Episode 35 · Saturday, 14 June 2008

Obama and Olbermann

European integration faces a populist revolt in Ireland while American media enters a partisan fever dream ahead of the Obama-McCain showdown.

By The No Agenda Show | 1h 31m listen | 25 chapters
Obama and Olbermann cover
The No Agenda Show · No. 35

About this episode

Ireland voters have rejected the Lisbon Treaty by a 55% margin, effectively stalling the expansion of the European Union and its plans for a unified army and centralized taxation. Despite this democratic setback, leaders like Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel signal that the integration process will proceed, raising concerns about a bloodless coup by Brussels officials and central bankers.

In the United States, the media landscape shifts as Keith Olbermann pivots from sports to aggressive political commentary at MSNBC, targeting the George W. Bush administration. Meanwhile, the sudden death of Meet the Press host Tim Russert sparks theories regarding his knowledge of the Valerie Plame affair. In the Middle East, Afghan President Hamid Karzai admits the Taliban cannot be defeated by 2010 due to their safe havens in Pakistan, while oil prices face suspected manipulation similar to the Enron energy crisis.

From the foggy summers of San Francisco to the red-light districts of Amsterdam, the program captures the friction between global governance and local sovereignty. A host recounts a chance encounter with Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende at the Rotterdam Jet Center, while the U.S. Supreme Court issues a landmark ruling on the constitutional rights of Guantanamo Bay detainees.


Loading show notes…
Loading clips…
CHAPTER 01 / 25 Discussion

California Summer Weather, San Francisco Fog Anecdote

The hosts open the program discussing the local weather in Northern California and the United Kingdom. They reference the famous quote attributed to Mark Twain regarding the coldest winter being a summer in San Francisco, noting how tourists are often caught off guard by the July fog. A brief technical glitch occurs with a microphone fader before the conversation shifts to the damp reputation of British summers.

san francisco· california· weather· mark twain· fog· napa valley

00:01 You know, it's really hard to believe that it's already the 14th of June 2008 and well, we've been doing this for about 35 times so far. It is no agenda coming to you from the Curry Manor in the United Kingdom. I'm Adam Curry. And here in the United States of America, Northern California, I'm John C. Dvorak. Hey, Johnny boy, how you doing? It's foggy today. Really? Oh, it's been nice here. We've had a pretty good week. Well, it's been nice and hot here all week, but we're getting our, looks like our classic California summer weather where it's cold and foggy in the morning, and then it might break up and then it gets nice and warm in the afternoon. Of course, oh, this is kind of weird. Hold on. Something really weird is going on here, John. Hold on. Oh, wow.

00:54 That's weird. All of a sudden my microphone started to... the fader just went down automatically. Okay, seems to be fixed. No worries. We're good. Yeah, is this one of those... That sounds the same. Yeah, was this one of those Mark Twain... what is it? The Coldest Winter Was Summer In San Francisco? Is that what he was famous for? Yeah, or July. I think it was July. I think you may have said... because actually July is when it really is... it doesn't warm up. It's just... July people come out to Cali. It's actually funny. It's like a local joke. I mean, cause people will come out from all over the world to San Francisco in the like July 10th, which you would think would be like one of the worst. It would be nice and warm, right? Imagine it would be hot. It would be hot. Right. And it'll be fogged in and freezing and the fog never goes away and it can be just chilly. And even the locals actually,

01:49 It's kind of amusing because every year you kind of say, well, you know, you always think about them when it rolls around, you remember it. But you even the locals sometimes are caught off guard and you float around without, you know, the sweaters that you need to be wearing in July. And I would warn people, I say, you're forgetting to come out. I mean, it's not always that way, but it's most often that way. And I always want people to come into the San Francisco Bay Area in the middle of summer that they're, you know, gonna be in for a shock. That said, you can always go up to the Napa Valley. It's nice and warm up there. And, you know, that said, over here in the United Kingdom, which of course has a reputation for being horribly damp and chilly and cold and foggy and windy, in the summertime, you know, I've been here now, this is the third, one, two, three, this'll be our fourth summer, I think,

02:39 And it's just, you know, yeah, you get clouds and rain, it's seasonal, but it's really quite nice. And the women in London, man, when it gets above like 71 degrees, hoo boy, they start dressing like it's a thousand degrees. They're not used to the hot weather so they have to take their clothes off. I think it's different, it's not that they're not used to it, I think it's a cultural thing where they're basically saying to the outside world, we have great weather here, look, see? See how warm, how we're dressed for the heat? Maybe. I think they just like to take their clothes off. Man, we got a shitty connection today. You were great when you started off and now you're coming through like...

03:20 Well, you know what happened? The connection kind of fell apart when you had that microphone anomaly. Yeah. Well, it's coming in. I mean, you're legible, no problem. I read you four instead of five. Yeah, well, ever since that microphone anomaly, you have been flaky. John, I don't think that was since the microphone anomaly. I think that's been that way for the past 25 years, perhaps. You use that joke every time. Do I really? I need some new material. I gotta call Jon Stewart, have him write some new shit for me. I'm telling you, you've used that at least three times on this show. Well, when you get to be 43, you're allowed to make age jokes over and over again. I'm noticing that.

CHAPTER 02 / 25 Discussion

Ireland Rejects Lisbon Treaty, European Union Expansion

Ireland voters rejected the Lisbon Treaty by a margin of 55% to 45%, effectively stalling the formation of a more unified European entity. The document, which replaced the failed 2005 European Constitution, sought to establish common taxation, immigration policies, and a European army. Despite the "no" vote, leaders like Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel suggest the integration process will continue despite the legal setback.

ireland· lisbon treaty· european union· brussels· referendum· angela merkel

04:06 So, what's on the agenda, or what's on the no agenda? What's going on? I mean, the only news that I've seen that's kind of interesting is that Ireland, I guess, voted no to the EU. And that showed up on our blog. Yeah, well that's something I've been tracking on Daily Source Code for the past couple of weeks. Didn't we talk about this last week? We did touch on it. We talked about how Ireland can save the world by, you know, rejecting the EU. So I'll recap then because I'm really deep into this and it's very interesting because we're watching the formation of a huge entity with 500 million people known as Europe

04:49 and each of the 27 member countries are actually known as states. So in a way it's kind of like the United States, but in many ways not. But they, so essentially the background to this, in 2005 the European Parliament, which sits in Brussels, actually alternates between Brussels and Strasbourg. I think every other month or something they change location, some kind of dumb political thing. They put together a constitution and they called it the Constitution and it was filled with a lot of language, very lawyer-esque type language, very hard to understand, not as simple as for example the Constitution of the United States which is, anyone can kind of read that and understand, it's open to interpretation obviously and it's always under attack for interpretation but it's reasonably easy to understand.

05:42 And so this went to all the states in 2005 and they had to vote. And I think every country held a referendum, which is a public vote, you know, yea or nay, we're for this or against this. And two countries in particular who were pretty disappointed with their governments at the time, France and the Netherlands, voted it down. by a rather large margin and so then every member state has to ratify this constitution or any document of this scope in order for it to go into effect. So that basically fell apart because of the Dutch and the French voting it down. So what appears to be kind of like a railroading move in the past couple years, they came up with a new treaty called the Lisbon Treaty

06:28 And it's really nothing other than a document with a whole bunch of references to the original constitutional document. It's a legal document. Change this word for that word. Change the word constitution to Lisbon Treaty. And the main reason for that is if it's not a constitution, you don't necessarily have to call a referendum for it. So the big criticism of Brussels for the past couple of years is this Lisbon Treaty has been coming to fruition, was supposed to start January 1st, 2009. was that most of the member states just kind of like passed it through their governments really fast, no referendum except for one country which was Ireland and they for whatever reason

07:13 they differed from the other states and I said, you know, we're going to hold a referendum anyway. And I think the same thing basically happened with the addition of the fact that, you know, first of all people can't read it. I've read it, it's very complicated, I certainly don't understand all of it. I've asked ministers of European Parliament for explanation on some points. have gotten some satisfactory response but again I'm like you know well where can I read what you're saying in this document and there's all kinds of protocols and directives and all it's just a it's a it's a huge mess they didn't communicate it to the public a lot of these countries are up in arms saying you know hey what the hell happened here you guys ratified something we don't understand what's going on and I think that was had a lot to do with the Irish who by a margin of I think it was 55 to

08:01 45% or something like that. They basically turned it down and this is a big deal because now it's all fallen apart. And the main things, as far as I can tell, the main drivers that uh... brussels was really going for is one a possible common taxation across all of europe and to actually three things uh... to uh... common taxation common immigration policy and probably the most important one uh... a common army european army which if necessary would uh... also go outside of europe to acting whatever theater uh... they might be called to and understandably

08:42 people aren't just gonna say yes to that. No one got the choice except for Ireland and there you go they said no. So this thing is basically kaput. It's hilarious. Well it's frightening because now we have to see what happens. Both Sarkozy, President of France, and Angela Merkel who is Prime Minister of Germany, have said, well it's not really kaput, it certainly won't be implemented by January 1st 2009, but they've got to go back because it's all these legal things, it's all these guys live for in Brussels, is to get this document set up to be able to execute on whatever their plan's on, which of course the public has no freaking idea, no clue as to what it actually is.

CHAPTER 03 / 25 Discussion

European Union Governance, Fascism and Currency Concerns

The discussion explores the historical context of attempts to unite Europe, comparing the current European Union structure to past efforts by Charlemagne and Napoleon. Concerns are raised regarding the lack of democratic elections for Brussels officials and the potential for a "bloodless coup" through central banking. One host recounts a personal anecdote about old British pound notes being rejected because they lacked the specific EU stamp required for modern circulation.

fascism· charlemagne· napoleonic wars· european central bank· euro· currency

09:32 It looks like, sounds like some sort of a fascist takeover of the entire European continent. Thank you. Well this of course, you know me, Mr. Conspiracy Theory. That's exactly what it is. Of course it's a fascist takeover. The common army would have me concerned if I was French. Why particularly French? Well I mean because the common army is going to be run by the Germans. Let's face reality. Good point. Well, a lot of it is going to be run by... In fact, that is another part of the treaty I forgot to mention. And I don't have all the exact numbers in front of me, but the way it's set up, if something goes to vote in the European Parliament, which of course most laws will now have to go to Europe instead of to your individual countries, you have to have a majority, but not just a majority of

10:24 Member states, I think you have to have at least 15 states that will agree with you, but you also have to have a majority of people. So basically, if France and Germany, if they decide anything they want, together they have enough people to pass a vote, and then all they have to do essentially is just call up these little member states which are completely reliant on them anyway, and just say, okay, we need 13 more of you guys to say yes. which basically means that if 15 smaller states got together and said, hey, you know, which is a majority in number of states, they still wouldn't be able to pass anything because they don't have enough people in these little mini states. So it's, to me, it's kind of a clusterfuck.

