2000 comes along. We're all going to die is just I need to get cold it because you got a good role there but it's a few more things we need to listen to. We are all gonna die! Do I have this clip? Yes