3 chapters across the catalog
The legal structure of music performing rights in the United States is explained, focusing on the 50-50 split between composers and publishers. Organizations like ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC act as intermediaries, collecting royalties through blanket licenses traditionally paid for by venues rather than individual performers. The statutory duty of publishers to maximize revenue often leads to conflicts when artists attempt to block specific public performances of their work.
Tom Petty Estate, Performance Rights, Virtue Signaling
The family of the late Tom Petty criticized the Trump campaign for using the song "I Won't Back Down" at the Tulsa rally. Legal analysis suggests the estate has no recourse as long as the venue pays statutory performance rights fees. The hosts characterize the family's public complaint as virtue signaling rather than a valid legal dispute.
Performance Rights Act, Radio Fees, House Judiciary Committee
The House Judiciary Committee passed a bill that would levy new fees on local radio stations for airing music. If enacted, half of these fees would go to major record labels, most of which are based outside the United States. The hosts suggest this move could be the "final neck chop" for traditional music radio, leading to an increase in talk radio.
