Episode 49 · Saturday, 27 September 2008

Everybody Wants to Rule the World

A technical breakdown of the first presidential debate reveals the media machinery behind the candidates as the global financial crisis triggers bank seizures and gold shortages.

By The No Agenda Show | 1h 18m listen | 34 chapters
Everybody Wants to Rule the World cover
The No Agenda Show · No. 49

About this episode

Barack Obama and John McCain faced off in the first 2008 presidential debate, a television event marked by technical delays and the controversial use of CNN real-time focus group graphs. While Obama gained significant momentum by focusing on energy independence and American pride, McCain struggled with a shaggy dog story and a failure to engage independent voters on the topic of earmarks. The production is criticized for its restrictive no-applause rules and moderator Jim Lehrer's phrasing regarding how the candidates would rule the country.

The financial crisis deepens as Warren Buffett invests $5 billion in Goldman Sachs while the FDIC seizes Washington Mutual. In the United Kingdom, Chancellor Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown face aggressive questioning from Jeremy Paxman as the mortgage market destabilizes. Meanwhile, the McCain campaign faces scrutiny over Sarah Palin's robotic interview performances with Katie Couric and Charlie Gibson. Additional reports highlight the presence of melamine in Chinese milk products and the Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit against the government over the secretive Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak provide a boots-on-the-ground perspective from San Francisco and Silicon Valley, debating the merits of dishwasher engineering and the influence of the Brzezinski family on the National Security Council. The duo analyzes the media deconstruction skills of Rush Limbaugh and the show-business instincts of Karl Rove. Personal anecdotes regarding expert witness depositions in high-stakes technology litigation round out the session.


Loading show notes…
Loading clips…
CHAPTER 01 / 34 Discussion

Curry Condo and Silicon Valley Studio Locations

Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak open the program from their respective locations in San Francisco and Northern Silicon Valley. They describe the views from the Curry Condo overlooking the Financial District and discuss the lack of opening windows in Dvorak's high-rise apartment.

adam curry· john c. dvorak· san francisco· silicon valley· curry condo· gitmo nation west

00:01 So close, yet so far away. It's time once again for No Agenda, coming to you this week from Gitmo Nation West in two locations. Overlooking the Financial District and the Bay, it is the Curry Condo where I'm coming from. My name is Adam Curry. And I'm up here on the other side. I can see you from here with my binoculars. Let me wave! Hey John! How you doing? Don't fall out the window! If only I had a window to fall out of. That's the only thing wrong with this place. I'm over here in northern Silicon Valley. So what you don't have a window is that you're is it like a

00:37 There's no light coming in? No, no, no, no. I have 180 degree floor to ceiling windows here except the only window you can really, the only two windows you can really open to get fresh air. I'm on the 24th floor by the way. And one is in the bedroom, which is nice. And then here there's only one kind of like that, you know, rectangular window that just opens up from the bottom and, you know, gives you some fresh air. That's the only thing wrong with this place is no real access to atmosphere, if you will. which is... Well, they don't want you dropping, you know, because you're in California, they figure you'd be dropping pennies out the window and hitting people. And this is a one bedroom. The two bedrooms have a balcony. That's really what I want. But, you know, who needs a two-bedroom place when I'm only here, you know, once in a while? I think you should lease the place out when you're not there to hookers. Who says I'm not doing that already? Oh, okay, never mind. It is the perfect place for in-calls. Oh my goodness.

CHAPTER 02 / 34 Discussion

Presidential Debate Media Presentation and Technical Delays

The first 2008 presidential debate between Barack Obama and John McCain is analyzed regarding its television production and technical execution. Observations include the varying signal delays between networks, C-SPAN's use of side-by-side reaction shots, and the illegibility of Obama's flag pin in high definition.

barack obama· john mccain· cnn· c-span· cnbc· presidential debate

01:35 Alright, John, well, we haven't seen you yet, even though I've been in town for a couple days. You've been in meetings all day? Yeah, most of the days. But we're really getting some cool stuff cranking next week. Less meetings, more doing, so I'm excited about that. But we are having dinner tonight, which is cool. Well planned, actually, because I'm glad we didn't have dinner last night, otherwise we'd have nothing to talk about. Yeah, no, uh, that, well, we wouldn't have been able to do it, right, because we had to watch the debate. Yes, we did. Yes, we did. You want to start off with the debate? Is that what you want to go right for? Well, I don't know, why not? I mean, you know, I think a lot of people, you know, there's a lot of suggestions saying that we should be streaming our commentary during the debate. Oh, please. Which, uh, I don't know. That's, oh, no. Just every once in a while you could say something. I don't think you have to be, but you're probably right, because I was actually watching most, I watched the debates on all the channels.

02:27 to see the difference in the presentation because they did present everybody slightly different. The main networks had the guys pretty much the same but they were blocked in by the big logo. Hold on a second, but it was a pool video feed right? It wasn't like everyone had their own cameras and their own switching. It was one... They had their own... No, obviously everyone had their own switching because Switching but not camera shots. The shots were predetermined, I presume. I think the shots were, but there was a bunch of these fixed shots and I think people could flip between them because I saw, because I was watching simultaneously, I could see, oh and the weird thing about it by the way is that the soundtrack... The delay, yeah, the delays. I noticed that too as I was switching around. It would be one or two seconds difference between the channels.

03:07 and they were all different. I didn't find any two that were synced up at all, which I thought was peculiar. Well, I thought about that for a second and then I was like, it actually is kind of logical because if they're all switching, if they're all getting these feeds, so they're getting from multiple cameras and I presume they were I don't know if they're getting multiple audio feeds or just one mixed signal, but that's all going through their own digital trucks, their own processes, you know, each system works a little bit differently. And maybe, you know, maybe someone wanted to have a little delay on there for some reason in case they wanted to dump out of it. Some of them were pretty long delays, but anyway. So I noticed the, but anyway, they're pretty much the same except for CNN and C-SPAN. C-SPAN had essentially the close-ups of the two guys on a side-by-side split screen and that's all they did. Oh, that's nice because then you can get all the reactions. You can see the grimaces and you can count the amount of times Obama said, that's not true, John. That's not true, John. That's not true, John.

04:10 You kept saying that. So what I did is I stuck with one channel, I stuck with CNBC. I'm not quite sure why, but I always feel like those guys are kind of honest. I don't know, I just, I, so I left it on CNBC, but what I did is I paid attention to the language. I really paid attention to what people were saying. And what I, in some cases, presumed to be code. uh... and there's a lot of code so anyway i was uh... died first i tell you i checked all the different channels of the ended up watching in hd on cnn Because CNN had a I'm so happy wait because I just asked you a question. I could not tell on my screen I don't have an HD screen here What was on the pin that Obama was wearing was that a flag because I couldn't tell didn't look like an American flag It looked like a flag to me. Okay. It was it was illegible on it was a crappy looking fly It was it was a lame-o flag wasn't But that's if I remember it was a flag cuz yeah, he was in anyway They were in high def but was interesting

CHAPTER 03 / 34 Discussion

CNN Real-Time Focus Group Graphs and Audience Restrictions

CNN's use of real-time focus group graphs during the debate is criticized for being hypnotic and distracting. The discussion covers how the lines for Democrats, Republicans, and Independents reacted to specific candidate statements and expresses frustration with the "no applause" rules imposed on the live audience.

cnn· focus groups· swing voters· jim lehrer· debate rules

05:10 was the, it was distracting and in fact it was hypnotic and I think people who watch this thing on CNN probably didn't really get the same effect. I had actually had to turn it off a couple times because they had a graph running at the bottom of the screen, they had a lot of real estate, they had a graph running at the bottom of the screen that showed a real-time focus group. Oh, and you could see who was liking who, so you had like a blue line and a red line, one of those deals? There was three lines, and the thing was there was a blue line, a red line, and a green line for independence, and it was the green line that was interesting. Yeah, because that was the sway, right? That had the most movement, I'll bet. yeah and the blue line in the red line they just you know when bo bomb a spoke to blue line my way out when became some folk they flipped in the red line but it was a missus israeli killers predictable right it was unbelievably ridiculous once in a while the all the thing would come hit their beaks some confluence and it would all become one line and that was interesting but obama achieved that more than mccain did unless they said when mccain was dull

06:09 so uh... and or when mcclain where to make me all over the layer whenever time layer spoke to think took a nose dive it was a larry you know he he was pretty interesting because first of all he did something which i thought you know i'm i'm sure they all agreed to this but i really do not like when you have a a public performance of any kind let's face it a debate is a public performance we start off by saying the audience is going to shut up no applauding no laughing no no no applaud you know no no nothing and that's that's like uh... and you know and so it really made uncomfortable because i thought john mccain actually was a lot looser than obama may you know he's very uh... he's very comfortable and he gets kind of into his jokey mode which i appreciate i have to say uh... but the everything fell flat because i was afraid to snicker or to laugh or to do anything well i i i i i'm i'm in a disagreement with you on that because i think the problem with is is that they would be when you don't try to shut this audience that you end up with a loaded audience

CHAPTER 04 / 34 Discussion

Jim Lehrer and the Concept of Ruling the Country

Moderator Jim Lehrer is criticized for a specific phrasing during the debate where he allegedly asked how policies would affect the way the candidates "rule the country." The terminology is challenged as being more appropriate for a king or royalty than a president who is meant to lead or govern.

jim lehrer· presidential power· monarchy· governing· debate moderator

07:06 because of the one to one side or the other will stuff the audience with a bunch of shills. But then why do it at the university at all? Why not just sit in a studio and have it be a much more controlled environment? I mean that's useless. You couldn't even see the audience, it was so dark. Well... It's useless. No, I'm not arguing, but they did laugh once in a while. The audience wasn't dead silent the whole time. Here's the one thing that really, that my ears pricked up when I heard Jim say uh... and i wrote it down here uh... so how are you uh... howard are your policies going affect going to affect the country or the way you whoops you dialing out no that was a bike at the keyboard on the uh... he talked about the candidates ruling the country

