Ivermectin, The Hill, Worms and COVID-19 in Africa
The Hill's Rising podcast features a discussion regarding the efficacy of Ivermectin against COVID-19 in South Africa and Asia compared to the United States. One participant suggests the drug's success in those regions is due to its ability to treat parasitic worms, thereby improving the overall health of patients fighting the virus. The segment notes that while Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize for treating river blindness, its role as a primary COVID-19 treatment remains a subject of intense debate between mainstream and fringe media sources.
ivermectin· the hill· covid-19· nobel prize· river blindness· africa
00:00 Boost, boost, boost. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Thursday, December 16th, 2021. This is your award-winning Gimel Nation Media Assassination Episode 1408. This is no agenda. Digging for worms and broadcasting live from the heart of Texas Hill Country here in FEMA Region Number 6. In the morning everybody, I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley where I'm train spotting today, I'm John C. Dvorak. It's Crackpot and Buzzkill! In the morning! That's right, we had a whopper! Your dog has worms? No, no, no man. What dogs? Dogs have worms. You're gonna make me go right into the worms if you want me to go straight into the worms. I might have to do it.
00:48 Yes You know Ivermectin if we just want to go straight for it Ivermectin has been quite controversial and over on the hills rising podcast, you know That's the one that those superstars left who we've never heard from again. Yeah, two superstars Crystal ball and and what's his name the other guy? The other the other guy So they're talking about Ivermectin with the current crew. Those two or the new guys? No, no, the new team. And who's that? Yeah, but now it's three or four people. Yeah, they got a woman and two guys and the kid with the blonde hair, he's been around. What's his name? I don't know. I don't watch it. Okay, anyway. But they're a bunch of liberal intellectual elites, obviously.
01:35 And so now they're going to explain, by the way there's the one woman, she's very, I forget her name, but she knows what's up. She's trying to interject with these guys because they're not going to give you the reason why ivermectin works well against COVID in South Africa. and Africa in general, but not in the United States. Do you know? I mean, it's crazy. It's racist. That's why. If hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin legitimately worked and could be demonstrated to work. Doctors would be prescribing it. And we understand now what happened with ivermectin. Ivermectin basically deals with worms. And so when they were giving it to people in Bangladesh and Africa and a lot of places in Asia. It was helping because it was killing off the worms they had, which made their body better able to fight COVID. So it did in a weird way. Oh my gosh! Are you feeling it?
02:31 I feelin' it. So let's just, now this poor woman's gonna come in, she's gonna try and interject, but this was just, it's such a great conversation. And I consider The Hill to be mainstream at this point. This is a mainstream podcast. That was this huge mystery because we're seeing studies, we're seeing clinical studies here that shows that it actually does have some effectiveness in, but yet it doesn't have effectiveness in the United States. What is the problem here? And so a lot of people are like, oh, obviously it's a conspiracy. No, it turns out we don't have a lot of worms here in the United States. We just don't have a lot of worms! I mean, we don't know for sure that it was killing the worms and that's why it was helping people. We do know it kills worms. Like, that's what ivermectin does. It's very good at it. Didn't the guy win a Nobel Prize for it? But we, I don't think we can make an alarm. Listen to her trying.
03:21 that the thing beats COVID but we're not confident that it kills worms? It's actually built to kill worms. Wait, wait, wait, we're confident it kills worms. That's what ivermectin does. It won a Nobel Prize for that. So if it kills the worms, people are going to feel better. We don't know if the reason why people were getting better with COVID had worms. I think it's like, how can you mass assert that they all had worms? Because we have studied those populations. You're gonna get clip of the day for this clip. I want to mention something, by the way, the Nobel Prize and all the rest was won because of its curation of river blindness, not worms. But it's beside the point. These are just a bunch of numb nuts that are just trying to kill time. It's unbelievable how stupid, that they even allow this kind of stupidity to come, even on a podcast.
04:13 Do you want to hear more? There is more. Yeah, I might as well. You know, they have said things that have not borne out. But that's also true of a lot of mainstream sources of information about COVID. So I think some people who are a little bit more on the fringe, they get frustrated. Like, why are we being labeled misinformation when, like, the New York Times is casting doubt on boosters in an effort to keep masking in place forever. Like, I completely believe they're doing that. The New York Times is dedicated to that project, or at least its lead COVID reporter is.
04:58 and and they deserve criticism for that but then also that doesn't mean that like no just all mainstream sources are wrong about everything and you should only listen to fringe people because the french people have also been wrong about a lot and all been wrong right no matter how much worse level of respectability we we get or deserve we have all been wrong right and what ok I'm gonna take it before we forget. Have you seen any of the excerpts or clips? No, but you know, we introduced McCullough on our show, I don't know, six months ago. Of course. And pretty much covered all the stuff that he had to say. Of course. And so I didn't bother to listen. I mean, even when McCullough comes up with something new and still producing, I don't listen anymore because we've heard it all. We've heard it all. Exactly. What I like about this is I've
