Episode 32 · Saturday, 24 May 2008

Benefits Supervisor Sleeping

A record-breaking Lucian Freud auction and a software glitch at Moody's define a week of high-stakes financial errors and political blunders.

By The No Agenda Show | 1h 22m listen | 26 chapters
Benefits Supervisor Sleeping cover
The No Agenda Show · No. 32

About this episode

Lucian Freud broke auction records this week as his painting Benefit Supervisor Sleeping fetched $33.6 million, sparking a global debate on the valuation of contemporary art. The sale of the nude portrait coincides with a deepening scandal at Moody's Investors Service, where a software coding error allegedly inflated subprime mortgage ratings to AAA status for over a year. These events highlight a week of institutional volatility ranging from the art market to the heart of the global financial crisis.

In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Gordon Brown faces mounting pressure to resign as government bank stabilization costs soar to 200 billion pounds following a Conservative Party landslide. Across the Atlantic, Hillary Clinton remains under fire for referencing the Robert F. Kennedy assassination while justifying her continued primary campaign against Barack Obama. Meanwhile, the wine industry grapples with the Mega Purple additive scandal, and Vodafone users navigate restrictive fair-use data policies on new 7.5 megabit USB sticks. Technological shifts continue as Rasmussen Reports moves toward fully automated robopolls, and Jajah emerges as a web-based telephony competitor to Skype and British Telecom.

From the rainy peaks of Northern California to the uncharacteristic sunshine of Southwest London, the week concludes with Manchester United securing a dramatic Champions League victory in Moscow. Observations on the waterproof wool of prehistoric Icelandic sheep and the search for yak meat in Indian regional cuisine provide a brief respite from the heavy rotation of political marketing. The hosts eventually settle on a title inspired by the Freud masterpiece, reflecting on a week defined by expensive mistakes and unexpected beauty.


Loading show notes…
Loading clips…
CHAPTER 01 / 26 Discussion

Weather Anomalies in London and Northern California

The hosts compare current weather conditions between Southwest London and Northern California. While London experiences uncharacteristic sunshine and gusty winds, Northern California faces unusual late-May snow and rain attributed to a low-pressure system moving back from Denver.

london· northern california· denver· lake tahoe· weather patterns

00:04 In a world where two guys who wear comfortable shoes meet to speak, Armageddon must be near. Time once again for No Agenda. From the Manor in Southwest London, I'm Adam Curry. And I'm up here in rainy Northern California as our weather turns weird. I'm John C. Dvorak. Yeah, you've been bitching about it all week. You know, wind and rain and we've had nothing but beautiful weather over here, more or less. There was a low pressure that kind of apparently floated through and got somewhere near Denver and turned around and came back and dumped a bunch of snow on California. It snowed last night. It's almost June. It's crazy. In Tahoe, I guess down in the grapevine down in LA. It's been good here. Today actually isn't so nice. The first day that isn't fantastic. There's a lot of wind, gusty wind, which is some kind of pressure system coming in, but otherwise it's been a beautiful week.

CHAPTER 02 / 26 Discussion

Vodafone Mobile Data Plans and Roaming Fees

A discussion regarding UK mobile data services focuses on Vodafone's transition from hardware dongles to USB sticks offering 7.5 megabits down. The conversation highlights the high cost of international roaming and the frustration with "fair use" limits that restrict users to small monthly data allowances.

vodafone· mobile data· dongle· roaming charges· data caps

00:58 So you've been working on upgrading your cell phone, mobile phone, what's that? No, I have this Vodafone, it's a dongle that you can plug into your Mac and I bought it when we moved into this house before I had internet access. And it does about 700 kilobits where I live right now, but anywhere like half a mile further up the road it can actually do, it's HDSPA or whatever that is, so it can do like 1.5 megabits. And it's from Vodafone. And you have some kind of so-called unlimited fair use limit that you have. It's wireless, right? It's wireless, yeah, yeah. It's 3G, basically. And so you have some kind of limit for the UK, which I was just reading online. Of course, this is from a year ago, that fair use limit was one gigabyte per month, which of course is nothing.

01:50 That's like one day. Yeah, really. Well, I've looked at it. It is just about one day for someone who surfs, you know, and has lots of media files. 30 is more like it. But I really only need to use it for certain occasions. And so now they have a new version which is now just kind of like a memory stick. It's no longer a dongle. and it's USB, you plug it in and that gives you, in the right areas, 7.5 megabits down. I'm not quite sure what the upstream is, I'll have to look at it again. But it's cheaper, they give you, I think you can get up to like 20 gigabytes per month if you're roaming in another country, which is where you really got screwed before. I mean, I'm talking like 4 pounds per megabyte transferred in a foreign country. Oh yeah, I mean you check your email and you're like, oh that was 50 bucks.

02:37 So now that's become like $4.95 for a 24 hour period up to 200 megs. It's better, but it's still highway robbery. But they didn't give me any notification that I could... I pay 45 pounds a month now, it would cost... They can actually get me to pay them more, 60 per month, to get this new bundle. But they didn't offer it to me. And I look at the commercials and I'm like, wait a minute, I've got an old plan here. So I'm trying to figure that out. We'll see how helpful Vodafone is. My wife and sister use... we just about talked about that before we started the show. They use ZhaZha. Are you familiar with ZhaZha? Never heard of it. JulietAlphaJulietAlphaHotel.com. And so they give you a little address book. You prepay. I think it's like automatically they deduct 25 bucks from my PayPal or something.

CHAPTER 03 / 26 Discussion

Jajah VoIP Service and International Calling Costs

The Jajah telephony service is presented as a cost-effective alternative to Skype and traditional carriers like British Telecom. The platform functions by connecting two standard phone lines via a web interface, utilizing preferred exchanges and backhaul networks to provide near-landline quality at a fraction of the cost.

jajah· skype· voip· sequoia capital· british telecom

03:34 and if you make a phone call, you enter the phone number and you hit call and then it will call a designated phone that you specify so it can call your mobile phone, your home phone, or your office phone and then it'll say one moment, no actually it says one moment, Zsa Zsa is connecting you and then you hear the phone ring and then your caller ID shows up on the other end and they answer and it's a very very cheap phone call like a penny a minute or something or a tenth, I mean a tenth of a penny a minute And if you, uh, if both phone numbers that are calling each other are registered with Zsa Zsa, then it's absolutely free. So they both have, uh, have an account and they talk for hours for free, which with British telecom, the amount of money they'd talk, it could easily be eight, eight or 900 pounds a month if they were just to get a, you know, like a basic, uh, rate plan.

04:24 Well that sounds like a winner. Yeah it's good and the quality is good because you know basically they just connect different networks so they'll look at whatever you know whatever's available in London, whatever deal they have, I guess whatever interconnect exchange etc. Sometimes I think it must be VoIP because one out of every 20 calls has a little bit of an echo or not echo has a little bit of a delay. But everything else is almost like a pure regular phone call. They bought Django, or they didn't buy Django, they bought the remnants, the team or whatever. You know Django, right? Yeah, yeah. So they went out of business or something like that. Do they have that service in the US? Jaja? Jaja. Yeah, it's a US company. I think... Is it J-A-J-A? No, J-A-J-A-H dot com. J-A-J-A-H? Yeah, I think Sequoia is an investor.

05:20 Yeah, it's cool. Well, you know cuz I use disposable phones. I use a track phone as a matter of fact for your mobile phone Yeah, isn't that Jaja for mobile phones is that what it's for it's for any phone You know, but you have to initiate the call On the web so you can do that in a mobile browser. You can do a bookmark. How's that better than Skype? Well, you know the first of all, I think the quality is better and The quality is better than Skype? Yeah, yeah it's better than Skype. It's a real phone call. You can hear that you're connected through wires, not through IP. It's not... It makes a difference, huh? Look... What are you gonna say, the customer's wrong?

06:09 Yeah. I'll tell her, honey you're wrong. Go back to using Skype. She hated it. She's like, I tried to get her on Skype first. She's like, oh the headset sucks and I can't walk too far. You know, then I got to, you know, I tried the Skype phone. Yeah, but the Skype to phone thing, I call you all the time on Skype to phone and it works great. But it's not as cheap as you think. Zsa Zsa is much, much cheaper. Maybe a tenth of the price. Now Skype is not all that cheap. So you think it's a SIP thing? S-I-P? No. No, no, no. It's a... They have... They have termination at the exchanges or whatever, you know. That's a big business. I don't know a lot about it, but it's a huge, huge business.