07:53 And I was like, you don't rule the country as president, do you? He said that? He said rule? He said rule the country. How is it going to... Wow. He said, yeah, when... I have this on tape. I have to go back and see that. This was right after McCain was talking about the 45 nuclear plants, and then I wrote down, affect the way you rule the country. So I'm not quite sure what he was talking about, but he asked the question, how will this affect the way you rule the country? And I was like, there's not a king. It's not royalty, it's like you govern the country or you lead the country or you know, you're our main actor, I don't know, but it's not rule. I have to go back and see that. If he said that, that's embarrassing. I thought, yeah, well, so I picked up on that. I'm sure, no offense to the Democrats out there, but I'm sure they'd like to have a king. And McCain, could he be any more inaccurate and outrageous

CHAPTER 05 / 34 Discussion

John McCain Inflammatory Rhetoric and Obama Language Flubs

John McCain is accused of using inflammatory and inaccurately translated rhetoric regarding Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel. Additionally, Barack Obama is noted for a linguistic slip where he referred to $700 billion as "potentially" a lot of money during the financial crisis discussion.

john mccain· mahmoud ahmadinejad· israel· barack obama· economic crisis

08:45 the way he talked about whenever Israel came up you know the Holocaust you know Ahmadinejad which I thought was hilarious because the guy's name is not Ahmadinejad it's Ahmadinejad You know, this guy wants to obliterate the stinking corpse of Israel. Now look, I already believe that the translation of that famous line of, you know, we want to obliterate Israel, I already think that was quite an exaggeration and I think there was some nuance there that was probably purposely translated incorrectly. but he certainly never, you know, Ahmadinejad certainly never spoke of, you know, the stinking rotting corpse of Israel. I thought that was pretty inflammatory. I was like, man, that's not okay. You know, looking at the graph, let me just go over what, let me go over the things that I noticed based on the graph.

09:37 I only took notes based on that, except I did get one, I was looking for some quotes, talking about language. I got a beauty from Obama which has to go into the Flub, one of those Flub websites. He says the following word for word, 700 billion is potentially a lot of money. potential only potentially seven hundred billion isn't potentially a lot of money it's a lot of money there was there were a couple of real singers some really and McCain man he he he kept coming so first of all everyone's saying this

CHAPTER 06 / 34 Discussion

Main Street Rhetoric and McCain Shaggy Dog Stories

The repetitive use of the phrase "Wall Street to Main Street" is mocked as being disconnected from reality. Analysis of the debate performance suggests McCain failed to mention the middle class and struggled with a "shaggy dog story" that resulted in a botched response.

john mccain· middle class· main street· sarah palin· debate performance

10:12 Wall Street to Main Street, Wall Street to Main Street. Can we shut up already? Main Street makes me think of Disneyland and the Main Street Electrical Parade. One of the commentators on one of the evaluation shows after, you know, one of the postmortems... I watched none of them. I hate those. I didn't watch a single one. I watched all of them. And so one of the postmortems, somebody mentioned that McCain never once said middle class. Yeah, I can't recall him saying middle class. No, he was talking about Main Street and of course, the miscongeniality. That's my favorite that he's doing. He's using that a lot. He did that twice. Twice, yeah. I'm not miscongeniality. No, you're ugly. That's why you got Sarah Palin, dude, to balance out the ugliness factor.

10:51 Well, he also did one thing. I wish I'd go back and I'm sure it'll be on YouTube He got there's one thing where he gave a long-winded response that became a shaggy dog story Then he kind of wandered off the topic and then he tried to bring it back. It was a complete botch I don't I don't remember what that was. I'm watching but what the hell is he doing? Yeah So, okay, here's the deal with the up and down graph. In other words, what got the most effect? And then the main thing, by the way, only Obama managed to really spike this thing. And he only did it once. He almost did it twice. But the main thing, here's a couple of things that I noticed. And this is on McCain's graph in terms of the independents, which are the swing voters. Earmarks.

11:38 It got nothing and he finally started talking about corruption though the word corruption tended to boost His numbers corruption really got him some good numbers when he brought and then when he talked about kids He said double dividend for kids that got him some numbers when I started talking about education which he didn't do much of when he talked about nuke nuking anybody and down. Down, yeah. Of course. Or he talked about getting, in fact he did a nuke, Jobs nuke and it was really weird. He talked about nuking and then the thing started diving and then he started talking about jobs, nuclear power and he says nuclear power and it started going down. But it'll give us a lot of jobs. It went up again. Then it went back down again because it went back to nuke.

CHAPTER 07 / 34 Discussion

McCain Debate Performance and Independent Voter Metrics

Real-time graph data suggests that John McCain's focus on earmarks failed to move independent voters, while his mentions of corruption and ending torture provided positive spikes. Conversely, his discussion of nuclear power caused numbers to dive until he linked the topic to job creation.

john mccain· earmarks· nuclear power· torture· independent voters

10:51 Well, he also did one thing. I wish I'd go back and I'm sure it'll be on YouTube He got there's one thing where he gave a long-winded response that became a shaggy dog story Then he kind of wandered off the topic and then he tried to bring it back. It was a complete botch I don't I don't remember what that was. I'm watching but what the hell is he doing? Yeah So, okay, here's the deal with the up and down graph. In other words, what got the most effect? And then the main thing, by the way, only Obama managed to really spike this thing. And he only did it once. He almost did it twice. But the main thing, here's a couple of things that I noticed. And this is on McCain's graph in terms of the independents, which are the swing voters. Earmarks.

11:38 It got nothing and he finally started talking about corruption though the word corruption tended to boost His numbers corruption really got him some good numbers when he brought and then when he talked about kids He said double dividend for kids that got him some numbers when I started talking about education which he didn't do much of when he talked about nuke nuking anybody and down. Down, yeah. Of course. Or he talked about getting, in fact he did a nuke, Jobs nuke and it was really weird. He talked about nuking and then the thing started diving and then he started talking about jobs, nuclear power and he says nuclear power and it started going down. But it'll give us a lot of jobs. It went up again. Then it went back down again because it went back to nuke.

12:20 Oh, that's funny. When he talked about partnering, it went down. When he used the word partnering, when he talked about 9-11 and fix it, and I can't remember what this was about, it went up. And when he talked about no more torture, it went up. And which means that people were concerned about that. But every single time he attacked Obama head on, it went down. Yeah, I believe that. And here's the thing that got me and I've talked about this before is that if you listen to right wing talk radio guys, They say, especially Rush Limbaugh, who this is one of his litanies, he says, you know, the thing is the Democrats always have a negative, a negative, negative approach. They never say something positive about anything. And that's their problem. We always have a positive message in the Republican Party. I didn't see it in this debate. And let's go over Obama's graphs.

CHAPTER 08 / 34 Discussion

Obama Energy Independence Strategy and Positive Messaging

Barack Obama achieved his highest focus group ratings when discussing energy independence, biodiesel, and efficient automobiles. This positive messaging is contrasted with typical Republican claims that Democrats only offer negative critiques, noting that Obama's "you're absolutely right" tactic toward McCain was a specific rhetorical choice.

barack obama· energy independence· biodiesel· rush limbaugh· debate strategy

13:11 uh... when he interrupted an attack mccain the few times he did he you know i don't know how you are a few went down down down here down instantly did not what he did say consistently which i thought was very interesting he would start off uh... many sentences by saying uh... will join us at your absolutely right john and and that became a an immediate advertisement twenty minutes before the end of the debate but you can't actually say you're absolutely right except now because you if you're absolutely right you're absolutely right there's no you can't get no point of discussion yeah that's the end of it right yeah I know I thought it was crazy dumb I thought that was a dumb language but anyway back to his ups here's where he got the big numbers that damn near spike 200% he talked about it I wanted to guess go ahead go ahead go ahead what is it

14:05 I give up. Energy independence. Really? He did a thing about energy independence and then brought automobiles into it. We have to have more efficient cars, we gotta get energy. Biodiesel. Right, he brought a very positive message and actually when McCain mentioned this stuff, he got a boost too, but the way Obama phrased it, he spiked it. And that's where he got the... How are the graphs whenever... because McCain talked about veterans a lot, very purposely. Nothing. Nothing didn't spike at all? No. Interesting. No, that's very... nothing. But this was so... this energy independence and cars thing spiked so much. On my notes here I have two up arrows and the word WOW.

CHAPTER 09 / 34 Discussion

Voter Priorities and American Pride Rhetoric

Analysis of voter response data indicates that education and research and development (R&D) are high priorities for the public, while the financial crisis and Al-Qaeda mentions resulted in flatlined interest. Obama's closing remarks regarding American pride and restoring the nation's reputation in Europe reportedly generated significant positive spikes.

education· healthcare· veterans· al-qaeda· american pride

14:45 Okay, now the other ones here's the other ones he got a boost not not nothing like this one But he got an up arrow on fought it on 30% something about 30% I don't even know what this means But he said we start talking about a health care the way he did he got up arrows And he got a huge up arrow when he started talking about competing in education Education gets big numbers. And here's another one that's interesting. How about the financial crisis? The financial stuff did nothing. Nothing, right? I mean, I had no notes on it except for the earmarks. We're so dumb. We're such stupid sheep. Corruption got some numbers, but that's it. And that was McCain. And I love it where McCain's going to fire the SEC chairman. I don't think he actually has that power.

15:33 So he does if he's the ruler. Yeah, true. So here's another here's another. McCain or I'm sorry, Obama kind of get flatlined on health care. But when he changed from health care to R&D, boom, boom. R&D is important. Another one, he started talking about vet care because he was giving anyone to slam McCain because I think McCain voted against some veterans thing. And as soon as he started talking about vet care, it actually went down. Nobody cares about the veterans in this country. That's, you know... That's a tradition, by the way. Yeah, but you need them, right? You need them to win an election. Yeah, you really do. Okay, he got some more. This is the last couple. When he mentioned Al-Qaeda and going after them, nothing. Zip. Flatlined. Because no one believes it. He mentioned torture, took him up again. He brought up being tortured a little bit. Up. More attack. Every time they attacked McCain, down.