11:10 Sounds terrible. I mean, I can't see how anything can get done. So I think it's gonna do the only way the only solution is to pass broad-reaching laws that have sketchy powers attached to them so you end up with a fascist state. Exactly. That's the only way it's gonna work. That's yeah, well if you go back and look at history, I think you could see a lot of parallels in this. Uh, well, yeah, well, nothing quite that disambitious. This is the probably the most interesting. I mean, they've always been trying to unite Europe. I mean, very, you ever see you go back to, uh, I guess you could go back to Charlemagne at some point, you know what I mean? But, but meanwhile, you have the Napoleonic wars to try, you know, in some ways you're trying to, uh, unite Europe and then you have the, the fascism.

12:04 was a movement that tried to unite Europe. Of course, it never got very far because it had to be done by force. And I think this is the, I'm not absolutely sure, some European historian may want to chime in on this. But I don't know of any kind of bloodless coup attempt that has been made on this sort of a scale, which is essentially what we're looking at here, which is the takeover of all of Europe. by a single entity, you know, out of Belgium of all places.

12:43 even though it may be the puppet masters may be elsewhere and I think they're you know combined well I mean John obviously where did this all start this started after the Second World War it started with the United Nations that's that when of course the United Nations famously started with a was like an eight million dollar donation from the Rockefellers I believe you know that that combined with NATO and a couple other organizations like this essentially once they once they got the euro in the common currency which officially took took hold in 2000 and I think it went into effect everywhere either 2001 or 2002 that also meant they could combine all the central banks so we have you know a European Central Bank which maintains you know what central banks do except now not just you know now it's all over

13:39 500 million people who are using this or almost all of them are using the same currency. It's still kind of interesting how countries like the United Kingdom get away with not converting to the Euro. And I think, it's one other country isn't it? Sweden I think? I think Sweden has their own, yeah. Yeah, they have the Kroner or whatever. Right. Even though they have a little bit, even though the new British money and then a new Swedish money, they have to be, you know, I went there a few years ago when they made this transition and I had some pound notes, but the pound notes that are only acceptable now, generally speaking, have to have a little EU stamp someplace on the note.

14:19 Yeah, well yeah, everyone changed their money one way or the other. And if you have, so it's a pound note but it's got this little EU thing, so if you have the old pounds, because I always have a drawer full of alien money because I travel, so I grab it, put it in the thing, so I have some money to buy a cab without having to change money when I show up someplace. So I show up and I drop down some pound notes that look just exactly the same. No, no, no, you can't use these. Your money's no good here, Mr. Dvorak. But like, it's really no good here. It's like no good. I said, what am I supposed to do with this? And they said, well you can go to certain banks and they'll swap it out. And so I went to the bank, swapped it out, and I got exactly the same money back except for this little bitty... There's a little bitty bug on there, a little bitty thing that says EU. So I did learn a couple things. I spoke to a Dutch minister of European Parliament.

CHAPTER 04 / 25 Discussion

European Football Championships, Media Distraction Tactics

The rejection of the EU treaty coincided with the European football championships, leading to claims that the sports media cycle is used to distract the public from complex political documents. While government ministers traveled to Switzerland for matches, the Irish referendum results were finalized. The hosts suggest that the complexity of the Lisbon Treaty was a deliberate attempt to prevent public understanding.

european football championships· bbc world service· media· distraction· switzerland

15:14 And he said, you know what, we have no plan B. He's going to be in Strasbourg starting Monday. They're all getting together and trying to figure out what they're going to do. They have no plan B? They expected everybody just to roll over? Yep. Well, everyone did roll over. I mean, if you look at... There's some great video online. I put one on curry.com. You have to go back a week or two, like a week and a half ago. It's one of the British members of European Parliament stands up and has this whole rant and he literally says, You know, you guys are horrible. Basically, without saying it, he said this almost like a fascist state. You're all railroading this thing through without referendum in each individual country. You're doing it because you're afraid that people will actually vote it down again. You're doing all this backroom politics.

16:02 You know, that's... they had no plan B. Every single member of the Parliament and the Commission all said that they expected it to go through and only Ireland. They thought, you know, fuck it, Ireland, you know, no problem. But there were ministers of foreign affairs from almost every single country in Europe who were campaigning in Ireland either for or against. I think a lot of them were against. or certainly if they were opposition parties. It was really, really intense. It's a big deal. It is still a big deal. I haven't picked up my weekend copy of the Financial Times, but I think this is going to be messed up for a while. Of course it happens at exactly the same moment we're in the middle of the largest media event Europe can even imagine, which of course you know is... What? European football championships.

16:59 I can't imagine anything bigger than that. There is nothing bigger in Europe than the European football championships. There really isn't. No coincidence there, I'm sure, that all this is going down at the same time. Well, I don't know. You don't think it's a coincidence? You think there's a connection? I'm not getting that one. Of course there's a connection. The media is dominated by sport. Look, no one wants anyone to understand this document, otherwise they would have made it understandable. So you've got to be suspicious at least. People aren't stupid anymore. This is what these guys forget. They make all this shit available on their website. You know what? People actually take the time, they download it, and they look at it and say, what the hell is this shit? I don't get it.

CHAPTER 05 / 25 Discussion

Rotterdam Jet Center, Meeting Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende

A host shares a story about parking a Cessna 182 at the Rotterdam Jet Center and encountering the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs, Frans Timmermans, and Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende. The encounter involved a ten-minute conversation about football while the Irish referendum results were being tallied. The segment concludes with a brief correction regarding the appearance of the Dutch and French football coaches.

rotterdam· jan peter balkenende· frans timmermans· netherlands· cessna 182· football

17:51 You know, so they're old, they're thinking and acting old-fashioned. You know, people are just not stupid anymore. No, they are. They're not stupid. They're old-fashioned, those people. And a lot of them are younger than I am, believe it or not, but they're still acting really old-fashioned. Like, well, we can ram-rob this through. Anyway, here's kind of a fun story on the side. So yesterday I was set to fly back from Rotterdam. I paid a quick visit. And I was going to fly, and usually I go to Hilversum, some other small field, but for a number of reasons I decided to go to the rather bigger airport, Rotterdam. And they have a jet center, which of course, what it sounds like, it's meant for jets, it's for private jets. So here I come in my little, you know, Cessna 182, right? I park it in the jet parking. I like it, because, you know, they roll out a red carpet, they carry my bags, you know, they take care of the airplane, so it's fine. So I'm going to leave.

18:44 And the Hague, of course, where the government in the Netherlands sits, is right next to Rotterdam. So I roll up, a friend of mine dropped me off in his Volkswagen bus. Like a VW bus. And I already saw like a couple of official looking cars outside and so I walk in and like, oh I see there's the there's the Royal Jet is on the tarmac. John literally nose to nose with my plane right which of course was just funny by itself. And this is a you know it's like where's your camera where's your camera? I'm such a dick. Well let me tell you I didn't even think about that because here's what happened. So I walk in, I see like, it's like 50 suits, right? And there's a couple of waiting rooms in this place and they're all filled up and all these guys have orange ties on. I'm like, oh, of course, they're going to go watch the Netherlands play France in Switzerland tonight. And I knew that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Frans Timmermans,

19:37 Because I spoke to him on the Dutch radio earlier in the week, I knew that he was going, right? So I'm like, oh, that's kind of cool. He must be here. And I'd never met the guy. So I ask around. I'm like, so one of these stoop guys. I'm like, hey, is Mr. Timmermans here, the Minister of Foreign Affairs? And the guy's immediately like, Why? Why do you want to know? I said, well, you know, I met him on the phone the other day and I just wanted to shake his hand. Do you have an appointment with him? I said, no, dude, I'm here. I'm going to go fly my own freaking plane. I'm leaving. I just wanted to say hi. Is he around? So while this dialogue is going on, this shithead is like staring me down.

20:13 This woman walks by and says, oh Mr. Curry, yes, hi, I'm Bonnie, you know, your producer spoke to me and oh please come on through, I want you to meet Mr. Timmermans. So I walk in and into the waiting room and... You should have given the raspberries to that creep. Well no wait, the raspberries gets even better because he followed behind me and what he saw made him total shitless. So I walk in, I walk straight to the guy. There's like 10 guys in this waiting room. I say, hey Franz, because we're on a first name basis. Franz, how are you doing? So he's like, oh yeah, it's good to meet you and I'd love to talk again. Oh, let me introduce you to this guy over here. And I turned to the right, it's the Prime Minister Balkanende. And I'm like, oh hey, nice to meet you. And the Prime Minister goes, oh yes. He's kind of a dorky Harry Potter looking guy. If you see him, you just laugh.

20:59 And he says, oh yes, well I know you of course, you're famous from radio and television. And I said, you know, you're famous from radio and television too. He says, oh we're kind of like colleagues. And I said, well, don't I just wish we were colleagues? So it was like this really weird encounter and we stood there and we talked for like 10 minutes about football. Meanwhile, the referendum was taking place at that very moment. The results came out no more than like an hour after that because I was listening in the plane to the BBC World Service. And you know these guys couldn't give a shit. They were they were you know the they were Jetting off to Switzerland to go watch the game by the way Holland killed France 4 to 1 what an awesome game that was Holland has a real chance this year in the championship. You know this is funny I Ed Campbell predicted that you'd say something about this stupid football game on the show here today and told me to mention that I guess I don't know whether this is true or not, but I guess the coach of the of the Dutch team looks like a serial killer

21:56 The coach of the Dutch team, who is Marco van Busten, was one of the best players Holland ever knew. He does not look like a serial killer at all. That would be the French coach who looks like a serial killer. Okay, well maybe I haven't mixed up. He has the wacky, curly, freaked out hair. No, no, no. It was the French guy, if anyone's referring to serial killers. Well, of course I gotta mention it. I'm really proud and by the way all of Britain's behind the Netherlands because half the team plays for UK football teams anyway. Yeah, everybody plays for UK football teams or Brazil. Yeah, yeah. So anyway, so it's a mess man. It really is. Well, I congratulate the Irish.

