38:05 I have two more independent things. Emma from the Young Turks, she was boots on the ground and I think she was mainly in the Bernie camp. They have quite a connection there, a long time connection to Bernie Sanders with the Young Turks. And here's her feedback on the situation. The narrative that I think should be coming out of this is this plays directly into Donald Trump's hands, right? So the Democratic Party has no cohesive idea when it comes to combating Donald Trump in 2020. They want to nominate a status quo candidate, a moderate candidate, a corporatist candidate like Deepu Dajjaj or like Joe Biden.
38:50 But they're unable to coalesce around anything other than that, except for kneecapping Bernie Sanders every chance that they get. But what they really needed to do was show that they were able to be competent and that they weren't the very corrupt party and part of the corrupt system that Donald Trump ran against successfully in 2016. And when you have this completely convoluted process, an app crashing that they didn't test before and then just ask 70 year olds, hey, work this app on your phone. As a part of the process, didn't have any of the captains or people who were monitoring the precincts have any experience with this app before. That just speaks to the very incompetence that Trump so effectively ran against in 2016. So we're off to a great start.
39:41 I thought that was funny. I applaud that line. That was pretty good. Good. It was a very well set up. Yeah, it was good. So it can really only be A, total incompetence, which seems the easiest. B, it could be nefarious stuff from the outside or from one of the campaigns. But when you see all the connections, huge Silicon Valley billionaires, Hillary Clinton operatives, and when I say operatives, campaign managers, surrogates, it starts to become suspicious enough that you could just say, hey, what's up with these people involved in the party to this degree and screwing up this badly? And the woman who's in charge of this at
40:31 Not shadow, but the acronym the 75 million dollar Super PAC that was running that built this you know she is supposed to be the the Democrat digital you know high priestess and she's the one that's gonna make sure that whoever the nominee is that that we're gonna out digitize Trump and and his team and It's sad, it's sad, sad, sad. Yeah, good start, exactly. And we can't, we have to remember that just the day before, or really just the day before, yeah, because it was on Saturday or Sunday, the poll, the most important poll from the Iowa Register
41:14 And again, it appears it was a digital problem that some wrong fonts were used and therefore sometimes Pete's name was omitted. Jake Tapper actually explains it differently. It's not just Trump is doing his own thing and then you also have a series of events leading up to even before we get to Iowa. that I think understandably made a lot of not just Bernie supporters but supporters of all Democratic campaigns skeptical. Like what? The Des Moines Register poll, one of the most important polls coming out before Iowa deciding not to get pulled out. Well because they had a glitch. I mean they had a mistake and so they decided in the interest of... So when it happens in the advantage of the other party, it's Russian hacking. When it's your own party, it's a glitch. I just want to understand the terms.
42:05 It's a glitch. And then last night, or was it like, yeah, it was last night. I don't know. It's been so many days. They really didn't get the coverage. And I only heard about it through this YouTube channel, Status Quo, who reported on it. And that was, again, a data integrity issue two days after the caucus. What the heck is happening with the results from the Iowa caucuses? I know I started this video off with a smile on my face. I promise you, I'm not really smiling because it's gotten absurd at this point. I just, I don't even know what to think. The Iowa Democratic Party released results after we've been waiting and waiting and waiting. They released results that got us up to 85% of results. Then all of a sudden they said they had to pull the results because there were discrepancies.
43:02 Oh my god, what is going on here? This is the Iowa Democratic Party. There will be a minor correction to the last batch of results and we will be publishing or pushing an update momentarily. What? What? You're telling me it's here two days after the Iowa caucuses. You've had two days to report these results that usually take about an hour to report. So normally in past years, we would have had results pretty much right away on the night of the caucuses. Here we are two days later.
43:38 And not only are you slow trickling these results, but you're screwing them up in a really, really shady way. So they went from 62% to 71%, then to 85%, and then had to retract that additional that got them to 85% because the data was wrong. I mean, if this wasn't at some level corrupt, then I got a wooden leg or I deserve one. It was, there is corruption here. Someone is Clearly doing one or two things, certainly trying to tap Bernie down. The final results like what, one-tenth of a point of the delegates? Okay, got it, got the message. And Joe Biden is, you know, sayonara, he's out, see ya. And that's the narrative now. Oh, he can't raise money, there's no money, Joe's talking about a punch to the gut.
44:31 He's done, he's over. So this was, but it was just like Malcolm Nance said, it was so blatant, so obvious and everyone just go, oh well, New Hampshire, that's it. Well, if Biden can sneak through, he will win South Carolina. And if he sticks around, even if he doesn't advertise. And I think it revitalizes campaign. I'm not giving up on Joe. No, no, that's okay. But I do want you to know that the players are out there. I still think Hillary's doing it should jump in. But I'll take Joe next because I don't think Buttigieg, let's face it, is not going to get it because nobody wants that guy.
45:14 But strange... Bernie doesn't want Bernie. But what Buttigieg is the story. He came out with a victory speech. And really it was Amy Klobuchar was the first one to say screw it I'm going up and saying we did great see in New Hampshire. I thought that was a bold move and I thought it was smart. The media completely covered that up and went all in on the Pete Buttigieg taking the victory lap and then he arrives in New Hampshire the next day he takes another victory lap and you know it
45:51 I don't think it's related, but it's bad optics to have both the Buttigieg and the Biden campaign and the Bernie campaign. Was it the Bernie? I think so. using parts of this company's services, more like text messaging. So it's just money flowing. It's just, it's sick. It's sick is what it is. Very, very sad for the Democrat Party, for Iowans who are just, I mean, I've been to Iowa and the people in Iowa, by the way, racist, everywhere, MSNBC in particular, they kept having these Clinton people on, black women primarily. Well, you know, the caucuses are really racist because who has time on a Monday night to go out? You know, that's white people. Black people don't have the time because they're babysitting for the white people's babies and the white people are going out to caucus. That's truly the message they were sending. So it's sad. Well,
46:54 It's an embarrassment, that's for sure. I don't know how sad it is. Anyway, it'll be blow over. It'll just go away after the next round. But then they're going to have to reanalyze. But I think Pete will do well the next round. But it's going to be Sanders and Warren that look like they're going to take this. And Biden is going to be again and forth. Oh, yeah. Biden's out. He's done. He was in these. No, that's that's that's me. I know. I know you fought. Look, I was wrong about the Super Bowl and it happens. And you'll be wrong about Joe and I won't rub it in your face. It happens. Yeah, you will. But it's not gonna... Who is gonna get the nod?