06:47 and so they just buy millions of minutes at preferred exchanges and some of these exchanges are interconnected with backhaul. That's basically their business, making the connections as cheap as possible. I think most of it is POTS. Interesting. Okay, well I'll check it out. Marginally interesting. Well, I mean, you know, I probably have seen, if I saw the logo, I'd probably say, oh yeah, those guys or something. But it's like I you can't try everything they've been around for a while Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. Yeah, that's pretty I mean again for my wife. It works perfectly. I never use it I always you know I'm just a sucker. I use AT&T on my cell phone all the time Geez yeah, well, what do you know one of the things we've done at the Dvorak ranch is that we've all gone to using

CHAPTER 04 / 26 Discussion

Global Communication Challenges and Text Message Routing

Managing multiple international phone numbers presents logistical hurdles, particularly regarding SMS. While services like Grand Central (acquired by Google) allow for voice call forwarding, the lack of a standardized routing facility for text messages forces users to rely on complex manual workarounds involving Bluetooth and local computers.

grand central· google· text messaging· bluetooth· mobile routing

07:43 Besides, nobody else but me uses the prepaid burners, you know, the cell phones, disposables. But for regular long distance, we've all gone to calling cards. Well, here's the problem. Here's my specific problem. I live and work in two separate countries, so obviously it would be much cheaper to use a U... and of course I have a UK number over here, and lots of people actually have the UK number. But here's what happens. When someone needs to get a hold of me, because that's... let's face it, the only reason you're going to call me on my cell phone is because you actually need to speak to me and I want to talk to you, because no one else calls me. I don't get business pitches or anything. It's real.

08:21 Are you soliciting the public to just call you at random? No, please do not. So, you know, you can do, you can get these centralized numbers like Grand Central or whatever it is that Google bought and I looked into that and so you can route your phone calls around no problems that you get the most, you give people one number and then if you don't answer this phone it'll automatically transfer to the other phone, that's fantastic. I find Grand Central to be highly annoying. I'm just talking about the basic concept that I can have one number and it'll re-enroll the phone. The problem is text messaging because you know text what are people gonna you there's no routing facility for text messaging there just is none.

09:03 There's a business, let's start one. It's a huge business. You have individual pieces of software that can do it. There is a way to actually... For instance, I would take my US mobile, connect it through Bluetooth to my Mac. I've looked into all of this. And if a text message comes in, then the Mac will actually reroute it and send it out to the other phone. But it's a pain in the ass. It's not handy. And let's face it, the text messaging, I'd probably use the phone for that more than for voice calls. I noticed that in meetings. Thanks buddy. Highly appreciated comment. So, uh, at least you're not sitting there doing your email like most people. Wait until the new iPhone comes out, then meetings will be much more fun.

09:53 You know, it reminds me of going to the, you give speeches. This tendency, by the way, is extremely, I think, negative. Which is you go give a big speech, it depends on the group, of course, if you have a mature group that is not necessarily so plugged into the computer it's ridiculous. But you go to a, like if it was any kind of a web 2.0 crowd and you gave a speech to them, nobody's looking at but the stage. So you can't do like... Even worse, they're twittering each other and they sit in little chat rooms and make fun about the speaker. Yeah, and so you can't get any good laughs from any sight gags. If you were a prop comic, forget about it. And so everyone's all hunched over their laptops and they're typing away as you're trying to talk and it's not even that they're taking notes, they're just talking to everybody else in the place. You know what this is, John? All of this shit started when schools let the kids call the teachers by their first name. That's when all this crap started.

CHAPTER 05 / 26 Discussion

Social Etiquette and Technology Distractions in Public Speaking

The rise of mobile technology and social media platforms like Twitter has altered the dynamics of public speaking, with audiences often distracted by devices rather than engaging with the speaker. This shift in social decorum is compared to changes in classroom environments where traditional boundaries between students and teachers have eroded.

web 2.0· twitter· social etiquette· public speaking· classroom behavior

09:03 There's a business, let's start one. It's a huge business. You have individual pieces of software that can do it. There is a way to actually... For instance, I would take my US mobile, connect it through Bluetooth to my Mac. I've looked into all of this. And if a text message comes in, then the Mac will actually reroute it and send it out to the other phone. But it's a pain in the ass. It's not handy. And let's face it, the text messaging, I'd probably use the phone for that more than for voice calls. I noticed that in meetings. Thanks buddy. Highly appreciated comment. So, uh, at least you're not sitting there doing your email like most people. Wait until the new iPhone comes out, then meetings will be much more fun.

09:53 You know, it reminds me of going to the, you give speeches. This tendency, by the way, is extremely, I think, negative. Which is you go give a big speech, it depends on the group, of course, if you have a mature group that is not necessarily so plugged into the computer it's ridiculous. But you go to a, like if it was any kind of a web 2.0 crowd and you gave a speech to them, nobody's looking at but the stage. So you can't do like... Even worse, they're twittering each other and they sit in little chat rooms and make fun about the speaker. Yeah, and so you can't get any good laughs from any sight gags. If you were a prop comic, forget about it. And so everyone's all hunched over their laptops and they're typing away as you're trying to talk and it's not even that they're taking notes, they're just talking to everybody else in the place. You know what this is, John? All of this shit started when schools let the kids call the teachers by their first name. That's when all this crap started.

10:49 That's a good old cranky comment. Well, you might as well take it back one step further where the kids were encouraged to call their parents by their first name. Whoa, boy, we lost a lot of ground there, didn't we? That was really bad. And it's still creepy, by the way. If you go to somebody's house and you've got some kid, you know, some eight-year-old calling her Father Frank. I know, isn't that crazy? Do your kids call you Dad? Yeah. Yeah, I've noticed that. It is really creepy when you hear that. You're like, eugh. And the first thing that goes through your mind is, um, are you stepfather? Yeah, well that's one. And then you know, we're calling the mother, you know, Margaret. Margaret, can I get something to eat? I'm hungry. Yeah, that is weird. I mean, it's just like, whoa. In Dutch... What are the parents, by the way, what are the parents thinking?

CHAPTER 06 / 26 Discussion

Linguistic Formality and Cultural Shifts in Addressing Others

European languages such as French, Dutch, and German maintain formal and informal versions of the word "you," a distinction that does not exist in English. There is a noted trend toward informal address in professional settings, potentially influenced by the global reach of American media and English linguistic norms.

french language· dutch language· german language· linguistic etiquette· formal address

11:38 by encouraging this. Do they think it's cool? Is this some sort of a liberal thing? That you would, you want your children on this unusual first name basis? Do you think that's still happening? Because it was kind of a big thing in the 70s I think when a lot of that happened. I don't think it was ever happening a lot but I think it does still happen. Well, in different languages such as Dutch, German, French you have a formal way of saying you. In English it's just you and hey you, right? But in French it would be tu or you could say formally it would be vous. And in Dutch it's either je or u. And German also has its variant. And Patricia still calls or still addresses her parents in the formal way.

12:29 Which is of course she's from 1918 I think. Yeah, it's gonna go over well. So um... It's an easy joke. You know the funny thing is about that two versus voo is that if you start talking conversational... When I was a kid we were taught that even with conversational French you never use the two unless you really knew somebody. You're shacked up with them basically. if you've had some kind of intimate contact. But nowadays this always seems to be encouraged. Have you noticed this? Yeah, I was talking to someone else about that the other day and I think it is because of English culture seeping through the entire world where in English you've got drama, you've got movies, you've got all kinds of media and it's just you. All of it is you, you, you, you, you. And I think it's just so much easier and it seems to be ebbing away.

13:22 What the voo? Yeah, yeah the formal uh, the formal way of addressing people. I uh... Yeah, it makes you, it gets you sounding like an old fart, you know, if you still use it. Well, so here's... Unfortunately, I, you know, I don't speak enough French that I can make that transition that easy. So I've been doing this thing in the mornings for Dutch radio, for this Arrow is the name of the radio station and so on the show i get to talk to ministers of parliament which is pretty cool and i get to talk about you know like the fucked up traffic so i'm enjoying these conversations but most of these these men and many of them are women actually in the netherlands uh... are younger than i am the like you know mid thirties and to the first thing i say when i get him on the phone or for you know if i meet him face to face is you know can we just uh... it's called to two year and can we just uh... uh... use the informal uh...

14:08 way of addressing each other. They all say yes, of course. But- Yeah, that's the same as saying, can I call you Bill? Not quite the same. That's one more step. Oh. That's after I kiss the ministers. That's when I get to call him Bill. Okay. So it's not exactly the same. Not exactly the same. Because that middle element that you're describing does not exist in English. No, it doesn't. It's either we either go from, you know, Mr. President or can I call you Bill? And there's nothing in between. No, you may not call me Bill. Stop calling me Shirley. So, there is one thing I wanted to bring up. I'm sure you've heard about it. Wait a minute, go back to the story. So you ask him about this and then what do they say? Oh, they sometimes they don't know what to say, depending on what I ask them.

CHAPTER 07 / 26 Discussion

Dutch Societal Issues and Integration

The primary topics of public discourse in the Netherlands center on the challenges of a multicultural society, specifically the integration of Muslim immigrants, and persistent traffic congestion. Despite frequent discussion, there is a perceived lack of political action to address these core issues.

netherlands· multiculturalism· muslim integration· traffic congestion· dutch politics

15:02 There's a whole bunch of, Holland has a whole bunch of interesting issues. The main one being the multicultural society, integration of Muslim immigrants, and then the other one is basically traffic. If I boil it down, those are the only two things that people talk about all the time, and no one ever does anything about it. They don't talk about the weather like they do in the UK constantly? Yeah, it just sucks. They all know it's... You live in Holland, man. You're like six feet below sea level. You're gonna get fogged in a lot. You get used to it. So no. And they talk about other things. Football.