CHAPTER 06 / 25 Discussion

EU Diesel Tax, Potential for European Civil War

The conversation turns to the practical impacts of EU governance, such as a mandatory 3% tax increase on diesel to combat CO2 emissions starting July 1st. The hosts speculate that the lack of local control could eventually lead to a civil war if member states like Spain or Portugal resist the central authority. They note that non-member countries like Norway and Switzerland have avoided these complications by maintaining sovereignty.

diesel tax· co2 emissions· norway· switzerland· civil war· sovereignty

22:42 Me too. I think it's fantastic. You know what, this is all headed in one direction the way I see it. Because they're going to keep trying to ramrod this EU down everybody's throat. I think a trade agreement between the countries works out, but to have a single government so you have the Germans telling the French how to make cheese really seems to be a problem. I don't think it's exactly that. I think the biggest problem is none of the people who are making the laws in Brussels have been elected. You know what I'm saying? Yeah, that's bad. That's like a real problem and people don't want that and you know it's worrisome.

23:31 You don't think about these things often, you know? But then you realize, you know, shit, wait a minute, you know, this really is going to impact my life one way or the other. For example, July 1st, all of Europe, all member states are adding 3, I think it's 3% or 3 cents, but like 3, let's just say 3%, additional tax to diesel to combat CO2 emissions. And at this moment in time, the last thing anyone needs is any rise in the cost of diesel. And so none of the individual states can really do anything about it. So everyone just kind of has to implement it. You know, that's a perfect example of, fuck no, you know, we need to be able to change. And not every state has the same prices, by the way, because there's different

24:19 Different pricing and different taxing structures. It's it's very confusing and all people see is money flying out of their pocket That's all they know. Yeah. Well, that's a bad thing But anyway, this thing all looks to me looking at it from a long-term kind of perspective especially if you even have a clue about the history of Europe and And if you think about the way the United States' history went, it looks to me as though at some point, if this thing actually started to come together, one of the states would start to resist. I mean, the smart money already resisted completely. Norway and Switzerland never joined this operation, as far as they're concerned, it's something they don't need.

24:58 But these other guys who kind of agreed to it, at some point if they start to resist, there's going to be what amounts to a civil war. Especially if you have a nation, you know, an army that is a EU army, which will be a German army, seems to me. And you get some little country like Portugal or Spain deciding that they don't like what's going on, they're going to just march in there and take them over. It's just going to be a mess. Well, I think what's kind of weird about it is that the citizens of Europe get along fine. We trade with each other, we visit each other's countries, we do business together.

25:39 We have cheap airlines, we can visit each other, we're on the internet, we're talking to each other, we're emailing, we're cyber-sexing. Yet somewhere in Brussels all these people are like doing all kinds of other shit and as you say like now all of a sudden an army is gonna march into a country? Like, you know, it feels so wrong. Well, it is wrong. And I'm against it, but you know, I'm just over here, carping. Yeah, it's like the States is all fine and dandy, politically speaking. Yeah, well we have our own armies marching around. Yeah, exactly. It's not as if... But I mean, who needs another situation? I mean, the thing about... I don't know, it's just I've never been...

26:27 I've never subscribed to the EU ever actually working out from the from the first time I've heard about it to today. I'm a skeptic about it and every time one of these situations falls apart like this with this Irish deal, I'm just going there you go, you know, I mean it's just like It's not working. There's too many languages over there and things you have to I don't know I don't want to get into it because I'm not that knowledgeable. What else do we have to talk about? Yes, shit, I don't know. It's no agenda man. I'm not planning stuff. Well, you know there's somebody's wanting me to talk about that we have a Commentator over here has become quite popular. In fact, there was an NPR special about him the other day I was just in northern Michigan giving a speech to a newspaper group telling them, you know that I don't know how well over how it went over but I'm gonna turn this speech into a monograph because it's pretty much outlines I think what's wrong with

CHAPTER 07 / 25 Discussion

Keith Olbermann Career, MSNBC Bush Bashing Success

The hosts provide a background on Keith Olbermann, tracing his career from a wisecracking sports commentator at ESPN to a political firebrand at MSNBC. Olbermann's popularity surged after he pivoted to aggressive criticism of the George W. Bush administration, helping MSNBC compete with Fox News and CNN. His "Special Comments" are noted for their sharp, partisan tone against the Republican leadership.

keith olbermann· espn· msnbc· george w. bush· disney· cable news

27:20 the assumptions made by newspapers when they think they're gonna be able to go online. And it's, anyway, so, but I'm floating around this part of Michigan, which I've never been to before, and it's absolutely beautiful. And, you know, there's north, western Michigan along the Long Lake, Michigan up onto the Upper Peninsula, which is called the UP up there. They never say Upper Peninsula for some reason. But anyway, so I'm listening to this special on NPR about this guy who does MSNBC, Olbermann. Keith Olbermann? Sure. Oh, okay, yeah, we were going to talk about this, right, I remember. Yeah, Keith Olbermann. And somebody says, it was a British listener to the show, said, you know, what is the deal with this guy?

28:09 Because he seems to be, you know, I don't know, he's getting attention overseas. I'm not sure what the international implications are. But he wanted a little background. Keith Olbermann started off years and years ago as a commentator on ESPN. And he's the one, along with a couple other guys, I don't know if he invented it, but ESPN in its early days was still trying to figure out where it was headed as a broadcasting entity. And he is one of the people who became the Wisecrack-oriented sports guy, you know, where you'd be given sports highlights and then you'd have snide comments to make constantly about whatever you were witnessing.

28:53 I didn't know that about his background. That's interesting. I didn't know that he came from ESPN. Yeah, he came his roots as a TV guy in terms of his popularity. I'm sure he did other TV someplace locally or whatever because he had to but it was at ESPN and he got so good and so popular at ESPN that he the way the story goes and this a lot of this is folklore of course But he got pop, but this is a fact, he was extremely popular and he wanted more money. And Disney basically just fired him. And so that, and it got a bunch of people mad. In fact, my stepson Eric is still mad at Disney for firing Keith Olbermann like 15 years ago. I guess he was a real fan of his. Anyway, so Olbermann then kicked around for a while and he never really found himself. And then he showed up at MSNBC doing this kind of political show instead of sports.

29:50 He gave up on sports, but his style is exactly the same. It was like just snide remarks and you know, in his own distinctive way, because I do snide remarks, but I don't do him his style. He has a unique style. And he had a show, and the show's been on for a number of years, and it had got zero traction whatsoever. Then he decided to start focusing on bush bashing. And so he became a number one Bush basher. And this is what, and all of a sudden during the election, this last election, primary elections, his show on MSNBC or him doing commentation or commentating on MSNBC became the number one thing. And they actually took over the whole scene from Fox, they beat Fox, they beat CNN, they did all, they just

30:41 And it was all because Olbermann was bush-bashing during the whole primary season and people were loving it. Honestly, I've watched a couple of his videos, because I don't get to see it live on MSNBC, but there's a lot of YouTube videos and probably once every two weeks someone will send me a link to a Keith Olbermann statement, and he usually starts out with, Mr. Bush, you're a liar, you know, you have consistently lied to this country, you are, you know, he's almost, he's not just this short of calling Bush a war criminal, which he might have even said somewhere along the line, and I must admit that just about every single rant he's done, I have enjoyed thoroughly.

CHAPTER 08 / 25 Discussion

John McCain Today Show Interview, Keith Olbermann Rant

A recent Keith Olbermann rant focused on John McCain's appearance on the Today Show with Matt Lauer, where McCain discussed troop withdrawals from Iraq. The hosts argue that Olbermann took McCain's comments out of context to create a "gaffe" for ratings. They also discuss the potential conflict of interest for MSNBC, which is owned by General Electric, a major defense contractor.

john mccain· matt lauer· today show· iraq war· general electric

31:27 Yeah, of course. I mean, this is fun to watch, but you know, the thing is, it's very partisan and pretty focused on Bush and the Republicans to a lesser extent. I mean, he did a John McCain thing recently that one of my bloggers put up. Let me see if I can find it. And, you know, I looked at him and I, you know, he's essentially doing what Jon Stewart does. Only with a little more a little more mean-spirited version of Jon Stewart where you take some guy who says yeah No, I think that we should close this bridge and then you find 45 examples of him saying that we should open the bridge Clips clips from the archives this is so what this listener sent in I remember now He said this is a thing that is now sir another one of those links that I get sent a thousand times Please don't stop sending him. I appreciate it

32:22 and it was John McCain on the Today Show with Matt Lauer and I think it was actually taken out of context now that I look at the video but the essence was pulling the troops out of Iraq John McCain's quote was, that's not important what's important is no casualties and so that's what this entire rant, Olbermann rant was built around Yeah, yeah, no, because he used the term, that's not important. And the thing that McCain's doing is he is parsing a little too much for my taste, but if you start really listening to him, he's almost saying...

33:05 that uh... i can't and i'm still this opinion i think mccain's the only one with the standing who could actually just take office and then the next day say we're pulling all the troops out i look this over i don't like what i'm saying we're going to be they've already won you know we've already won over there were removing the troops are keeping a small army in the greens or something like that i mean he could do that the green zone which by the way is big enough for fifty bases or some shit like that the green zones the size of texas Huge and it's the only safe part of the country, but you know so they could just turn into its own country anyway, so The green zones a joke I have friends actually that are in the green zone as we speak

33:47 And anyway, so I mean he could get away with that and nobody else could. So I'm not convinced that he's this horrible person who wants to use a warmonger, because if anybody's not a warmonger, it's probably him having suffered from being a prisoner of war for such a long time. Anyway, this will all eventually shake out, but Olbermann has gone after him now and this last thing I thought was actually weak. And I did think it was taken out of context and I'm not absolutely sure he's going to be able to maintain this bashing for much longer for a couple of reasons that somebody pointed out. One, MSNBC is owned by General Electric. Yeah, that's not going to last long is what you're saying.

CHAPTER 09 / 25 Discussion

Media Bias, Barack Obama Campaign Coverage

The discussion shifts to perceived media bias in favor of Barack Obama, with the hosts noting that very few journalists identify as supporters of John McCain. They criticize the modern journalistic trend of hunting for "gaffes" and verbal contradictions rather than focusing on policy substance. The segment highlights how Obama's vague message of "change" makes him difficult to pin down compared to candidates like Hillary Clinton.

barack obama· media bias· journalism· dan quayle· hillary clinton

34:37 And, Olbermann's already shown that he doesn't mind burning bridges because he already burned the Disney Bridge when he was at ESPN and, uh, in some way. And, uh, he probably will go down in flames here too if he doesn't, uh, you know, even Jon Stewart tries to balance his act a little bit. It's not just, I mean, he's not, Olbermann is obviously an Obama like many of the media here in the country. In fact, when I questioned this group that I was talking to, I had about 150 people that were in the newspaper industry and I asked them, how many people in the group would be for McCain? After prefacing it with the comment that the media is very left-wing, generally speaking, and Democrats.

