1:24:05 And I have now come into possession of the most recent update. It is the CleanIT project. This is from the European Union. There's a link in the show notes at 452.nashownotes.com. You can see the entire CleanIT site. This, of course, this document is not listed there because it is confidential, not for publication, limited distribution. The recipient may share this document only with others within their organization on a need-to-know basis. Now the fact that I am in possession of this probably means that it's being floated to see what the response will be. It's being purposely leaked. Yes, it is being leaked. I would like to read you some of the recommendations that will be a part of the legislation of the European Union as it pertains to terrorism, illegal activities and the Internet.
1:24:54 Are you ready? No. Okay, so they'll lead in the European Commission. will be approached to consider finding a European organization that will adopt the results of the Clean IT, continue its activities and host a new European public-private dialogue and cooperation format to reduce terrorist use of the Internet. So what they're doing here is they're pitching for regulation and of course another government body that will regulate your Internet freedoms. And in Europe it is the European Commission who does this. They have all the power. These are the non-elected elites who run the show.
1:25:31 So let's just run through a couple of things of what this will... Oh, by the way, governments that commit to this document will start the National Clean IT Cooperation format within half a year. So this is six months from now, John. We could be off air within six months, and I'll tell you why. Listen to what's going on here. Under the legal framework, Internet companies must be obliged by law to provide LEAs, that's law enforcement agencies, but I'll just call them LEAs from now on because they use it throughout the entire document. With all necessary customer information for investigations of terrorist use of the internet, it must be legal for police officers to patrol on social media. This includes having a profile, joining user groups, sending and receiving messages on the platform. So we're going to have cops on the social media. Oh, this is a cop job I wouldn't mind having. Well, stand by. Hey, I'm going to be on patrol today. I'll be on Twitter.
1:26:25 I need a break. I'm on patrol. Yeah, I gotta take a break from Twitter. I'm gonna go. I'll see you guys at lunch. I'm gonna be out. Yeah, this afternoon I'm gonna be patrolling Facebook if you know what I mean. And then I'm gonna go patrol Friend Finder if you know what I mean. I got a camera. Gotta check on everybody. Gotta check on the terrorists. Okay, knowingly providing hyperlinks on websites to terrorist content must be defined by law as illegal. Let me repeat that. Yes, please repeat that. That was a good one. Knowingly providing hyperlinks on websites to terrorist content must be defined by law as illegal.
1:27:08 Of course, really what is terrorist content? Is that of course? There you go terrorist content States mustn't states and that that means of course the the member states of the European Union countries must make clear that original terrorist content and terrorist activities on the internet of people and organizations are is illegal and should not be allowed on internet company platforms. And the platforms is the thing that becomes very interesting because we're going to explain what that means. I love this. Judges, public prosecutors and specialized police officers must be legally allowed to order by means of a notice and take action procedure to remove terrorist content from the internet. So that doesn't mean you're going to have a trial.
1:27:57 I mean specialized police officers can go, let's remove this from the internet. This is terrorist content, let's get rid of it. Governments must have LEAs or intelligence agencies monitor terrorist use of the internet, but only monitor specific threats, not primarily the population as a whole or all internet use. Again, what could possibly go wrong with that? Governments have clear policies on intelligence gathering and when to take action against terrorists, radicalizing content on the Internet. So now it's radicalizing content that they will be policing. Governments must have specialized police officers patrol on social media. There it is again. Governments must disseminate lists of domain names that are not allowed to be registered to prevent terrorist propaganda.
1:28:49 So what would that be? Like, I don't know, noagendershow.com? No agenda, that's got a very nebulous. It's propaganda man. It's to prevent terrorist propaganda. This is so open for interpretation. Governments must subsidize competent NGOs as non-governmental organizations. That's going to have to be us. Exactly. That substantially contribute to reducing terrorist use on the internet and radicalize. That's what we're up. That's exactly what the no agenda shows all about. But then we have to become a registered NGO. Yeah. Okay, well there's money in it for us. I'm telling you there's big money in it for us. Yeah, I mean I don't have a problem with this. Okay, um let me skip down to the next bit here. And by the way we also consider Hillary a terrorist. Yes, and just saying this is enough to get us kicked off. Now we have to implement flagging and reporting button systems.
1:29:46 Flagging slash report button systems must be implemented by provider everywhere. Ah, yes blog. Well, yes, I'll tell you This has to happen on the following providers of chat boxes email services messaging system social networks retailing sites voice over internet protocol web forums must all have flagging systems web forums I Now it's dumb. It gets better. The anonymity of the... Hey, boing boing. Yeah. The anonymity of the reporter must be preserved. Reporter details must... Wait a minute, this is contradictory because there's other laws saying you can't have anonymity. What's the deal? Let me finish the sentence. Reporter details must never be shown to content owners. In other words, you can just go rat on people and you're never gonna have any repercussions because you know you'll be protected.