CHAPTER 08 / 26 Discussion

Champions League Final in Moscow

The Champions League final between Manchester United and Chelsea, held in Moscow, concluded with a penalty shootout victory for United. The match featured high drama, including a goal by Frank Lampard shortly after the death of his mother, and was notable for the lack of fan violence despite the high stakes.

champions league· manchester united· chelsea· frank lampard· moscow

15:42 Oh yeah, well everybody's got to talk about football. Well we had a big ass match here, well actually not here but in Moscow. The Champions League. Manchester United, Chelsea, Finck. Yeah it was a great, great match. They must have aired it in the States somewhere. It was a great match, it was the same boring old game and they had to have a shoot off at the end. It was a great match, what are you talking about? In that, after they played the 90 minutes, they had an extension of 30 minutes, any goal would have won the match for that team. the english boys against each other you kidding me was a great for a good match unfortunately you know penalty kicks is uh... is basically a lottery anyone can win that but it was a great game did you want to like it that that you didn't want to come on the other night and you'll be all tied it wasn't a little bit higher was one one and i'm not going to give you some more so the guy on chelsea side uh...

16:37 What's his name? Frank Lumpard, who scored the one Chelsea goal. This was a real emotional moment. His mom died like two weeks before this of pneumonia and no one knew if he was going to come to the team and he scored. They had that beautiful... It was high drama, John. They had that beautiful shot of him looking up at the heaven and saying, this one's for you, mom. I mean, it was beautiful. It was great television. It was a great game. You know, the crowds didn't kill each other. It was in Moscow, which was interesting. Well, that's one of the reasons the crowds didn't kill each other. Normally they would have. No, I disagree. I think it was a good match and everyone was tired after the 30 minute extension of the game.

17:23 And the teams were just strong. I thought it was good. I liked it. Yeah, I'm glad that a lot of people liked watching that game, you know, and they talked about it. I think we even blogged it because I have one of my... Ed Campbell is a huge... Soccer fan? Soccer fan which you know makes me wonder about him, but they set for that one hello Does most of the work, but I'll tell you at four o'clock in the afternoon You could you could hear a pin drop in the in the middle of the high street of Guilford You know everyone had already gone home everyone was home early You know the game didn't start until like you know quarter to eight and everyone was you know there No one was on the street. It was completely late in the morning evening in the evening It started quarter date in the evening. Yeah

18:08 And then when the game was over at 10.30 and it was quiet? You're talking about Guilford at night? It's a jumping place normally? Is that what you're saying? Dude, you should come down to Guilford at night and see what's going on. Oh yeah, the Voodoo Lounge, the new place, Dusk. Are you crazy? Guilford is quite the place to go clubbing and drinking. Within limits, there's no London. But yeah, for Surrey, absolutely. Huh. Yeah. Lot of messed up kids on Fridays and Saturdays and Sunday nights. Yeah. My recommendation for that is Iceland, but that's another story. Which is...

CHAPTER 09 / 26 Discussion

Iceland Tourism and Prehistoric Sheep

Iceland is described as a low-stress travel destination characterized by its small population and unique wildlife. The country is known for its "prehistoric" looking sheep with waterproof wool that comes in natural black, white, and brown shades, allowing for undyed textile production.

iceland· guilford· puffin· wool· prehistoric sheep

18:48 Well, it was recently named something, Iceland. It was named the... Best place in the world to live or something like that? Not best to live, I think it was most... at least stressful or something like that? Well, it's because everything's free. And there's no one there. There's no people there. There's a quarter of a million people. It's the size of a good... It's the size of a... A Guilford. It's the size of a Guilford, yes. It's the size of Guilford. It looks beautiful. Vanessa from the UK office is there this weekend. She and her boyfriend were going to Iceland. I'm like, why? She says, I've never been there. There's nothing much to do. Two days, you're done. But you eat a lot of puffin. Oh, that's right. We talked about that, didn't we? Puffin. Yeah, puffin. And then the thing I always tell people, go to the wool shop at the airport. And that's where you buy your sweaters and blankets and stuff. Because it'd be cold there. Well, no, they got this great, you know, they got these weird sheep in Iceland.

19:42 that look like they're from, they look prehistoric, they're creepy looking. And they, you know, they got big Rastafarian curls hanging down, they look like something, it looked like they washed in, they always look wet. And the wool is waterproof and it's a very, and it comes in three colors naturally. There's a black sheep, a white sheep, and a brown sheep. And so they can make colorful sweaters without even dyeing them. Well, it's hardly colorful, but you know, brown. But that shop at the airport, at least when I was there, was the best shop in the whole... Yeah, they're really... They're like long-haired sheep with... I'm looking into some Google images now. They don't look that crazy. They don't look that rustic. They look kind of creepy when you see them. I don't know. Maybe it was just... Maybe I'm scared of sheep. Do they taste good?

CHAPTER 10 / 26 Discussion

Indian Regional Cuisines and Yak Meat

Research into Indian spices reveals that "Indian food" is actually a collection of roughly 18 distinct regional cuisines with varying dietary laws. While yak meat is a staple in Tibet and the Himalayan regions, its presence in specific northeastern Indian diets is a subject of investigation.

india· tibet· yak· indian cuisine· spices

20:29 They didn't eat, I didn't have any sheep, all they eat is puffin' it seems to me. You know all these countries that we've talked about before, I have this one or two thing, the one, I was talking to my wife the other day about some countries that eat yak. Yeah. And I realize that of all the meats I've had, I've never had yak. Where does yak typically grow? Well, it's in parts of India. There's one of the Indian cuisines. We're doing a book on spices because you know we have this spice shop And so I've said we got to break down the we she's doing all the writing I said we got to break down the the cuisines of India because a lot of people don't realize when they go to especially Americans to a lesser extent the English but Americans in particular

21:16 Don't realize that there is no Indian. You know when you go to an Indian restaurant You're getting a eclectic mishmash of who knows what that has no connection to it You know these dishes have no connection because they're from the various cuisines and it turns out that there's about Depending on how you break it down either for major cuisines or something like 18 in India and they're all very different they use different spices they eat different meat if they eat meat and and it's radically different in every way. So this is interesting, so I went to Wikipedia of course, the authority, no mention of India. The yak is from Tibet, Mongolia, Central Asia, Himalayan region, no mention of India whatsoever.

22:05 Yeah, I think it's the northeastern cuisine that my wife isolated as eating yak. Although I'm sure an Indian listening, that's not true! We eat a lot of yak here, dammit! But they may or they don't eat yak, but the research so far, but we're gonna run this by some natives, of course, before I like to... They look pretty prehistoric, these yak. Yeah, yeah, I wonder what they taste like prehistoric. That's a really old meat You can milk them too there you go tea is made with yak milk awesome I wonder what that tastes like it. It probably like a goat. They probably have a distinctive taste yeah

22:48 Although it just could taste like beef, it could be just, you know, progenitor, who knows what kind of flavor. Aren't they close to the bison family? They look like them. A little more like bison. Bisons, you know, you could pass off a bison meat for cattle. If you did it right. Hey, something new. Bison has a distinctive flavor, but if you did it right, you could convince somebody it was just a piece of beef. Hey, I just saw something new. The Google image labeler. Oh really, what's that? What do you think? It just showed up on the search. Welcome to Google Image Labeler, a feature of Google Search that allows you to label images and help improve the quality of Google's image search results.

CHAPTER 11 / 26 Discussion

Google Image Labeler and Gamified Data Entry

Google Image Labeler is a tool that gamifies the process of tagging images to improve search results by pairing anonymous users to compete for points. This strategy is compared to the use of CAPTCHAs, where users unknowingly perform free labor to train algorithms or assist spammers.

google· image search· gamification· crowdsourcing· captchas

23:30 Cool. How does it work? You'll be randomly paired with a partner who's online and using the feature. Over a two minute period, you and your partner will view the same set of images, provide as many labels as possible to describe each image you see, receive points when your label matches your partner's label. Cool, it's like a game. The number of points will depend on how specific your label is and you'll see more images until time is run out. What is this, like a game? Well look I'm looking at today's top pairs zippy and yonatan have got twenty five hundred or twenty six But the all-time contributors which includes zippy is number two and go speed go What is this number? Here's one? It's twenty four million two hundred and sixty six one hundred points

24:16 What is this guy doing? He's just hanging on. This is unbelievable. So people are doing free work for Google. Yeah. Oh, do it, John. Do start labeling. Oh, man, that's cool. So I've been matched up with someone. Already? Yeah, we don't have the partner suggested to list. I got like a Chinese girl. I put, I want to, I want to label. Oh, matched on girl. 50 points. Bing, bing, bing. Okay. Now I see like royalty. I don't, this, it's crazy. They've turned working for Google into a game. How crazy is that? These guys are smart. They really are. This looks more Indian. I don't know what that is. This is, you know what this is? You know where they got this idea? Battleships? No, they got the idea from those guys doing the porn, doing the captions. Oh, Hot or Not?