35:25 And out of like 150 people, 100 people maybe, three people raised their hand, which seemed about right. A fourth person came up to me afterwards, which I thought was amusing, and said, you know, I would've raised my hand too, but I just started working here and I didn't think it would be a good idea. Oh shit. Oh great, okay, well that's good to know. Let me just say, I watched this clip. And just about the context bit for one moment here. I think what John McCain answered a question and when he said it's not important, I think he was referring to what he thinks is not important. Not necessarily about the troops being pulled out. It felt like it was taken out of context. And then what really bothered me, because I do like Olbermann rants,

36:13 It completely came across as if, you know, he was saying, shit, I've only got until November. If I really want to keep this gig going, I got to start picking on somebody really big. And indeed, you're right, immediately it's like Obama spokespeople on the phone, you know, three or four of them, you know, then right back to you know, all the so-called gaffes that McCain has made, like, you know, we could be in Iraq for a hundred years, you know. And I don't know what McCain's thinking, you know, whether he's for or against. I really don't know at this point because, you know, there's so many conflicting information out there presented by the media. But to me it felt really contrived and, you know, making a huge thing out of something. We already know McCain's a kook when it comes to that. He's just a kook.

37:04 Yeah, he is. He's the obvious cooch. But anyway, I agree with that. I felt that the thing was a stretch. And it's almost as though you're trying too hard to be mean about this. Because it wasn't making the point. In fact, I had my own bloggers say, you know, they keep using the word gaffe. And I'm trying to think, what's the gaffe here? I mean, where was a gaffe? I mean, he's just saying what he says. A gaffe is where you say something really stupid like, you know, potato spelled with an E. You know, something Dan Quayle would make gaffes all the time and Bush makes gaffes all the time. He says dumb things. But, well, I mean, where's the gaffe technically? I'm not seeing one. I'm just seeing, you know, just be contradictory.

37:52 You know what Don Donnie? What he said three years ago is not what he's saying today. I mean, but who doesn't do that? Yeah, exactly. Oh, yeah. Well, that's the whole thing, you know. Now the big journalistic thing has become to catch somebody on their words, which is a very internet thing, by the way. And boy, can you interpret words differently. let alone what comes out of someone's mouth. So it's like the Hillary Clinton thing, where Hillary Clinton said, you know, under sniper fire we arrived at the airport and then someone pulls the tape and finds the tape where of course it turns out that wasn't true at all. I think that's what journalists are looking for these days, is you know, how can we catch someone on his own words? You know, how can we nail him down to something they said eons ago? Which you're right, people change their mind, come up with

CHAPTER 10 / 25 Discussion

Political Conference Calls, Barack Obama Oratory Style

The hosts express frustration with the lack of transparency in daily political conference calls held by campaigns for selected reporters. They analyze Barack Obama's speaking style, comparing his deliberate pauses and cadence to legendary broadcasters Walter Cronkite and Paul Harvey. They argue that while this "old-fashioned" network news style is currently effective, it lacks substantive detail.

conference calls· walter cronkite· paul harvey· transparency· oration

38:35 with different theories, thank God people's opinions change. What really bothers me though in all of this, and it dawned on me, that there's something going on. There are conference calls, press conference calls being made, particularly during this election. So I know the Obama camp has a conference call every day with reporters. Then there's the, of course, the Clintons. I don't know if they still do it, but they certainly were. McCain, every candidate had their own conference call. And these are not like public conference calls. It's basically the candidates or any political party's version of talking points. And they hand them out to reporters on these conference calls, which we're not privy to. In fact, I would really love to be able to get MP3s or

39:22 or a dial-in number for all I care so I can listen in to what these people have to say but it feels like we're really one step removed from a lot of important information that is being interpreted by what I consider to be pretty much lazy journalists. Yeah, there's no reason that these things shouldn't go directly to the public, to have the journalists become kind of a filter when they do such a crappy job of it and they're all biased. I mean, everybody's like, I mean, you could just see, I mean, everybody's essentially all Obama. I mean, they think Obama's the next John Kennedy or something and so they're all hoping for this, you know, the change as it were. You know, he's just another senator.

40:00 And the thing about Obama, by the way, in terms of catching him with his words, he's interesting because he never says anything. He doesn't say anything except change. Of course we all want change. That's a great message. How simple are we as Americans, dude? How fucking simple are we that we go behind the Pied Piper just because he says change? Hell yeah. Of course we want change. But I have yet to hear anything of substance. I totally agree. So anyway, so you can't catch him contradicting himself because he doesn't really say anything. And he's also had, so I was listening to his ponderous style and I realized that, you know who he sounds like if you start listening to him? He sounds like he's doing an imitation of Walter Cronkite.

40:47 Seriously, he's doing his type of speaking because it's an oration. I thought it was an oration but I realize now it's old-fashioned network news is the style he obviously when he was a kid he was influenced by. It's like Paul Harvey. This is Paul Harvey? Good day. Did I freak you out? There's a bit of that without the Paul Harvey had a or still does. He has a kind of an abrupt that's hard at the beginning, whereas Walter Cronkite would have an abruptness, in other words, they have the pregnant pause and then hit the word, and it would be a little softer, and it would be a little more amenable to a network audience listening to a newscast, and that's what Obama's doing. I mean, you're right, he could probably transform himself into a Paul Harvey if he wanted to,

41:40 But I think that style of presentation is old-fashioned, and I think it's going to catch up to him. Yeah, but it is working, dude. I mean, he's totally got people loving him. Yeah, no, I agree. I mean, he seems like a very likable guy. That I don't know. You know what? To me, he doesn't seem like a very likable guy. Well, I mean, he seems like, yeah, maybe you're right. I mean, I've heard stories that he's actually kind of mean-spirited and one of those guys likes to boss around the hired help. Do you know, by the way, John, just before we embark on this, do you know that a lot of... You still there? Ah, crap. I knew that was going to happen. Let's get John back on the line. Hold on.

CHAPTER 11 / 25 Discussion

Listener Feedback, Hillary Clinton Vice President Theory

Following a brief Skype connection failure, the hosts address angry listener emails regarding their previous coverage of Barack Obama. They compare Obama's political brand to the "Macintosh" of politics, where supporters are intensely protective. A theory is proposed that John McCain should select Hillary Clinton as his vice-presidential running mate to disrupt the election.

listener email· macintosh· hillary clinton· john mccain· propaganda

42:28 Okay, we're back a little Skype crash there as you pointed out. It's amazing. It works at all What I was gonna say you were in the middle of your rant I was just gonna say that after the last show we did and we talked about Obama I got a lot of really angry emails from people saying who were we to bash Obama and I'm like Dude, we didn't bash. Yeah, we bashed everybody. You know, I don't think we you know, I I don't know. Obama is essentially the Macintosh of politics. There you go. You can't say anything. You can't say anything about him. The thing is, again, though, the public is, this is early. I mean, we're talking about the election in November. And at some, everything is like,

43:18 We haven't even seen, you know, what's gonna happen, how the fickle public is gonna react to Obama over time. Especially when and if the comics take him on and the real critics jump in and they start putting his feet to the fire and say, you know, okay, the word change is cool, but what does it mean? I mean should we just drop the constitution? That's a change. Wait a minute. Just to clarify, he didn't actually say that anywhere did he? No, no, but I'm just saying. I mean if you just want change for change's sake, why don't we install a king?

44:02 Yeah, well you're right. I mean I wouldn't mind hearing... You know, so just getting back to Olbermann kind of in a roundabout way, you could also conceive that entire episode he did, and I'm sure Bubba Martin will put some amazing links in the show notes. I saw it was on Dvorak.org obviously, so you can find the video of Olbermann there as well. You could also construe this as being a setup with the Obama camp. Yeah, that could be. I mean he's obviously, I mean it's almost, it does bother me that people who, I mean Jan Wenner came on, Jan Wenner came on, Jan, which is what his name should be, Jan Wenner, the publisher of Rolling Stone, came on. He was on MSNBC in an interview show with Michael Eisner. And the two of them were going back, and he just comes out and says, you know, they're pushing Obama.

45:00 You know, I don't know how a publication you know, this is I don't know I mean, I guess if you're just in their camp, I mean I don't think there's anything wrong with you know Advising the public to some point but to become a tool of propaganda. I think it's another issue and I think that's just dubious We have a mixed bag of people who like this and that but we try to at least everybody gets there You know their opinion. It's not like one thing. I think it's By the way, I did come up with a good one though. My wife actually came up with it and I'm promoting it. It's that McCain should take Hillary as the vice president. Yeah, I saw that. Yeah, right. Okay. That's real realistic, John. Nice. It's possible. Hey, you know, they were talking about Lieberman. That's not possible. I think it is.

CHAPTER 12 / 25 Discussion

Hillary Clinton Campaign Failure, Management Criticism

The hosts analyze the collapse of Hillary Clinton's primary campaign, attributing it to early arrogance and poor management. They argue she relied on "sorority sisters" and friends rather than top-tier political consultants, allowing Barack Obama to seize the momentum. Obama's success is framed as a demonstration of superior management skills compared to Clinton's reliance on cronies.

hillary clinton· political consultants· campaign management· arrogance· primary election

45:47 I mean, what clearly happened, and this of course is where your theory that Hillary would get the nomination no matter what, you know, what clearly happened is that some of this seeped over into the institutional money guys, and I think they all just, you know, kind of said, well, screw it, you know, we just want a winning horse here, we'll just switch over to Obama, you know, and they started backing him, and then, you know, it was done. It was over with. Yeah, well, I think it is over with. I mean, I don't see how she can pull a rabbit out of a hat now. I think it's, I mean, I thought it was possible, but she never did get that one, I mean, she couldn't quite get the momentum back when she lost it. And a lot of it stems back, and everybody will say the same thing, it stems to her arrogance at the beginning thinking she was gonna get the nomination. Jon Stewart had a real funny bit where he showed all these people predicting it early on and guaranteeing it.

46:38 all these pundits on TV. Like you. I never, well, I did, yeah, you're right. Yeah, I did. You're right, I'm one of them. But I'm not on TV doing it. I guess that's my... Oh, okay. It makes it all right. Besides the point, I still have to bet the other way. So anyway, yeah, you're right. I feel bad. But anyway, so the point is that she was cocky at the beginning and she had a bunch of her pals doing all the work for her. She didn't have any of the hot, political consultants that you would normally hire. She was using her friends, you know, her sorority sisters. And they dropped the ball. You know, they screwed up left and right. She had to fire two different groups of them before she'd get on track. And by the time she got on track, she was so far behind in the race that she couldn't catch up. It was a disaster. Yeah, I think it'll go down in the history books as how not to do it.