16:31 Here's the one that at the end they had a two of them went off against each other McCain got nowhere But here's the one that got Obama a big spike again Relating back to what Rush Limbaugh says Obama started talking about American pride and how we can you know get our reputation back in Europe and we are the greatest country, you know He started with this positive message with this great country and we should be respected more and we have pride and blah blah blah boom big numbers unbelievable So I was just listening to languages I said earlier and what is the what's it called when you when you take a phrase we say like this isn't the beginning of the end it's the end of the beginning that has a that has a definition a term what is that called

CHAPTER 10 / 34 Discussion

Foreign Policy Isolationism and Debate Soundbites

Barack Obama's stance against isolationism is examined, specifically his omission of Cuba when listing countries where embargoes should end. The debate is ultimately characterized as a boring show-business product that excluded third-party candidates and lacked a definitive "moment" or story.

isolationism· cuba· iran· jim lehrer· third party candidates

17:13 I'm sorry, just repeat that? So when you construct a sentence where you switch things around so you'll say this isn't the beginning of the end, it's the end of the beginning. Yeah, I don't know what that's called. That doesn't name, because McCain is doing that a lot, I'm noticing. Yeah, I don't know what the point of that. Oh, here's one more note I took on the back I got to mention. This is interesting. Obama, and this is not about the numbers, this is something Obama said that I thought was peculiar. Obama said, by the way McCain also got an up arrow when he started bitching about the pipeline in Russia. Obama goes on and on and he says isolationism doesn't work, we can't go on and on, you know, because McCain's pushing the idea of just cutting off Iran, isolating them, you know, with embargoes and whatever. And Obama came out and said, isolate, it doesn't work, we should stop all these embargoes right now, and then he named all the countries and curiously left off Cuba, knowing it would piss off everybody in Florida if he threw it in. I thought it was chicken shit.

18:15 Yeah. I learned a couple things though. I learned from our host Jim that only one of them can be president. One of you will be president, so there's no independence apparently running. I mean, I know it doesn't matter because they never get invited to the debates, but I just thought it was kind of crude to just say that. And he was really trying to, you know, in the beginning it was like, address Mr. Obama, address, you know, trying to get some fireworks going, you know, trying to get that, which I think was part of the whole make the audience shut up, because what I was also looking for was the soundbite, you know. what are the sound bites and from a a general show business perspective this is just boring john it was a really boring show it was not there was no story is no moment where were somebody you say i was a one at that time still i don't know who do you think won the debate i would say

CHAPTER 11 / 34 Discussion

Debate Winner Analysis and Media Training

Barack Obama is judged to have won the debate by a narrow margin due to his superior media training, specifically his habit of looking directly into the camera. McCain is criticized for nervous habits like clearing his throat and failing to use assertive "When I'm President" phrasing.

barack obama· john mccain· media training· mind control· presidential debate

19:04 I would say Obama by a hair. I would agree with you 100%. I think he won by a hair, but it was a draw for all practical purposes. Well, they agreed on everything. They agreed on everything. There was no differences. And McCain didn't do McCain any good. And by the way, I thought Obama was actually a little smoother at the beginning. McCain was, besides Obama making weird, he talks a little like John Kerry. He's a little long-winded. But McCain was clearing his throat constantly like a nervous guy. Well, what was interesting also is Obama started out looking right into the camera. When he was answering his questions, he was so aware and in fact throughout the entire debate, he looked into the camera like it must have been twice as much if not more than McCain. I thought that was interesting to notice because then when you look into that camera, you really are talking to someone sitting at home. It just works. It's media training 101.

20:01 I had a couple things. Interesting to note that McCain is so sure that the French will come and support us in Iran. I would beg to differ. They actually speak French in Iran. It may not be that simple, Johnny boy. Obama kept saying, when I'm President of the United States, I thought that was well done. McCain didn't say that once. You know, which is, that's really, that's mind control, you know, it's really important to say that stuff. When I hear somebody say that, either one of them, I find it totally offensive. Well, that's not that I don't find it offensive, but I think it's interesting that he's saying that, and I think most people at home don't find it offensive, they just pass over it. I would like to do a poll on that from our listeners. Yeah, but our listeners are not your typical American listeners, I don't think, John. They're the ones that are switched on. We need the sleeping people.

CHAPTER 12 / 34 Discussion

Post-Debate Hot Mic and Candidate Height

Barack Obama's physical height is discussed, with estimates placing him over six feet tall. A "hot mic" moment on CNBC captured Obama asking Michelle Obama "How'd we do?" immediately following the debate, which is compared to the post-show banter of professional performers.

barack obama· michelle obama· cnbc· hot mic· physical stature

20:52 And I learned something very important that the average height of the South Korean is three inches taller than the North Koreans. Yeah, I heard that too. I was like, my God, they really are suppressing those people, aren't they? What, are they putting bricks on their head or something? That was hilarious. By the way, talking about tall, Obama appears to be rather tall. Yeah, he is. He does look tall, doesn't he? How tall is he? Do we know? I think he's up around six feet. Has to be. No, no, he's over 6 feet. He looks like he's about 6'2", 6'3". He's like about as tall as I am probably. And at the end there, on CNBC they left his mic open. I don't know if you heard that, but he, you know, so Michelle comes up. First of all, they were congratulating each other, you know, like almost like WWF, you know, like, hey, that was a good match, man. Yeah, you really threw me into that cage. Good. Okay. Hey, great, John. Yeah, great Obama. You know, it was like, the hell was that?

21:42 Oh, I didn't know this. Yeah, because they didn't leave the mic on when I was watching. Yeah, no, they had the mic open. In fact, Michelle came up on stage and you heard Obama go, well, how'd we do? How'd we do? Which is exactly what, you know, it's what, what, what my wife says to me or what I say to her after a TV show, you know, and I'll say, how'd we do, hon? How'd it look? You know, how was it? How was the show? Big show. So anyway, and not a single word about, uh, the temporary cancellation of the debate or anything like that. It was not a single thing. Not a single thing. I think that what somebody pointed out, one of the guys, there was something they were supposed to pound home.

CHAPTER 13 / 34 Discussion

Sarah Palin Coaching and McCain Media Blunders

Sarah Palin is described as becoming "robotic" due to over-coaching by the McCain campaign. John McCain's decision to cancel an appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman to focus on the economic crisis is labeled a "botch" after he was seen being interviewed by Katie Couric in New York the same night.

sarah palin· john mccain· david letterman· katie couric· debate prep

22:25 Damn it, I can't remember this one because I didn't take a note on it. But one of the guys and one of the commentators in the Postmortems said that, and it was one of the, I think it was Fred Barnes on Fox, one of those guys, they said that McCain was supposed to go in some direction on this economy thing because of something Obama did, and he was supposed to use it as a thematic thing, and he didn't do it. And they think it was a complete botch. And of course, Obama was supposed to equate McCain more with Bush. Yeah, he definitely tried to make it sound like this was just a continuation of the past eight years. You know, the thing that I think if we boil it down, we go back to what we said earlier, it was a boring debate that probably had a huge audience because everyone wanted to see these two guys go at it. I think it's going to be up to Palin.

23:20 My God. It's going to be a problem because she has not performed well ever since they started coaching her. I think that, you know, instead of coaching her to be natural, they've coached her into being a robot. And I'm totally convinced. And I wrote this in an essay that it's on the Dvorak dot org slash blogs. Yes, they can look it up. It's called, you know, is McCain surrounded by idiots? And it has to do with the fact that he stiffed Johnny Carson, he stiffed David Letterman, and Letterman was then laced into him, you know, that night and the night after, because it was bullshit, because he said they had to fly back to Washington, so he canceled the show with one hour. Oh yeah, totally, yeah, totally. And then he didn't even go. He went over to Katie Couric's and spent the night in New York and he went the next morning, so it was all bullshit.

24:01 bull and then meanwhile one of his dumb spokespersons come on say well we didn't think it was right to do a comedy show with all this you know going on. Right, meanwhile when Katrina hit McCain was sitting there with Bush with his birthday cake laughing and having fun. The point is that you know that this was stupid. 29.5 million viewers. It's not bad. Let me see if they compare it to anything, if there's a comparison to... because I thought it was going to be as big as the Carter-Reagan debate. There you go again. What do you mean? That was the line that got Reagan elected, everyone thinks. Oh, I don't remember that. Yeah. I'm not that old, John. Speaking of old, I am so tired, and I see this all over the place on CNBC,

CHAPTER 14 / 34 Discussion

Ageism in Politics and Older Voter Demographics

The frequent media focus on John McCain's age is criticized as a form of socially acceptable discrimination. The discussion highlights the hypocrisy of ageist rhetoric in a country with strict age-based employment laws and notes that older voters, who have high turnout rates, may be alienated by these attacks.

john mccain· ageism· keith olbermann· employment law· voter turnout

24:54 What's the guy Mark? The kind of chubby guy who was like their main anchor for Squawk Box? Mark yeah, no wait a minute. I'm sorry. It wasn't it was no it was Keith Olbermann He he plugged into it. It's not on CNN. I know I know he's an MSNBC he talks to the girl the woman who she has like really thick horn-trimmed glasses and She's from I want to say she's from like a real serious publication. Maybe Wall Street Journal. Maybe New York Times I can't think of her name right now. You're not helping us, but she I know But she really and I see this all the time about John McCain's age, and it's it's really starting to piss me off It's ageism it well. It's it's to me it is I'm not quite sure why maybe because I hang you know my friends my wife And you know they're all 60 This maybe because of that but to me it's all it's it's almost like I