25:09 Like that? You know where you join up and they say here tell us what this CAPTCHA is and you're basically working and they'll show you porn and then the CAPTCHA is actually used by spammers to crack all these you know CAPTCHAs that keep cropping up. Oh that's right yeah I remember that. Oh that's crazy. Well I'm not gonna help them anymore. I'm done helping you Google. So, uh... But I want to know who my partner is. How come I don't get to meet this person? That's kind of cool. What a great way to meet someone. It could be lies. Maybe there is no partner. They're just trying to make it seem more social than it is for these poor lonely guys out there that would sit around doing this to the point where they'd have 24 million points. Guys like GoSpeedGo. It's just the whole thing's a scam. Because my partner here wants to pass. Yeah, I just passed. Maybe I was your partner.

CHAPTER 12 / 26 Discussion

Moody's Ratings Scandal and Software Coding Errors

Moody's Investors Service attributed the misrating of complex debt vehicles (CDOs) during the subprime mortgage crisis to a software coding error. The agency reportedly knew about the glitch, which inflated ratings to AAA status, for a full year before the information was made public.

moody's· credit ratings· cdos· subprime mortgages· financial crisis

26:03 I don't think so. I just went away. So maybe it's possible and maybe you are. I think you should be able to choose your partner. Did you get the Cypress? No. Okay. So anyway, Financial Times two days ago. By the way, my partner is obviously a dud. Your partner can't come up with anything good? No good labels? Quitting. Anyway, go ahead. Financial Times. I'm sure you heard about this. About Moody's, the ratings agency? This is the funniest thing in the world, John. Okay. So, of course, the premise here is that Moody's rates funds and bonds and gives them a status. All of our listeners, I'm sure, at one point have heard the AAA status. And so they rated all these CDOs, which were these investment vehicles or debt vehicles that were backed by these bogus mortgages, by these subprime mortgages. And they basically rated, we talked about this, they rated them AAA status.

27:06 Right? Yes, it was a scandal. Okay. They have come out now, a year after their investigation, and they know how it happened, that they gave out a AAA rating to these bogus investment vehicles. And guess what it was, John? Interns? A software coding error. Oh, bullshit. Don't you just love it? Do you think, can they actually get away with that bullshit? Software code, what coding error was it? Oh, an unfortunate one. Apparently, an unfortunate one. And they knew about the so-called software coding error for a year before this news came out. A year. What kind of a software coding error is there here possible? Well, they were supposed to receive four notches lower, which would mean that they should have been a triple B instead of a triple A.

28:04 Which of course would make sense, because that's probably, they're probably closer to a C- or maybe a double D. Well, double D is another problem, but it's neither here nor there. Especially if it's not here. I got some downstairs. But, uh, can you believe that front page? And, and you know, it's like, and you don't hear about it anywhere. No one's talking about it. This is one of the actual reasons of this shit happening. Is this fucking rating agency, ratings agency. Now they're gonna investigate standards and poors, I guess, or whatever. I wonder what they're gonna... Yeah, definitely, they have to. They'll probably be, you know, they'll have the same, what, the same database issue? We had the same guy, we hired that same coder. And he came over here and screwed us too. Isn't that crazy? Coding error.

CHAPTER 13 / 26 Discussion

UK Financial Crisis and Gordon Brown's Leadership

The UK government's financial commitment to stabilize banks has doubled to approximately 200 billion pounds. Amidst this economic turmoil, Prime Minister Gordon Brown faces calls for resignation following a landslide victory for the Conservative Party in local elections.

gordon brown· united kingdom· banking crisis· conservative party· elections

28:50 Yeah, it's coming apart man. All of the shit that we've been talking about is happening. In the UK now, remember they made that $100 billion commitment to all the banks so the government would swap the bonds for their bad debt? That has now been inflated to $200 billion. It doubled overnight. Wow, that's a lot of money. That's a humongous amount of money. That's 200 billion pounds, right? No, no, I'm doing the conversion. No, so total is like 90 billion pounds. So it's almost, it's 200 million essentially. And Gordon Brown is about to get kicked out. I guess they can't really kick him out. People are calling for his resignation. Very important municipality, now what is it? Area, crew, is it, you know?

CHAPTER 14 / 26 Discussion

Hillary Clinton's RFK Assassination Comment Controversy

Hillary Clinton sparked a major political scandal by referencing the June 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy as a reason to remain in the primary race against Barack Obama. While Clinton issued an apology, the remark is viewed as a significant strategic blunder that may damage her future prospects within the Democratic Party.

hillary clinton· barack obama· bobby kennedy· 2008 election· assassination

29:40 They had a local election and the conservatives landslide win and everyone's like, Brown has to go. They're already talking about his successor. It's bad news. Well, you know, that country's screwed up. Yeah, luckily America's all on the straight and narrow. Well, we have more space. Yeah, it's cool to follow the news about the Hillary Obama stuff over here. Yeah, you, uh, people that don't know this, essentially Hillary's called for the assassination of Obama. That's not exactly what she did. Well, that's the way it was played by the media, you know, and I'll explain it to people who haven't heard what happened when she was in a meeting.

30:29 uh... with some some journalists editorial board it was some small little paper and really small little town but they had it never filming air somebody was in the got the audio and the video of her saying the following what after she was asked you want to want to quit and give up because you're not going to win and she says there's a guy but i haven't been mathematically eliminated she goes on she says look my husband was uh... who didn't win his nomination until June 22nd. So why should I quit? And besides, Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June and so I don't see why I should quit. It's just like... She has gone on to repeat this several other times without using the assassination word.

31:15 Right and so it was like so that was picked up immediately by the media now the thing that I was thinking of course You know she says oh, she's so sorry, and she didn't mean anything by it, and she was she was sincerely Apologetic I don't think she actually did mean anything by it. I think it's just dumb you know well No, but here's what I'm thinking even taking it beyond dumb. She had to be thinking about it She had to have in her mind to make this assertion or to even bring it up. It had to be in the back of her mind thinking, you know, Obama could get killed. I mean, he could get hit by a bus. I mean, there's a million things that can happen. I don't think she was thinking that way. She was thinking about it or she wouldn't have said it. That's the way I'm looking at it. But isn't that always the case? I mean, I've said myself, you know, Ron Paul is still only one heartbeat away from the nomination. I think it's more than one.

32:07 I don't know man. He's like about 40 heartbeats away. There's no one else left. He's the only guy left if McCain keels over. Oh yeah, McCain. Well, no, they, yeah. Well, that's, that's right. He's only one heartbeat away. Actually, it probably applies more to McCain, you know, just having, you know, dying of old age. Yeah, exactly. But anyway, so that's the story. And so now it's become a big scandal and it's put her in a situation where she's now completely screwed herself. She won't get the vice presidency. She's going to have trouble running in 2012. I mean, these little things, you know, it's like that Howard Dean guy, you know, screaming, you know, yeah, kind of thing. It sticks to you. And this is the worst thing. So now you're going to revise your prediction?

32:54 What the Hillary's gonna find, you know, no. I'm gonna stick with the possibility that there could be some something weird. I think this didn't help. In fact, I think if I was gonna take bets right now who is gonna be the Democratic nominee, I would not take any bets. uh... or i'd probably take obama because it was the kind of hands and how they spin this right and i think there's two things that have to happen because i i'm and really enjoying following your analysis and and truth truly believing that the clinton's will exert so much power over superdelegates and whatever needs to happen in florida and all this stuff and then you know the uh... uh... the appeasement stuff against obama so you know clearly she slipped up she's doing all the republicans work for them

CHAPTER 15 / 26 Discussion

Media Bias and Barack Obama's Campaign Financing

Barack Obama's rise is attributed in part to strong support from major media outlets and figures like Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner. Analysis of campaign contributions on OpenSecrets.org shows a mix of small donations and significant contributions from corporate executives, despite individual donation limits.

barack obama· rolling stone· jann wenner· media bias· campaign finance

33:35 So it could kind of blow over, you know, something new could crop up. I mean, we've already forgotten Reverend Wright with this thing, right? So there's still a lot of time. Yeah, it did up the ante and anything can happen. I mean, Obama though has been so... I mean, he doesn't say anything if you listen to him. He just... And the way we should be looking at this, you know, just a very slow kind of a monotone is... I mean, he sounds like he's eloquent, but he's getting to be boring, you know? Can this guy say anything at all? He says nothing. And he's pompous, and I think it's gonna start wearing thin after a while. I don't think he's gonna, by the time the November election goes around, there should be two or three comedians copying his cadence, which is just.

34:22 horrendous has Saturday Night Live not done anything on him yet? I don't know, you know, I stopped watching so I'm gonna have to I'm sure they're doing everything on a weekly basis maybe I'll have to watch it I haven't watched a Saturday Night Live for me neither three or four months yeah I haven't watched it maybe a year or so and I haven't seen you know there's got to be some comics that are nailing this guy because he's uh and he never says anything he just you know, talks about change. He doesn't have anything, he doesn't have anything of any, there's nothing specific, it's just this rambling, trying to skycrap. Who's financing him? It's not just all little people making donations on the web. Who's financing, you know, the Obama campaign? Wall Street? I don't know. It's gotta be Wall Street. I don't know, I'll have to look into it. It's gotta be Wall Street. There hasn't been much on it, because the media has jumped on, you know, and all the right-wing talk show guys are talking about this and they're

35:13 You know, and actually a lot of the Democrats are talking about it. Which is the media has just out and out subscribed to Obama and they're just, I guess they, I think there must be some hatred of the Clintons because the Clintons were really never media friendly. And so they're just on Obama's side. In fact, there was a, one of the weirdest shows on television is on CNBC or MSN, I think it's CNBC. It's called Interviews or Conversations with Michael Eisner. Yeah, I've seen a couple of these. He's not a great interviewer, but it's compelling to watch just because it's him. No, no, he's absolutely terrible at it as a matter of fact, because he's trying to be everybody's friend and he's kind of creepy as an interviewer. He is. He has that like Steve Ballmer kind of facial expression, you know what I mean? Yeah, and it's like he's doing job interviews or something, or it's shitty, it's really crappy dinner conversation with your boss kind of thing. Yeah, right.

