1:07:11 you know anti-bull crap for sure. I don't think anyone can show or prove anywhere that I or you ever said polio vaccine is no good or other vaccines that have been proven for you know decades and decades but when you come up with stuff like Gardasil And this is, and the dentist. Or the swine flu, there's a classic. Oh, hello. We saw that coming out of the blue. It was just handed to us with a silver platter. And it was obvious what was going on here was all using adjuvants and all these things. First you needed two shots, it was just going to rack up. And then they changed the definition of a pandemic.
1:07:51 Yeah, they changed the definition of all this. So this is being anti-science? Is this what this guy's implying? Well, he's an idiot. Well, so I had a little back and forth because he was saying, oh, you know, by the way, I believe in vaccines, but I also believe in UFOs. So, you know, I'm like... What, he believes in UFOs? Yeah. He was trying to endear me at the same time while putting me down and saying, you know, we see more and more HPV in people's mouths. And I write back, I say, yeah, let me guess, ever since Bill Clinton made it okay for blowjobs to not be sex, I think people are having more oral sex. The guy writes back. That's a known trend. That's a known trend. Yes. Yes. So the guy- That would account for seeing more HPV and it was everybody coming in with it. Right. And then, you know, he says, yeah, oh yeah, there's definitely that, but we don't take any risks and we cut it out of, you know, we cut it out of the people's mouths after a buyout, whatever it is. So it's going on and on and on.
1:08:47 And I'm like, there must be, there's got to be more that we can do to have people understand that this particular This particular vaccine is, it really truly is a scam. We saw the amount of money that went into marketing this thing. I have my, Mickey and Christina were both terrorized by the doctors calling up after a simple pap smear with the new pap smear system, which has a much higher rate of false positives. We've done all of this work with all this research. And they call up and say, oh, you're pre-cancerous.
1:09:25 You should probably come by, we'll do a biopsy. This is not fun for women. And then the biopsy comes back and oh you're clean, but you know what, you probably should get the HPV shot. Now, there's a movie. that has been put together. It's called One Girl, and I wanted to play a couple clips from this because they have a number of scientists, doctors, and in fact, this is Dr. Diane Harper who was the lead Merck Gardasil researcher And she's in this movie. It's professionally put together. I think it's onegirlmovie.com. Have a listen to this first clip from this movie, One Girl. What we know is that if you look at all the women who get an HPV infection, approximately 70% of those are going to clear that infection all by themselves within the first year with no help from anybody. You don't have to detect it and you don't have to make it go away. It's going to do it. The body's going to take over and do it. Gee, I haven't heard that.
1:10:24 Of course not. Within two years, about 90% of all of those HPV infections are going to clear all by themselves. Oh, okay. That's 90% have cleared. Good. Now, by three years, you've got 10% of that original group of women that have HPV infections that are left. And by three years, half of those infections have progressed into what we call a CIN2-3 lesion or a precancerous lesion. So, approximately 5% of HPV infections are going to go into a precancerous lesion. Which is not what the doctor said. This would take years before you can go into a precancerous lesion.
1:11:07 They're like, oh no, you're precancerous and you're also pre-dead. So now you have that small group of women who have precancerous lesions and now let's look at that moving into invasive carcinoma. What we know then is that amongst women with CIN3 lesions, so that's a little bit more severe than the other group, it takes five years for about 20% of them to become invasive carcinomas. That's a pretty slow process. It takes about 30 years for 40% of them to become invasive cervical carcinomas. So there's some numbers that you probably won't hear anywhere else except in this movie and here. Well, let the dentist do in his own juices. Then we have the negative effects. Dr. Lucia Tomlijonovic
1:12:02 The adverse effects of this particular vaccine. When one looks at the independent literature, so studies which are not sponsored by the vaccine manufacturers, so with relation to Gardasil, there have been several reports documenting multiple sclerosis and encephalomyelitis, which is brain inflammation. Hey, this sounds good! In girls who have received the Gardasil vaccine. So just because a study sponsored by the manufacturers does not identify problems with the vaccine does not necessarily mean that the vaccine is safe.
1:12:44 In fact, if one looks at the manufacturer studies, they are often not designed to detect serious adverse events. There was a study done by a group of researchers sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline and they were looking at Cervarix, which is another HPV vaccine. And the authors acknowledged that none of the studies that they evaluated has been designed None of these studies have been designed to detect autoimmune diseases. So obviously you're not going to find what you're not looking for. I love that. This is just beautiful. And then the one that we're most interested in, and this comes from the same movie, this is Lee O'Donnell regarding the Vaccine Compensation Act. The reason vaccines are different than, say,
1:13:45 a drug, a prescription drug, is that there is an act. It's called the Vaccine Compensation Act. And it was enacted, I believe, in the mid-80s. And the purpose of the act was to limit, in a very significant way, the number or the manner in which you could bring a claim against a pharmaceutical company as a result of an adverse event associated with that vaccine. So for example, in the use Vioxx, which we talked about Vioxx a bit, if you took Vioxx and you had a heart attack, you could bring a claim in your local state court potentially or the local federal court and be actively litigating that claim directly against Merck in that court.
1:14:36 to prove that you were damaged by the drug and to prove exactly how you'd been injured, what your long-term effects would be of the injury and so forth. But that was as a direct exchange between the individual who's injured and the pharmaceutical company itself. In a vaccine situation, The patient who's been injured does not have the right to bring a case against Merck directly in an initial matter. Under the Vaccine Compensation Act, they have to file a claim in the Federal Court of Claims in DC. And they actually, the other party is the U.S. government, the Department of Justice. And so Merck in some measure or in every measure at that point doesn't have any skin in the game. They have no risk. They have nothing. The government advocates the sort of the safety of the vaccine.
1:15:34 And the individual has a limited mechanism in which they can prove that the vaccine was the cause of their particular injury. So I know we've discussed this many times, but I thought this was a nice summary of how it actually works where you have no recourse. Yeah, that's the way it works when you have no recourse. And I think this dentist who criticized you for being unscientific should listen to some...actually be scientific himself instead of just jumping to conclusions like that. I mean, this is what's going on with the public today. They get suckered by these public relations people... Who have good slogans like anti-science. Right. You propagate the anti-science thing. Oh, you're anti-science. Oh, you're a conspiracy nut.