25:50 you know, race discrimination based on skin color. It's like, what the fuck is that about? It's really angering me. Yeah, well I think it's irking a lot of people, but I have to say one of the pollsters, I think it's a guy who works for Fox, I think his name's Lutz, he was one of the better guys in terms, he does the audience response stuff too. He says that the, that the, At least now, generally speaking, the older voters who come out in droves by the way, compared to younger voters, the older voters are not skewing necessarily toward McCain, although they may as the election approaches. And I think what will happen is that this ageism thing will keep coming up. Because these guys, you know, I mean, I find it

26:33 Weirdly offensive because the Democrats are the ones who are wanting equal pay for equal work and they're against sexism and they're against racism and they're against this and they're against that. But why are they all of a sudden all ageists? And in a country where you cannot conduct a job interview and ask anyone their age, you cannot even say, when did you graduate college? because then from that you could deduct someone's age. If you don't hire that person, they can sue you successfully in court for age discrimination. Exactly. I mean, how is this possible? And from really smart, I would presume intelligent people. It's just, I'm just not glossing over that really easy. And I'm not that old, I don't think. 44, and I'm

27:14 I feel old, but it's like that's not okay. It's just not okay. Right. And I think it's going to continue because they don't really have any, you know, I don't know. I don't think they're very creative in how they go about their campaigning. That's why I think they keep losing these elections. And I, you know, this thing, even though Obama keeps putting himself into the lead, you know, the whole mechanism of the Democrat Party seems to keep, you know, making it more even. And that's one of the things they do. and they may have learned something from this from what happened on this debate. And I'm quite pleased though with the with this financial crisis the the rescue plan formerly known as the bailout plan is that Dr. Ron Paul is getting massive airtime on every single station with huge amounts of respect because of course he's been predicting this for years and by the way another guy who's in his seventies I might point out although you never hear anyone accusing him of being an old fart

CHAPTER 15 / 34 Discussion

Financial Bailout Opposition and ACORN Funding

Dr. Ron Paul is credited for his long-term predictions regarding the financial crisis as he gains increased media visibility. The "No Banker Left Behind" program is criticized for containing pork barrel spending and social program funding, such as allocations for the organization ACORN.

ron paul· financial crisis· acorn· pork barrel spending· house republicans

28:11 Yet you call him a nutter and a kook. I never said he was a nutter, I call him a kook. But it's fantastic to see how much traction he's getting in his message. I'm really pleased about that. And what blew me away, and I can only think that this thing is a setup, it has to be some form of setup, that the House Republicans walked away and said we're not going to do this, we're not going to vote for this. That blew me away. I did not expect that. Well, here's another thing going on. It looks like if you start doing some work into this, or look into this, this bailout thing that the Democrats, by the way, are totally promoting, totally behind. Yeah, well, they're totally behind it. They're totally promoting. They're the ones that control the purse strings of nobody's notice for the last two years in Congress. And, you know, they want to give all... and within this money, there's a whole bunch of pork

29:00 I mean, first they're going to take $700 billion of the taxpayers' money, and it's not just for bailing these guys out, it's for a whole bunch of social programs, that ACORN thing gets a couple million or more, or God knows how much, you know, which is just the thing Obama worked for. And it's like, it's just like the whole thing is rife with fraud and corruption and it's ridiculous. I heard someone call it the No Banker Left Behind program, which I thought was kind of funny. Did you ever get a chance to read Brzezinski's book? No, I have not gotten to it yet. I really want you to read that. It turns out that four of his sons are in pretty key spots. Oh, really? Zygmunt Brzezinski is the advisor for Obama on foreign affairs.

CHAPTER 16 / 34 Discussion

Brzezinski Family Influence and Shadow Government Claims

The extensive political influence of the Brzezinski family is detailed, noting Zbigniew Brzezinski's role as an advisor to Obama. Family members are cited in key positions within the National Security Council, the State Department, and the media, leading to claims of a "shadow government" structure.

zbigniew brzezinski· mika brzezinski· barack obama· national security council· shadow government

29:51 and I'm just looking at this article right now, because I just got a hold of this. And his sons have very interesting, hold on a second, have very interesting spots within politics. Let me just bring this up, I'm sorry, for some reason I fucked it up. Here we go. His son Mark is the director of Russian and Eurasian affairs at the National Security Council, or was under Clinton, and one of the prime movers of the 2004 color revolution in Ukraine. Ian Brzezinski, currently the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and NATO Affairs and backer of Kosovo independence, NATO expansion into Ukraine and Georgia and US missiles in Poland. Mika is political commentator on MSNBC. Is Mika, it must be his daughter, that's not a son I don't presume.

30:45 Maybe it is a guy. He says here, who's interview with Michelle Obama contributed to the general media Obama mania. And Matthew is US envoy of the Czech opposition. I mean these guys are so entrenched. Sounds like the shadow government. Totally! Well thank you, this is why you need to read this book. You need to read it because it's... everything is all spelled out, man. Every single thing is taking place. I'll try to read it this week. Do you have it? Did you order it yet? Did you get it? Yeah, I ordered it. It should be coming on Monday. Okay. You'll enjoy it. You really will. Because I know that bit by bit, John, and people are sending me messages about this. They're so happy that you're waking up to the true reality. Oh, please. They sent me the same message as saying, poor Adam, he's going to be locked up in an insane asylum if he keeps going this way. Oh, they're both right. Oh, man.

CHAPTER 17 / 34 Discussion

Sarah Palin Robotic Interview Style

Sarah Palin's interview performances with Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric are analyzed, specifically her tendency to repeat scripted talking points verbatim even when asked the same question multiple times. This behavior is described as robotic and detrimental to her public image.

sarah palin· katie couric· charlie gibson· talking points· fembot

31:44 Let's see, uh, okay, I'm kind of done on, uh... Yeah, we're done. Forget it. Those two guys can wait till the Palin thing. We'll do the show after that. When is that? When is the vice presidential debate? Next Thursday. Oh, God, fantastic. Oh, I'm looking forward to that. Because, you know, obviously, Palin interests me enormously. And we talked about this last week. She went to the George Bush training school where she's taught to speak in bursts of sound bites which are directly from the Talking Points memo. And, you know, it's so easy to confuse her because what, you know, it's one thing to talk like that when you're in the Rose Garden. It's another thing when, you know, you're being interviewed by Katie Couric. You know, that just doesn't work. But she's got to be more personable. I mean, the whole thing about her, it seemed to me that reason you'd be detracted to her is because she seemed very personable. Now, the thing, a good example is what, you know, they have this, you know, this negative YouTube video of her in a church.

32:40 Yeah, I've seen that. And she's very personable. She's actually a pretty good speaker. She's walking on the stage. She's very natural. She didn't have any trouble talking in that environment. When did she become a robot? Now she's stiff. She never has she just never any back and forth and my argument about this is when she was with Charlie Gibson She had this one answer she had for one question Gibson asked him about what happens if Israel bombs Iran? What would we do and she said I don't think we can second-guess what Israel does it's not our position to second guess so Gibson asked the question again a second time reworded so she says

33:17 the exact same answer. So he tries the third re-wording of the exact same question and she says it again exactly the same way the third time. Now, why doesn't she say, Charlie, you're asking me the same question over and over and over. It's like a politician would. Why do you expect me to change my answer? I mean, it's the same question. I give you one answer. You want the same answer 20 times? I mean, what's the point of that? Why doesn't she do something like that? No. She robotically says, Oh, no, it's not our job to second guess. Oh, it's not our job to second guess. I mean, this is not a conversation. This is no back and forth. She's just getting... she looks like an idiot. Have you considered that maybe she is a robot? And that she's a fembot. Come on, she's been chipped, man. I'm telling you, these fuckers have been chipped. One day you'll understand.

CHAPTER 18 / 34 Discussion

Bank Stability and Gold Storage Strategies

Following the potential collapse of Fortis Bank, strategies for protecting physical gold assets are discussed. Anecdotes include painting gold bars to look like silver doorstops or black picture frames to avoid theft, while noting that the US Mint has run out of 24-carat gold coins due to high demand.

fortis bank· gold bars· safe deposit boxes· asset protection· us mint

34:06 uh... anyway that's gonna be a good one i can't wait we might even have to do a show on friday or maybe or thursday night because it we can't we do on saturday or it'll be too late and maybe have to have to a couple of the things that uh... last week we uh... we talked about me and my gold which i got a lot of uh... response to but i was not that crazy as now forces bank uh... which is uh... was was my main bank Um, looks like they're going down the tubes. Looks like they're going to collapse. Yeah, and you know what my wife says to me when I told her about the gold bar? She says, I hope Adam knows that when one of these banks falls, they shut it down and they lock down all the safe deposit boxes and you can't get your gold. That's why it's not at the Fortis safe deposit box, because then I wouldn't have had to take it with me, would I?

34:50 Now, she thinks that you should just paint the thing kind of silver colored so it looks like a bar and leave it on the floor as a doorstop. That's a good one or make it a brick color and just put it into the wall or something like that. Yeah, that's good. That's good. I had a friend of mine I used to work with years ago who was a gold prospector and he collected quite a bit of gold. He must have had about a few pounds of gold in his house at least. And he says, you know what, he turned the gold into picture frames and painted them black. They look like cheap-ass picture frames. If anyone robbed the place, that's the last thing they'd take were these horrible-looking picture frames. That's funny. Well, you know, in the meantime, I'm not the only one thinking this way because the US Mint has now said, we don't have any more 24-carat gold coins. Stop. We're out of them. They've been bought up. Everyone's saving this shit.