36:12 So he had, but he did have one of his old buddies on the other day. And I just, first time I've seen the show for a while, because it's on some weird hour and it's hard to catch and I'm not going to record it. Because I hate to come back from a vacation going, oh, I'm filled up with this, you know. So. He had Jan Winter, the Rolling Stone editor, the original founder, right? And he was just out and out, says, you know, yeah, no, we're just backing Obama. The whole publication is just Obama, put Obama on the cover. And we did this and we did that. And, you know, we offered something to Hillary early on, but she said no. And so we're just behind Obama.

36:49 and uh... thinking for this is magazine they're behind obama and i think the median generals behind obama that's what's given in this big boost is very typical though isn't it mean that the the media everywhere is a is basically claiming him the winner and you know with this latest uh... clinton uh... gas gas that's what i'm looking for uh... some just look at the open secrets dot org actually uh... does a pretty good job it uh... tracking all donations So I'm looking at everything over $2,300 and I don't see any Don't really see any Wall Street companies in there yet. I'll come in in the general That's when they give money to both sides hedge Interesting. Well, maybe it is from some maybe maybe Well, clearly not the whole country is behind him, you know only a part of it just looking at the at the primaries Well, no that problem is is he hasn't won any of the big monster states with the exception of Illinois, which is his state, right?

CHAPTER 16 / 26 Discussion

Historical Comparisons of Democratic Candidates

The Democratic Party has a history of nominating "intellectual" or "egghead" candidates, such as Adlai Stevenson and John Kerry, who are known for eloquent but ponderous speaking styles. Barack Obama is compared to these figures, with some questioning if his rhetorical style will wear thin with voters by the general election.

adlai stevenson· john kerry· barack obama· democratic party· oratory

37:54 And I'm beginning to, I'm getting reminded of, my dad was a big Republican, or I'm sorry, a big Democrat. He's never a Republican, he hated the Republicans. But he always was lamenting, I remember for years after the elections were over, he was always lamenting the fact that the Democrats ran Adlai Stevenson, who was a, he was described by my father and apparently most of the people in the Democrat party as an egghead. And they ran him twice in a row. And he was like Obama in so far as that he's kind of intellectualized a lot of things and had a really outstanding speaking, you know, he was an eloquent person.

38:43 But it was also the same kind of thing. It was kind of slow and ponderous, and it gets on your nerves after a while. And in fact, John Kerry is in the same camp. So the Democrats keep throwing up these throwbacks to the era of the people that could do speeches. There's a term for these two guys who do these eloquent speeches in front of a large crowd. They keep bringing these guys in instead of some plain talking person. Well, show business, right? I mean, Bush is at the complete opposite spectrum, and so everyone makes that comparison, but the fact of the matter is there is a middle ground today. Aren't the rules that you can only donate a maximum of $2,300 to a presidential campaign? Or a...

CHAPTER 17 / 26 Discussion

Campaign Finance Limits and State Election Rules

An investigation into political donation records reveals individuals contributing multiple times to the same candidate. This is explained by varying state laws and the distinction between primary and general election limits, which allow donors to contribute up to $2,300 per specific election cycle.

campaign finance· ferc· political donations· primaries· election law

39:32 in these elections? There is a maximum number, it's like $2,500 or even less, or $250 or something. I'm looking here, it's like Susan Adleman, who is the president and CEO of Tivoli Inc., which is a software company, I think, so she's donated three times $2,300. Isn't that illegal? I don't know. And I see David Adelson, who's from the University of Oklahoma, has donated 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 times $2,300. I see people donating $3,200, $4,600. I thought there were limits on this stuff. There is some sort of limit. Now we're going to have to do our research on the next show. Which is annoying. Because I gave Ron Paul what I thought was the max, was $2,300. I thought that's all you could do.

40:20 Well, I think maybe these have to do with events when you buy a seat at a table or something like that perhaps. There might be some way getting around it. Interesting. Well, so that's not exactly tons of donations from small people. This is like rather significant donations from multiple times from people who can afford it. Yeah, well they can definitely afford it. In fact, they're cheap. Let's see here. Maximum political donation election. $2,300 per election. The current maximum limits for these offices are $2,300 per election it says. The current maximum candidate donation increased. This is a maximum donation blah blah blah. Dude I'm seeing all kinds of people donating multiple times.

41:25 Well, this needs to be looked into. And here's an area where it's 1,100 annual maximum donations allowed per individual. Maybe it's a family of people and they're donating for their child themselves, a husband, wife. No, you have to do it by name. You have to do it by name. So it's this exact same name every single time, over and over again. Well, husband and wife combo, I understand. But here, Charles N. Alexander. He's donated $4,600 on the 14th of March. $2,300 on the 9th of March. Oh, these are state elections. Okay, here it goes. 15 states, including Wyoming, have limits ranging from $1,000 to $5,000. 10 states allow maximum donation of $5,000 to $10,000, while 4 states have contribution maximums topping $10,000. Okay. And this is all primaries, right? So these donations are going into various state elections. Gotcha. Okay.

42:24 So is Maryland one of those states or Virginia? Doesn't list them on this particular story. All right, okay. Well, there you go. Mystery solved. Yeah, so you could have given a lot more. Shit. You know he would have been the frontrunner if only I'd given him a little bit more. Yeah, well, it's too bad. So, yeah, no, it'd be interesting to see who's backing these various people, but the big corporations will be backing McCain. You can count on that. I'm with you man, I'm riding on the Hillary tip. I still think that at the end of the day the Democratic Party is going to say, holy shit man, we got to have someone who can actually maybe, maybe, maybe on a far outside chance with some luck and a little bit of tailwind keep our spot in the White House or get our spot in the White House. Yeah, I don't know, I mean I'm still of the opinion that Obama's not electable. Well he's electable, I don't think he can win, he just can't win yet.

CHAPTER 18 / 26 Discussion

Political Marketing and the Ineffectiveness of Campaign Ads

Despite the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on presidential campaigns, the resulting television commercials are often criticized for poor production quality and conservative messaging. The media industry is identified as the primary opponent of campaign finance reform, as it benefits directly from the massive spending on political advertisements.

larry lessig· campaign finance reform· political advertising· moveon.org· focus groups

43:29 Well, I just don't see him anything changing. I mean, I think this is unless he has something to say one of these days except change change change You know, and I'm you know, it doesn't mean anything. It's meaningless change What did Larry Lessig go into that Congress congressional thing that he was after? You know, I saw he just did a piece for the New York Times on on orphan copyright stuff And, uh, I don't know. I haven't been a hold of, gotten a hold of him because he was doing something in Europe. I don't know. I'm gonna have to track him down because I usually try to have lunch or something with him once in a while. Yeah, because that kind of, it was kind of sizzling for a while and then, and then when he wanted to do like campaign finance reform or something like that.

44:15 Yeah, I know it was weird. Special interest reform, yeah, it was kind of weird. I always say, you know, people don't get campaign finance reform and why it's never going to go anywhere. Because they don't know where the money, I mean, if you just analyze campaign finance reform, who gets the money at the end of the day? The media. Media, yeah, it's a spent on commercials. So the media, if campaign finance reform ever came to pass, the only people that would really be screwed by it would be the media, the people taking all that money and running these ads. And so if it ever got close to turning around, there would be all kinds of 60-minute reports and scandalous things about how campaign finance reform is unconstitutional and it's against free speech and it's a horrible thing and it's gonna ruin the country and every place else they've done it has resulted in fascism and it's never gonna happen.

45:06 What always amazes me though, is for the amount of money that is raised and is spent, so let's say maybe 50% of the money is spent on media, I'm just picking a random number because there's a lot of expensive consultants and all kinds of people who ride along on these campaigns. Right, but so let's say it's a 50 50 to 100 million combined right between Barack and and Clinton man They're making some badass TV commercials for that kind of money. That's crap the absolute freaking crap They're making who is there someone is stealing from them big-time. There's shit. I mean that's felt like Final Cut Press like Rev 3 is making these commercials It's it's lame

45:46 Not to say their programming is lame, I'm just... you get my point. I mean, for that kind of money, you could have Spielberg making commercials. I don't get it. I know what you're saying, because these things are terrible. The problem is, I think they're over-consulted. And they're getting too conservative. The commercials are uninteresting. You know, when moveon.org was doing this commercial, I don't know if they're doing it anymore, because I haven't visited their site recently, but a number of years ago, they had do-it-yourself commercials. that were done by the public using Final Cut Pro, but much of the public doing these are actually Hollywood directors. And on their website you could watch all these crazy commercials that were really nasty. And some of them were actually quite funny. And if that was implemented and actually went into major play so people could actually see some really poignant observational commercials rather than these stupid commercials that they run.