47:31 Yeah, no, absolutely. It could, you know, total screw up. It was, I mean, it was incompetence at every imaginable level, which makes you wonder what kind of a president she'd be. Yeah, nice way to run a show, Hillary. So I mean it's just basically essentially giving it away. I mean Obama was on some interview showing I saw him he was with talking to somebody and in his plane and talking about how he says look at we look at that you know I can manage and check check out what I've been doing with this election you know this is a management job that I'm doing here and I'm winning. Does that say something for me? And it does in that regard. It definitely says that Hillary, if she was the president, she'd just line the office with a bunch of cronies. We'd just have another democratic version of Bush. And amongst all of this, a very important player in this election in the United States passed away. Tim Russert from Meet the Press, which was, you know, and actually I saw it on your blog. That's where I first read the news and it really shocked me. You know, I was like, wow, fuck, I didn't expect that to happen.

CHAPTER 13 / 25 Discussion

Tim Russert Death, Valerie Plame Conspiracy Theories

The sudden death of Meet the Press host Tim Russert at age 58 is discussed. While official reports cite a heart attack, the hosts entertain conspiracy theories related to Russert's knowledge of the Valerie Plame affair. They note physical signs of high blood pressure in recent photos of Russert but question why anyone would have a motive to silence the neutral commentator.

tim russert· meet the press· valerie plame· high blood pressure· nbc news

48:35 Yeah, that was out of the blue. You know, one of the guys at the office was watching him. He said he saw him a week ago or something. He said he didn't look right. Maybe he had something, you know, one of those weird... heart conditions that... Yeah, well I showed... Yeah, because he's only 58. Yeah, I showed a picture to... because you know, obviously I talked about this with Patricia last night. I said, so here's two things. First of all, you could say there's a conspiracy because of course he does have a lot of knowledge about the Valerie Plame affair and all of that and said, but take a look at the picture and Patricia looked, took one look, she said, oh look at those eyes, they're puffing, he has huge pressure behind his eyes. I bet he was a... he was suffering from high blood pressure and something just blew up. Maybe.

49:17 Although I like the conspiracy thing a lot. You like that one, huh? Well, you know, it doesn't take much. Prussic acid and there's other techniques to make you look like you had a heart attack and it can't be traced. I don't know why they want to kill him. I mean, you know. Well, there's a lot riding on that. He is mentioned in a lot of these documents. This Valerie Plame thing is no joke. I mean, there's people going to go to jail over this. There's people sitting in jail now, I think. Perhaps. Generally speaking they just keep denying it and then it goes away, but maybe whatever the case is yeah Well, he was a big I guess he was an he was pretty neutral You know he's been criticized by the right-wing talk show guys for being a left-wing character because of all his background He was like he worked he's a politician or worked in politics most of his life And then he became a journalist later, but I always thought he was pretty

50:09 pretty good as a neutral commentator. I get the podcast version which downloads around 5 or 6 o'clock on Sunday afternoon, Sunday evening. And I always enjoyed watching it. There's only two shows. It's like the McLaughlin group which reminds me of a political, you know, like Dvorak. What's the name? McLaughlin. And meet the Prince. Wrong! Bye bye! Yeah, McLaughlin. I saw him in New York once, you know, he just looks like, I mean he does look like a cranky geek.

50:52 uh... nothing more than i do yes no worries john so uh... but anyway so that's kind of the overman thing that's about the best we can do is that he's just essentially an obama you know uh... guy period that's what it is So we should, just to go back on that, I'd really like to be able to get in on these conference calls. I mean, that's the shit that I want to hear. Well, you know, there's got to be somebody out there that's got a dial-in number. You would expect. I mean, they send it to all the press. And it seems to me that if you have a dial-in, and here's what bothers me about the media again. If you've got a dial-in number, why aren't you recording this thing and then posting it someplace?

CHAPTER 14 / 25 Discussion

Marilyn Monroe Death, Personality Types and Suicide

A host mentions an upcoming interview with an author who has a new theory on the death of Marilyn Monroe. The theory suggests that certain personality types are prone to being driven to suicide by their partners. An anecdote is shared about a woman who reportedly left a gun and a note for her husband, leading to his self-inflicted death.

marilyn monroe· suicide· psychology· dissertation· book interview

51:35 Just, you know, I think it'd be more interesting than your interpretation of it. I had a call yesterday with a guy who wrote the latest book on the death of Marilyn Monroe. So I'm gonna post the audio of it. I have the whole conversation there, about 18 and a half minutes. And it's actually quite interesting. It's quite interesting. Was this just a chat or did you interview him? Yes, it's no, you know, it was an interview. So it was an out and out interview. So I ran it as such, but I didn't really have to say much. He's one of those guys with a million stories. He's an old, I guess he worked with the coroner's office or something during that era as an older guy.

52:15 and I'll be posting it probably Monday or Tuesday. Oh cool, are you gonna do that on Tech 5 or just on Dvorak or where are you gonna do that? I'll just do it on Dvorak. It's not really a Tech 5, you know Tech 5 has got to be about tech, there's nothing high tech about Marilyn Monroe being you know, cajoled into killing yourself, which is basically his theory. That's the theory? Okay. Well, the guy wrote a book on how there are personality types that are prone to suicide and they often match up with personality types, in other words, they get married to or they hang out with people who drive them to suicide. He actually wrote a book on this years ago, I think it was his college dissertation for his PhD.

52:59 Or is it a dissertation? One's a, well, whatever you do for the PhD. And, uh, dissertation. So, um, anyway, so he's, he says these people match up a lot and he had examples of how one woman, uh, uh, married one of these pro, you know, these, one of these soft males who was always threatening to kill himself and he was serious about it. And so one day, with the comment that, you know, if you ever left me I'd kill myself. If you ever left me I'd kill myself. And so she wrote him a note one day. He says, this is documented by the way. She wrote him a note, says, I'm leaving you. And then she left a gun there and her last count was, you know what to do.

CHAPTER 15 / 25 Discussion

Red Light District Anecdote, Beauty Standards

The hosts discuss the evolution of beauty standards, comparing the natural look of Marilyn Monroe to modern "Photoshopped" celebrities. This leads to an anecdote about a host making a disparaging comment about a worker's appearance in Amsterdam's Red Light District. The worker reportedly heard the comment through the glass and confronted the host's group.

amsterdam· red light district· beauty standards· photoshop· natalie wood

53:43 And he shot himself. No shit. Oh cry. Oh, man. You know with all this With all this Marilyn Monroe stuff because I think there's also some Some new footage unseen footage, which is being auctioned on Monday or Tuesday There's a lot of pictures that you know now in the press of Marilyn Monroe again that kind of heats up And I was looking at one of her more famous pictures. It was a really big it was on a in a restaurant, in the bathroom on the wall, as you do, you're kind of sitting there, or standing, I'm sorry, doing your business. I'm looking at this picture, and I'm like, she wasn't really all that hot. Does that make any sense? Well, by today's standards, it's hard to say. She had, I've seen a lot of photos of her, because you can't not.

54:31 and she I thought she was really had a really pretty face. Yeah but she in a milfy way but not like in a in a young sex bomb way if you look at her hands and her fingers and you look at the condition of her skin around her around her neck I mean I'm really picky about this I'm really looking at it. Apparently. Yeah but well you know I had I was there for like two minutes I got nothing better to do and and so I'm really examining this I'm like you know And also, maybe I should say this, maybe it's because I've become so used to looking at these photoshopped, completely unnatural looking beauties that are in today's media. This is what women actually look like, honestly. And they didn't use any of those techniques back in the day. Maybe it's that.

55:18 Yeah, it could be. Although you might just be hypercritical. So there we were, which is probably more like it. So meanwhile, I mean, so this reminds me of a story. Hey John, fuck you very much. Okay, your next story. Yes. So I'm going, I'm in Amsterdam with this group of people and we're floating around the area where all the hookers are. Or these girls in those little booths. There's like rows of them and they're all over the place. We're just roaming around. That's known as the red light district. Anyway, but it's the one that's for the tourists. You know that apparently there's a couple of them there And it is but it's like a bunch of people guys walk away I don't see anybody even doing any business, but it's kind of funny to walk by so I'm walking by just as I'm about to turn a corner I'm look I look I'm with a bunch of these other people in this group And I said I look inside and this girl's in there, and I just make this to come I said she's not that hot

56:07 And so I turned the corner, apparently, I guess the windows there are so thin. She heard you say it? I didn't think she was hearing, heard that. So she apparently comes roaring out of the little booth thing and starts screaming at all this group of people. Meanwhile, I have turned the corner, I'm gone. And so she just berating them and cussing them up and down and just, this is the way the story was told to me. And then they come and finally catch up to me and they say, you son of a bitch, you know what, you got us into trouble. This comment, I was completely oblivious. And she wasn't that hot though, that was the point.

CHAPTER 16 / 25 Discussion

Iranian and Croatian Women, Viral Video Discussion

The conversation shifts to the appearance of women in different regions, specifically Croatia and Iran. One host claims that Croatian women often resemble Natalie Wood, while the other references a YouTube video sent by a pilot named Captain Chris showcasing the beauty of Iranian women. They briefly touch upon the political oppression of women in Iran by the mullahs.

croatia· iran· persian women· youtube· captain chris

56:50 You gotta be careful man, what you say? She was kind of sensitive, but now I know not to say anything around those, that thing, because they can hear you. Nah, they don't understand you anymore because now they're all from Croatia. They don't, they don't speak any English or Dutch. It's, they've ruined the whole vibe. Yeah, I've heard bad things. Yeah, it's, it's really, it's, it's no more fun there. I'm reliably informed. Oh, here's one for you. Big thing happening over here. By the way, Croatian women are pretty hot looking. The ones, when I go to, well maybe the ones they're shipping out aren't. Maybe that's what the deal is, that's possible. But I'll tell you, when I was in Croatia, I've been there a couple of times because I write for a magazine there, so I go there and float around. There are more women there that are dead ringers for Natalie Wood than any place I've ever been. It's unbelievable. You know what, I'm gonna send you this link right now. I got a link from a guy

57:48 and it was titled Iranian women are hot and he's got this... Well they're Persians, Persian women are traditionally hot. Holy crap you gotta see this man. Are they terrible looking? No, they're serious. Captain Chris sent it to me here. Oh it's a YouTube video here we go hold on. Captain Chris who's a commercial pilot and he sent this to me says dude I so know you. You should probably send a copy to Should send a copy to Bubba You mean the link? He'll post it. Yeah, well hold on let me just I'll just send it in through to you you can because I don't think there's even sound with it so you can just take a look at it, but wow whoo Smoking hot is what I'd say well Probably a good thing. They're being kept down by the mullahs As it were well. It's just kind of sad when I think about it. You know because there's all this talk about bombing Iran

CHAPTER 17 / 25 Discussion

Afghanistan War Strategy, President Hamid Karzai Interview

A host recounts asking Afghan President Hamid Karzai how he plans to defeat the Taliban. Karzai reportedly admitted that the Taliban cannot be defeated by the 2010 deadline because their core leadership resides in Pakistan. The discussion covers the complex geopolitical history of the region, including the Cold War alliances between the US, Pakistan, India, and the Soviet Union.

hamid karzai· afghanistan· taliban· pakistan· geopolitics

58:54 striking out and I only realized just the other day when I actually looked at Google Earth, I can't remember what I was looking for, but you know it finally hit me when I saw Afghanistan and where it lies in position to Iraq and then all of a sudden I understood why we're actually in Afghanistan. You know, we're surrounding Iran. Well, we seem to be. Oh, oh, dude. Yeah, people need to look at them. You know, people don't, you know, Americans in particular, we don't look at maps enough. I forgot to tell you, John, this, I got a really big piece of news for you. I got a scoop-a-roonie. Oh, good. So, um, I, I was allowed to ask on behalf of my Dutch audience a question to the president of Iran, uh, Mr. Karzai. No, he's not the president of Iran. Uh, I'm sorry, uh, Afghanistan. Right.

