Topic: Cass Review

4 chapters across the catalog

Gorgeous
Episode 1694 2:36:41 - 2:45:57

1694: Gorgeous

Kara Swisher vs Jillian Michaels, WPATH Files, Cass Review

Journalist Kara Swisher and fitness expert Jillian Michaels engaged in a heated debate regarding transgender medical procedures for minors. Michaels cited the UK's Cass Review and the leaked WPATH files to argue against the medicalization of children, while Swisher dismissed the data as inaccurate and politically motivated. Swisher also criticized Elon Musk's claims about his child's transition, labeling him a "terrible parent."

e-Safety
Episode 1654 42:15 - 46:19

1654: e-Safety

Fredericksburg School Board, SHAC and Library Books

In Fredericksburg, Texas, parents and members of "Moms for Liberty" are protesting the School Health Advisory Committee (SHAC) over the inclusion of sexually explicit books in school libraries. The local school board delayed a vote on the materials following a large turnout of concerned citizens. The hosts link this local struggle to the broader findings of the Cass Review regarding gender identity services for children.

WWX
Episode 1651 1:57:52 - 1:59:47

1651: WWX

Cass Review Final Report, Gender Identity Services

The final report of the Cass Review, led by Dr. Hilary Cass, concludes that medical pathways are not the best way to manage gender-related distress for most young people. The report emphasizes the need for holistic mental health support and warns against the "creep" of unproven clinical practices. The findings are expected to significantly impact how gender identity services are regulated in the UK and beyond.

Algo Juice
Episode 1650 28:18 - 36:54

1650: Algo Juice

Cass Review Challenges Youth Gender Transition Protocols

Dr. Hillary Cass released a landmark independent review for the UK's National Health Service finding that youth gender transition procedures lack sound scientific evidence. The report concludes that the evidence base for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is "severely lacking" and was driven more by ideology than medicine. The review highlights a "citation ring" involving WPATH that manufactured a false medical consensus.