CHAPTER 19 / 34 Discussion

Melamine Contamination in Chinese Food Products

The scandal involving melamine in Chinese milk products is explored, explaining that the chemical is used to artificially inflate protein counts in lab tests. Melamine is identified as a component of plastic resins, and its presence in the food supply is characterized as a deliberate and dangerous poisoning of consumers.

melamine· china· protein testing· plastics· food safety

35:45 You know, that's what happens when people get panicky. I'm not panicky, man. I'm just smart and I'm prepared. Prepared? You always hit somebody with that brick. I'm very prepared. I wanted to ask you a chemical question, knowing your background in chemical engineering or whatever it is. You seem to have done so much. I was a chemist. Yes, you were a chemist. Well, I'm a chemist. Better living through chemistry is... I was a real chemist, not a chemist. Better living through chemistry is my motto. This melamine in China, I want to understand a little bit more about why melamine is used, why it's showing up in milk, and it seems to me like this is probably a much larger scandal that is going to be unraveled and that it's not just in Chinese products and probably in other things that have to show a protein count. I mean, have you followed this at all?

36:36 On and off. I remember when it first became scandalous. Yeah, you don't care about babies dying. No, I do care about babies dying, but you know, that cropped up on the radar. It's some sort of a thing that confuses tests. Yeah, it shows a higher protein count in the product. Yeah, but it's poison, right? What is melamine? Well, let's find out. Oh, okay. I thought you might know. No, I don't know this stuff. This is like, you know, this is about food. I was not in the food industry. There was even a scare going around that there was melamine in Oreo cookies, which was it Kraft, I think, who makes them? They immediately jumped on that one and said, no, no, no, no, no. In fact, there's nothing of any value in Oreo cookies. Please do not be alarmed. It's just lard. It's colored lard.

37:27 You looking at melamine? Yeah, I'm looking at it. Wikipedia's got a pretty good little thing on it. You can check it out there. But is it, what is it used for? It's a product used to make plastics. A product used to make plastics? And they're putting that into food? Yeah, it's interesting because it's combined with formaldehyde to produce melamine resin, which then becomes a thermosetting plastic. It's one of those things that you use. I would see this in China. They make plastics. Yeah, and the plastics. I mean, the Chinese, in fact, the Taiwanese in particular, are the world's greatest plastic makers. Just years ago, I went to Computex and I was looking at some routers that somebody had

38:14 were selling, it was some company. And these things were gorgeous and they were, and they locked together in some funny way and they were all plastic and they were just the coolest looking things and they were all beautiful. And I said, I'm sorry, I asked the guy where the case is, oh he said we couldn't get these, somehow in the conversation, we couldn't get this produced in the United States because nobody can do injection molding like the Chinese can. And they, you can take them and do a prototype and they'll make an ejection molded version that's just dynamite. Somewhere there's a, there's a CEO of a Japanese plastics company who's saying, oh no I watched this movie to graduate, gladuate. Okay that went over everyone's head, I'm sorry. Boy, oof. Anyway so uh, I don't think it went over anyone's head but we're talking about the Chinese anyway. So uh, the Japanese. Who are even shorter than the North Koreans, I'll have you know.

CHAPTER 20 / 34 Discussion

Gardasil Vaccine Safety and Merck Marketing

The safety of the Gardasil HPV vaccine is questioned following reports of deaths and adverse reactions in the UK and US. The vaccine is described as a high-priced "money scheme" by Merck to address patent expirations, with criticism directed at the aggressive marketing of the drug to 12-year-old girls through schools.

gardasil· hpv vaccine· merck· cervical cancer· pharmaceutical marketing

39:04 So anyway, so I guess it can get into all kinds of things. But it's not getting into it, they're purposely putting it in. Just because it shows up in a test. Yeah, but that's poisoning people! Well, I don't think they mean to. Okay. Now the Chinese, yeah, I... I will say though that my warning signals about Gardasil, the HPV vaccine for cervical cancer thank goodness now mainstream media is picking this up eight eight girls have died already i think in the u k thousands have gone into convulsions nausea joint pain now this is bad bad shit why don't you review us on that because you haven't brought that up on this show well i did but it was a couple weeks ago so what i noticed because i i kind of scanned three news

39:54 sources. I'm looking at the UK, I'm looking at continental Europe, mainly through the Netherlands, which of course reports on Germany and France and a number of different countries, and of course US news. And what I saw is simultaneously I saw this big push towards this vaccine for cervical cancer and the way they're dispensing it, and by the way it's a combination of three shots for the treatment combined about five or six hundred dollars. And it's made by Merck, So, you know, and who of course have a pipeline problem because all these products that they already have are, you know, their patents are expiring. And you can even read it right there in their annual reports, which I think you'd enjoy, John. You can see how they have billions in the pipeline for the pandemic flu virus, and this is one of them. So it's in the plan. And you see this simultaneously being marketed to 12-year-old children, girls only, which is interesting because boys can also carry this virus.

40:52 uh... and it came up at the same time it's being dispensed through schools they're trying to make it mandatory and when i saw the commercial in the u k it just it blew me away because it's that's really have you know it's like and christina were laughing about it because of course it's targeted towards girls younger than she is so she started to see through this stuff and it's like hey i'm on my face book and mama myspace i've got my mobile i'm doing my hair i'm going to school yet no compute little tune there and then and i'm gonna get jab and they have a little fake tattoo i got the jab no complete mind control of this drug And now, thank God, schools are saying, no, we're not gonna let this be injected on our premises. That's the same as endorsing it. And we don't know anything about it. And now children are dying. They're dying from this shit. They're dying. And the way it's marketed, it's like, oh, take this shot, you'll never get cancer. But that's not what this is. This HPV is a sexually transmitted disease

41:53 And every 3,000 girls who have it, 2,000 boys have it. They're not getting any vaccinations. And you know, so it's a, obviously, a huge-ass money scheme. Yeah, well, it's 500 bucks. That's an unconscionable. It's huge. It's a scam. It's not just a scam. It's a scam and a travesty. Thank you. So, and luckily though, I'm seeing more and more Um, mainly schools and parents just saying no way. Just not, not gonna do this. And I'm so happy because thousands of girls are getting sick from this and eight of them have died. Well, I'm glad somebody's on it. There you go. You. Yeah. How about Warren Buffett though, pumping five billion bucks into a Goldman? Yeah, I thought that was weird. Interesting, huh? I guess that'll save the company.

CHAPTER 21 / 34 Discussion

Goldman Sachs Influence and Washington Mutual Seizure

Warren Buffett's $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs is discussed alongside the company's deep ties to the US Treasury through Secretary Hank Paulson. The seizure of Washington Mutual by the FDIC and the ongoing instability of the UK mortgage market are cited as evidence that the financial crisis is not yet over.

goldman sachs· warren buffett· washington mutual· hank paulson· fdic

42:50 I think they gotta keep Goldman in business for some reason. I think there's something shady about them. Well, first of all, the general, even Kramer was saying this the other night, everyone on Wall Street hates Goldman Sachs. I'm not quite sure why, but they are generally hated by other firms. But it's very clear that, you know, Paulson just hired another Goldman guy to advise him, you know, he of course is also a Goldman, he was the CEO of Goldman Sachs. I mean, Goldman Sachs is clearly... They're in the shadow government. Yeah, yeah. Not just that, but they're the spider at the middle of the web somehow, or at least of the financial web. Yeah, they're somewhere. And so we have Washington Mutual.

43:32 Yeah, that was pretty weird. My wife was really concerned about this. She said, how can the government do that? They just say you're going to do this. I don't have a good explanation for it, but I have a theory. Well, I think that at some point they were given a, I think they must have gotten some government money with a proviso attached that if they didn't turn something around, then the government could just take them over and tell them what to do. Well, but they haven't been taken, the FDIC is run in, right? No, I know, but they didn't, I know, they just say, here's a deal, you guys are gonna do this whether you like it or not. And this is like when they made Bank of America by those guys. I mean, the whole thing is weird. And now in the UK, the largest mortgage lender about to go under, was it Bing and Bramley or something? Yeah, I don't know who they are. This mortgage thing's not over yet.

44:24 Now, this has got to be just the beginning. No, it's not the beginning, it's the end. Oh please, you feel the bottom yet, John? You didn't see the market go below 10,000, it bottomed out, bang, bang, bang, just bouncing around the top of that number. Right. Around 10,400 and then it shot back up to 11,000 and now it's stabilizing. Right, but it all depends on what's going to happen. So I presume that they're actually going to pass a bill and the way I see it happening is they're already positioning this and saying well you know we'll give you a couple hundred billion and like it's chump change, give you a couple hundred billion and then if you want more you have to come back to the trough and

CHAPTER 22 / 34 Discussion

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and EFF Lawsuit

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is suing the US government to reveal the contents of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). The treaty is criticized for its lack of transparency, with concerns that it may contain restrictive patent and copyright provisions that bypass public oversight.

eff· acta· copyright treaty· wipo· transparency

45:05 But the real interesting thing is about this oversight. You know, the no court, no committee, no nobody can look at what we're doing. That's the thing that I'm interested in because that power, that's the scary, the evil shadow government power that they've been looking for. Yeah, I hate that kind of stuff. They need to be sued. There's also something else going on that's kind of interesting. The EFF is suing the government over a new copyright treaty. Really? A new copyright treaty? Oh boy. Yeah, there's some new copyright treaty that's floating around and they won't divulge its contents. The government won't? Right! You're kidding me. And you know what that means? It means it's like one of those European ones, the Brits have a couple of these things where it's against copyright law to divulge the contents of the law because of some, because in there there's a bunch of provisos that you know, there's a bunch of new, the WIPO people have been trying to do this for years. I've written about this at least a half a dozen times. Where they get, they put a copyright law together when one of the things is to protect patents. You can't even talk about the patent.

46:06 And to protect this, you can't even talk about the law that protects the patent from being talked about even. I mean, it's just this ridiculous onion of kind of you can't do this, you can't do that, and it's part of the law, you know, and it's just to me, it's like, this stems back to where you can't, to the reverse engineering, you can't reverse engineer something. I mean, that's, stuff like that is in these laws. The anti-counterfeiting trade agreement, ACTA, that's what it's about? I don't know. Announced 2007 as a partnership to combat counterfeiting and piracy that the US and several of its trading partners view as critical threats to their business and the cause of billions of dollars lost in revenue annually. Is this a China thing maybe because of the counterfeiting? No, that's the problem. I don't know because we can't see the bill, we can't read the bill. Crazy. Could be about you know how to make donuts for all we know. Crazy.