46:46 I think it would be probably a benefit to these people. But they're too conservative. Nobody wants to do anything that's, you know, Obama won't say anything, what he really means about anything. He just talks in generalities. Hillary, you know, if she ever does open her mouth, she sticks her foot in it like this Kennedy thing. I mean, it's just, these two people are dull. I have a different theory about those commercials, though. I believe that They're probably actually highly effective and they probably are tested to death because they look very much like washing powder commercials. And I think, you know, my theory is that in general... Forget California and New York, everything in between, people elect their presidents the same way they do. Choose which washing powder they're going to use. Those are bad commercials. You know, often... You call it detergent here in the US. Detergent. I'm sorry. You know what I'm talking about though. Those are horrible commercials. Soap commercials, yeah. So maybe they just do it. Maybe that's what really works. Lame-ass shit. Everything else is art.

CHAPTER 19 / 26 Discussion

Automated Polling Technology and Rasmussen Reports

Rasmussen Reports has institutionalized the use of fully automated "robopolls" that utilize interactive voice menus to collect voter data. This shift toward automation allows for high-volume data collection with branching logic based on user responses, removing the need for human interviewers.

rasmussen reports· polling· automation· mtv· market research

47:50 So I ran into something interesting yesterday. I got a call from, I get called, people say, oh, I don't know, pollsters have never called. I get called by pollsters all the time. And I, you know, I do what I'm obliged to do as a normal person, which is to give them bad information. Of course. But this case I didn't because it was a pretty straightforward poll, but I've never had this. It was from Rasmussen. And it seemed to have to do with, it was, and you have to, you can deconstruct the poll afterwards and figure out what they were trying to get at. And, you know, they're trying to always direct it a little bit, even though this didn't have any trick questions by any means. And this seemed to be a poll about where you get your news from, newspapers or the Internet, and how does it affect your judgment based on your age, insofar as who you'd vote for for president. That's what I'm kind of thinking it was really about.

48:38 But the thing that was unique about it was it was the entire thing was automated. I never had a, uh, there's no voice, there's no person, there's nobody calling me. It's just a menu? It's just a multiple choice menu? Yeah, it was like a voice came on, a woman's voice saying, if you were to vote for president today, would you vote for Obama, Hillary, or McCain? Press one for Obama. For Obama press one, for Hillary press two. And that's a... That's expensive too. Well, yeah, it has to be on some obviously some big computers doing the whole thing because it also had forks. Oh, you could go off into a different survey?

49:18 Yeah, you could tell there was a fork every once in a while that would take you in a different direction because of your one of your previous answers But the fact of the matter is the whole thing was automated. I'm thinking holy crap They're making these are they've institutionalized these polls now where the where it's not even anybody doing them They're just they just you know program a computer, and then they push the button and it starts calling everybody yep, so it's becoming pole mania in this country you know when MTV when I was there on the uh... lady late eighties early nineties they did a lot of research and so you know mtv played music videos but the research they did was traditional radio call out research so that literally call a thousand people a day on the phone and say do you recognize this song and they play the song over the phone and that's how they programmed mtv they had no way of uh... of or no money really to uh... to do research on music videos adjusted audio what's interesting

CHAPTER 20 / 26 Discussion

The Failure of Focus Groups in Design and Innovation

The reliance on focus groups is criticized for stifling innovation in the automotive and fashion industries, leading to "milquetoast" products. Industry leaders like Steve Jobs are cited for the belief that the public cannot accurately predict or request future innovations, as their preferences are often rooted in current or past trends.

steve jobs· focus groups· automotive design· fashion industry· innovation

50:20 So, well, I'm not a big fan of necessarily overdoing the, you know, there's a moment where the public doesn't know the answer. I mean, focus groups and I think they're okay to do post-mortem analysis. But to do stuff that's active, I don't think they're that accurate. I think this is what you hear The car companies, American car companies have fallen prey to focus groups before they can make a decision and many times it's a design decision. And you can't have the public making design decisions in advance of a car being released because the fact of the matter is that in some ways the better cars that actually influence other designs are art.

51:05 And it should be a professional designer who makes a decision, not the public. Because the public will say, I don't know, it looks like, I don't like the looks of it. But that's because the look a year or two from now might be the hottest thing going. And if you'd ask the same question to the same person two years later that says it's the best looking thing ever. It's like a fashion thing. I mean, you can't poll the public if you're a fashion designer doing dresses for the fall season, six months in advance of the season. They don't know about the color swatches and all the other kind of weird infrastructure stuff that takes place. But that's all the fashion magazines. The people who determine that are the editor of Vogue and Marie Claire magazine. Well, they make a judgment at the end, but they do these presentations that are kind of, you know, here it is, here's my collection, what do you think? And then you can be destroyed after the fact, but at least it's not...

51:54 overanalyze before they roll it out and then they end up rolling out some milquetoast crap that is like done interesting and probably five years behind the times which is what happens when you do too much polling and you rely on the public to make your decisions in the fashion industry it doesn't work that way It really doesn't. The people who are calling the shots are the leading magazines and actually the manufacturers. The manufacturers... What I'm... No, I'm understanding that. What I'm just telling you is that you could try to implement a public first policy if you were like a big design house and do focus groups and then determine what should be in the collection. You could do that and it would be a huge disaster. Kmart probably already does that then.

52:40 Well, I suppose. I mean, it's possible. They probably do now that you mention it. Um, Walmart too, I'm sure. But maybe, I don't know. It's hard to say. Those places are operated kind of like warehouses and it's somebody else's responsibility to move the goods. But those guys have it easy. I mean, they just look at the designs that, you know, they just look at what's coming out and they just copy it. Yeah, well, that's the business that it is. That is their business. So, yeah, I understand what you're saying about the politics. But the point, beside the point of fashion issue, what I'm just saying is that there's this dependency on the public to, you know, in advance of things that are changing. I don't think the public is good at dealing with or predicting change and direction. Steve Jobs, I think one of his quotes that I subscribe to a Quota Day service or something like that, quote, whatever it is, he said, you know, if we actually made what the public asked for, you know, we'd be bankrupt. Yeah. I think there's a lot to that.

CHAPTER 21 / 26 Discussion

Personality and Authenticity in Political Candidates

Political candidates often adopt a "phony facade" during campaigns that masks their true personalities. Historical examples like Walter Mondale and contemporary figures like Mike Huckabee demonstrate that candidates often appear more engaging and humorous when they are not constrained by the rigors of a presidential race.

walter mondale· jesse ventura· mike huckabee· political persona· authenticity

53:40 It's like the Simpsons episode where Homer was given the uh... design was the head designer of the car company you know it's a good size and he said do whatever you want i would we don't want to see until finished you know i did you know the wind up with a and i'm not familiar with the episode it's a good episode he runs up with this huge boat for the car that's got like everything in except the barber's chair which is disaster all the features all the future you want and some So, anyway, I think in politics they've really fallen prey to this sort of thinking. Which is, you know, don't do anything that might offend the public. And so you have these... And this started years and years ago, obviously, it's nothing new. But I always remember, the most memorable example to me was, I think it was when Mondale, who seemed like the dullest guy in history... He was vice president, wasn't he?

54:39 Yeah, then he ran for president and lost against who McGovern oh no no McGovern no no I'm sorry the government was never president so I always like to refer to President Hubert Humphrey He ran with that woman Ferraro wasn't it Oh Geraldine Ferraro Yeah, I think so. I think it was Mondale Ferraro. Is that the thing? You can't remember Mondale Ferraro. It's like you can't remember, I was thinking about this yesterday, yeah, Mondale Ferraro, is that you can't remember these matchups. And I was thinking who won last year's Super Bowl? I mean, it was the Giants won the Super Bowl. Who did they beat? And I was thinking about it. And I couldn't... Patriots? Right. If you say the Denver Broncos, you're pretty much okay too.

55:32 Well, yeah, 20 years ago maybe. So anyway, you can't, I know you follow soccer more. No, I follow football. I follow everything I can. The important games. I don't give a shit about any sport, but the important stuff, you know, the big matches, I'll follow that. Do you want to watch some, something, watch the basketball finals? I'll watch it, I'll watch the finals, but I don't like, it bores me. That's a game that bores me. The Lakers and the Celtics are going to be fantastic. It's a throwback. But anyway, so Mondale, Ferraro, they go out and they give all these talks and then,

56:07 It's dull, just dull, it's unbelievable, Walter Mondale. So he comes on after he loses, he comes on the Johnny Carson show or wherever it was, and the guy's a laugh riot. I thought he had tons of personality. He had one-liners, he was quick on the draw, he was sharp as a whip, or just attack. And he was just like, I'm watching this guy going, holy crap, I would have voted for this guy. Yeah, but so but this time around everyone has already been on the talk shows and so that you know we've seen their personality Huckabee's killed on on Jay Leno No, Huckabee's the funniest of the group. Yeah, the guy could be doing stand-up. Yeah, he killed but you know still he's out

56:52 Yeah, no, but these other guys, you know, what we're still seeing with Hillary and with Obama and to a lesser extent McCain, we're still seeing a phony facade of a person that if this election was over and they came back on the same show, they would not be acting that way. They would be different. if either one of them was a totally different person. both like their Manchurian candidates. The counter argument to that if you're one of the consultants is well that's what Hillary did in Sioux Falls or Sioux City or wherever she was when she brought the assassination up. No, it's also what she did when she, you know, when everyone thought she was gonna cry and that really turned her campaign around at that point.

