FBI Agents Association President, Six-Week Terror Cycle Theory
A No Agenda producer named Matt called into C-SPAN's Washington Journal to question the president of the FBI Agents Association regarding the show's "six-week cycle" theory. The theory posits that the FBI orchestrates domestic terror busts every six weeks to maintain public fear and justify agency relevance. The FBI representative denied knowledge of a specific cycle but confirmed the agency seeks media attention for cases to demonstrate they are keeping the public safe.
fbi· c-span· six-week cycle· entrapment· washington journal· matt from reno· terrorism
00:00 I'm always confused. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. Look at... I'm sorry. Sorry. What was that? That was a mistake. I messed it up. Alright, give me another cue. 10, 9, hit it. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Sunday, January 12, 2014. Time for your Gitmo Nation Media Assassination Episode 582. This is no agenda. Looking over here when told to look over at FEMA Region 6 here at the Travis Heights Hideout in Austin, Texas. Good morning everybody, I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley where we're looking nowhere, I'm John C. Dvorak.
00:48 I don't know. They're telling me to look over here, there, somewhere else. Never, never look in the... We don't start looking for stuff for another, what, two weeks? Oh, for the six-week cycle you mean? Yeah, it's coming up. Well, no, it's... And I'm, by the way, totally convinced it's gonna be in Indianapolis. Okay, well, do you recall one of your predictions for 2014? No. The end of the six-week cycle? Oh yeah, right. Well I think your prediction is going to come true sooner than you expected my friend. Oh? Yeah, we've been busted. Oh, well we've been busted by a bunch of people. Well this is our producer Matt. He sent me a note, he said, in the morning this morning my 16 month old woke me up at 5.40am to clean his shit filled diaper. So the only thing worth watching on TV was C-SPAN.
01:39 I was only able to get through on the Republican line. Have you seen or heard his outstanding PR moment for the No Agenda show? Yeah, it was quite good. Here's Matt from Reno, Nevada. Republican line, hello. In the morning, I was just calling. I'm a watcher of C-SPAN and also a listener of the show called No Agenda. I'm with Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak. Right there. Great. Great. It's about time. Finally, finally. And by the way, Matt was calling and the guest on the Washington Journal for the call-in show was the president of the FBI Agents Association, which I think is kind of like a drinking club maybe, John? Is that what that sounds like? It's probably a combination drinking club and an internal lobbying operation. And this guy was very interesting, particularly his answer
02:39 To Matt's question, which I'll play without further interruption. I'm a watcher of C-SPAN and also a listener of the show called No Agenda. I'm with Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak. They bring up an interesting point a lot in their deconstruction of the media and also what's sort of going on with our FBI and our federal agencies. The guy, by the way, he's looking at the camera like, what? What's this? And they bring up a good point of every six weeks almost. To the week you're on the dot there's some type of FBI sort of bust that goes down and it's been explained too that it's possibly, you know, a cycle that they like to have because otherwise you can't really keep the American people scared. Now when he mentioned the six weeks
03:36 The FBI guy, he squirmed a little. There was some subtle movement. The body language shifted just ever so slightly. I was just wondering what your comments were on that and also is it legal to sort of entrap people with like those guys in Ohio who didn't have the capability or means to actually detonate or set up a bomb on a bridge but were arrested and thrown in jail and the last one's actually just trying to fight for his life. All right, so here's what I would recommend for Matt. And good job, by the way, Matt. That was a complicated example. It probably would have been better if you said, you know, that guy that you hounded for two months and set him up with fake explosives and then made him go to the Wichita airport? That would have been a little easier, more recent example. I think a lot of people have forgotten about the bridge example. But anyway, let's listen, because I think the FBI agent or the president of the Agents Association
04:38 kind of confirmed it. Caller will leave it there. Mr. Tariqi. The FBI investigates thousands of cases with proper media attention to those cases. We like to show the American people what it is that we do to keep them safe and also... Wait a minute, didn't he just agree? Yeah. Didn't he just say, yeah, we like, you know, no, we're keeping you safe, Shittison. and try to show criminals and terrorists that we the FBI are out there. We're boss. I'm not aware of any six-week cycle that you're talking about and I'm not aware of the facts of your case. All that I'll say is the individuals that you referenced were brought through a very regimented legal process with a strict adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America and a jury of their peers will decide whether
05:38 They did what they were accused of doing. Wow. Good job, Matt. Excellent. Excellent. Yeah, well maybe you're right. Maybe the six-week cycle would be canned in favor of something a little... You know what they need to do is an offset cycle for a four-seven. You can't go too far because you can't go too long past six weeks. I think that's, I think Matt kind of hit it, which is our thesis, which is you can't, the American public starts to relax. Yeah, exactly. So you got to keep them tense and on edge so they could do But they still have to forget the other one. You know, the six is the magic number. I don't know what they're going to do about it. Maybe they'll just say, screw it, who listens to those idiots? That's probably what's going on right now. Hey boss, I got this call about the six week cycle and who is it? I don't know, are you talking about some dudes? Some guys. We looked it up, it's a stupid podcast. It's a podcast. Wait, are you telling me a podcast you're concerned about anything a podcaster's are doing?