47:02 I mean, so I don't know what it's about. I'm just saying. Once somebody gets the bill released so we can actually read it, we can figure out what they're trying to do. You know, if there's something like that's going on, they're trying to pull a fast one. There's no other reason to do something like that. That's scary. There's a whole thing here on EFF. That's too much to read now, but... Yeah, we'll talk about it later. Yeah, a lot of countries involved. Switzerland, Japan, European Community, Republic of Korea.

47:38 New Zealand, Mexico, Jordan, Morocco, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Canada. Hmm, I wonder. I bet you it's a pure information thing. I bet you're right. I think your instinct there is spot on. This is about being able to even, you know, maybe it's to combat the Freedom of Information Act. You thought you never I mean is would you we don't know like crazier things have happened We're doing guess until we're blue in the face, and it could be anything it could be something really weird It could be just something stupid. I mean who knows I mean hopefully you'll get this thing You know some judge somewhere along the lines will say what is it with this? What is this BS, and then you know make them reveal of course they won't right away See oh, okay. Well. We'll have to find it first

CHAPTER 23 / 34 Discussion

Expert Witness Experiences in Silicon Valley Litigation

Personal experiences serving as an expert witness in high-stakes Silicon Valley technology lawsuits are shared. The discussion covers the tactical use of document stalling in cases like Intel vs. AMD and the process of providing depositions for companies like Microsoft and Lindows.

expert witness· intel· amd· hayes modem· litigation· discovery

48:27 This is the kind of thing, this is the game they used to, in fact they still play this game in Silicon Valley. And I'm always surprised when somebody doesn't know how to play the game. But I've been involved with enough, you know, as an expert witness in enough court cases in Silicon Valley to know how it's played and it's quite hilarious. And it basically goes like this. Let's say we take two companies like AMD and Intel for example. And so, They made some agreement and Intel is supposed to provide AMD with something and all of a sudden they decide, I think we shouldn't be providing this anymore. So AMD will sue Intel and then The judge will say, well first there's a lot of stalling and the court, the case takes forever to be resolved and then the judge says, okay you have to give them the documents. And so then Intel gives them the documents but they don't give them the real documents, they give them phony documents. Phony documents. It takes like six months to figure out these documents are no good, they're the wrong documents. Oops, sorry. So they have to go back in the court and the guy says, oh you, and then the end? Oh, hold on John, hold on. Ah, ah, I hate this.

49:32 Don't move. Alright, I got you back. Okay. Sorry about that. All of a sudden I just got static from Skype. Anyway, so this kind of thing goes back and forth and back and forth with a bunch of game playing and by the time everything is finally, you know, kosher and the documents, it's too late because the technology and everything else has moved on like by a year. So what I learned here is that you've been an expert witness in these types of court cases. Yeah, I have. Like an Intel AMD or? I've done a couple. I did a whole bunch. I've done something, you know, for the guys that were being sued by Hays Modem. I did a modem case. I did the 287 chip case.

50:17 I did something about, there's a key lock thing and somewhere in Denver I did a case. I've done about maybe 10 of these things. I was gonna be an expert witness for Rodney Dangerfield, actually. And then he died. Well no, he won this case. I mean it was one of these things where sometimes they'll bring somebody like me in to be a you know, just to scare the other side and the other side got scared. And um... This is like your lawyer buddies? I mean, do you know Rodney Dangerfield? I never met him, no, but I have a check signed by him. Cool. For my fee. And I made a big blow up of it. And then I did the Lynspire case where Microsoft was suing Lindows.

51:02 uh... and it was uh... it came down to the and and and michael robertson and over the pot full of money that she's named the lindspeyer and actually uh... i had a bob by deposition in that case i think was probably the thing that was the best in the case to be honest about do it i don't solicit you know there's a couple of these agencies that would ask me to Put my name on it. I don't normally solicit this work because it's actually kind of boring and tedious. It's totally But I'll tell you what's cool about it is that you get all kinds of inside dope Yeah, that's the only reason to be honest about the only reason I do it the money Yeah, and there's some money to be made But there's you find out weird stuff because these lawyers have access because they do discovery right and so they they find out all kinds of crazy things and it's like they tell you about them and you go wow

CHAPTER 25 / 34 Discussion

MTV Domain Name Lawsuit and Witness Fees

A 1993 lawsuit involving MTV and the mtv.com domain name is recalled, highlighting the early days of digital discovery and the use of video depositions. The financial aspects of being an expert witness are also discussed, with hourly rates ranging from $200 to $1,000.

mtv· domain names· video depositions· expert witness fees· discovery

53:52 you know, some unbelievable number. Oh, and they'll pull something out. Well, in 1923, Mr. Dvorak, you wrote in CBS Prehistoric Market Watch that... Yeah, no, they do that. And then the worst part, the most embarrassing thing, and I've decided this is, this happened to me twice and never gonna happen again. When you do video depositions, the side that you're working on, because the video deposition is gonna be seen by someone, they put makeup on you. So you look healthy and proper. Yeah, you don't look like you're dying on there. It's funny because when MTV sued me over the MTV.com domain name,

54:28 uh... i'll never forget will first of all they did discovery and this was in nineteen ninety three they did discovery and the other had like to interns were the only ones who and who had uh... any knowledge of html literally and i had to bring in all of the files that i had on the server now the server was like a headless on three at the dig x in uh... in virginia So, you know, I spent like days downloading stuff and then put it all onto floppy disks, if you can believe it. And they went through all these files and they would literally come up with not just, so okay, well this was a file that was apparently on this server whether it was public or not, right? I mean, this was just, the server was also kind of a dumping ground. These are early days.

55:14 And this was like pre... this was... the web had just kind of come around. Most of this stuff was from a... there was a gopher server installed on it. But then in these proceedings they actually would roll out videotapes of me on MTV and you're like, well you were talking about this and this type of manner and you just sit there and go, holy crap! You almost feel guilty sometimes. Like I'm an evil guy, you know? Clearly I had no idea what I was doing. It's scary is what it is. Well the thing about the one that mentioned about the makeup is they put the makeup on so the other side they come out and they start grilling you about the makeup. Oh why are you wearing makeup? Exactly. Is there a problem? I like it. Don't you think it brings out my skin tone?

55:59 Yeah, well you're always tempted to have a one-liner like that, but essentially you go up to and you say yes and no yes and no and then you make your opinion about something that usually your side makes you expose the information that they want on the record and the other side just does nothing but try to discredit you in every imaginable way, embarrass you, you know, try to make you out to be an idiot, you know, that probably shouldn't even be in the job, you know, why are you even here? What kind of money can you make with that? Was it an hourly rate or how does that work? Here's a minimum. The way I finally got the, you know, years ago somebody who is an expert on expert witnesses, so you basically you charge them up front. for a, you know, you have a minimum period and then usually you never get to that. It's almost like a book advance. Okay, okay, Ms. Palin, please answer the question. What kind of money are we talking about? You can get, depending on who you are, you can get anywhere from $200 to probably $1,000 an hour. Wow. And this is a while ago. Is this still current prices? That depends on the person. I mean, I don't get to $1,000 an hour, let's put it that way. But there are people that do.

CHAPTER 26 / 34 Discussion

San Francisco Dining and Dishwasher Philosophy

Plans for dining in San Francisco lead to a debate over the utility of dishwashers. One perspective argues that dishwashers are inefficient because they require handling plates twice, while the other defends them as essential labor-saving devices.

ritz-carlton· san francisco· restaurants· dishwashers· household chores

57:03 Good deal. Alright. Hey, um, 530? Well, you know you're you're uh, no, I appreciate the thought being me being on UK time and everything at the at the Ritz-Carlton That's an interesting choice. I had no idea they had an award-winning restaurant there I think the Ritz-Carlton right now is one of the top three restaurants in San Francisco for real So for those of you who don't know John and I of course always try to have dinner together. It's gonna be a couple times John I'm here for weeks. I'm not going anywhere I'm staying until we got this these hosted channels up and running and all this stuff we're doing and Right, now we'll probably, I figure we'll have about three major, or two, at least two major. I want to do this one, probably have to be on a, I don't know how we're going to do it, but still there's a restaurant in the city I haven't been to called Quah, C-O-I. I've eaten at Quah's.

57:54 No, you haven't. Yeah, I think I have. I think a couple... How long has it been around? Not long. Isn't it on Embarcadero? No. Oh, then I must be wrong. But isn't that a... Jesus, wasn't that a UK restaurant? Maybe it was a London restaurant called Quah. C-O-I? Oh, no, I'm sorry. No, I'm thinking of something with a Q. No, I'm wrong. Okay, so that's a major restaurant we have to go to so we should do at least three and it would be great if you would cook for me since I'm here all by myself Mm-hmm. Yeah, I got to get sex from someone else at the dinner. I figure I could at least get from you assisting on Hello Yeah, the tech guys were joking about that. They were so sending me porn. So here for your weekend I

58:40 Yeah, it entails me cleaning up. So, anyway... I'll do the dishes if you cook, don't worry. The dish? I got a dishwasher. I only need the dishes clean, it's not the problem. You don't seem like a guy who would have a dishwasher. You know, for a guy who doesn't have a microwave, I'm figuring, maybe, yeah, you probably like, you have something about... No, no, no, dishwashers are the world's greatest things. I think you... My uncle would always say... I want to have a garbage compactor, but my wife is dead set against it. My uncle, Don, would always say, I don't believe... and then he's 80. I don't believe in dishwashers because you handle the plates twice. I always thought that was quite interesting. You handle the plates twice? Yeah, because you handle them going in and you handle them going out. So? Well, he feels that's not a good use of his time, clearly.