57:49 Yeah, well she's one for two. But you know if she just said, hey look, Americans, dudes, dudettes, like, look I know this gas thing is out of control, you know, I'm gonna go fix that, you know, I'm gonna take care of some shit for you, and vote for me. It would work. I think people are ready for that. They're tired of all the screaming and that's what the media has become. It's just screaming, screaming, screaming, loud voices. That's kind of how Jesse Ventura became the governor of Minnesota with that kind of approach. And how did that work out for him? He got bored with the job.

58:25 It does seem like a pretty crappy job, doesn't it? That's why... You know, he got it. He got the job and he wasn't the worst governor they've ever had, I suppose. I'll say at the end of the day, I mean, my hat's off to all of these people who are doing this shit. I mean, it's worse than show business. You know? It's not show business? Yeah, for ugly people. No, but you go through a lot of shit if you want to... I think everyone's pretty jaded. We really need to sex it up. We need to bring in you know some like whoever does Boston legal You know they got to start doing the coverage of this stuff that guy is that a but yeah? That's not much go is it no no much go by no no much goes. It was Steven Bocco Somebody's dead. He's not dead no Aaron Spelling's dead

CHAPTER 22 / 26 Discussion

Television Production Economics and David E. Kelly

The economics of high-end television production, such as David E. Kelly's "Boston Legal," rely heavily on reaching the five-year mark to secure lucrative syndication deals. While DVD sales provide some revenue, the traditional model of long-term broadcast runs remains the primary driver of profit for expensive scripted dramas.

david e. kelly· boston legal· syndication· television production· jerry seinfeld

59:18 No, I was there's some other one of the whatever the case is no This is what's his name the guy who did Boston legal is the guy who used to do a little bit? Yeah, you know that guy right and he's good. He's got a good sense of humor hell Yeah, this is great episode guys one of our guys from tech TV worked for him for a while and then he went on to law and order and I haven't been able to get a hold of him. I think he just married some actress so I guess he's screwed now What is that guy's name? This has become the Google show

59:54 And here we are on Google, Googling so you don't have to. That's right, you can sit in your car. It's a new service from Google. Click here to be attached to an audio buddy. David E. Kelly, there you go. Yeah, David E. Kelly. Well, and then my friend is Luke Reiter, who now shows up, I believe, as Lucas. But didn't he marry with Ally McBeal? Oh no, she's living with Harrison Ford. I think Kelly might have married her. I don't know. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. She's with Harrison Ford. Oh, that's right. Right. Harrison Ford. Lucky bastard. She's a little thin. No, she was. I don't... Just her build. I don't think she was anorexic. I know. When you're that thin on television, because television adds... Well, in my case, it adds 100 pounds. But in most cases, it adds a little weight to you because of the horizontal scan lines. And if you look that thin on television, you must be really thin. Yeah. It's fashion.

1:00:58 I don't care what difference does it make. So yeah, Kelly. Yeah, he would be better then. But you know, he's like I said, he's obviously would be, he probably subscribes, he's probably on the Obama campaign. Because he's obviously, if you watch his shows, you know he's like a liberal Democrat. With some, you know, conservative leanings on specific issues. Or he wouldn't have these highly entertaining conservative characters on the show. So he's probably a libertarian that's thinking Obama would be good. That's my guess. There was a funny episode that aired here last night where Nantucket wants an atomic bomb and so they asked the firm to go sue. The laws won't give them rights to buy plutonium or whatever else they need.

1:01:55 I never saw that one. I've actually stopped watching the show. I watched it religiously for its first two or three seasons. Then I found it becoming, they lost some of their better characters and they moved their emphasis around a little bit and the dynamics changed just enough that it's like, you know, Denny is too much of a, he's Cornier than he ever was they did get him off the mad cow thing and moved him over to various other ailments which was a plus and Now you should pick it up again because it's gotten good with John larouquet and yes, I find larouquet not to be he's You know I've just found larouquet to be a slightly annoyed. I think he's as a Comic actor is kind of funny, but he's in this role. I find it annoying I find him to be annoying and I can't say specifically why I

1:02:47 Man, I hope these shows stay around. They're so expensive to make. These shows are like 2-3 million bucks an episode. Yeah, but they make their money on the DVDs. And the problem is can the DVD business stay around and keep them going? Yeah, probably not. Well, syndication is really where all the money comes from. The big money is syndication. Right. That's why they have to do the show for five years. Yeah. People is over five years with five years is five years means we the show is shown one day every every day of the week Yeah, every day week for one year. That's same as five years of You know once a week and then the other thing I was the other thing I'm watching is wait after five years They just quit the show

1:03:25 Yeah, like Jerry Seinfeld. He did more than five years, didn't he? He did nine years, but I think James Caan on that Vegas show, which is actually... That's a pretty good show, I've seen that. Yeah, it's a good show. I like it. It's got nice characters. It's comedic. But he quit the show after his five seasons and just left, as far as I can tell, his five seasons. Dirty Sexy Money with Donald Sutherland? You know, I can't watch that show. Really? It's just that to me. It's just unwatchable. It's a it's exaggeration that you know just a bunch of jokes as much of gags and It doesn't do anything for me. I like Donald Sutherland. I like him no matter what he does and And to be honest about I do too, but in this role. I don't like him I think he's too creepy and of course I as a pilot I actually want to know what happened to the to to Dutch I want to know what went wrong with this flight and

CHAPTER 23 / 26 Discussion

Wine Additives and the Mega Purple Scandal

The global wine industry is facing a quiet scandal regarding the use of "Mega Purple," a concentrated additive used to darken the color and alter the flavor profile of wines. This trend is driven by the influence of critic Robert Parker, whose preference for "inky" wines has led producers to manipulate their products to achieve higher scores.

mega purple· wine additives· robert parker· viticulture· blind tasting

1:04:21 in his Cessna 172 that they keep showing at the beginning of the show. CIA. Yeah, of course. Alright, John, you got anything else? Uh, well let's see. Well, we were... Yeah, I do as a matter of fact. I'm trying, you know, there's a lot of interesting things going on in the wine world. Besides the, uh, besides the new sensational straw? Oh that's right, we haven't gotten those straws yet. So it came out Thursday, I haven't seen it yet in the stores. I did go and look for it for the wine in the carton, which came with a straw. I haven't seen it yet. Keep my eyes out. Well once we get the straws in our hands then we can use them with other liquids. Yes, once we get our hands on a couple of those straws, sensory straws, that's what they're called. They're using a lot of dye in wine nowadays. Really?

1:05:21 Yeah, there's this one particular one called Mega Purple. You can look it up. But Mega Purple is used all over the world now, and it's kind of a proprietary formulation. They claim it's made from boiled down wine or something like that, but nobody will tell how exactly. It's some big chemical company, or additive company, or something like that. And so you use this Mega Purple, because ever since Robert Parker became this the American who became the number one wine reviewer in the world and with a huge influence. One of the things is that they have this thing called Parkerized wines, which are wines that have to do with, you know, that appeal to his specific taste, which are for big, dark, black, inky wines. And so now they're just adding this crap to all these wines, which apparently also affects the flavor in kind of a positive way during a blind tasting.

1:06:18 But they're doing that in the barrel, not after it's in the bottle, right? Well, no, you wouldn't do it after it's in the bottle. It would be impractical. But it's somewhere in the process, maybe during the... I don't know where it's used in the process. Probably just before it's put in the barrel. That would be my guess. I don't know. And this has happened with premium wines? With like the stuff you and I drink? Well, that's with the controversies. They say it's with under $20 wines to make them better. I'd call that premium. Yeah, you would. 20 bucks, man. Screw top. But generally speaking, it's believed that the under $20 wines have it and of course the cheaper ones would too. But you don't know that the over 20 buck guys aren't using it in a bad year or whatever because there's been an awful lot of wines over the last five years or longer that are just way too dark for their standing in society as it were.

1:07:17 There's are not wines that should be dark. There's just not they're not but that's determined by the color of the grape no Yeah, what's it? It X the colors are extracted from the skins in the fermentation process the you know Alcohol for one things a solvent and it helps extract some of these colors, but what's the point if you can just dump this stuff in and Anyway, it's a big scandal Nobody knows what to do about it. I run into these wines every once in a while and I'm thinking if I could come up with a test, but unfortunately the product if it's made from grape skins to begin with there's nothing to test for. Yeah, so there's no extra chemical or additive that you can... So they're just basically taking dark grape juice and adding... You know, they're doing what Patricia's doing. They're just adding grape juice.

