1:17:02 How does that fit in again, how can I back it in how can I back global warming into this? It didn't manage to do that which is a stunner although Zika is now being backed into that here and oh yeah in the States Yeah with the Zika virus we have to be cognizant of global warming because it makes the Zika fires grow Like this guy sure definitely all right let's play part two Well, interestingly, as you point out, before 1980 virtually no American soldier had ever been killed in any kind of military action in that part of the world. And since 1980 very few have been killed who were not in that part of the world.
1:17:43 How—this shift that occurred, from the Middle East being largely an area of influence or control by the European colonial powers to the United States exercising such a huge role. How did that happen? Well, we Americans have forgotten, but prior to the beginning of the Cold War, the United States was not a great military power. We raised forces from time to time to deal with some particular issue, but it was in the wake of the Cold War that we as a nation decided on a permanent basis to maintain a large military establishment. For the first several decades of that Cold War, The United States had two priorities. We were willing to fight for Western Europe. We were willing to fight... did fight in East Asia. We were not willing to fight for the Middle East. That changes in 1980 specifically
1:18:35 a particular moment in January of 1980 when President Jimmy Carter, in his State of the Union address promulgates what's known as the Carter Doctrine. I think we actually have a clip on that and we'd like to go to that now this is Jimmy Carter January 23rd 1980 delivering the State of the Union Address you mentioned laying out what would later become known as The Carter Doctrine Let our position be absolutely clear An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interest of the United States of America. Nice work for a Democrat! And such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force
1:19:32 Wow, okay. So it was Carter who had a dem- fine Democrat who started that? Yeah yeah Oh no one knows about it Actually the reason why we have terrorists is because of George W Bush That's really the answer Apparently its Jimmy Carter Yeah turns out Jimmy Carter was the first to throw down the gauntlet I didn't know that Yeah Jimmy Carter also if you start looking into responsible For the homeless situation in this country because of some law changes that took place because there wasn't a homeless problem before he came around. Really? Yeah, it had to do with the... Some sort of lending process or something There was some specific thing and I've been discussed before by some of these guys I just don't remember the details but it would trace us back to Carter So we okay exacerbated by We did not have...so where there were no homeless people
1:20:22 There was, it wasn't a homelessness that the way it is now where there's people all over the place begging for money. It was not a problem until Carter came along and then it started to become a problem and then it became something people focused on if you remember that my favorite event was hands across America. I love that one we got to I don't know did we get to Peoria? Don't know they went across the country with a few gaps yeah And it was, and I met the guy at some dinner party. Obama bought parties years and years ago obviously in the 70's or 80's. It was a dinner with this guy who did it and I got a little pin and um... lapel pin. They were dead serious that this is going to solve their homeless problem. We've heard this over and over again. I mean its just ridiculous!
1:21:15 Well, I'd like to find out what that is. I'm definitely going to do some research on it. I like that and know what's going on there. And then of course then when Clinton came around again gave the banks free reign to do anything they wanted to and let the economy go to hell Yeah, and it was even though we had a balanced budget That was the end of that surplus yeah You know, does he want to play a little more of this guy? Yeah. It's good with me sure I think it's interesting the base of its three would go well one of the things to appreciate i think is that carter himself had no understanding Of the implications that would flow from that statement What what happens on an immediate basis Is that the national security bureaucracy
1:21:57 now redefines its priorities and begins to orient itself toward the possibility of armed intervention by U.S. forces in the region, and over the course of the next 10 years that process begins. Reagan sending peacekeepers into Lebanon, the initial jousting with Colonel Qaddafi in Libya Support for Saddam Hussein of all people in what I refer to as the first Gulf War, that's the Gulf War of 1980-88.
1:22:33 pitting Iraq against Iran with the United States coming to the aid of Iraq. So Carter starts the process of militarizing US policy which over time deepens, becomes more frequent and becomes more ambitious and becomes more, more costly. Bringing us to where we are today in 2016 where we continue to hear these speeches by presidents who insisting that we will prevail when obviously we have not. Oh man this is good it's surprising the democracy now had this guy on for so long They do that once in a while It's always surprising to me too And I cut a lot of this out but here's the wrap which actually to me
1:23:22 It's got a couple of zingers in there that I just think are interesting. Again, as they were for oil and the proximate trigger of Carter's speech was the Iranian revolution which had produced a second oil shock of the 1970s combined with the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan which in Washington raised fears that...I mean they're bizarre notions but raised fear is that the Soviets were going to march across Iran and attack Saudi Arabia. So at a time when we were increasingly dependent upon foreign oil to include oil from the Persian Gulf, yes we decided to fight for the region but I argue that there really was much more at stake than simply access to oil that in the context of The Times, the war for the greater Middle East really becomes an effort
1:24:17 to refute the notion that the United States is a country that has to take, to accept limits. To affirm the claim of American exceptionalism, of our uniqueness, of our special status in history and in the world at large." Yeah we're a bunch of A-holes. Yeah well there's an element does... There's quite an element of A-holeness in there! My goodness. So that's a dead end? Yeah, oh here's another. Here's another story since it's kind of related to this Here's a story that again no network big shots Nobody's playing this story again democracy now picked it up because this is perfect for them They love the sort of story but play this clip was just slightly disgusting This is the rebuilding Afghanistan failure clip a US oversight office has issued a damning report indicating 113 billion dollar