59:24 Oh, it's better to hold a plate for half an hour scrubbing it clean? I don't think so. What I like is, and I desperately want, when we move I hope we can get one of these if it's the right house and space, is one of those dishwasher drawers so that you actually put the plates back where you're going to get them from. I love those. To be honest, I did a lot of research on dishwashers before because we had a dishwasher in this house That was one of the most advanced it was a thousand dollars. It was a it was made by one of these companies That makes all this high-end stuff Stainless steel and I know listen it had the most water pressure of anything ever, you know, just rip, you know, if there was something on a dish, it would rip it off. And anyway, but the pump kept blowing up and the thing was a noisy contraption. So I did some research and I found, you know, that if you start really looking into it, when you buy a dishwasher, you don't want an expensive one. You want the cheap, one of the cheap Kenmore's and you want the following features. You don't want stainless steel inside. You want plastic because

CHAPTER 27 / 34 Discussion

Dishwasher Engineering and Kitchen Design

Technical advice on purchasing dishwashers suggests that plastic interiors are quieter than stainless steel and that mechanical buttons are more durable than digital displays. The concept of "dishwasher drawers" is praised for allowing one drawer to serve as storage while the other is in use.

kenmore· dishwasher drawers· plastic vs stainless· kitchen appliances· engineering

58:40 Yeah, it entails me cleaning up. So, anyway... I'll do the dishes if you cook, don't worry. The dish? I got a dishwasher. I only need the dishes clean, it's not the problem. You don't seem like a guy who would have a dishwasher. You know, for a guy who doesn't have a microwave, I'm figuring, maybe, yeah, you probably like, you have something about... No, no, no, dishwashers are the world's greatest things. I think you... My uncle would always say... I want to have a garbage compactor, but my wife is dead set against it. My uncle, Don, would always say, I don't believe... and then he's 80. I don't believe in dishwashers because you handle the plates twice. I always thought that was quite interesting. You handle the plates twice? Yeah, because you handle them going in and you handle them going out. So? Well, he feels that's not a good use of his time, clearly.

59:24 Oh, it's better to hold a plate for half an hour scrubbing it clean? I don't think so. What I like is, and I desperately want, when we move I hope we can get one of these if it's the right house and space, is one of those dishwasher drawers so that you actually put the plates back where you're going to get them from. I love those. To be honest, I did a lot of research on dishwashers before because we had a dishwasher in this house That was one of the most advanced it was a thousand dollars. It was a it was made by one of these companies That makes all this high-end stuff Stainless steel and I know listen it had the most water pressure of anything ever, you know, just rip, you know, if there was something on a dish, it would rip it off. And anyway, but the pump kept blowing up and the thing was a noisy contraption. So I did some research and I found, you know, that if you start really looking into it, when you buy a dishwasher, you don't want an expensive one. You want the cheap, one of the cheap Kenmore's and you want the following features. You don't want stainless steel inside. You want plastic because

1:00:22 Stainless steel dishwashers make a lot of noise. Plastic dishwashers are almost dead silent. It's amazingly different. You want a dishwasher that has push buttons that are just mechanical because if you have a lot of steam... You don't want no electronics, none of that fucking digital readout. The LEDs always burn out. The programming messes up. screwed up by the moisture and the heat. Just on, on, off. That's what I like. Well, I mean, just get a little knob too that changes the style. Yeah, you don't need that. You don't need that. But the point is that you get these, you know, just a basic good quality dishwasher that holds wine glasses. You got to make sure that the racks will hold wine glass, especially the upper one. And I always actually, when I buy wine glasses, I always buy one first and see how it fits into the dishwasher. See if it fits. Of course you do. Because I don't want some guy biting. But listen, but these drawers,

1:01:10 The way what I like about these dishwashers is it's two draws either side by side or I like the way you Pronounce that word draw is that wrong or is what I think yeah, but anyway go ahead. I'm from England drawer so it has two drawers either side by side or or or one above each other and the theory is is One of them is is in use and the other one is then the storage so after you've eaten you put your plates away you close it up and you then you get your plates from the other drawer And so I don't know how well they clean, obviously, but just the idea of that's where the dishes go, I really, really like. And not just dishes, the utensils, everything. It's just like a utensil and drawer. I can't even pronounce it. Well, I've been listening, there's a couple things you pronounce differently. Another one is measurement, where I'm used to saying measurement.

CHAPTER 28 / 34 Discussion

Regional Accents and Linguistic Misunderstandings

The conversation shifts to regional American accents, specifically the "Midwestern" pronunciation of words like "milk" and "pillow." The difficulty of understanding certain British accents, such as Cockney or upper-class mumbling, is also noted as a barrier to communication.

accents· chicago· midwest· british english· linguistics

1:02:04 I don't think I've ever used the word measurement. You've used the word measure. You can't measure it, you said to me several times. Can't measure it. Measure it. Measure it. Measure it. Well, I have a slight Midwestern accent, so it comes out once in a while. That's okay. We won't hold it against you. The ones I had to correct because the family got sick of it was I have to say, you know, I said, I used to say like you would say in Chicago, I would say milk instead of milk. Yeah. And then the other one, which I finally, I just changed. I said, screw it. I'm, you know, I'm just, I can say milk. It's not that hard. And the other one was a pillow instead of pillow. It's pillow.

1:02:39 It is Pelo. Are you from Chicago? If you live in Milwaukee, it's probably Pelo. Where are you from? Are you from the Midwest? No, but my mom and dad were, and I did live in Chicago for a little while when I was a kid. So what can I say? It's like people from Buffalo, New York, they also have very interesting pronunciation. Boston, let's go hit the home run here with weird pronunciations. This whole country is just illiterate. It's not illiterate. What about Britain? They got the, you can't understand a cockney. Let me tell you, you can go to North Guilford and not understand them. You don't need to go to anywhere like, you don't have to go to anywhere exquisite. And I'm pretty good at it. I can listen to almost any accent, any nationality speaking

1:03:29 uh... english i can figure it out about for some reason i'm really good at that but i look at uh... patricia i could you see how even though we've been mission speaking to me for you know twenty two years lived in america live in the u k but some accents just impossible and that's on television well i had a guy who when i was in high school who was a i think he taught german or french or something but he was a german and he was a uh... fascinated by southern drawl because he couldn't understand a word of it So when somebody talked like this, it was not, he wasn't picking up a word of it. And so I thought that was kind of interesting, but I've noticed when I used to write for PC Magazine UK, and so I would go to England a lot, and all these editors, you know, were all fairly well educated, and they would sit around at lunch or something, I couldn't understand a word that any of them said. Because the Brits are starting, especially the upper class ones, they're starting to mumble so much. Yeah, but also a lot of what they say is very intertwined with local cultural knowledge and stuff.

CHAPTER 29 / 34 Discussion

UK Economic Crisis and Jeremy Paxman Interviews

The economic downturn in the United Kingdom is discussed, including the leadership of Gordon Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling. Journalist Jeremy Paxman is praised for his aggressive and non-deferential interviewing style when questioning British statesmen about the financial bailout.

gordon brown· alistair darling· jeremy paxman· labour party· uk economy

1:04:29 that they refer to very quickly that you just, if you don't know it, you're never going to pick up on it. Maybe. Like politics, oh yeah, everything they say is there's always some irony or joke about politics or something else that's cultural that's going on. I love them. I love those Brits. I miss them. Yeah, well it's expensive. Uh-huh, to say the least. So how's the economy doing over there? I understand it's in the tank. Totally in the tank, yeah. And everyone's just, you know, the answer is drink more. Here in the States it's go shop and in Britain it's drink more. Now it's totally in the tank. Gordon Brown, they had their big party.

1:05:14 who, how, shindig and they all get together and you know there's been a question of should there be a leadership change and of course Gordon Brown is saying you know no way I'm the guy you can't switch to someone into a new leader and from the same party right from the Labour Party not even talking about a general election it's kind of weird the way they can kick someone out and do all kinds of stuff and switch it around But the best, and I recorded it, of course I didn't bring it with me, I did record it for you, was an interview with Alistair Darling, who is the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And it was about the financial bailout. Man, he is worse than Bush, the way the bullshit that comes out of his mouth. He really just has no idea. Has no idea what's going on.

1:05:58 and Jeremy Paxman, you know him? The journalist? Yeah, he's been coming up in the conversation. Yeah, so he interviewed him. Jeremy Paxman is great. Because he'll sit there and he doesn't give a shit who you are. He's the guy who does Newsnight, right? Yeah, exactly. He'll laugh at you. He'll just say, what are you talking about? You know, he'll just start and he'll throw his head back and roll his eyes. I love that guy. He's really good at interviewing statesmen. Well, the Canadians do that kind of interviewing too. It's only in the United States where they're so deferential. Yeah, and we have to be so proper. Why didn't you know... How did that happen? political correctness of course. It's doublespeak, it's the Orwellian age we're moving into. That's what that's about. Absolutely. And we all have to be so proper. Senator McCain, you know, what is Palin? What is she? She's a governor. Governor. Governor Palin. Just for once say, Miss Palin, Mrs. Palin, Sarah. Just for once.

CHAPTER 30 / 34 Discussion

US Coal Reserves and Wind Power Potential

The United States is described as the "Saudi Arabia of coal," with enough reserves to power the country for 350 years. However, the discussion notes that energy elites and the "petrodollar" system prevent the adoption of modern coal technology or the massive wind power potential found in states like North Dakota.

coal· wind power· energy independence· north dakota· petrodollar

1:06:59 Like Ron Paul. I know you think we have the Queen of England over here with a bunch of etiquette crap. Exactly. Well, according to Jim Lehrer, we do. Our next president's gonna rule. The ruler. I gotta get that sound bite. When you rule the country... It's right after the nuclear thing about the 45 nuclear plants. Which I didn't know about that plan, by the way. Plan for 45 nuclear plants. I didn't either. I guess that's the energy plan. Well, we've got a lot of coal. A lot of people don't realize that we are the Saudi Arabia of coal in the United States. We have 300... Right now, running at the current capacity for all the energy needs that we have, we have enough coal. If we just drop everything else, we have enough coal to power this country. And that would include making electric cars and using electricity to power everything. We have enough coal for 350 years. So what's the drawback of coal?

