44:33 his own political profile maybe but certainly profiled in America. Avanadi too! Sorry? Avanadi too! Completely an Avenadi story except Avenadi didn't stick the hair on his head he went full bald enter Christiane Anampour she does an interview with a foreign minister of Ukraine Vadim Pristaiko This is the Secretary of State, this is the Foreign Minister. This is the guy who deals with everything with other countries he deals with the United States State Department and he's been in the inner circle of Zelensky since before he got elected and throughout his entire first year in office
45:18 Christiane Anampour is so help and the guys in I think it was actually in DC at the embassy's you know, it's outside shot. And he's you know, just doing this interview. He has business in Washington, D C because that's what foreign ministers do Christiane Annapur is so hell-bent on getting him to admit about this quid pro quo and it's so obvious that Lev Parnas, you know he's the missing link in everything. Now we can finally get rid of the president. But she can't make it happen, and her valiant efforts are well appreciated. But this clip which ran on CNN International has not aired once on CNN in the US And this is one of the main guys who would know exactly what's happening He is just like Hillary Clinton was a sidekick to Barack Obama when she was Secretary of State The guy was on the call
46:14 I have a couple of clips from this interview. Rudy Giuliani, who is the president's personal lawyer has now spoken out as you know and he has said several things mostly that he did carry a very explicit message from the president via
46:50 Rudy Giuliani that there would need to be a quid pro quo if Ukraine was going to continue getting any kind of assistance, financial military political whatever kind of assistance. And furthermore he has now said that he is spoken to key officials within President Zelensky's circle since you are one of those and you were when this happened did you get that message from Lev Parnas? Now, you have to kind of get into the guy's speech pattern because he is obviously not a native English speaker. His English is impeccable but it has a heavy accent and is a little jerky But the question is very clear and obvious It's all Ukrainian media as well today and yesterday And strangely enough my name was not mentioned although I am Minister for Foreign Affairs And frankly I never spoke with this individual And again frankly I don't trust any word that he is now saying
47:44 The assistance which he is referring to was reviewed each and every year, annually at least twice. And half a year at the end of the year so we knew that this assistance is to be reviewed sometimes it would be cut because of some political understanding of what is to be done in Ukraine Sometimes being erased which now we are observing So I know it's, you'll get into it as you listen to him but he saying no this is very normal. It's very normal every six months we adjust, we talk to the State Department talked to our counterparts sometimes things have to be adjusted down We have to do certain things all in normal course of business This Lev Parnas guy yeah not quite sure what he is He seems like has his own problems As he said he's fighting for his own case The guy when he did the interview with Rachel Maddow had a GPS tracker on his ankle
49:00 Because he's on bail, he is not allowed to leave the country etc. But! That doesn't work for Christiana Ampour. Let's make sure... You say that your name hasn't been mentioned public, I just want to make sure that you will never receive this kind of message verbally or otherwise from anybody connected with Rudolph Giuliani or representing the president Just to make sure you didn't trick me and someone else told you there was a quid pro quo Are you really sure? I never met Rudy, I never met this Parnas and all other names mentioned. I believe that people are now trying to raise their political importance. I've never had the chance and frankly we don't need these channels our channels of communication with Americans are well established
49:47 If some of the unofficial contacts through the advisors, that's why advisors for. We took the official formal part were happy with the conversation I was at all the meetings and the conversation is a telephone on the person with President Trump and they can tell you with all certainty that he was never mentioned that we have to do something and president Zelenskyy was always telling him that whatever this message and the lesson you were teaching us all these 30 years of our independence, that it should be rule of law and should do independent judiciary and prosecutor general from the present. We finally got their message we are not going to intervene because of some political gains with all them if you have information send us through official channels which is prosecutors general's office You have your prosecutor general we have ours let them talk at great if anything to be investigated less investigate this
50:35 Again, we understand there are always things that are political or things that need to be done for particularly in the arena of corruption in Ukraine We understand sometimes all or parts of the funds are held withheld delayed because we have to do something Very normal course of business just send us the changes whatever you need. We'll get right on it but but but Didn't the president get all pissed off and not attend the inauguration because there was no formal announcement of investigating the Bidens? Clearly, the United States had made it clear that either the President or the Vice President was going to come to President Zelensky's inauguration. And this we are told also was a
51:19 Mentioned by either Lev Parnas, Rudy Giuliani or a number of people who they say were carrying message to your president It didn't happen as you very well know. They didn't come to the inauguration I can tell you why we had some blame on our side because we had to do it in very fast way President Zelensky wanted to leave the Parliament free from his new presidency. And we have just a couple of days to make it legal, we've been limited by ourselves and time so we gave quite short notice to all the nations and in our case, in American case Secretary Perry came We believe that would have somebody else if you want to If he give more time for foreign delegations
52:05 So now he could be covering, that would be the one view of this. But what he's saying and you know this is the kind of like a number two guy in the country... No we made the decision at you know a couple days before it's not easy to move the president or vice president if we had want really wanted that level to show up we would have planned it differently. We got Secretary Perry then it was secretary of energy. We feel that was pretty appropriate okay One more time. This can't be true! What about that ambassador, Sondland? He clearly said quid pro quo. This can't be true! Okay so let's just be perfectly clear Mr Foreign Minister Even the President's own ambassador to the EU, Sondland who was tasked with the Ukrainian brief says there was a quid pro quo
52:54 Was there a quid pro quo as far as you know? And were you surprised when you did actually hear that military aid was being suspended. I know personally Ambassador Salonen and have to again remind you that he was political appointee, He was not on the formal side of the State Department. He was also close to the circles which were sort of trying to get in their own business like way Maybe he was bringing message, but if you read in his statement, he never talked to me. Although I was the advisor and then minister for the first about any people or any unofficial channels always of what we can do to get closer to President Trump? No, he was talking to some people who believed it was instrumental at that time. I personally see that we are OK with this support we have right now and we don't need sorry to be blunt
53:49 and we don't need this unofficial support. It's not on the level at the level when we have with American Americans already, we can have the support and if we are told that the assistance military assistance can be affected by some lack of reform This is a normal conversation We had was American so many times before And during this particular year you're describing right now. We had a couple of times to explain to members of Congress that we understand that this is not coming from the sky, it is connected to some reforms we have to do two changes and what were doing so? It was not about political gains on any side. We heard this assistance is important or we told them that this is important and it's connected to some reforms which we are doing
54:33 And that was it. She could not beat it out of him and this is, as far as I understand kind of the crux of this abuse-of-power which we now know is not constitutional impeachment article Well...I mean..I know you slipped into my subconscious the idea of clip of the day No! These clips are difficult I would give you a clip for the day because its really an outstanding clip and unbelievable catch But because that guy is so difficult to listen to, I'm going to give you a borderline. Okay and i'll accept the border line it's completely fair. But that is the whole... now it's just the foreign minister we also have the actual president saying no there's no pressure