2 chapters across the catalog
Climate Denialism, 200 Years of Science and Academic Publishing
Proponents of the COP21 agreement challenged climate skeptics to publish their findings in scientific journals rather than using slogans. The debate centers on whether current climate science represents a consensus built over 200 years of literature.
The Lancet and the Crisis of Scientific Integrity
Richard Horton, editor of the prestigious medical journal *The Lancet*, published a scathing editorial claiming that half of all scientific literature may be untrue. He cited small sample sizes, invalid analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest as primary drivers of a "turn towards darkness" in the scientific community. This admission supports the argument that government grants and the "military-industrial-academic complex" have corrupted the pursuit of objective truth.