1:07:57 Well, actually there's not really a lot. I mean, you get a lot of... Oh, come on. There's got to be some tax we can throw on something there. Well, the drawback is, you know, it has a bad reputation. Modern coal plants with the floating bed do a really good job of burning coal without creating a lot of pollution, but there's still an issue with the little mercury getting out, and nobody wants a coal plant, you know, up downwind or upwind from them. You don't want to plant upwind, you don't want to be downwind of a coal plant. I don't think that they've solved the odor problem necessarily.

1:08:33 But you know, I think combining coal with wind power, I've mentioned this before, I had on my old radio show, Real Computing, I had the father of modern wind power, who happens to be an American, who says that in the United States we're on generation one, while everybody else is on generation three and four around the world. and we could power the entire US grid all the power needs that we can have are all doable. uh... from north dakota they have you have because the way i bring it up all the time to use i think you mentioned that before well of course is not going to happen because the shadow government and energy elites that's not their game plan and that by the way is tied into the dollar in the petro dollars in the oil so it's never gonna happen any of course we could do it and that's why i'm about no bailout plan fuck wall street let them burn blood burn all the way up to the white house lawn where americans we can figure this shit out we knew we are very resourceful and we have the resources

CHAPTER 31 / 34 Discussion

Methane Gas and Green Investment Skepticism

Reports of methane gas "chimneys" in the Arctic are met with skepticism regarding their impact on global warming. The "green" investment movement is characterized as a financial vehicle for figures like Al Gore and venture capital firms like Kleiner Perkins rather than a purely environmental endeavor.

methane· arctic· greenhouse gases· al gore· kleiner perkins

1:09:34 But we're just not taking advantage of the opportunity to make this change now. Right. Well, it's academic. My thinking about this is a cycle anyway, so it doesn't make any difference. Yeah. It just, it bugs me. I have to say, it bugs me. Apparently. Yeah. You got anything else? Come on. Oh, there's one thing. I'm sure you blogged this. The methane gas in, was it the Arctic? Do you hear about this? Yeah. I think somebody may have blogged it. Your thoughts? I don't know. Because what they're saying is methane gas, these chimneys, it's a... well first of all, immediately, oh, it's worse than CO2. Yeah, it's always something. Yeah. It's like three times as bad a greenhouse gas as CO2. Right. I don't know. I don't know if it is. But you don't have any more insight into that? No, actually, when I read it, I was like, huh.

1:10:37 I mean, I'm just, you know, I think we're all kind of inundated with this greenhouse gas, you know, and everything just has to be green and all the money is going to these investments. And I don't know, I think it's just one of those, you know, it's like, well, you know, who's huge, you know, who's huge on all this green stuff, right? I'm dubious, let's put it that way. You know, who's doing all this green stuff investment is Kleiner. Yeah, I know, big time. Well, that's because they got Gore working for them. Yeah, they've got Gore. In fact, Ray Lane is doing a lot of that work. Well, Ray Lane and John Doar are both kind of green. It's funny because Ray is such a Republican, John Doar is such a Democrat. It's interesting to see them working on those things side by side. Yeah, I think Doar was a Republican originally and then he decided to become a Democrat. He's a massive Democrat right now, I'll tell you that. Well, yes, because his goal is to become an ambassador or the secretary of state or something like that. A Nobel Peace Prize!

CHAPTER 32 / 34 Discussion

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Investigation

An informal investigation into the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation suggests the organization may be involved in controversial DNA-altering vaccination experiments in Africa. The foundation is also scrutinized as a potential vehicle for tax-deductible money movement and large-scale R&D for biotech companies.

bill gates· africa· vaccinations· dna engineering· money laundering

1:11:32 I mean, if you have everything, right? I think Bill Gates is going to get one of those before John Doar does. Well, I'm investigating the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation kind of on the side here, and from the things I'm starting to find and read, I don't think he's in line for any Nobel Peace Prize soon. Why? uh... because they're uh... you think it's a little shady yes very shady uh... you know once you get past the handing out mosquito nets to people then there's you know there's a apparently in seattle there are many many office buildings that you can't get into you can't get invited to these are laboratories working for the bill and melinda gates foundation there's no signage you know this is the people who work there you can't meet them at their office they have to meet you somewhere else

1:12:20 And from what I understand, they're testing out vaccinations in Africa primarily. But it's not like antiviral vaccinations, it's like DNA changing shit. So they're experimenting on... How do we know this? Is this something else you got from one of your nutter friends? Yes, yes, of course. So that's why I said I'm investigating it. I'm just giving you... I'm not giving you facts, I'm just telling you what I'm hearing. Apparently there's some whistleblowers out there. which would be interesting to see if anything makes it into the nation. I was thinking that the whole thing was a way to... I wouldn't say it was a money laundering operation, but I would say it's a way of moving money around. No, John, of course it's money laundering. Well, it's not laundering, but it's like Turner. He gave a billion dollars to the UN, whatever. There's no tax on it. It's a whole interest

1:13:15 deductible thing. I heard they never delivered the check. No, of course not because it's like the IMF or the World Bank. First of all, there's no money. You know, it's like, okay, here's my computer entry. Now you can change it over there. I mean, please. But it's not like, you know, you're giving away a billion dollars and you're down a billion dollars. That's just not the way it works. And it's over time and it's an annuity and it's a big tax thing. No doubt about it. But Well, keep looking into it. The Bill and Melinda Gates thing, it's, that's, and you know what, I don't think Bill Gates is evil. I don't know his wife. But it's probably, you know, you put 40, 60, 80 billion dollars into the pot and you get all kinds of people showing up and they can talk a good game. And I think that under the auspices of R&D, you know, Gates is going to be really interested in that. It's unfortunately, we're testing it out on African

CHAPTER 33 / 34 Discussion

Audience Growth and DNA Modification Concerns

The hosts call for audience growth, aiming to reach a quarter of a million listeners. The discussion returns to concerns about biotechnology companies using philanthropic foundations to test human DNA modification under the guise of disease prevention.

podcasting· audience growth· drop.io· dna engineering· biotechnology

1:14:09 children and killing them. I have a good friend who is, I actually know a lot of people there, but I have one friend who's working directly with the foundation. He's an Africa expert. He's always going back and forth to Africa. So I'll bring this up. and please don't use my name okay don't use my name just yeah I guess heaven forbid no one's gonna know that you're interested in this since we only have a hundred some by the way everyone out there who listens to this show please get one more one more friend one friend we got a hundred thousand listeners we want to make it 200 we had like a hundred and thirty men but when I make it 200 well quarter of a million is what I think is is really something we should be able to reach and then and then we're good with them we gotta go make some money

1:14:51 What about our t-shirts? We're gonna sell t-shirts. Yeah, we gotta get on there. You know what the problem is? It's me. I don't do enough work. So anyway, thank you. Finally that you know what Ron bloom agrees. Ron Bloom. Depending on what day it is. Yeah, of course. So, um... Anyway, the point is that I'll ask him and then I've also got other people. I don't think so. I think it's maybe just a way of moving money around, but I just don't see some nasty weirdness going on with Mr. Burns kind of an accident. But again, this is not nasty. It's not Bill Gates who has some evil plan, but it's totally pharmaceutical

1:15:33 uh... or biotech bioengineering companies who you know can you know that they present a powerpoint and saying look we can modify the human dna so they'll now no longer uh... be susceptible to these illnesses or etcetera etcetera. You're messing around with people's dna man that's heavy shit. We'll see. Yes, we will. I'm going to continue to do some investigation and of course we have drop.io slash noagenda where people are posting stuff pretty regularly so if you find anything, any research, pass that on. Very interested. Yeah, please do. Because the only people who are going to save the world is you and I, John. Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket. As usual. We're the only ones that can do it. Alright, man. Unless you got something else. No, no, but I expect we'll have a lot of stuff for next week's show after the Palin thing. Yes.

CHAPTER 34 / 34 Discussion

Political Commentary and Media Deconstruction

The program concludes with a review of political analysts, praising Karl Rove for his understanding of show business and Rush Limbaugh for his skills as a media deconstructionist. The hosts sign off from San Francisco and Silicon Valley, promising further analysis after the upcoming vice-presidential debate.

karl rove· rush limbaugh· media analysis· deconstruction· san francisco

1:16:24 And hopefully we bring a better perspective to the analysis of these debates than all these other Yahoo shows. I get sick of that. I know you watch them all, but I just, ugh, I can't stand it. And I always get one or two little insights that helps me like to, you know, think in a different way. I don't agree with these guys necessarily, but the guy I really liked when he was on was Karl Rove, believe it or not. He's really good. He's a show business. He understands this shit. Yeah, and of course he says one thing one minute and something else the next, but it's still really good analysis. And the other guy, people out there think he's a jerk.

1:17:03 whatever i think rush limbaugh is one of the best deconstructionist working on radio today mean he takes up a part in a very unique way that is always kind of fascinating amies one-sided about everything but but it's it's really a dislike watching a master it's amazing that's why the guys makes you know you got a contractor for a million dollars is not because he's a slouch Alright, so we'll continue our conversations. Are you going to pick me up? Yeah, I'll pick you up at 5. 15? 5. Oh really? We need half an hour to get there? 5.15. Okay, 5.15. Alright, coming to you from the Curry condo overlooking the bay in the financial district of San Francisco, my name's Adam Curry. And I'm John C. DeVorek here in northern Silicon Valley overlooking the bay from the other side. Both of us in Gitmo Nation West this week. We'll talk again next week right here on No Agenda.