1:30:42 You'll be protected by ratting someone out. I'm ratting out the New York Times. Specialized NGOs should actively flagged illegal terrorist content. Oh my god, John. Can you imagine just sitting around all day just clicking flagging stuff? All day. I don't like this guy's face, dick. And it gets better. Internet companies could extend a higher credibility status to trusted flagging organizations. Ooh, trusted flaggers! I'm a trusted flagger. Wanna see my flag? We'll have the brown shirts in cyberspace. I don't know about your flag, but I wouldn't mind seeing your pole. I know. Voice over IP services, it must be possible to flag users for terrorist activity. How can you do that? Unless you're listening in. If messaging systems are attached, it must also be possible to flag specific messages.
1:31:36 Some voice over IP technologies allow for conversations to be flagged. Yeah, I guess that's what Skype's doing. That's why they're sucking so bad. Yeah, too many flags clogging up the bandwidth. Internet companies offering users the opportunity to create their own subgroups. should make flagging reporting buttons available on these subgroups and for the... This is ridiculous. Now you're getting me mad. Now there's a column in this. This is my Monday column. PC Magazine how stupid this is. You can't have every blog and every comment stream and everything else have a flagging button that goes to the government. Hold on. And for the moderators to remove content. So we need to have Nazis... That's what moderators can do already. Yeah. Nazis.
1:32:22 Moderators moderate for a reason. Is it terrorism if somebody comes on the blog and says you suck? Well this is interesting because I'm glad you asked me that question. They're terrorizing me. Here it is. So now they're calling for this advisory organization which will determine all of these things. This is the Ministry of Appropriate Freedoms. The organization will provide research and advice on terrorist and other content which is recognized as dangerous throughout the EU and in each individual country. They would be, the organization should provide advice on legislation and jurisprudence, academic work on the subject, material that can be researched and used for machine learning,
1:33:14 Known terrorist and extremist content and here it comes hate speech So that's where you're going to get kicked off the interwebs is because of your hate speech because you said something hateful you bullied somebody And by the way, if you're going to join one of the NGOs, the Nazi group organizations, it states here specifically governments, legal law enforcement agencies, NGOs and internet companies could employ or use former terrorists and victims to reduce radicalization online. So there's a gig in it for you. So we can flip you. Yeah. Oh, yeah.
1:34:06 So, let's see, I had one more thing. Referral units. What are you reading from again? Why don't you remind me? This is the Clean IT, Clean It, September 2012 document for best practices and permanent dialogue. And this came from? From the interwebs. No, I mean it came from the EU or who's the author? This is the... I'll give you the website. Hold on a second. It is... Here it is. Come on, mouse. The URL is cleanitproject.eu and they have the August up there, the August draft. This is September.
1:35:00 This is reduced so the most recent article on the clean IT is reducing the impact of terrorist use of the internet and so September is not published officially. Now interestingly enough this is... How does this differ from the August? Did you do a comparison? Yeah, the August one is just like a terrorist you know using the internet whatever. Radicalizing. No, no. This has specific rules and regulations they're laying out here. You sure this wasn't just planted and it's bullcrap and it never will appear in the real document? No, because the last time I got one it was published a few weeks later. Okay. Internet companies must only ask customers' users to identify themselves with real names. Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
1:36:00 How can you, what are the cops doing? Are they going to be patrolling the Facebook and the Twitter and the Friend Finder and all the rest of these things? Are they going to be using their real names? The office Sergeant John Jenkins? Well, I'm glad you asked that. We have the heading Virtual Community Policing. Let me read you some, and this by the way is all marked up in the show notes. You can download the PDF. Virtual community policing must be used to find and connect to persons in danger of being radicalized. There's a whole bunch of... We could just arrest them and throw them in the slammer like we normally do. Virtual police officers should be... Oh hey, I got a better idea. Why don't we find these people and then trick them into pushing a button that says there's a bomb blowing up a building? That would be a good... well... virtual... Are we doing most of the radicalization ourselves? I mean... Well... Just cutting out the middleman thing, it doesn't make sense. Then I'll jump straight to point eight.
1:36:55 Virtual police officers should become members in extremist and terrorist fora as much as possible, subscribing to news, mailing lists, alerts, etc. to be able to detect any terrorist content or activity. It's saying it right there! The virtual police officers have to join the terrorist forums, which they call fora, subscribe to the news lists and mailing lists, I guess get involved in the community so you can then go bust people. Hmm. Virtual police officers on the other hand should be easily recognizable, make clear they are real policemen, and use their real photos, names, and various ways to contact them. What?
1:37:39 Virtual police officers should use- That's not gonna work. Virtual police officers should use easy to understand popular language, friendly icons, and profile photographs in order to lower the threshold of being contacted and in order to be effective in combination with the younger users of social media. Wuzzup? Yo, brah. Yo, bro. Wuzzup? Wuzzup? Youse guys. Anyone lead around here So this is what's coming and you know, what's gonna happen? This is exactly what this is. You know, there's no stopping this and this is also going to be used for Intellectual property. Yeah, this is going to be used to curb your free speech which you already don't have certainly not in Europe and