1:13:18 Well, that sinkhole is still weird. So, uh, we got a letter from a guy. Unless you want to talk more about the spiral. No, I'm done with the spiral. I felt real good about this letter because we're actually teaching some people to look more carefully. Everybody I talk to that listens to our show, whether they like it or not, they always say, well, at least we're taking a more skeptical look at things instead of just, you know, we're not hooked like fish anymore. Right. So this guy came in with a little thing and I wanted to go over it because I have some comments for him. Here's a headline, this is Jeff Wheeler, here's a headline and subhead I saw on Reuters and after learning from your show how to identify one-sided reporting I saw right away how biased and unfair this was.
1:14:04 And he, I think rightly so, he feels that this has been slanted in the way it's told, the way the story's told, and we talked about this before, toward a Republican or toward a Democratic slant. Here's the story, Reuters, with an eye on November elections. This is very short, there's only a sentence. With an eye on November elections, Republicans pounced on a weaker than expected jobs report on Friday to cast doubt on President Obama's economic leadership and question if his policies would spur enough growth. his interpretation he said he's noticed right away says pounced like a kitten it's a weak word yeah and this one I thought was really good this is outstanding this little thing to cast doubt the word to with to cast doubt implies that it was their intention and they didn't actually do it oh very good I thought that was his best best hit words matter and this by the way we say words matter this is what we're talking about spur enough growth
1:15:01 unquote, the word enough here is double speak. Have you ever had enough growth? It's saying Republicans are so hard to please. So he alternatively wrote it as, with an eye on November's election, Republicans noted in a weaker than expected jobs report on Friday that cast doubt on President Obama's economic leadership and questioned if his policies would spur growth, which is a pretty neutral way of doing it. But I would slant it toward the Republican side just for, to be balanced. And I would, here's what I would do. With the eye on November elections, Republican, instead of noted, said, that's more statement-like rather than just something that's minor. Noted always implies, oh they noted it, I noted it. Said a weaker than expected jobs report on Friday.
1:15:50 see if friday there was friday june fourth and i'm trying to let him try to get a word kit that cast doubt that that that would be eliminated and i would go with a more active uh... were were in the past tense casted doubt should go like uh... expect jobs report on friday but that didn't get friday not that but you can restart over the athletes uh... republicans said in a week and expected jobs report on friday that cast a doubt on President Barack Obama's economic leadership and questioned, it should be, and questioned his policies, questions if his policy would spur any growth. Now that would be the real slanted way of putting it. In other words, instead of if his policy would spur growth, if his policy would spur any growth. And then with question, you might want to take a look at using this usage instead of Obama's economic leadership
1:16:52 and questioned if his policies too, and now questioned if his policies would, and that changes it from past tense to what happened the other day to something more, um... uh... it would be now now is which become kind of a a story because you have a pass is moving toward the present so you're creating kind of a uh... movement you creating a drama and uh... it did brings the readers in a little better and it's the but this is completely slanted the way i wrote of course so what what i can't reconcile is all the financial reporting says weaker than expected jobs report yet the president
1:17:34 is out at Kay Neal International Trucks in Hyattsville, Maryland saying, uh, hey it's working! We added 431,000 jobs! Applause. Fifth month in a row we've seen jobs gains! Applause. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. You know, it's just like, the front page of WhiteHouse.gov is like, what's the headline? It's a great headline. On the road to recovery, during the first month of last year our economy lost an average 750,000 jobs each month. Now new job numbers show that even excluding temporary census jobs in the first five months of this year, the economy has created nearly half a million new jobs. But everyone at Wall Street says exactly the opposite. Somebody's wrong. Yeah, not the Ministry of Truth, John. Well, you know, if you lose 500,000 jobs and you create 400,000 jobs with a net loss of 100,000, you can still say you've created 400,000 jobs.