Topic: Amicus Brief

4 chapters across the catalog

Nukes in Space!
Episode 1634 1:53:32 - 1:55:44

1634: Nukes in Space!

Missouri vs. Biden, Supreme Court and Amicus Briefs

The "Missouri vs. Biden" case regarding government-pressured social media censorship is heading to the Supreme Court. There is a proposal for the "No Agenda Show" to file an amicus brief to represent the interests of independent podcasters and producers who have faced shadow-banning or content removal. The goal is to have the podcasting perspective considered by the justices in this landmark free speech case.

Deputary
Episode 1623 1:07:12 - 1:13:24

1623: Deputary

Mike Johnson Defends Constitutional Challenges to 2020 Election

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson defended his role in the 2020 election challenges during a contentious interview with Margaret Brennan on CBS. Johnson argued that the "Texas Amicus Brief" focused on Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, alleging that state officials changed election laws without legislative approval. He dismissed Brennan's "election denier" label, stating his arguments were based on the plain language of the law.

Yoko Swifto
Episode 1620 34:42 - 38:23

1620: Yoko Swifto

Missouri v. Biden, Supreme Court Amicus Briefs

The Missouri v. Biden lawsuit regarding government-coerced social media censorship has reached the Supreme Court. Nineteen amicus briefs have been filed, including submissions from medical associations arguing that the government had a "compelling interest" to suppress speech regarding vaccine safety. The CDC continues to emphasize the importance of vaccines for RSV, flu, and COVID-19 in children.

Soest Piet
Episode 1176 1:49:32 - 1:52:20

1176: Soest Piet

Title VII Civil Rights Act, Sex vs Gender Identity

The legal debate before the Supreme Court centers on whether the word "sex" in the 1964 Civil Rights Act includes sexual orientation and gender identity. Current case law suggests employers can fire individuals for being gay as long as the policy is applied equally to both men and women. Activists seek to expand the definition to provide specific protections for LGBTQ+ individuals under federal law.