59:49 And so you want another question? Yes, of course you do. The question was, which was chosen from many entries, was how are you going to beat the Taliban? Which I thought was a genius question because of course it has a false bottom seeing as the Russians tried to beat the Taliban for 10 years. And you know now the deal is that the coalition is supposed to stay in Afghanistan until 2010 at which point we pull out our, well that's what the deal is, everyone pulls out their troops and then the Afghan army and their police should be strong enough to take care of their own.

1:00:29 And he answered back, he said, you know what? I probably don't think we can actually defeat him. He said it out right. He said, I don't think we can defeat him by 2010. We won't be able to do it. You know, so here we are pouring billions into the country on a promise that we can get out by 2010. And the guy literally says, you know, I don't think we can do it. Well, he's probably right. And then I think we had our shot at it. I don't understand you. One of the things I've always thought is that I don't know why we even send troops into these places. We should just send assassins.

1:01:08 and and and and cruise missiles so these guys so the Taliban takes over they you know they're in there having a big meeting you just bomb them. But here's the whole problem the follow-up to his answer was the the core the core Taliban is in Pakistan he said they're not even in Afghanistan so yeah I know I think that's I think everybody knows that right you know but how messed up is that we don't have any troops in Pakistan Yeah, I know and every time we do everything something over there they all get all bent out of shape. Yeah, and they got nuclear weapons. I mean, how about let's let's go after those guys, you know, screw the rest of them. Well, we were in bed with them. Yeah, why? How? How are we in bed with them? Well, that goes way back because what happened years and years and years ago was that India

1:01:57 uh... during the soviet union era india became allies with russia and that's where they bought all their weaponry and everything from and so because of that we decided what we have to be allies with pakistan because there was no religious issue at the time it was just all you know uh... geopolitics and so that so the indians were allied with the russia the whole time and in fact most of their weaponry and all the jets and they were buying everything from russia and so uh... we got in bed with pakistan at that point and uh... you know even though we started looking at the analyzing it

1:02:34 If we're close to any country, it's India, because they speak, well, they speak English in Pakistan, too, but they're more connected to the British. Most of the people that immigrate to the United States are more likely to be Indian than Pakistani. We eat Indian food, the British eat Indian food as if it was Chinese food here in the US. They have to go take out and delivery, and it's amazing. And, but because of the geopolitics of it, that's the reason. I'm sure it could be clarified by one of the experts out there, but essentially, that was, it was the alliances of those of the Soviet era. We're all going to a hell in a handbasket, man. It's a joke.

CHAPTER 18 / 25 Discussion

Oil Price Manipulation, Enron Energy Crisis Parallel

The hosts discuss the current spike in oil prices, comparing it to the "rigged" California energy crisis involving Enron. They reference the documentary "The Smartest Guys in the Room," produced by Mark Cuban, which exposed how energy traders intentionally caused blackouts to drive up prices. They suggest that similar manipulation is currently happening in the oil commodities market in London and Dubai.

oil prices· enron· mark cuban· energy crisis· commodities· gray davis

1:03:21 You know me, Mr. Conspiracy Theory, all I can see is just more and more proof that this is all about money and control over people and control over territories and forces at work that aren't necessary to the politicians we think are running the show. Well, I mean, I think there's elements of that, but a lot of it is... Just the way things have evolved because they distribute I mean if you look at I don't think I mean there is a control issue this banks love to get in on certain deals and I mean right now the oil cry I think that's gonna end shortly by the way because it finally looks like it just passed the legislation needed to Close the loophole on the clothes the in Ron loophole Yeah, and that was there was a piece of it left open and so they could do is all the and the guys who are the bad actors here again we're talking about Dubai and

1:04:13 and the London commodities people that were the ones racking these oil prices up. Then when it turns around, which is gonna be probably right after summer. I think it's still gonna go higher before it turns around, John. I think they're just gonna go for it. Well, I think it's right now it's gonna be harder because of their scrutiny has changed. And, but I mean, you can, I mean, a lot of my smart money friends are already going short I had about 140 in the oil field. Hoping to catch it on the downside, because when it starts to go down, I think you might be right, it could go to 160, 170. I don't think it's going to make 200 now. But when it starts to turn around, starts to slide, it's going to fall so fast you won't know what happened. And then everybody's going to go, oh gee, well that's interesting. The thing that's weird to me is how the public is like

1:05:05 bamboozled like, I mean the best example was the Enron, you know, the energy crisis that we'd had years ago when they were having these rolling blackouts in California which made no logical sense and they had all these writers, you know, all the newspapers, well we don't have enough power and people were using too much. There's all these rationales for this when the whole thing was rigged and they were just turning the power off, they were shorting us, they were basically cutting us off so we could have to pay more and nobody was paying any attention to that. There was all this, you know, all the greenies came out going on and on about, oh my God, we have to conserve more energy, we have to do this, we have to do that when it's just the whole thing was a scam.

1:05:50 If you've never seen smartest guys in the room, which is the Enron story produced by What's a maverick guy name? What's his name? I know the smartest guys in the room, I can't remember who produced that. The guy who sold broadcast.com to Yahoo, the Mavericks owner. Mark Cuban? Right, Mark Cuban produced that, yeah. That's his... Oh, I didn't know that, okay. It's called the smartest guys in the room and you will literally hear recordings of these energy traders That's with a D for Delta. And literally hear them saying, all right man, screw those guys. We're just gonna turn them off. All right, ready? Yeah, black them out, black them out. You know, it was like fucking crazy. Right. Meanwhile, who was writing about that? I mean, who was investigating this? Where's all the reporters? Where are the journalists? No, they're all talking about how we should be more green. Yeah.

1:06:42 There you go, and it's happening again right before our very eyes. It's the big institutions. They're all you know they're rolling over these these investments in oil commodities month over month they keep Tapping it up, and they're screwing everyone. They're absolutely screwing everyone And I bet you there's recording somewhere that will surface in ten years from now where you hear these guys going Yeah, fuck them. Let's take the oil to 170 come on. We can do it screw everybody you you watch that'll come out Oh yeah, it probably will. After the fact and everyone, then there'll be the next scam. You know, and these things come and go and nobody picks up on it. And the funny thing that bothers me the most, and it really bothered me with the rolling blackouts during that era, is that it was obvious that it was a scam.

1:07:25 I mean you don't go from having 24-7 great power to having rolling blackouts every month. Even when there's no weirdness going on, it's not like we're having a blizzard. Well no, too many air conditioners are on. There's no air conditioners in California. We don't use them. But that's what the story was. There's too much air conditioning being used. Yeah, don't use your air conditioners. It's unbelievable. And we had a governor, Gray Davis, who was an out and out idiot. And he was like, I don't know who he had working for him, but he was buying right into it. Oh yes, you know, this is a problem because we don't have enough power capability, generation capability, and this is gonna be the way it is from now on. In fact, they were telling us this was gonna be the way it's gonna be forever. Rolling blackouts in California, they're never gonna end. And nobody thought this was like a little odd.

1:08:21 Yeah, and no one no one got the story we should go back and look and see if anyone did get the story or not if anyone ever looked into that to any depth and How ironic is it? Well, you know there may have been some alternative press maybe some alternative press picked it up I don't remember seeing anything So this is the thing that I've learned and which is just bugging the shit out of me. So we have this show which, I don't know, 35, 40,000 people listen to it on a weekly basis, maybe more, I haven't looked in a while. We're discussing a lot of stuff, we're talking about a lot of things, but it has so little impact. Whereas, you know, I get on a little fricking rinky-dink radio station in Holland which is 10th in the ratings, no one gives a shit about. And all of a sudden I get all this access, doors open up, I can get any kind of member of parliament, ministers, you know, anything I want just because it's radio, because it's quote mass media.

CHAPTER 19 / 25 Discussion

Media Impact, Podcasting vs. Traditional Radio

The hosts reflect on the influence of their podcast compared to traditional "mass media." Despite having a significant audience, they feel they have less institutional impact than a low-rated radio station in the Netherlands. They discuss the "red pill" nature of their show in opening listeners' minds to alternative viewpoints while expressing frustration at the slow pace of societal change.

podcasting· mass media· tipping point· netherlands· audience engagement

1:07:25 I mean you don't go from having 24-7 great power to having rolling blackouts every month. Even when there's no weirdness going on, it's not like we're having a blizzard. Well no, too many air conditioners are on. There's no air conditioners in California. We don't use them. But that's what the story was. There's too much air conditioning being used. Yeah, don't use your air conditioners. It's unbelievable. And we had a governor, Gray Davis, who was an out and out idiot. And he was like, I don't know who he had working for him, but he was buying right into it. Oh yes, you know, this is a problem because we don't have enough power capability, generation capability, and this is gonna be the way it is from now on. In fact, they were telling us this was gonna be the way it's gonna be forever. Rolling blackouts in California, they're never gonna end. And nobody thought this was like a little odd.

