5 chapters across the catalog
Business Consequences of Political Commentary, Public Speaking Safety
Scott Adams reveals that his public analysis of Donald Trump's persuasion skills resulted in a 40% loss of income and the loss of 75% of his social circle. He explains that he stopped public speaking engagements because he no longer feels safe in front of large crowds due to political polarization.
A host thanks a couple from Hawaii for a care package containing macadamia nuts and books on Pidgin English. A listener from Australia reports hitting his brother "in the mouth" (metaphorically) for refusing to listen to the show because he views the hosts as "Trump apologists."
Scott Adams reveals that his public support for Donald Trump's persuasion skills resulted in a 40% loss of income and the loss of 75% of his social circle. He explains that he no longer performs public speaking engagements because he feels it is no longer safe to be in front of large crowds. The interviewer notes a similar "mania" affecting podcast listenership.
A listener vote was conducted via the newsletter to determine if the show has outlived its usefulness. Donors were asked to add 37 cents to their contribution to vote "yes" (stop the show) or 38 cents for "no" (continue). Early results show a majority of "no" votes, though some listeners expressed dissatisfaction, labeling the hosts as "Trump apologists."
A listener's donation included a "douchebag callout" intended to preempt a similar move by his wife, leading to a discussion on the show's core mission. The hosts reiterated that their thesis remains focused on analyzing the manipulation of the populace by globalist interests, regardless of which political party is in power. They addressed accusations of being "Trump apologists" by stating that their critical perspective on mainstream media has remained consistent since the Obama administration.
