02:58 Anyway in in the morning to you there Jean-Claude. And in the morning to you Adam and in the morning to all the ships at sea and boots on the ground that listen to the No Agenda show on a bi-weekly basis. Also the feet in the air that probably never listen. And in the morning to all of our human resources those who have shown up today in the chat room at noagendastream.com, noagendachat.net. Actually we seem to have a reasonable quorum who have gathered round to talk turkey with us post this turkey holiday and I think we both were working on the same News item which of course is a perfect time to slip this in Not only into the news stream to basically keep it out of the news stream because everyone's too busy with Black Friday Cyber Monday get your pepper spray at the mall
03:50 that no one is paying attention to what's going to happen Monday in the Senate. And I think both you and I were both working on this bill that is going to be voted on apparently Monday. Senate Bill 112, I believe it is. This is the bill and this has been passed around the interwebs here and there. that essentially will do exactly what Newt Gingrich was talking about at the opening of the previous presidential debate, is create a separate system in these United States of Gitmo Nation, where a military judge will determine if you are, if you deserve the status of an unprivileged enemy belligerent,
04:41 If so, then they can pick you up and troops will come to your home and knock on your door and take you away and lock you up. Now which bill are you talking about? What number? I believe it's Senate Bill 112. I can double check. It's going along, it's been parallel with the Senate Bill 1867. I'm sorry, 1867. You are correct. 1867. And so I'm looking at this, go ahead. I like the fact that it's McCain. Douchebag McCain, our friend. Let's hit him right now. Douchebag! A total dork. With Levin, who is a Democrat. It's funny, they always bicker about all these different kinds of things.
05:29 But when it comes down to cracking down on the American public, Democrats and Republicans are in lockstep. We agree. This is great. We agree on something. Finally, we agree on locking up American citizens. Is this not exactly the same type of legislation they had when they locked up the Japanese Americans? Isn't this exactly the same thing? No, this is much more onerous. It's worse? That was something else. That was illegal too, but it was a different stuff. This basically allows the military, first you gotta change a bunch of laws. Posse comitatus, you know, we essentially in our country, we cannot allow the military to police the public. It's a law since like 1880, isn't it? That this posse comitatus means the American military may not be used against the American citizens like in Egypt and stuff.
06:19 Right, and by the way, you wonder why people want to support the second... Maybe the liberals out there who are against gun ownership should follow this a little more closely and understand the reasons for the Second Amendment. The judge is coming. I got the judge. This is why I moved to Texas, man, for this very reason. To teach your last stance. That's right. That's the Alamo here. Camp Alamo Mofo. Not too far away from San Antonio as a matter of fact. Davey Curry here. While you're down there you should take a drive and go look at the Alamo. It's very funny. I'm sure there's going to be border patrol there. I don't want to go there. I was like this is bad news here.
06:58 Yeah, that's where they set it up. So subtitle D detainee matters. Now I, of course, what I usually do is I go through these bills and see what they, what other things they refer to is how did this happen? Because you know, you, they are not actually changing the posse comitatus act. I figured out how this worked. Section 131031, affirmation of authority of the armed forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the authorization for use of military force. So this is the portion of the bill that says a person who was a part of or substantially supported Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces, which I think is the no agenda audience. I think we can be deemed as associated forces.
07:48 If you are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person, any person who has committed a belligerent act. What does that mean, belligerent act? Well, let's look up the definition of belligerent first. Let's just do what we always do. Belligerent here we go adjective hostile and aggressive a bull-necked belligerent old man Hey, you better lock your window Hostile That's the belligerent right there that is the definition under arrest bull-necked belligerent old man It's that's the first definition
08:34 engaged in a war of conflict as recognized by international law. Noun, a nation or person engaged in war or conflict as recognized by international law. Then we have derivatives belligerently, origin late 16th century from Latin belligerant, waging war from the verb belligerare from bellum, which is war. So basically if you're just doing war talk, Or if you have directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces and what is I guess they imply support being money, but it could just be holding up a foam finger saying go go. You're good. Yeah, it could be a go for go for go for do things that that's what it will be. This is what I want to arrest. I have a different take on this whole thing when you're finished with your little elaboration here. I want to. Okay, let me just go through how this actually came to be and how it can actually happen.
09:30 So here, detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the authorization for use of military force. So what they're doing is they're referring back to a previous document, which I shall grab for you now. Hold on a second. We have to go back to Public Law 107-40 from September 18th, 2001. This is just one week after 9-11. Authorization for the use of United States Armed Forces. So this has been on the books and renewed by every single, by both Presidents Bush and
10:07 And of course, Obama, the president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11th or harbored such organizations or persons in order to prevent any future acts, blah, blah, blah. A specific statutory authorization consistent with Section 8A1 of the War Powers Resolution The Congress declares this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of Section 5B of the War Powers Resolution. So, and this is all in the show notes, by the way, 360.nashownotes.com.
10:45 Then we go to the US War Powers Resolution 50 U.S. Code 1541-1548, and here I have highlighted, well this is basically telling you how Congress and the Senate, it has special rules for how new executive powers are to be passed, which of course is exactly what's taking place. And which happens is they've had these closed door Senate committees and House committees, which not publicized, not on C-SPAN. No one's talked about it. And then all of a sudden there's a vote on Monday. Of course, everyone's still drunk. And it's Cyber Monday. We get no time. We're going to be shopping. The whole world is going to be in front of their computer shopping, not watching C-SPAN. Yeah, the nerve of these guys to do this on our shopping day. Yeah, that is, that's belligerent right there. That's un-American. It's abhorrent, I tell you. So then specifically,
11:38 Section 1036, procedures for status determinations. This is what's important. This is from the bill that will be voted on on Cyber Monday. How do we determine if you are to receive your Miranda rights and essentially be prosecuted the way the law of the land is supposed to work in the United States or how this will take place if Newt Gingrich is president and he says, you know what? I think you're a bad guy. I'm going to go take care of you. Here's how it works. One, a military judge shall preside at the proceedings for the determination of status of an unprivileged enemy belligerent. So some judge from the military is going to sit there and say, you know, you seem to be a bullnecked old man.
12:25 You are now an unprivileged enemy belligerent. Well, let's assume it'd be some hippie protest or some unreconstructed hippie protest or probably my age Shaking his fist at the good at everything, you know You're supporting terrorism. There you go. Well, there's birds on a wire to an unprivileged enemy belligerent may at the election of the belligerent be represented by military council at proceed so jag Because we get that guy from Jag to show up at proceedings for the maybe I could get Demi Moore She was hot in wasn't that officer and gentleman wasn't she? Wasn't she in that continue be represented by military council proceedings for the determination of status of belligerent
13:10 The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on any modification of the procedures submitted under this section. The report on any such modification shall be so submitted not later than 60 days before the date on which this modification goes into effect." So essentially if they want to change these rules, they just send a little note to Congress, hey we're changing the rules and My take is set up. This has been going on since 9-11 with the War Powers Resolution.