1:08:21 Yeah, and no one no one got the story we should go back and look and see if anyone did get the story or not if anyone ever looked into that to any depth and How ironic is it? Well, you know there may have been some alternative press maybe some alternative press picked it up I don't remember seeing anything So this is the thing that I've learned and which is just bugging the shit out of me. So we have this show which, I don't know, 35, 40,000 people listen to it on a weekly basis, maybe more, I haven't looked in a while. We're discussing a lot of stuff, we're talking about a lot of things, but it has so little impact. Whereas, you know, I get on a little fricking rinky-dink radio station in Holland which is 10th in the ratings, no one gives a shit about. And all of a sudden I get all this access, doors open up, I can get any kind of member of parliament, ministers, you know, anything I want just because it's radio, because it's quote mass media.

1:09:19 it's a lot pisses me off we're so far from the tipping point on any of this stuff is all just it's this noise in the ether unfortunately i think we are you know opening up up individuals and citizens minds to other thinking and you know kind of red pill like you know like hey dude there there might be something else going on here but it really has so little impact and I'm so frustrated by it. Yeah it doesn't bother me I figure it's got no impact but at some point we can sell these people something. Fuck yeah, now you're talking. All right. That's the American spirit, John. I gotta get some books done or something. At least we have an audience, for God's sake. Hey, speaking of books, have you read McCullum's book yet? The former White House press secretary? You know, I've seen that guy. That guy bothers me. Me too. Thank you for saying that. I'm happy you said that. Oh, by the way, I was in New York with my agent and I was talking to some other people in the book business.

CHAPTER 20 / 25 Discussion

Scott McClellan Memoir, White House Press Secretary Criticism

The hosts critique the new memoir by former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan. They claim the book's scandalous content was manufactured at the request of publishers to increase sales. They describe McClellan as a "robot" in interviews and argue that the book is a "smoke screen" that distracts from more substantive investigative work regarding the Bush administration.

scott mcclellan· white house· book publishing· jon stewart· propaganda

1:10:18 And, um, the story behind the book is, I don't think is necessarily known. Apparently, McClellan had this manuscript that he's been, he was schlepping around Manhattan agencies for quite a while. And it was either the publisher or one of the agents that said, look, unless you come up with some stuff in here that's a little more, uh, you know, scandalous we can't publish it because nobody's gonna buy this boring book you wrote so he uh... went back to the drawing board came up with some stuff and they made him do some more along those same lines and so the whole thing was just created for the purposes of selling the book and i don't think he's sincere about it i think he's in a way you seem he seems very sheepish then he still talks about how great the president is yeah you know i've heard him in three interviews now i heard him on uh... what's uh... terry gross uh... npr uh...

1:11:13 Whatever that's yeah, I heard Fresh air fresh air. I heard him on another NPR on the media. I've seen a couple interviews He has exactly the same story exactly the same answers He's like a he's like a robot and and it all seems to focus on two things uh... which is annoying as you really really get any real content in fact i don't believe there's any content of this book because the things are uh... the so-called uh... he says well it's very clear that the white house uh... had a meeting in the uh... you know in the situation room or whatever and came up with talking points about me in the talking points were going to be this is not the uh... uh... mccollum that i know this sounds like someone else uh... wrote this book and of course you know everyone you know to be a replace the uh...

1:11:59 just like Jon Stewart does, plays the bits of all the different commentators saying exactly that. And they all feel betrayed by this guy saying, well you lied to us and on December 13th 2005 you said this. And it's like, thank you, hon. It's just like, get to the content of the book. It's not there. Yeah, no I agree. I have no interest. I mean I've seen him interviewed, I've heard the same things you're talking about. I saw the Jon Stewart ridicule. It's just, I don't, there's nothing there. It's just a, you know, it's a publicity stunt and I don't even, not impressed by it. But anyway, the back story is that he, what his real tale originally was, was just dull.

1:12:44 Like he is, he's a dull guy. I always thought he was a snot when he was the press secretary. But the point he's trying to make is that he too got sucked into the way things are done in politics in general and certainly Washington specifically. And that's no message, no one gives a shit, everyone knows it's like that. Yeah, I know, it's not breaking any new grounds, that's for sure. There's a lot of good books. The problem is there's a lot of good books about this administration, lots of them. And a lot of them end up, the good authors show up on the Stewart Show. And this book is just a smoke screen book. And it just takes money out of the pockets of the writers who are actually doing good work and puts it into this guy's pockets and it doesn't accomplish anything. I think it's a bad idea. I don't think people should buy this book.

CHAPTER 21 / 25 Discussion

George W. Bush UK Visit, Lisbon Treaty Isolation

President George W. Bush is scheduled to visit the United Kingdom as part of a farewell tour, prompting plans for large demonstrations. Meanwhile, news breaks that Germany and France are moving to isolate Ireland within the EU to resuscitate the Lisbon Treaty. The hosts compare the EU's refusal to accept the "no" vote to a gambler demanding "two out of three" after losing a bet.

george w. bush· farewell tour· the guardian· lisbon treaty· ireland

1:13:33 And by the way, if you are in the United Kingdom, I believe tomorrow, Sunday, that'll be the 15th, I believe George Bush is coming to visit the United Kingdom. I think he's on his farewell tour. And there's some huge demonstrations being planned. Not farewell! It is! Is he gonna be with Cher? It's gonna be President Bush, Cher and Bill Gates. Yeah, they're all saying goodbye again. So I think there's some huge demonstrations planned for his arrival here. I think it's tomorrow. So it'll be interesting to see. Yeah, those demonstrations have not been effective. I guess they make people feel good, but I think it's a pointless waste of time.

1:14:21 Well, I think when people want to express their emotions, that's good. You know, when people say, did it help? No, but it made me feel good. Yeah, I guess that's okay. That's important. And if they have creative signage, I think that would be cool. Yeah. Creative signage. Nice. I don't know. So what else we got? Anything? I think we're done. Let me see. Yeah, this just in. Germany and France moved to isolate Ireland in the European Union. What? Is that what it says, really? Yeah, Guardian. Germany and France have moved to isolate Ireland in the European Union, scrambling for ways to resuscitate the Lisbon Treaty after the Irish dealt the architects of the Union's new regime a crushing defeat.

1:15:17 Refusing to take... Oh, so I get it. So you just like, we have the vote. It's like making a bet with some guy. Say, okay, I'll flip it for heads. Okay, two out of three. Yeah. Okay, okay. Heads, heads. No, no, no. Three out of five. Three out of five. Yeah, heads I win, tails you lose. Come on, boom, boom. Come on. Okay, we'll do five out of seven and then we'll do it. I mean, it's just like, give me a break. It's nuts. There are local as well as European elections in Ireland next year and Fianna Fail will not risk having to hold another referendum. Not within the next 12 months at least. You know what, these guys, and you know what, for all I know this may be a great, a great treaty. You know, why don't they just spend, you know, 500 million euros and go explain it to people. Write a fricking... Or rewrite it so it's in simpler language. Yeah, just, you know, give the guy, blue collar guy a break.

1:16:08 We talked about this last week, a good contract is clear. And that's what this is, it's a contract, it's not a constitution, it's a contract. Constitution is like the US has, there's other ones. It's simple. It's simple, then you can work with it. This is a giant contract, obviously, but it's not clear. Now you should take a look at it John, I'll send you the link, you should just take a look at it and just if you want to laugh because you won't get through two pages of it. I'm guaranteed. I'll plow, actually I'll give it to my wife, she likes reading contracts so maybe I'll give it to her and she can plow through it. That would be great, maybe she can give us some info on it. I don't understand it.

CHAPTER 22 / 25 Discussion

Supreme Court Guantanamo Bay Ruling, Sovereignty Issues

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant ruling regarding the rights of prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The court determined that the government cannot move prisoners offshore to evade the U.S. Constitution. The hosts discuss the legal complexities of maintaining a military base on Cuban territory and the partisan split among the justices regarding the ruling.

supreme court· guantanamo bay· cuba· habeas corpus· military base

1:16:49 So the only two things I think we have left open, one is on your side, is because we really, it was not well explained here in Europe. Bush suffered some form of defeat over the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Yeah, there's, this is a, this one had, this is actually an interesting situation. The Supreme Court said that that the US government has, but essentially took the sovereignty of the country and moved it offshore in some funny way. And it depends on how you interpret it. There's two interpretations. One says this is a horrible thing that happened because essentially it gives rights, American citizen rights outside of the country to prisoners, but not necessarily citizens.

1:17:42 But isn't Guantanamo Bay just like an embassy? Isn't it? Because if you go to an embassy in any foreign country that land... It's not an embassy. Yeah, but it's not an embassy. No, I know, I know. I understand. It's a territory, right? Right. Okay. And, uh, but it's considered on... it's there's... it's a sketchy place because it's, you know, really part of Cuba and it was part of some agreement and it's hard to say what it's... status is in terms of US law. What is the deal? I mean, right there. That's, you know, we kind of gloss over it now, Guantanamo Bay, but why the hell do we have a prison in Cuba? Can we make it Texas or Florida or why does it have to be Cuba? Well, then you'd have, then you would have, well, that's the reason because then you would have a sovereignty issue. I mean, you would have

1:18:29 U.S. law apply. This is essentially a military base. Like, say it would be one in Germany. Say you have a military base in Germany and you put somebody in the brig that is a German. Does he have American citizens' rights to due process? When he's not an American, he's not in America. He's in a military base prison in Germany. And so that's what they've said. Yeah, he did it. So this has become a real problem. Mainly because they think it's a slippery slope of, you know, just, it just could be in the total resolution of it is yet to be determined, but it's, it seemed to be a setback because Bush didn't want this because it's going to complicate matters. And so, and it was just a straight party vote.

1:19:23 The liberals on the court voted for it and the conservatives voted against it. And the weird thing was is that the votes against it required a number of different dissensions. It wasn't not just one, there was I think at least two or three of different interpretations of why it's bad, why it shouldn't go this way. That's that's the best I can explain the only reason I can even explain it that well is because I was watching Night, you know the one of the PBS shows that had two people arguing both sides of it So and the big thing in the UK this week was that?

CHAPTER 23 / 25 Discussion

UK Anti-Terrorism Laws, Incarceration Without Process

A new law in the United Kingdom extends the period the government can hold terror suspects without charge from 28 days to 42 days. The hosts express concern that such laws could be used for political motivation to silence critics. One host jokes about being a "monkey wrench" in the system, while the other suggests they are merely an "annoyance" that the government finds laughable.

42 days· anti-terrorism· united kingdom· due process· civil liberties

1:20:00 A law was passed, which has been a huge discussion point for months, maybe even longer than that, extending the period the government can hold you captivate... incarcerate you without process from 28 days to 42 days under the anti-terrorism laws in the United Kingdom. Which, 42 days, quite a long time to go without due process. It's a really long time. I mean, it's like a month and a half of just sitting on your ass. Yeah, and there's all kinds of stuff. I mean, it seems to me as if you got somebody in jail, you should have a reason for it. Yeah, well, that would be the argument. Let's just go to incarcerate people randomly, which you could do under these circumstances. You grab somebody, you don't like them.

