Topic: Election Unrest

Predictions for the aftermath of the 2024 election vary, with some expecting a "big wet fart" of no activity and others anticipating significant rioting if Donald Trump wins. The discussion recalls the 2016 protests involving "pink pussy hats" and immediate calls for impeachment. There is a consensus that while massive protests are likely, large-scale violent riots may be less probable than media narratives suggest.

Venezuela's top court has ratified the controversial re-election of Nicolás Maduro despite widespread allegations of fraud. The hosts compare the situation to the US political climate, expressing concern that a Donald Trump victory in November could trigger violent protests from activist groups.

Mark Zuckerberg stated in an Axios interview that Facebook is preparing the American public for the possibility that election results may take weeks to finalize. He emphasized that delays are a normal part of ensuring a fair election and that Facebook will label posts from candidates who claim victory prematurely. Zuckerberg cited a "heightened risk of civil unrest" as the primary reason for these new informational context measures.

Kamala Harris stated in an interview that the current social justice protest movement is "not going to stop" before or after Election Day. She urged people to "beware" and take note of the movement's persistence. Critics interpret these remarks as an incitement of continued unrest regardless of the election's outcome.

The hosts discuss ongoing military and FEMA drills in New York that simulate three phases of deteriorating social order: "No Rule of Law," "Limited Rule of Law," and "Authoritarian Rule of Law." These drills include scenarios for curfews and resource control. While the hosts don't expect post-election unrest, they note the government is preparing for such a possibility.