6 chapters across the catalog
The "Great Reset" is characterized as an effort by globalist entities to return to the pre-Trump international order, specifically resuming policies from the Obama era. This perspective suggests that the four-year Trump presidency disrupted a long-term globalist plan that the current administration is now attempting to put back on track.
A discussion on "no borders" internationalism leads to a tangent about the metric system and paper sizes. One host expresses a visceral dislike for the dimensions of A4 paper, calling it "creepy" and "too narrow" compared to standard 8.5x11 letter paper. They debate whether paper dimensions should follow the Fibonacci golden ratio and why the U.S. has resisted adopting the metric system.
CIA Opposition to Donald Trump and Support for Hillary Clinton
Speculation suggests the CIA and globalist elites are aligned against Donald Trump due to his anti-interventionist stance, favoring Hillary Clinton instead. The discussion posits that the intelligence community views Clinton as a reliable internationalist who understands their established systems, unlike Trump who threatens elite structures.
The Economist, Zanny Minton Beddoes and Internationalism
Zanny Minton Beddoes has taken over as editor-in-chief of The Economist, leading to a perceived shift toward a more accusatory and internationalist editorial tone. Critics suggest her background with the IMF influences the magazine's coverage of populist movements.
New York Times, Peter Spiro Propaganda Analysis
An op-ed by Peter Spiro in the New York Times titled "Trump's Anti-Muslim Plan is Awful and Constitutional" is deconstructed as a piece of propaganda. The analysis focuses on the use of the word "and" instead of "but" to linguistically link the Constitution with the word "awful." Spiro is identified as an internationalist whose framing suggests the Constitution itself is a problem.
The hosts debate the motivations of wealthy donors like Soros and the Rockefellers. Dvorak posits a "rubbleization" theory, suggesting that internationalist organizations promote world peace and global governance primarily to prevent major wars that would lead to the theft or redistribution of their personal wealth and art collections.