1:20:52 Which I always think is, you know, I always think a lot of this is going to be eventually politically motivated. You get some despot, you know, running things. He says, okay, well there's one of my critics. We got 30 days for the election, throw him in jail for 45 days. Right, or you get some non-likable guy like, let me see, oh, Adam Curry, and you're saying, you know, let's just fuck with this guy. Let's just call him a terrorist or a suspect and we'll throw him in the brig for 42 days. Yeah, it would certainly shut me up. It would I mean, like, okay, okay. My wife is so worried about this, John, I can't tell you. She's worried they're going to throw you in jail for 42 days because you're a loud mouth? No, she thinks, she's afraid they're going to throw me in jail, sabotage my airplane, you know, sick, which of course they've done consistently, try and screw me for, you know, taxes. This is my life. You know, the tax thing, I've been investigated

1:21:46 eight, nine times in my life, in my professional career. It's crazy. The problem with, I mean, the airplane thing bothers me too after having read the confessions of an economic hitman because that's a methodology they seem to like to use. They sure like to sabotage. They like to sabotage. But the point is, is that for the most part, I think your wife should be assured that you're really part of the machine that they need. You're not really a force that... Makes things not work or they try you're not a wrench that's being thrown in the works. I mean I hate to tell you this You're actually a mecca you're part of the part of the system I have to say that probably am too that actually keeps the thing you know we bring up these these these criticisms, but they're not like the same thing as plotting to overthrow the government or doing something really wacky which is dangerous to the status quo and

1:22:49 We're not dangerous, I mean, in any way. In fact, we're probably laughable to some of these guys if they ever listen to the show. And so I think your wife's fears are unfounded. Not that somebody in the government might not want to screw with you in terms of like investigating you for your taxes because you lived a high life. Now, that's someone... You're always flying back and forth and back and forth and back... You're always flying back and forth. You must be transporting money. It must be. Let's check this guy. But what you said there is in a way comforting and in a way extremely disappointing, of course. And I hope that one day... Because I think I'm finally starting to find my calling in life, John. I hate to say it.

1:23:32 But I'm really you know I clearly I have enough time on my hands to you know to download shit and look at it And I'm really interested, and I'm interested in passing on this information to other people so yeah I don't think I'm not like a I'm like a monkey wrench that I throw into the machine But I'm more like a guy who has a pot of water and everyone's sitting in it And I'm just turning up the heat very slowly and other people start to turn up the heat and maybe one day It'll come to a boil and maybe something will happen. I really hope so this is This is, this is your, it's a Ron Paul type of guy. You know, you're kind of an annoyance to some people because you point stuff out, but that's it. You're an annoyance is what you are and that's not worth dealing with. I mean, you know, the annoyances are necessary. They're good, they're part of the mechanism. Well, maybe I'll strike on something one of these days and become more than... You have to... I'm not seeing it.

1:24:26 Thanks, buddy. I really appreciate it. This is not gonna happen. Yeah, but someone's gotta say something. You know, I can't just sit around... Well, you can say all you want. The fact is that the mechanisms long since realized that saying things, unless you're really good at it, not that you're not, but I'm talking about in a Leninist style or Trotsky type of thing, which wouldn't work anymore. I don't know what the mechanism is to get people riled up. I mean, let's face it, the public has become extremely passive and you're just, you know, it's just pissing in the wind with some of this stuff. And you don't matter how good your information. Yeah, right now, first of all, yes, you're probably right, but I'm not going to accept that as a reason not to continue. Not that you're saying that, but

CHAPTER 24 / 25 Discussion

Public Passivity, Professional Sports and Olympics Smog

The hosts discuss the general passivity of the public and predict a decline in interest in professional sports among younger generations. They specifically target the upcoming Beijing Olympics, predicting low viewership due to the extreme smog in China. They describe the environmental conditions in Beijing as a "smoke storm" that will make broadcasting the events difficult.

beijing olympics· smog· professional sports· generation y· passivity

1:23:32 But I'm really you know I clearly I have enough time on my hands to you know to download shit and look at it And I'm really interested, and I'm interested in passing on this information to other people so yeah I don't think I'm not like a I'm like a monkey wrench that I throw into the machine But I'm more like a guy who has a pot of water and everyone's sitting in it And I'm just turning up the heat very slowly and other people start to turn up the heat and maybe one day It'll come to a boil and maybe something will happen. I really hope so this is This is, this is your, it's a Ron Paul type of guy. You know, you're kind of an annoyance to some people because you point stuff out, but that's it. You're an annoyance is what you are and that's not worth dealing with. I mean, you know, the annoyances are necessary. They're good, they're part of the mechanism. Well, maybe I'll strike on something one of these days and become more than... You have to... I'm not seeing it.

1:24:26 Thanks, buddy. I really appreciate it. This is not gonna happen. Yeah, but someone's gotta say something. You know, I can't just sit around... Well, you can say all you want. The fact is that the mechanisms long since realized that saying things, unless you're really good at it, not that you're not, but I'm talking about in a Leninist style or Trotsky type of thing, which wouldn't work anymore. I don't know what the mechanism is to get people riled up. I mean, let's face it, the public has become extremely passive and you're just, you know, it's just pissing in the wind with some of this stuff. And you don't matter how good your information. Yeah, right now, first of all, yes, you're probably right, but I'm not going to accept that as a reason not to continue. Not that you're saying that, but

1:25:13 I do see that every single day there's another person who will send me an email and say, you know, dude, thanks, you opened up my eyes. At least I'm thinking a little bit about this stuff now. And maybe, maybe one day, we'll be able to, like this European Union thing, I truly believe that citizens around the world are smarter than the old-fashioned guys in Brussels as we discussed or the old-fashioned way of doing things and they're saying, you know, fuck no, we're not gonna do that, we don't understand what it is so screw it and I think that people are awakening, not enough of them, but if we keep... Well the Irish woke up even though they don't listen to our show. The Irish didn't wake up, the Irish... well they are suspicious, you know, they're like, wait a minute, this just smells bad, but because of big internet campaigns

1:25:57 And there's been a ton of them, a ton of online action telling people to say no. That is working, I think. You've got to believe that some of that is spilling over. Yeah, well no, I'm not saying it's completely a waste of time. You just made me feel so fucking worthless. I'm just saying, a lot of it is, there's a wheel spinning mechanism involved in most of this kind of complaining. I'm not complaining. I'm just saying pointing out anyway go Europe go Holland you guys will kick ass in the finals see this is what always boils down to this is where they know where they got you that's all people care about is football

1:26:44 I think that's true. Or at least over there, over here. Actually over here too, except it's a different kind of football. But when the football season, our football, American football starts, that's all people care about. Although I have to say the Y generation, the younger kids coming up don't care at all about it. I think there's going to be a huge problem. I think there's going to be a drop off in the interest in professional sports. uh... somewhere along the line is going to be in the next ten or twenty years is going to be a dramatic because i think you know you were going to see it first the first time we're gonna see it is with the olympics the olympics i predict will have nowhere near the viewership uh... despite the coverage nowhere near the viewership that uh... it's it's enjoyed in the past i don't think people care anymore well there's one other reason for that of course that china

1:27:33 Well, no, you're gonna have the camera up in the stadium and then they won't be able to get through the smog with the zoom lens. So it's all gonna have to be done with handhelds and nobody can run that fast. So I mean, it's gonna be tough. What did the Romans used to say? Give the people bread and games or what is the saying? Something like that. Yeah. Games. They love games. You know, every time, by the way, I keep my point is this is the last thing I'm going to say, but I keep pointing this out. When you see these reports coming in from China where they use correspondents talking about the Olympics, just look behind him. You cannot see anything. It's just like these guys in a smoke storm. Hi, everybody. We're here at the Olympics. Beijing has got problems. This is the eye in the sky at the Beijing Olympic Stadium. And well, we see absolutely nothing.

CHAPTER 25 / 25 Discussion

Show Outro, AMD Meeting, Fourth of July Plans

The episode concludes with the hosts sharing their plans for the upcoming week. One host mentions an upcoming meeting with AMD and cleaning his office, while the other prepares for a Fourth of July parade involving a deli promotion. They sign off from their respective locations in the United Kingdom and Northern California.

amd· fourth of july· parade· curry manor· northern california

1:28:23 You know, the Chinese, they're supposed to clear it up by shutting down all the factories and everything. I don't know if that's going to help because they're going to have to shut down the factories that are east of Beijing, and there's too many of them, and most of the guys won't shut down anyway. Then they're going to have to shut down the cars and all the freeways. The town is crawling with, you know, it's bumper to bumper, and it's got a bowl-like effect. So they have to keep the cars out of the town. I mean, I don't know how they're going to do it. Well, John, no matter what, and no matter if it makes no difference, I enjoy doing this with you every week. It's a good show. And maybe one day we can make some money off of these people. That's the worst thing you could ever say. I can see the emails already. They know that they feel guilty listening to this show knowing that we're dying here. Yeah, we're dying. Excuse me, I just stepped out of my own plane. Hold on a second.

1:29:21 I'm hurting so bad. Oh boy. Oh, he might get a tax problem. Yeah, people don't give a shit about oh by the way Monday I think Monday big news from me vo be on the lookout for it. I'm not well I'm not allowed to say what you know what it is. I'm not allowed to say what? It's a good teaser. Yeah, all right. What's coming up this week for you John? But I'm gonna be around all week. There's an AMD meeting I'm having because I you know have my penance for writing a nasty article So I have to like listen to the lectures and that's on Monday And then the rest of the week I'm thinking I may go off to the not sure I'm gonna probably be around the whole week I'll probably just be doing nothing. I gotta clean up my office Yeah, I've heard you say that about for two years now. I think it's pathetic and

1:30:13 It is well, I think I'm coming out maybe for 4th of July. What are you doing? I'm going up north or 4th of July shit crap I got to find a good hang for 4th of July we have to be at the we're doing the 4th of July parade Our deli is gas to be in the 4th of July parade And we one person is gonna be wearing a pig costume and then another one a chicken You know for a chicken sandwich. I don't know okay So you won't see me. Alright, then I'll have to re-plan my trip. I guess that's it. Alright, coming to you from the Curry Manor in the United Kingdom, I'm Adam Curry. And from foggy Northern California, I'm John C. Dvorak. We'll talk to you again next week, right here on No Agenda.