1:08:05 She should get in the business. I'm telling you she's got an idea there. She really does wait until I lay those cartons on her man. She's gonna love that I'm telling you she's gonna love and she's gonna love the sensory straw. Well, you know it could be she could do some ads for him. Yeah, right. It could probably move a lot of product in Holland. Yeah, wow. That's a market for you. Well, you know, it's market. You know a lot of the I've been reading about the talking about the you know chemicals the pharmaceuticals now all these patents are running out all these drugs and trying to figure out how they can make money even following that you know how do you not mean it is not they're trying to figure out how not to have a make money they're trying to figure out how to continue to gouge the public yeah that's it that was the issue that's what I heard it's right exactly how to go to but will the same thing with them

1:08:59 With copyrights that whole discussion is cranking up in the UK again where the copyrights are 50 years still what is it in the States? 100 and 190 years now. What does Disney push it up? It's actually if you it's 500 years after you die 500 years no you kidding me It's like 95 years isn't it something like that. Yeah, it's like a hundred or 150. There's some ridiculous thing they think I think it's like 75 years after you die, but you could die when you're 75, so the thing of being copyright for 150 years I think is about what it runs. And the irony of this is all of this copyright stuff in the states that was pushed forward by Sonny Bono, Cher's ex-husband, and he was mayor of Palm Springs? Well, he was a congressman for a while. He was also a congressman. And the irony, of course, is he hit a tree while skiing and died.

CHAPTER 25 / 26 Discussion

Lucian Freud's Record-Breaking Painting Sale

A painting by 85-year-old artist Lucian Freud, titled "Benefit Supervisor Sleeping," sold for a record $33.6 million at auction. The sale of the piece, which depicts a nude, obese woman, has sparked debate regarding the subjective nature of beauty and the astronomical prices currently found in the contemporary art market.

lucian freud· christie's· contemporary art· benefit supervisor sleeping· art market

1:13:38 And so it's like, well, should I do that? It's gonna cost me an extra 50 bucks if I do it this way or if I do this way. It's free. I'll go with the free thing and save 50 bucks. And you end up, you know, just promoting, continuing to promote Van Gogh and Monet. You know, we're the safest guys you can promote. And so... There's a story over here that hit my radar a couple of times, mainly because the woman in the painting is British. And it's, uh, this was a fascinating story a couple weeks ago. Lucian Freud is a painter. And his, this most recent painting, he's 85 years old, sold for 33 million dollars. The guy's still alive. It's basically a really, it's not even Rubenesque, it's like a fat lady, naked, lying on a couch. 33.6 million dollars. And the guy's alive. Who is this? Who is the artist? Lucian Freud.

1:14:34 Huh. Sounds like a Botano style. So, um... That's pretty good money if you can get it. But isn't that amazing? Here's a guy who's actually alive. Yeah, well, it's good for him. At 85, I don't know what he's gonna do with the money, but whatever. But what is that about, though? Why all of a sudden does a painting like that go into the stratosphere, which is close to Picasso prices? Why does that happen? That's baffling to me. I mean, it doesn't sound right. That's an awful lot of money to spend for a contemporary piece of art. Well, that's why it was in the news, obviously. Yeah, no, send me a link. You just did. I just Skyped you one, yeah. Well, just check that out and see what's what.

1:15:16 It's just... gobsmacked is what I am. Gobsmacked? But that's aspirational, man. Oh, that picture is terrible. You couldn't put that in the wall. You'd be so grossed out by it. That's what I'm trying to figure out. She's always the one giant breast. And it's a British woman. It's a British woman and she's done a couple interviews because obviously this painting sells for 33 million. That's pretty interesting that it's of her. 33 million! The name of this piece is Benefit Supervisor Sleeping. I think she was a benefit supervisor. It's like, people have to check this. I'm going to have to blog it and people are going to just have to go look it up. Oh wait, here's my opportunity to say, of course you will find a link in our extended show notes which are maintained by the expert hand of Bubba Martin.

1:16:12 Yeah, Bubba will put a link in there to this thing. That shows up on both Adam's site and the Cage Match, the Vorak site. But isn't that extraordinary that that's happening? I mean, that's inspirational. That means any kid who actually hears about this story, of course it's highly underreported, it's like, hey, wait a minute, I could be a lot of things. I could actually be a painter who makes good money on painting fat chicks. Well, you know the thing is that the the Lucian Freud is a good example of an artist who you don't get to see his stuff much because it's all covered by copyrights and So you just you know, it won't get in a lot of books. It won't get in too many classes I mean you have to go if you're teaching art history you have to go Sneak a camera in or buy some slides from the museum It's the whole thing is ridiculous

1:17:08 But you know, I understand it's important in the early going of a work when it becomes popular, but I don't know. I have mixed feelings about the whole thing. I'm on Larry Lessig's side. We're gonna get Larry Lessig on Cranky Geeks and we're gonna talk about this issue. About the art issue? About the orphan copyright works and about copyright in general. Because I don't think people really understand how screwed up it got. And of course they blame the internet for everything. It's not. It's Disney. It's Disney greed. It's that freaking mouse. That's exactly what it is. But I'm sure other people would have wanted to go this route. It's not just Disney. Everyone sees that, okay, wait a minute. Like Cliff Richard. It's freaking Cliff Richard. And the guy's up in arms. I can understand where he's coming from, but at a certain point, when are you going to do something that's good for the rest of the world? Good for society? I think it's important. Good for culture. Did I lose you?

1:18:09 No, I'm reading this piece that says in the 1980s this guy's paintings were frequently sold. They couldn't even sell them at auction. Oh, of course not. I just don't understand what's the trigger? What happened? What happened that this guy all of a sudden... There was a big story in Holland the other day. Let's stop for a second because people, they're gonna have to definitely check this out. Because it's like, what is even remotely appealing about this picture? It's not like a modern piece. It's a... It's just a... It's a very fat lady. It's horrible. It's a big fat lady, naked. Can I just say one thing? Can I just say, John, please, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, okay? Yeah, but she's built fat. That's beside the point. But fat does not equal horrible. Look at yourself, man. But a lot of people... I'm not as fat as she is. Well, I don't know. I haven't seen you naked on the couch.

1:19:04 You'll get lucky next time. You never will, by the way. I'll give you some of that grape juice wine and suck it through a straw and I'll have you out of your clothes in no time. If you were this woman, I mean it's not an attractive picture, let's put it that way. It's not flattering. Just because you're not into it, but a lot of people are into this. Now seriously, clearly a lot of people with a lot of money are into this. Ah, brother. Okay, I'm just being fair. Come on, just being fair. I mean, I'm not grossed out buyer. I'm just like, okay, well, no grossed out by it's a painting for God's sake. But the point is, it's just like 33.6 million. I don't think so. But what do I know? Obviously, Patricia might know. Come over here for what this painting you saw this painting of the fat lady. This one here. You saw that right?

1:19:59 Not Dutch paper? No, no, no. I've seen it. The English paper? You don't know the story. Okay. To ask her what she thinks of it. What do you think of it? How much would you pay for that painting? No, no, I've seen it in a paper. Come over here. Come over to the microphone. I've seen it in a paper. Hi! How much would you pay for it? Talk in the microphone. How much would you pay for that painting? Maybe... 5,000. 5,000? 5,000 pounds. But I know they paid a lot of money for it. 33 million dollars. Do you know why? She says, just a fat lady. Nobody knows why. 5,000? Eh, seems a little high. Anyway, okay, we won't go into it. I'm gonna get a bunch of nasty notes from everyone who's put on five pounds. I'm just saying, I'm just saying, there could be people who actually adore that. Yeah, whatever. So, I don't know, I guess we can leave and end the show on this baffling note.

CHAPTER 26 / 26 Discussion

Show Outro and Title Selection

The hosts conclude the episode by reflecting on its lack of a central theme, ultimately deciding to title the show "Benefit Supervisor Sleeping" after the Lucian Freud painting. They sign off from their respective locations in the UK and Northern California.

no agenda· adam curry· john c. dvorak· podcasting· guilford

1:21:04 It's like the world is gone crazy. We're going to hell in a handbasket I tell you So I'll just send it link to Bubba and then people can talk about it amongst themselves They'll have to do something Huh anyway, okay, so I totally felt this show had absolutely no direction. No it was a classic This was the the most no agenda we've ever had it just went wandered I But it got it had its moments it had its highs and lows, but you're right We were completely it wasn't there's no theme so it's gonna be tough to title this one. Well. Let's do the title now Oh, let's see. This is what we do after the show fat ladies Not until something with fat ladies things that would be right the I don't know Why don't we just call it name it after this painting which was the sleeping? What was it benefit supervisor?

1:22:04 That's great. Hold on, let me just see. Is that what it's called? Benefit Supervisor Sleeping. Yeah, okay, that's it. Benefit Supervisor Sleeping. That is now the title of the show. Excellent. All right, everybody. Coming to you from the Curry Manor in Guilford in the United Kingdom, my name's Adam Curry. And I'm John C. Dvorak here in a blustery and slightly wet Northern California. And we'll talk to you again next week right here on No Agenda.